hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Zoraya ter Beek: This was a private individual who chose to die under Netherlands long ago passed euthanasia laws.  Her death is unlikely to change anything regarding the Netherlands euthanasia policy, and thus does not pass WP:LASTING .  All coverage is about her death and thus is a WP:BLP1E and fails WP:NOTNEWS .  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Europe , Women and Netherlands .  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's not her death, but her personal process of advocating euthanasia rights that matters.  Victomrya ( talk ) 00:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (highly selective) into Euthanasia in the Netherlands .  Worthy of one sentence there.  gidonb ( talk ) 21:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Euthanasia in the Netherlands per nom.  I agree with gidonb that the subject of this article might deserve maybe one sentence in the Euthanasia in the Netherlands article, but there's really nothing of substance to merge.  In addition to the WP:NOTNEWS aspect, there are barely any reliable news sources about ter Beek as well.  – Epicgenius ( talk ) 00:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:BLP1E .  No article about her in Dutch Wikipedia, and nothing about her in the their article on Euthanasia in the Netherlands .  This looks like "news" planted by the  "slippery slope" campaigners against assisted dying: the Guardian says "An article about her case, published in April, was picked up by international media" (published where?) and she says herself that that coverage was "had many inaccuracies and misrepresentations ".  She died, legally, end of story.  Pam D 09:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Euthanasia in the Netherlands , article and sources don't show sufficient notability for WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 22:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Euthanasia in the Netherlands where she merits a brief mention.  Star Mississippi 01:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mexico–United States 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bid: The bid has been withdrawn, thus failing WP:GNG any relevant information can be moved to 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bids LouisOrr27 ( talk ) 14:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football .  LouisOrr27 ( talk ) 14:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Mexico ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Redirect to 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bids is also valid.  Svartner ( talk ) 18:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – The same (withdrawn bid) appears to happen with South Africa 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bid .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge both Mexico–United States 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bid and South Africa 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bid into 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup bids — ILoveSport2006 reverted my first attempt at merging these articles because they felt the Mexico–United States article was " very good and adds a lot of info that the paragraph on the bid page doesn't say ",

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jess Lemon: Nothing notable in the article.  Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER .  Most references are tabloid puff pieces or self-published sources.  WWGB ( talk ) 02:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Television ,  and Australia .  WWGB ( talk ) 02:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) where she is mentioned.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) per LibStar and the nominator.  And just to review WP:NBASIC , the sources need to be "substantial" in coverage.  Neither the headlines nor the contents of the articles focus on the actual person, Jess Lemon, in detail, merely describing her in the context of non-notable events.  Such pieces exist covering an incredibly large number of people, but it isn't practical to have an article on every non-notable TV contestant.  The sources used by the creator indiscriminately publish streams of such stories, so referring to them as "puff pieces" isn't incorrect.  The creator should also refrain from accusing the nominator of having a "sexist" opinion because they hold this view.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 10:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For me it's a weak Keep .  The Who piece is certainly a puff piece, but they do have editorial oversight, and it's sigcov.  The first Mammamia story, same.  The Yahoo news story is shortish, but I think it gets her over the hump.  I think the fact so many of the sources mention her popularity with fans probably explains why a 4th-runner-up got so much coverage.  It's the kind of celebrity bs coverage I hate to use, but it's independent, reliable, and significant.  Valereee ( talk ) 16:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per Valereee.  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 23:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) .  Coverage is routine for a reality-TV contestant.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Slow (Jackson Wang & Ciara song): Although it got a music video, there doesn't appear to be enough coverage per WP:GNG , additionally it did not chart, was not subject to considerable critical reception etc. so does not pass notability per WP:NSONGS .  Could be redirected to Jackson Wang >> Lil-unique1 ( talk ) — 21:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jackson Wang : A handful of websites, some reliable and others not so much, have covered this song/MV/Coachella performance, but few of them are saying much of substance and they're all essentially saying the same small handful of things.  Without charting or anything else, its case it very weak.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Though if this song is ever announced to be part of an album as multiple sources suggest it could be, the target should be changed to there (assuming the album is notable).  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per this logic 104.232.119.107 ( talk ) 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Carried Away (Ooberman album): There's a review of the album by Ox-Fanzine , which I added to the article.  The album is also mentioned in a Drowned in Sound review of the band's next album, and that's about it.  A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Ooberman .  toweli ( talk ) 15:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , United Kingdom ,  and England .  toweli ( talk ) 15:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ooberman per WP:ATD .  Ingratis ( talk ) 18:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ooberman § Discography unless more/better turns up at WP:Library .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aksyon Radyo U.S.: Not to mention, the article has been unreferenced for a long time.  Israel's Son 03:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  Israel's Son 03:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Creator was a sockmaster, and this is complete nonsense about a station in one community having an American-based format based in California that doesn't broadcast there; there's just nothing for this to stand on, and it's completely made up.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per MrSchimpf, salting may be considered if the sockpuppetry problem exists.  - Ian Lopez @ 16:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to DYRC : Barely found any independent coverage about the defunct online station.  Based on its website , it existed as a separate entity from DYRC until it closed shop a few years later.  ASTIG 😎 🙃 Redirect to DYRC , which was known as DYXR in the 2000s.  Fails WP:NCORP as a separate entity from the station per Astig's argument.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 01:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WFFC-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 03:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp. per nom (and my K04QR-D AfD).  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 16:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
UJ Soweto Stadium: With that being said, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NSTADIUM .  If I knew how to multi-AfD, I would've included UJ Stadium .  dxneo ( talk ) 03:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and South Africa .  dxneo ( talk ) 03:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to University of Johannesburg#Athletics, sport, arts and culture .  Giant Snowman 10:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] GiantSnowman , I concur, redirecting seems fair enough — dxneo ( talk ) 05:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tainted Canvas: The cited sources are not helpful for establishing notability, as they are promotional pre-release coverage with no independent analysis of the film.  Searching online, I was able to find reviews, but only one of them (a negative review in WhatKeptMeUp) appears to be potentially reliable ( [19] ); the others include a Medium blogpost ( [20] ), a two-person blog ( [21] ), an unbylined review from a 3-person blog ( [22] ), and a review on what appears to be a social media and PR site ( [23] , no masthead, no editorial policies, but there is a Log In button for their "African creatives community").  The film's Rotten Tomatoes entry lists no critics' reviews ( [24] ), and it seems somewhat telling that Pulse, which published most of the pre-release coverage, did not publish a review following release.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Nigeria .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Segilola Ogidan ; but given the reviews (although some are on blogs, technically ) and the minor award received ( https://www.pulse.ng/entertainment/movies/tainted-canvas-wins-first-award-amid-covid-19/t8vhnfg https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2021/05/15/segilola-ogidans-tainted-canvass/ really really not opposed to Keep; opposed to Deletion.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Slashed: Previously deleted and immediately recreated.  Donald D23 talk to me 19:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 19:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Because there are a LOT of interviews in reliable media ( Guardian , Belfast Telegraph , etc) at the very least a redirect to Ash (band)#Charlotte Hatherley, Nu-Clear Sounds and Free All Angels (1998–2004) , where it is treated.  But not opposed to keep if NME sources or other can be checked and considered significant. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , as nominator I am not opposed to a redirect as detailed above.  Donald D23 talk to me 23:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above, I don't think this is notable enough.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sarrive Badiambila: The subject has earned at least one cap for the aforementioned national team.  I am unable to find sufficient coverage, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Democratic Republic of the Congo women's international footballers .  BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  BLPs require strong sourcing from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 00:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
O'Farrell Street: Xx236 ( talk ) 09:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Xx236 ( talk ) 09:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Originally a redirect.  Xx236 ( talk ) 09:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I gather it is the central street in a notable neighborhood but it's plain that it goes through a lot of the rest of the city too.  No claim that it is notable in its own right.  Mangoe ( talk ) 14:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no objection to the redirect from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Farrell Street , although I note that the attempted 1 sentence rewrite of the article did indicate that Jasper O'Farrell is the best redirect target.   I went searching for stuff about the street, and instead hit several biographies of Jasper O'Farrell almost straightaway, after going through a load of things that turned out to be simple street addresses, including Tuomey's History of Sonoma County, California and the hyperbolic The Immortal San Franciscans for Whom the Streets Were Named .  Uncle G ( talk ) 03:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Iranian cleric taking photo incident: The title also appears to be shoddy Borgenland ( talk ) 17:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Crime , Events ,  and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not everything that happens in the news needs to have its own article.  No reason to keep based on existing sourcing.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 19:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I swear we just had a similar incident at AfD...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Scrolling through AFDs, I often have feelings of deja vu.  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I got confused with the templates when I nominated it.  My bad.  Borgenland ( talk ) 03:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Human rights in Iran : Non-notable incident in a long list of similar events in the country.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested.  It seems like a common event .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aas (TV series): — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sarwat_Nazir#Plays_and_dramas .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 17:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Antisyntagmatarchis: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  In Greek letters, the name is Αντισυνταγματάρχης.  The Greek article el:Αντισυνταγματάρχης doesn't have any references either, but if you google Αντισυνταγματάρχης through

Discussion outcome: redirect
Michael Dante (wrestler): Fram ( talk ) 09:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Wrestling ,  and Netherlands .  Fram ( talk ) 09:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines; no reliable sources found.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 14:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to wXw World Tag Team Championship .  There is coverage in niche media and some passing mentions in the regular media.  Not enough for the GNG, yet definitely sufficient for a redirect.  Dante won two world championships twice, one of these has an article.  That's to where we should ATD.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect