hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca and Ailurus fulgens): It is handled at both of the species' articles ( giant panda and red panda ) as well as the disambiguation ( panda (disambiguation) ).  - UtherSRG (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Science ,  and Biology .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - eminently superfluous.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 11:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree it's redundant with the species articles.  If there is any intersection discussion between the two in terms of characteristics, that can be handled in the respective species articles like we do for other species that share a name or similarity.  KoA ( talk ) 21:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Adding onto KoA's point, the respective Giant panda and Red panda articles already emphasize these species' distinct evolutionary history with Red panda#Phylogeny providing multiple phylogenetic trees to explain this point.  BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 07:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jim Kirwan: PatGallacher ( talk ) 20:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime ,  and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, WP:SIGCOV , WP:NVICTIM and WP:1E .  Before my own PROD tagging , I found (and subsequently added ) a number of sources to support parts of the text.  These are the only modern sources, however, I could find and they all deal with the subject's death (somewhat in passing) as part of the reprisals/aftermath of the Headford ambush.  Not amounting to significant biographical coverage.  The only contemporary (1921) sources I could find only deal with the subject's death - also reported as a matter of fact in the broader context.  (For example the Irish Independent of Tue 25 Jan 1921 which refers to "Kirwan (22), of Ballinastack" as "the second victim.  His father states that lorries, carrying about 10 men, entered the village at 2.30 p.m., having a machine-gun mounted on one of the cars.  Kirwan, who was on the road, was asked where his son, Jim, was.... ).  While there are therefore some contemporary short/news sources which deal with the subject's appalling/sad death, I can find NO sources which deal with the subject's life.  So no significant biographical coverage there either.  As I can/could not consider any alternatives to deletion (Draftify - to what end? Redirect - to where?) I am left with deletion as the only recommendation.  On NVICTIM/SIGCOV/1E grounds.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 10:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable.  900 civilians were killed in the Irish War of Independence alone; how many civilians were killed in conflicts around the world in the same period?  The article creator is User:Fergananim , who was notorious for creating stubs on non-notable people of all sorts.  Scolaire ( talk ) 12:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Non notable death.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 22:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ksenija Nagle: Searches only yield match reports and squad lists.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jong Chol-min: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree, this article fails  WP:GNG, This person is not notable enough and doesn't have enough coverage EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Corresponding article on Korean Wikipedia is an unsourced stub.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Fails WP:GNG , a recurring theme with this types of articles.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Germany: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Germany .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE .  No evidence that these lists are encyclopedic, they've never been discussed as a group in RS.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 00:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Indiscriminate list of trivia.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 11:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aukro.bg: Google gives limited sources.  Spinixster (chat!) 03:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet , Websites ,  and Bulgaria .  Spinixster (chat!) 03:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it evidently operated in several central and Eastern European countries for a while before being taken over but I’m not seeing anything to suggest notability.  Ukrainian Wikipedia has an article about the brand in that country with some sources, but I find nothing for Bulgaria.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion as a declined prod.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The subject doesn't pass the WP:GNG .  Cruzdoze ( talk ) 19:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lee Chu-hong: Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and South Korea .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Remember to provide rationale 104.232.119.107 ( talk ) 17:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That was an error; thank you!  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per rationale.  104.232.119.107 ( talk ) 22:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete because this can’t scratch WP:NSKATE .  She medaled at South Korea’s national championships, a senior-level event, though this is not international, and her international accomplishments did not earn her a medal.  There is no WP:SIGCOV for her in this or another context unfortunately.  CherryPie94 🍒🥧 ( talk ) 05:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elmar Kivistik (ship): Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 18:36, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Estonia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Delete would be a strange option as the Estonian Shipping Company has an article.  At the very least this should be a redirect.  I did not check for sources so not a ! vote, just my two cents.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Estonian Shipping Company : Can't find any SIRS sources, redirecting is an ATD per gidonb.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 01:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm not crazy about redirecting to Estonian Shipping Company – all that page tells the reader is that the Elmar Kivitisk is a ship formerly operated by that company.  These sort of redirects are frequently created at AfD as an alternative to deletion, but too often end up at RfD.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 11:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why on earth would it end up on RfD?  "no mention in the target article"?  Nope, it's there.  Pelmeen10 ( talk ) 16:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, but it's unhelpful to the reader looking for concrete information.  It's misleading.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 16:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand the point being made here by the nom, in that redirecting to the parent company with no additional detail is unhelpful and without purpose.  I do not think someone searching for this ship will find helpful resource having being sent to Estonian Shipping Company .  On balance, considering the redirect proposal, I would suggest simply deleting.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 09:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I do not see any value in a redirect to the company where the subject is not discussed in any meaningful way (a list entry, among others, does not constitute a mention).  Furthermore, if I was treating this as a RFD for arguments sake, I would consider WP:R#DELETE point 10 of reasons to not have a RD, which states "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." - this could , at some future point, become an article but the proposed target discussed here I do not think offers value at this time and so without a credible claim to notability, I suggest deleting.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 09:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sandrine Matiasek: Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Environment ,  and United States of America .  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete page reads like a resume.  Associate professor with little impact, WP:MILL and doesn't fulfill any WP:NACADEMIC criteria.  Broc ( talk ) 22:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  She has good citation counts for one publication, but she is in the middle position among the authors of that one, and nothing else stands out as evidence for WP:PROF notability.  That leaves a potential pass of WP:GNG instead, based on the "media appearances" section.  Several of the sources listed there are non-independent (published by CSU Chico, her employer).  Otherwise, we have three local news stories in NSPR and the Chico Enterprise-Record.  Of these, "Chico State professors publish Camp Fire water pollution study" has little depth of coverage of Matiasek, spending more of its attention on her coauthors and their study.  "Blue Dot" is a local radio station interview with the subject, not a story about her.  And "Students study" is, as the title suggests, mostly about a student research project, with only incidental mention of Matiasek's role in directing the students.  I don't think that's enough depth and prominence of coverage for GNG either.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way too early with no real verification of notability as yet.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 04:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:NACADEMIC .  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NACADEMIC .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Strike Germany: This topic, a small number of people calling for a cultural boycott of Germany due to government support for Israel, lacks sustained , in-depth coverage.  Many of the sources on the article are about other incidents, such as events cancelled in Germany due to anti-Israel views of the artist, or a violent protest that occured in Berlin.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Germany .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe this article should be merged with another article related to Palestinian politics.  There are sources, yeah, but is it enough for a standalone article?  I don't think so. -- Eastern Anatolia ( talk ) 11:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect I had tagged the article for notability for similar concerns.  Merge targets, Israeli–Palestinian conflict ?  IgelRM ( talk ) 14:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Strong case of WP:NOTNEWS .  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: See if there is more support for a Merge or Redirect.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arnold Shara: (proposed by JTtheOG)  Avishai11 ( talk ) 16:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Cricket ,  and Olympics .  Avishai11 ( talk ) 16:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Avishai11 Can you explain me why you removed the PROD and immediately nominated it for deletion via AFD?  Uncontested PROD would anyway get deleted in 7 days' time.  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh my gosh!  I am so sorry, as this was an accident.  I clicked the wrong button.  Is there any way to undo this?  Avishai11 ( talk ) 16:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no suitable redirect per WP:ATD as there are no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Warwickshire Primary Care Trust: Shellwood ( talk ) 17:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was unable to find any reliable sources for this article.  Tintinthereporter226 ( talk ) 18:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Beck (music manager): Reads like a resume.  No secondary sources.  Risedemise ( talk ) 18:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Pomotional.   Creator User:Cate andersona Possible sock.  — Maile ( talk ) 19:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Yep.  It's just a resume without any secondary sources.  Can't find any either after a quick Google search.  TheWikiToby ( talk ) 18:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Music , Management ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promo.  Additionally most BLPs on Category:Articles with a promotional tone from May 2024 are like this and should be deleted too Justanotherguy54 ( talk ) 11:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balijhor: MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets our WP:GNG with foreign language sources like this .  Lightburst ( talk ) 23:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Lightburst .  That seems to be a WP:ROUTINE preview article for an upcoming series, and multiple sources are needed to establish notability.  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That is not foreign language source.  The film is in Bengali language and the source is also from bengali language.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  06:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG and WP:RPRGM .  Source eval: Comments Source Launch promo  1. "New television show Balijhor to launch next month".  The Times of India.  Routine entertainment news  2. ^ "Balijhor; Trina Saha, Koushik Roy and Indrasish Roy in the passionate tale of love withstanding the power of politics".  Aaj Tak Bangla (in Bengali).  Routine entertainment news  3. ^ "Trina-Kaushik starrer Balijhor to replace Nabab Nandini will become Mithai's new opponent from 6th February" (in Bengali).  Routine entertainment promo  4. ^ "TRP: বালিঝড়কে হারিয়ে দিল মিঠাই! অনুরাগের ছোঁয়াকে কি টলাতে পারল জগদ্ধাত্রী?" (in Bengali).  BEFORE showed nothing taht meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 09:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with the source table review above, nothing notable, a preview for the series doesn't help for notability either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete