hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Argnesa Rexhepi : I was unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG .  The only thing I found that comes close is this 2023 interview.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Kosovo ,  and Switzerland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bambino cat : There are many Munchkin derived breeds and I do not believe that they meet notability without the recognition as there's nothing special about them, other issues in the article include poor sources such as generic pet care websites and many of the references are about the Munchkin itself (as health issues and legal issues relate to the breed) To add on to notability issues the breed doesn't even seem to be mentioned on TICA's website.  Have mentioned deletion on Wikiproject Cats too.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 02:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Improve and expand as needed.  Do not delete.  It appears to be an interesting, referenced article.  The purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to remove it from view.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 11:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The above user is an AFD spammer with non-policy based arguments.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] “Spammer” is an insult that should probably be avoided.  My comment stands.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 00:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments that do not touch upon policy at all, but instead are in breach of WP:INTERESTING , WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:NOTEVERYTHING , may "stand" but they don't carry much weight when the discussion is closed.  You seem to misunderstand or to not have read many policies.  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Munchkin and include a short section about derivatives there.  Happy editing, SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 21:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I've added the mention of the couple being warned to stop breeding it in Munchkin#Welfare concerns and have added details about the derivatives to the article as well.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 03:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To expand on my above ! vote, this article suffers from sourcing issues, and WikiProject Cats strongly recommends only having articles for cat breeds fully acknowledged by a major cat registry.  Happy editing, SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 20:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect per SilverTiger12 PianoDan ( talk ) 22:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
La que se avecina (season 1) : Unsourced and is just a cast list and a table of episodes.  Karnataka ( talk ) 22:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Spain .  Karnataka ( talk ) 22:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of La que se avecina episodes .  WikiVirus C (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of La que se avecina episodes .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
XX (organization) : 2605:B40:1303:900:CAD:8F6F:33AA:50BF (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC) UtherSRG (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to XIII (comics) as WP:ATD-M — siro χ o 02:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to XIII (comics) .  No referenced content, fails GNG.  But redirects are WP:CHEAP .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above TheLongTone ( talk ) 15:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Not enough WP:SIGCOV for a separate article.  Expansion can take place at the target, through editing.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 16:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to XIII (comics) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zack (Battlestar Galactica) : It is framed as a disambiguation page, but neither character has an article.  Additionally, it has zero sources.  There is no reason to keep this.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough reliable coverage to pass WP:SIGCOV .  A bare stub with no hope of expansion that meets our policies.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge to List of Battlestar Galactica characters .  There is no reason for the (albeit very little) information to be lost, so merging would be good.  Also, redirecting means that it on the future someone could potentially start the page again with lots of sources and real world info.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 22:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge.  I'm surprised this article has even stuck around this long.  Surprisingly, he's not listed in the original continuity there, so that might be worth adding, but aside from that no information is really being lost here from removing it.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or delete .  Weird, I thought I did a pass of BG's articles few years back.  How did I miss this?  Haven't seen an article that bad here for quite a while.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not even a single wikipedia article links here .  Orphaned, aparently insignificant even in-universe.  – sgeureka t • c 13:41, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
May Moustafa : Hmee2 ( talk ) 19:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Egypt .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fencing at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's épée per WP:ATD-R .  Pawnkingthree ( talk ) 23:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That seems a good approach to me.  Thank you Hmee2 ( talk ) 14:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , i'd support suitable WP:ATDs when offered, but in this instance I don't see value in redirecting to the above proposed, or any article.  If the results data on the above linked article is correct, this individual finished last of every participating athlete and little to no known coverage exists to assert notability.  I am unsure what encyclopedic value there is for a reader searching for this person, if they are then redirected to the event article.  As with many of these articles by the author, it shouldn't have been created and numerous similar AFDs have ended with delete.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 21:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you.  On reflection, I agree, contrary to my earlier comment above.  Hmee2 ( talk ) 22:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fencing at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's épée .  Completely plausible search term and there is encyclopedic information about this person at that article that someone searching for them could definitely be interested in.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 22:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
William Clouston : Likewise, being a candidate for national office doesn't normally meet WP:NPOL, absent substantial coverage in secondary sources, and I can find only routine local press coverage.  He has written for and been interviewed by some notable media, but those are WP:PRIMARY sources, and his written work doesn't yet meet WP:NAUTHOR.  Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON, unless he wins a parliamentary seat in the upcoming general election.  Restoring the redirect would be fine as an alternative to deletion, but I've brought it here for discussion rather than WP:BOLDly redirecting.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politicians , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of his activities demonstrate much notability, from leading a minor party to serving as a councillor.  Sourcing is not great, mostly primary sources, such as election results and his own tweets.  Can't find much better.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Social Democratic Party (UK, 1990–present)#Leaders if notability cannot be established at this point in time.  May pick up coverage in the forthcoming general election.  Rupples ( talk ) 02:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He hasn't held office at any level that would confer "inherent" notability under NPOL, but the article is referenced almost entirely to primary and unreliable sources and thus fails to get him over WP:GNG instead of having to pass NPOL.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins, but just being a candidate is not enough to already get him an article now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Robinette Ramírez : The subject has earned at least two caps for the El Salvador women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , El Salvador ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Edre Elskamp : One appearance for the Aruba national football team .  No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Michel Hne : Seven official appearances for the New Caledonia national football team ; no indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
MNC Entertainment : Not sure if MNC Channels would be unbalanced by a merge/redirect there.  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MNC Vision who is the provider of the channel.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Święte, Pomeranian Voivodeship : Not a village, nothing but trees at the specified location .  The Polish regulation on place-names lists this as "part of the colony of Lesiaki" ( część kolonii Lesiaki ) - see p. 1636 here .  We already have an article about Lesiaki, Pomeranian Voivodeship .  Nothing to merge as there is nothing accurately sourced in the article (yes, that includes the location for which we do not have a source).  Święte literally means "saints", of which I'm sure they have many even in just the Pomeranian Voivodeship, so a redirect makes no sense.  This is simply a location, with no evidence of inhabitants or ever having been inhabited.  TL;DR - fails WP:GEOLAND , WP:GNG , WP:NOPAGE .  FOARP ( talk ) 07:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 07:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Lesiaki, Pomeranian Voivodeship which it is a part of and which should mention that fact.  Not seeing enough GNG to merit keeping it as a stand-alone article.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Blade Runner 4: Eye and Talon : I tried the Wikipedia Library, OpenBooks, Google News, and Newspapers.com.  No review or in-depth coverage.  The best source I could find was this piece in ScreenRant , which covers a few snippets of the plot.  I don't think the article could be built on such a source, and doing so would not get us into compliance with WP:NBOOKS#Articles that are plot summaries and WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs ) 15:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs ) 15:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Blade Runner (franchise)#Books - I am only finding very brief mentions of the book, such as the ScreenRant fluff piece linked to in the nomination.  For example, this article , which goes in depth on the first of Jeter's Blade Runner books, briefly mentions this sequel at the end, but it does nothing more than state that it exists.  Likewise, this article , which is an overview of the various spinoff media of the franchise, mentions it, but has no actual coverage or discussion about it beyond that.  From what I can see, only the first of Jeter's Blade Runner books, Blade Runner 2: The Edge of Human , actually got any significant coverage.  That said, the Blade Runner franchise article has a section for these books already, with a quick plot summary, so redirecting there would be preferable over deletion.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 17:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Great suggestion.  Please consider me a redirect ! vote also.  Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs ) 17:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge .  I tried Booklist, Kirkus, and Publishers Weekly for reviews, with no luck.  I suggest "merge" because it would be nice for the plot synopsis at Blade Runner (franchise)#Books to spell out the ending (more spoilers and less "hook"), so drawing on the very long plot summary in this article could be useful to add two more sentences to the franchise page.  In general redirect is the right alternative to deletion.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 07:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Blade_Runner_(franchise)#Books per above editors' findings -- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Blade Runner (franchise)#Books : reviews online are merely in context of the franchise.  Password (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hasmik Yeremyan : JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 01:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Agreed.  Per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Green Dragon Canyon : Qwirkle ( talk ) 05:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Idaho .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Owyhee River : Does not meet WP:NATFEAT as it does not have information beyond location and name.  The single source included in the article is not reliable.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Luxembourgish Wikipedia : That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.  Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing?  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Internet , Websites , Europe ,  and Luxembourg .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per WP:ATD-R — siro χ o 06:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  No need for a separate article.  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on individual Wikipedia language editions .  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect