hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mauro Vargiu : Player hardly made any professional appearances, and I could find no significant coverage online for a player who played in the 2000s.  Only bit of coverage is here , which is cited on the page, and is only an article talking about how he signed at Dundee at age 17.  Not significant enough to warrant an article.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Italy .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails to prove WP:NBIO .  Kind regards ––– Àvî Râm7 (talk) 2:18,  2 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mamamusic : In other languages, the page has already been removed.  MaxBokstf ( talk ) 03:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxBokstf ( talk • contribs ) 03:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 16 .  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 04:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tiffany Ford : The principal notability claim here is that she's been a school board trustee and non-winning candidate for election to city council, which are not WP:NPOL -passing roles.  Having a bit of run of the mill campaign coverage in the context of a non-winning election campaign doesn't add up to passing WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL, either: every candidate in every election can always show some evidence of campaign coverage, so having campaign coverage doesn't make her more special than other candidates.  Otherwise, what's left is a couple of local-interest awards in local-interest contexts that don't fulfill WP:ANYBIO , and a bunch of primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she achieves a stronger notability claim, but nothing here is already enough as of right now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - unelected candidate, and don't quite think this is there on GNG grounds.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I checked the newspaper archives and wasn't able to find any interviews or significant coverage.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 18:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G5 - created by sock of Anne Barrington .   Confirmed (by me) on Commons.  Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sohaib Al-Malkawi : Couldn't find any articles or independent information about him online.  The article is mostly puffery .  Probably a COI - draftifying might be an alternative, though I can't find any coverage about him at all.  Clear friend a 💬 02:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism ,  and Jordan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: It is full on a promotional article, and if no sources can be found it should be axed.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 03:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I didn't want to write here since I wrote the article.  Anyway, I wanted to draw attention to the fact that since he's an Arabic figure when you search for him in Arabic (صهيب ملكاوي), you will find many sources.  From a promotional standpoint, I admit that the article contains some promotional words, which I have now deleted.  In terms of notability, I see that he fulfills the first rule.  He is seen as an important figure or widely cited by his peers or successors .  This is an interview of his on YouTube that shows it, and here's another one .  According to RanksArabia, a website that ranks according to the votes of the Arab public, Suhaib Al-Malkawi is ranked 30th among the best Arab media professionals , and 24th among the best broadcasters and program presenters on Al Jazeera .  He is one of the most prominent broadcasters on a channel considered to be one of the largest channels in the Arab world.  Clearfrienda mentioned that "Probably a COI" .  This is a bad assumption.  For some time now, I have been writing and contributing articles about important Arabic figures, poems, places... etc, here in the encyclopedia, there is a similarity with the family names.  Malkawi99 ( talk ) 05:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : probably meets G11, nothing found that meets WP:SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Legendary Giant Beast Wolfman vs. Godzilla : Also per WP:NFILM : films produced in the past which were either not completed or not distributed should not have their own articles, unless their failure was notable per the guidelines.  The subject also fails WP:N in general, having received no significant coverage in any reliable sources.  Of the four citations in the article, the first and second are to an unreliable fan site (SciFi Japan), the fourth is to YouTube, and the third is to Dread Central, a site of questionable reliability.  This is a 40-year-old, 26 minute duration, amateurish fan-film, and fan films are rarely notable for Wikipedia purposes.  The "film" itself, it should be noted, is either incomplete or incoherent, having no discernible plot, story line, or narrative structure.  Forty years after its "debut," there is no evidence whatsoever that it will ever be completed/improved.  JoJo Anthrax ( talk ) 10:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  JoJo Anthrax ( talk ) 10:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As stated by the nom, this unreleased, unofficial fan film does not appear to pass WP:NFILM .  The coverage of it is scant, at best, with the Dread Central source being the closest it comes to actual coverage.  Searches did not turn up anything additional in reliable sources.  The film does not even appear to be notable enough to be merged over to the main Godzilla (franchise) page for a mention there.  If anyone is able to pull up any significant coverage in reliable sources, particularly Japanese sources that I might have missed, please ping me so I can take a look.  But, I did note that, as far as I can tell, the Japanese Wikipedia does not have an article on this fanfilm to draw any sources from, so the prospects probably aren't great.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tianjin Rego International School : School was closed down in 2014.  Article was previously PRODed.  33ABGirl ( talk ) 09:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and China .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 09:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A search in English and Chinese in gnews yielded nothing.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Would reconsider if there is Chinese coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly its Fails.  WP:NSCHOOL Monhiroe ( talk ) 08:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Angolan co-produced films : This is a list of just three films, all of which are already also listed in the base List of Angolan films , and even that base list isn't so very long as to need separate sublists at all — so these three films can simply have their status as coprods mentioned in the notes column of the main list, without needing to stand alone as a separate list.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists ,  and Angola .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 17:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We already got List of Angolan films .  Dympies ( talk ) 17:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just put them in List of Angolan films with a note in the appropriate column that they are co-produced.  nf utvol ( talk ) 19:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Citizen Soldier (band) : There's no need to skip the AfC Process and create a badly referenced article.  Nobody ( talk ) 07:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Nobody ( talk ) 07:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 08:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nomination.  Not seeing any significant coverage.  -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 18:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable.  PROMO.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to insufficient sources cited in the article to demonstrate WP:N .  Moreover, my own WP:BEFORE discovers nothing that changes that.  Chetsford ( talk ) 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Fails notability at this point.  speedy delete and undo the redirected draft.  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, delete.  Brianroswell ( talk ) 00:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuki Toma : I found a passing mention in Gekisaka and a transfer announcement from Hamamatsu University , the latter being non-independent due to being the university that he attended and played football for.  I can't find any independent significant coverage of him.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – His JA Wikipedia is a stub despite being quite longer.  While searching on Google with romaji keyword (even Yūki Tōma and Tōma Yūki) might found other men with this name than this soccer player, failing WP:V , searching with his name in kanji (東間 勇気) on Google needs to be demonstrated for this article to be kept.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No sources, fails in WP:V .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per  Spiderone and also seems to fail WP:GNG Robertjamal12 ~🔔 18:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JKFZ Cambridge International School : Page has previously been nominated for CSD .  There are no sources given on the page, with the exception of a link to the official school website at the bottom of the page in external links, which appears to be no longer available.  33ABGirl ( talk ) 13:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Schools ,  and China .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 13:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Insufficient secondary sources in English – is this meant to imply that there are sufficient non-English secondary sources?  If so then keep .  small jars t c 18:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] " Insufficient secondary sources in English " was bad wording on my part and was not meant to imply sufficient non-English sources.  Nonetheless, a search using the schools Chinese name "江科附中" (

Discussion outcome: delete
List of international cricket centuries at the Harare Sports Club : Fails WP:NLIST , noted in statistical databases only (individual centuries are mentioned in news reports, but the topic of centuries at this ground (or most other grounds) is not the subject of significant non-statistical coverage.  Fram ( talk ) 09:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket , Lists ,  and Zimbabwe .  Fram ( talk ) 09:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTSTATS WP:NOTMIRROR .  The precedent has been set that these lists of centuries articles are essentially just the search results from ESPNCricinfo.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTSTATS trivial intersection— there is no obvious reason centuries (a fairly common event in the grand scheme of cricket) + place scored (every cricket game is played somewhere, obviously) is important, let alone why INTERNATIONAL centuries are more important than local ones (disclaimer: I’m not a cricket nerd, I just know the basic rules and terminology, but that’s arguably a case for “not a niche sports almanac”).  Dronebogus ( talk ) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom and other commenters so far.  WP:NOTSTATS .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there isn't significant coverage about centuries at this ground to meet WP:NLIST .  We don't need lists of centuries at every international cricket ground, only those where the list of centuries has significant non trivial coverage e.g. Lord's .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Italy, Ottawa : LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Italy ,  and Canada .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rivka Ladin : Attempts to find sources for notability in WP:BEFORE came up empty handed.  Cheers!  Fake scientist 8000 23:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Computing .  Cheers!  Fake scientist 8000 23:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : also attempted WP:BEFORE and found nothing Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  At the very least, the article should mention the subject's current position/institution/company and major contributions to the field, and there aren't even any RS on that.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 20:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I added 2 references proving she holds a patent, and published multiple papers about distributed computing.  She worked for Digital Equipment Corporation and Compaq .  She is (a retired) Director at Hewlett-Packard .  Geertivp ( talk ) 10:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think that the simple fact of holding a patent is anything to write home about - it depends whether the patent is widely used and whether it has been defended successfully in court.  The subject has contributed to several highly cited papers, but citations in computer science are so high that I don't know whether she passes WP:PROF#C1 on their basis.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 09:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , regretfully.  I am hesitant to delete any articles about Women in STEM, since there is such legion gender discrimination in those fields.  That having been said, there is too little about the person readily available online to make even a decent stub.  I would not oppose userfication, even if it's dumped in my user space.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William Roetzheim : He received a profile in Inc. in 2012, but nothing much since then.  He appears to have retired from entrepreneurship to try his hand at writing, for which he founded his own publishing company (Level 4 Press) to publish.  This article contains a large collection of unverified and unverifiable facts (including the fact that Roetzheim created an AI program for the US Navy prior to 1983, a dubious fact at best), and a long list of relatively meaningless awards (also unverified and unverifiable, and mostly for his Marotz company).  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  18:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and California .  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  18:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  18:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is incorrect.  Roetzheim is the CEO of a company called Level 4 Press.  See their website at www.Level4press.com.  Acastlerichard ( talk ) 20:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that the creator of this article ( MaryFrancisK

Discussion outcome: delete
Orhan Dragaš : There are only five links, and the last one is the website of his own organization, International Security Institute.  HPfan4 ( talk ) 04:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Serbia .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  I Can't say this I'd any way near writing notable books; there was no review also.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  17:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Draim : The company's only product, Draim arena , is already at AfD and likely to be deleted on notability grounds as well, so merging is not a viable AtD.  Jfire ( talk ) 22:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , Companies ,  and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no good refs.  No relevance at least not enough to warrant an article as of today.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 14:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources in Swedish news archives at all and no good sourcing online.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 10:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete