hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Iosefa Maposua: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found no significant coverage of the subject.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 04:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dia Davina: Many tags been here for years.  Seaweed ( talk ) 18:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry , Sexuality and gender ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The article appears abandoned and the sources do not appear to establish WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 09:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Does not appear to meet either WP:GNG nor WP:AUTHOR .  No significant coverage is demonstrated.  ⁂CountHacker ( talk ) 23:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing else to add MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tekin Salimi: Rationale is as follows: Article fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV .  If you look at the sources you can see there's barely any actual coverage on the person himself.  There seems to be more on promoting dao5 which isn't even notable enough to have it own article.  And that's assuming you can even use such sources which I don't think is possible since they seem to not be independent.  A few are flat out interviews which cannot be considered independent.  I'm also getting some WP:PROMO vibes from the article.  Qwaiiplayer ( talk ) 17:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Canada .  Qwaiiplayer ( talk ) 17:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Quick review of sources confirms lack of reliability, independence and sigcov, and feels like backdoor advertising for subject's fund.  I'd be willing to review WP:THREE if someone presents it.  — siro χ o 04:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clearly not notable.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dubai International Food Safety Conference: It was started in 2006 and a likely COI account immediately created a Wikipedia article for it.  It appears purely promotional in nature.  There is no substantive coverage by independent, reliable sources of this conference.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 12:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Events ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete coverage confirms it existed but nothing to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Romani people in Morocco: The field does not appear to be David J. Phillips' specialty, and all that is stated in the cited passage of his book  is: "Some Kali or Gitan are probably in Morocco."  The information currently available is inadequate to confirm the presence of Romani communities in Morocco, and there appears to be practically no substantial academic discourse on the matter.  The subject simply does not merit inclusion in an encyclopedia.  Mooonswimmer 22:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Morocco .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The subject might warrant a sentence in Romani people , but otherwise the table row in Romani diaspora is an appropriate weight for the topic.  There is just not enough meat here for an article to meet GNG.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 20:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree with the above.  No significant coverage from RS.  Cinadon 36 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
European BEST Engineering Competition: created by User:EBEC2009 , obvious conflict of interest .  written like an ad.  ltb d l ( talk ) 04:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Europe .  ltb d l ( talk ) 04:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed.  CosmoBurst ( talk ) 05:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Catfurball ( talk ) 16:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] While the style of the page may be arguable, the contents describe a relevant european-wide event that has involved hundreds of engineering students throughout Europe.  It deserves to stay, IMHO.  GioAlea88 ( talk ) 17:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  This article is widely visible to new editors since it is featured in the 'Newcomer task: links' section of Special:Homepage , so any new editors wanting to comment should read WP:AFDDISCUSS and/or WP:GNG .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 14:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ GoldRomean : left this message about deleting it on my talk page Lajmmoore ( talk ) 21:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : under G11 (which I previously nominated this for).  This article is promotional and there are no reliable sources cited or that I could find that indicate notability.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 19:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It is an Advertisement Tomlovesfar ( talk / contributions ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arnold Henry Bergier: I've found a few magazine refs but  a) these do not support the current content on the page which can therefore be removed per WP:V and  b) a proportion appear to be adverts placed by the artist.  If there are sources that show the subject meets the inclusion criteria that would be great, but I'm not seeing them.  JMWt ( talk ) 13:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , United States of America ,  and New York .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NWA New England X Division Championship: A regional title active for a few years.  Lack of third party reliable sources focusing on the title besides a few WP:ROUTINE results.  HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling , Maine ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support - Agree with the points made by OP.  The holders of the title also lack Notability , which also counts against the article.  CeltBrowne ( talk ) 00:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 CAFA U-14 Championship: Not enough secondary sources.  Not enough notability.  Wikipedia is not a site for listing statistics.  EpicAdventurer ( talk ) 17:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Tajikistan .  EpicAdventurer ( talk ) 17:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To Central Asian Football Association#Events timeline as WP:ATD .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have included additional reliable sources to substantiate the article.  The tournament holds significant notability, similar to other CAFA tournaments that have their own pages.  Lunar Spectrum96 ( talk ) 19:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Afghanistan , Turkmenistan , Uzbekistan ,  and Iran .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] i added additional reliable sources since EpicAdventurer delete nomination ?  Lunar Spectrum96 ( talk ) 22:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. I don't think an under-14s tournament merits a redirect.  Giant Snowman 10:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete echoing what Giant Snowman wrote.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yawa No Dey End: No source to establish notability here, for the charts, I am very skeptical about this one, also, the song ranked in TurnTable charts or any of the mentioned charts only indicates that the song may be notable, not that it is notable.  In this case, this song isn't notable.  Again, I am skeptical about the notability of the musician himself, and overall, the user who created this article and so many others which I am skeptical about.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  12:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : same as the other one, no coverage in WP:RS .  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harvey Whiteley: All I found was routine transfer news ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided Young player who could have an extensive career, but currently not notable and I sufficient coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , routine transactional announcements are not sufficient to meet NSPORT.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Little League World Series announcers: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Also, this list is entirely unsourced per WP:RS .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Baseball ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the sources provided above fall under WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete WP:LISTN .  This is a trivial list and does not withstand the WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Road signs in Brunei: It's a WP:NOTGALLERY violation apparently by intention.  There are tons of these articles that don't appear to be attempts at creating an encyclopedia article at all, but are just making a space to put 100+ images.  There's already a place for that, and it's on Commons.  G M G talk 10:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Brunei .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment All seem to be on commons:Category:SVG road signs in Brunei , and the one source on the page doesn't seem to support the cited information.  CMD ( talk ) 07:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Part of a bundled AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this collection of images.  There are other places for it.  Try Wikimedia Commons.  The article itself lacks substance.  It is barely sourced, and what it does have is questionable.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Farron, Washington: Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations.   Coordinates locate to empty farmland today.   Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND .   PROD was declined on the basis of geographic nominations being controversial.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Washington .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All the sources I've seen indicate this was a rail station only.  Google Books turns up a number of atlases listing it as a rail station with a population of X, indicating a rail site only.  The 1959 Yakima County Plat Map shows Farron was a rail site without any street grid or even a subdivided area.  There are no population figures for Farron in the 1940, 1910, 1900, or 1920 census.  There's no mention of Farron in county histories.  There are a few mentions in books of how many bushels of crops were shipped from the Farron station.  No post office, school, church, or cemetery, that I can find.  A redirect to Harrah, Washington , one mile to the west, isn't even merited, IMO.  Firsfron of Ronchester 04:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete What an embarrassing prod removal.  There is no basis whatsover that geographic places require AFD to be deleted, and this user should show up here with more legitimate reasoning or not do that again absent consensus for a blanket position.  There's so much junk geographic articles that more of these need to deleted by prod rather than clogging up AFD.  Blatantly false article made by the same person who brought us Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susie, Washington .  Reywas92 Talk 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are a lot of editors taking advantage of the fact that you don't have to have a reason at all to remove a prod.  James.folsom ( talk ) 21:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could only find this https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-beets-at-farron/140749787/ .  Implies train station.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete It's obviously a rail point with so sign there there ever was a town there.  Note that the coordinates in the article were incorrect.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brian Plummer (musician): The only properly verifiable claim of notability here is that he existed -- it asserts that he had hit singles, but fails to provide any verification of where they were "hits" (spoiler alert, not in RPM ). And for "referencing", it just contextlessly bulletpoints a list of mostly primary source websites that aren't support for notability, without footnoting anything in the article body to any of them. On a WP:BEFORE search, further, I didn't find enough coverage to salvage this -- apart from one concert review in The Globe and Mail on the occasion of him playing the El Mocambo in 1980, I otherwise only get local coverage in Saskatoon, glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that aren't about him in any sense, and tangential hits for other unrelated Brian Plummers (such as Bill Pullman's character in The Equalizer ).  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more and better sourcing than he has.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : it looks very much as though this was written as a WP:NOTMEMORIAL ... the only other edit the article creator has made to Wikipedia is to add some information about Jack Hazebroek to the article about the Rolling Stones Mobile Studio, and Hazebroek's name also appears in this article, so I imagine it was written as a tribute to Mr. Plummer, having worked with him.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 20:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage about this person found, other than the usual download/streaming sites.  Not meeting musical notability, tagged for a decade to be improved with sources, none added...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  The supplied "references" list is very questionable.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete