hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Bangladesh Premier League umpires : Umpiring in the BPL is routine for the profession; nothing remarkable; no significant coverage of this list.  I completely agree, scoring a 100, taking 5-for or even getting selected to play in a premier tournament like BPL is a significant achievement, all these having articles make sense.  But what is the credit of umpires here?  Umpiring is a normal profession, simply an appointment.  If you have a look at the list, there seems to be many non-notable persons umpiring in BPL.  All the sources are just database or stat-based about how many umpired who who umpired.  Couldn't find sources which discuss about the subject in a group.  Yes, umpiring in 50 or 100 BPL matches might have some coverage, but that's enough to be included in the biography of that umpire.  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Cricket , Lists ,  and Bangladesh .  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Fails the policies/guidelines as nom has suggested.  Not really a suitable redirect as umpiring isn't mentioned in the parent article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 20:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY , no encyclopedic value, and isn't significant coverage of the BPL umpires in sources.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete very specific listcruft.  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 14:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conservative left : Sources are cited to biased publications (including, in one case, a Japanese source which refers to the magazine of an extremely minor HK party claiming to be "conservative left").  No evidence of use of the term in mainstream media, and the article text characterisation of the concept is also, well, questionably put.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 01:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 01:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A search suggests that the term is used somewhat frequently, but there seems to be no consensus on what it means, and it's applied to all kinds of people and parties in various articles and op-eds.  This needs some academic backing before it deserves an article.  Cortador ( talk ) 07:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: The idea of a ”conservative left” is impossible and receives no authoritative support from the scholarly literature on the topic.  Trakking ( talk ) 15:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively into Conservatism where some of the information already exists.  I disagree that this is OR or SYNTH since at least one source (Kaufman, 2020) supports the basis of the article.  However, there is not nearly enough scholarship on this phenomenon to support a stand-alone article, and Conservatism has better and better-sourced material.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 20:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Is there any additional support for a possible selective Merge?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this is a poor attempt at WP:SYNTH of a couple disparate ideas, none of which really hold water.  I find it difficult to understand any of what the article is trying to say.  I think a selective merge is unnecessary – the only interesting thing in this article is the citation to the Kaufman (2020) article.  An author might consider throwing its thesis into the already-existing left-wing nationalism or liberal conservatism articles, but the text on this article is not worth salvaging.  Dan • ✉ 21:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shafkat Saeed : 2 of the 3 sources are primary.  And the third source is just routine coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , South Africa , Pakistan , Iran , Kuwait , Belgium , France ,  and Luxembourg .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yes fails GNG clearly.  I did WP:BEFOER and only found some WP:ROTM coverage.  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 14:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hassan Waleed : He is not to be confused with the handball player Hassan Walid , about whom plenty of content can be found.  My Arabic searches didn't yield any significant coverage about this footballer.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV in a league that gets decent coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I cannot find any sources that can make this person notable.  NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 10:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – After 7 years of having a page, it's all of 1 line. .  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Judah Lavulo : My searches yielded a few trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minimal sources and career doesn't appear notable.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 07:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Given the lack of in-depth, reliable sources, it's difficult to establish the player's notability for an encyclopedia entry.  Waqar 💬 17:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Al-Mohanadi : Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladimir Ivanov (model) : Both references are from 2013 (one is broken).  Doesn't seem to have his models.com profile updated since 2017.  Does not meet wp:ANYBIO or wp:GNG .  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  22:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Entertainment , Fashion , Kyrgyzstan , Russia ,  and United States of America .  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  22:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dhanesh MC : In my searches, I found a passing mention in The Hard Tackle but we need something way better than this for WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BridgeWay Station : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This development is only notable at the local level.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Parkruns in the United States of America : See also List of Parkruns in Australia ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in Australia ) and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 April 1 , in the latter discussion, the NOTDIR concern was raised by several experienced editors.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Lists ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy ping - to users who requested this go to AfD following completion of DRV Hobit , Jclemens , Robert McClenon , & Stifle Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the ping.  While I agree that this AfD is appropriate, I choose not to provide an opinion at this time.  Jclemens ( talk ) 20:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per list of Parkruns in Australia.  Clearly WP:NOTDIR .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 18:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is the sort of thing that readers would be better directed to the official source like https://www.parkrun.us/events/#geo=3.51/38.9/-96.41 rather than Wikipedia maintaining its own duplicate directory of non-notable small, local events like this.  LOL at "Thanks to Louisville Parks Dept for the use of their park!"  Reywas92 Talk 18:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per Wikipedia is not a directory and not satisfying list notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The "Thanks" mentioned by Reywas92 hit my copyvio alert and sure enough there is lots.  egs [12] , [13] , [14] .  There was a big copyvio dump here by User:The yeetgodboii .  More here by User:Jinmohl .  I've reverted the list itself to an older version and if this somehow survives afd content will need to be chopped from the history.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On top of NOTDIR and NLIST add other WP:NOTs .  Wikipedia is not a free web host for an organisations event listings.  Is not a mirror of primary content.  Is not a link farm.  Is not a means of promotion.  WP:PRIMARY , Do not base an entire article on primary sources.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clear WP:NOTDIR violation.  Stifle ( talk ) 08:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clear WP:NOTDIRECTORY violation.  Can't believe this and the UK equivalent survived AFDs in 2017, since no evidence has ever been given that these lists meet WP:GNG or WP:NLIST , and they clear violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 15:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greg McAdoo : — Preceding unsigned comment added by WebAgentBot63 ( talk • contribs ) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 01:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Finance , Technology ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is the only RS I can find that talks about him, and it's routine and rather short [32] Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Other than the source identified by Oaktree b, I could only find routine announcements regarding his leaving Sequoia.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  This discussion title should also be moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg McAdoo given that there is no prior AFD.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SP77 46-44 : SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 19:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no sources found.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the only sources which exist for this star are surveys and databases, which do not have any WP:SIGCOV of the subject or establish notability.  The star fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 08:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : only coverage is limited, trivial mentions in papers ( [6] , [7] ) or routine coverage from databases, etc.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicole Jordan (Miss Tennessee) : Let'srun ( talk ) 22:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Tennessee .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nothing since her win, and that's not enough.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All coverage relates to the beauty pageant win.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Majid Dastjani Farahani : Per BLP1E we should avoid having articles on individuals that reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.  Also relevant is WP:SUSPECT : "For individuals who are not public figures...editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of having committed a crime, unless a conviction has been secured."  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Iran ,  and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All the sources are dated the same day.  March 4, 2023, and finding the same in a search...all on about the same date so fails WP:NOTNEWS and per nom WP:SUSPECT is also concern.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samate language : Not much shows up in search engines.  In fact, "Samate" is another name for Ma'ya (going by "Word-prosodic systems of Raja Ampat languages", 2001, p. 14).  Semmiii ( talk ) 14:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not 100 percent sure on it's hoaxness, but what I can see is that its notability is not up to Wikipedia's standards.  Fails WP:GNG .  Cheers, atque supra !  Fake scientist 8000 14:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, then redirect to the unrelated Ma'ya language per nom.  (Not helped by the lack of an ISO 639-3 code, a red flag in itself.) -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 18:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is the second article on an Indonesian language I’ve come across today by the same creator, with very inadequate sourcing.  Not sure if theyre hoaxes exactly, or just leaps of the imagination.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Ma'ya language .  As mentioned in the source cited by the OP ( here 's a link to it), Ma'ya (including dialects) is often referred to by the place that it is spoken at.  Bahasa Samate is the variety spoken in the village Samate on Salawati Island.  In ISO 639-3, Ma'ya is split into four varieties, the dialect in Samate is included in "Salawati" [slz].  @ Mccapra : Believe me, this is indeed not an isolated occurrence with this page creator.  They have long a history of producing articles about spurious languages and ethnic groups bordering on hoaxes, probably created in good faith, but with a very poor grasp about what they're reading in the sources.  I mean, saying that a language variety is an isolate when it scores 95% lexical similarity with neighboring lects is sheer cluelessness.  Last month, I PROD-ed two of their creations ( Vanimo Malay and Poso Pesisir people ).  I know, this is not place for it, but this cries for a TBAN or at least making it compulsory for them to go through the draft submission process.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 19:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Austronesier, and support restrictions on creator.  JarrahTree 02:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Window well cover : The article even has a section named "How to purchase a window well cover".  This is not needed and salvageable content - if any - can be safely included in Window well .  Biologos ( talk ) 13:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "How to purchase" and the liability sections lead me to believe this is PROMO for the product.  I'm not impressed with the sourcing given; ok the thing exists, but beyond hardware store listings, I don't find any discussion of this item.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Promo and possible COI sourcing, and most of what is said is WP:SYNTH .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete