hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shooting ranges in Norway: Looking at the linked articles on NO:WP, they seem to just consist of a table of shooting ranges with name, municipality and the lat/long (which links to GeoHack).  So what we have is a list of links to pages on another wiki, which would themselves fail WP:NOTDIRECTORY here.  This is fine on no.wp if it meets their GNG.  On en.wp it does not.  There's no encyclopaedic content there worth importing to en.wp which would help this page meet WP:GNG.  I don't see how this page meets (or could ever meet) notability unless it could be rewritten to cover some unique or special feature of Norwegian shooting ranges that marks them out from ranges anywhere else in the world (if such a feature exists, which it probably doesn't).  I don't think any argument can be made that the no.wp links are just placeholding until equivalent articles can be created on en.wp because I can't see how a page like this would past LISTCRITERIA on en.wp.  It's interesting and useful information... but for some sort of geo project.  It's not encyclopaedic content.  Hemmers ( talk ) 08:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Lists ,  and Norway .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We don't have articles that do nothing but link to articles on other language wikis that would not be approved as an article here.  Reywas92 Talk 13:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Suggest that List of shooting ranges in Akershus is nominated as well.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ajf773 Agree.  I have done so Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shooting ranges in Akershus Hemmers ( talk ) 16:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Reywas92.  Orientls ( talk ) 17:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inri Manzo: An AfD in 2017 resulted in no consensus despite GNG failure under a presumption that because he was a young player, he would play enough to satisfy the deprecated NFOOTBALL in the future.  Well, he's only played as a semi-pro since, and the coverage hasn't really improved ( Los Pleyers and e-Consulta are the best sources I could find, but they are not in-depth coverage).  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sources where the subject is covered in-depth instead of just mentioned as part of a name list.  Does not appear notable enough to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find anything better than the sources that Jogurney has found Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce D. Jette: Independent sources are just not there.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 15:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I didn't bundle this guy with the three others nominated above because this is his second Afd.  I didn't find the 2018 keep verdict particularly convincing.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 15:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Massachusetts , New Jersey ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Has coverage in reliable sources.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What independent sources are there about him rather than events in which he may have played a part?  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 13:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] [7] [8] [9] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Passing mention, and two routine non-independent announcements, one by the US Army (duh) and one by the government about his appointment.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 07:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sohom ( talk ) 16:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG due to lack of independent sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpen320 ( talk • contribs ) 2023-12-12T17:34:14 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The last AFD discussion was convincing when one reads right to the bottom and then follows-up on what MelanieN pointed out five years ago.  As explained there, this started off as undeclared paid editing by Biografix ( talk · contribs ).   Then Dszarek1234 ( talk · contribs ) and 141.116.106.218

Discussion outcome: delete
Kayden Kiewit: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A case of WP:TOOSOON on my part, when the guidelines were changing.  Lots of coverage on the subject, but none of it enough to warrant a WP:GNG pass, with no suitable redirect either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Anthony Starr: Simione001 ( talk ) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article is sourced only to a database and promo interview. Fails BLP, GNG, BIO. There are no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 04:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 04:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choe Ju-song: Simione001 ( talk ) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  My response to all these nominations is that redirection is better than deletion.  In this case, however, the Korean Wikipedia has an article about a different person born in 1910 with the same or a similar name at ko:최주성 .  The 1910 person's notability comes from a listing in a directory of pro-Japanese Koreans and from being a book author – or perhaps more than one person's biography has been smooshed together by VIAF.  Perhaps someone with better knowledge of Korea and Korean could build an English article from the corresponding Korean Wikipedia article.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] North Korean footballers won't have coverage in South Korea sources, no matter how much we look.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is the best I can find [1] , it's a match report.  One line mentions don't help notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP:NSPORT due to a lack of secondary coverage.  Trivial mentions in match reports don't contribute to notability.  User:Let'srun 03:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Waterford Premier Intermediate Hurling Championship: Fails WP:NEVENT .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Ireland .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no WP:GNG coverage to be found.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 19:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peeled Snacks: GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP , references are below standard, appears only to be notable for going out of business, a common enough business happening to be treated as WP:ROTM 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AbanteCart Software: No real evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 15:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lacks WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted through PROD so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No meaningful claim of notability and no evidence of significant coverage in the article or found in a Google / Google News search.  Alansohn ( talk ) 03:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Claire Harris (artist): LibStar ( talk ) 19:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Visual arts ,  and New Zealand .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable artist.  104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 03:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I do not think any of the sources establish notability per WP:ARTIST .  David Palmer // cloventt ( talk ) 08:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only independent coverage is trivial.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 04:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William Dadiani II: The creator has linked it to various existing battle articles already in the encyclopedia.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Germany .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : 100% a hoax.  I have read numerous books on the WW1 East Africa Campaign, and all of them agree that Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck and Kurt Wahle were the only high-ranking German officers in East Africa.  Lettow-Vorbeck would have killed for another general; he had to put lieutenants in command of entire frontlines due to his extreme lack of officers.  Applodion ( talk ) 22:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hoax, and neither a good nor an entertaining one.  Get it outta here.  Ted52 ( talk ) 20:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mansur Toshmatov: I tried to salvage it, but the amount of work this article needs is too great IMO.  As with WP:A2 deletions (or the old WP:X2 criterion), no real information is being lost with deletion, as it takes no real effort to put a foreign language article through Google translate, which is what this is.  Mach61 18:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Uzbekistan .  Mach61 18:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nima Tamang: I can only find coverage like Sportskeeda and Times of India , both of which only mention him in passing as the scorer of a consolation goal in a 10-1 defeat.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Sikkim .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The squad template has not been updated in 10 years, and contains other deletion candidates such as Rahul Jaiswal .  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of stars larger than any closer star: SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 09:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per above.  killer bee 09:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As the first person to recommend AfD, I can attest to WP:NOTSTATS in addition to SYNTH.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stars more luminous than any closer star is very similar, and could have been bundled with this one.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 13:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I have no idea what the criterion even means.  And how is the Sun larger than any closer star?  What star is closer?  Taylor Swift?  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] By principle of vacuous truth , this statement is automatically true.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 20:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to lack of coverage in reliable sources as well as WP:SYNTH and WP:NOTSTATS .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 07:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the above reasons, and because it is dependent on the current accuracy of measurements.  The more distant the component, the less likely the information is to be valid.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 17:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard L. Albert: No possible redirect as his company does not have an article.  He seems to have worked mostly on B movies.  —Kaliforniyka Hi!  01:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  —Kaliforniyka Hi!  01:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Advertising ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Design Projects Incorporated was formed on February 10, 1978 in California, (see https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/search/business ) and was closed on June 1, 1994.  Design Projects first client was Universal Pictures, and also did advertising, design and packaging for 20th Century Fox, Warner Home Video, Columbia Pictures, as well as international distributors, starting with Best International Films and Producers Sales Organizations, and including Goldcrest and ad campaigns for Sanrio Films while they had a Los Angeles branch office.  It also created ad campaigns for many independent film distributors, such as Group One, New World, Film Ventures International.   We also Prior to 1978, I worked as a freelance designer for Universal Pictures, Filmways, as well as Universal Music.  Richard Albert RLA2024 ( talk ) 17:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG with zero evidence of notability.  Promotional article created by a single-purpose/COI account with no viable coverage at all (search turned up mostly an architectural firm with a similar name).  Heck, the only source cited therein doesn't even mention the subject nor his company.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 18:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete.  Article lacks solid sources, lacks evidence of notability.  Edit history suggests massive COI problem.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choe Kum-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete