hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Khan Shein Kunwar : Clearly does not meet notability guidelines; the only source is a dead link.  — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs ) 19:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs ) 19:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] added the reliable source about the author.  https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/detail/faaslon-ka-safar-khan-sheen-kunwar-ebooks/ Nurain 2007 ( talk ) 04:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Uttar Pradesh ,  and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] added the reliable source about the author.  https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/detail/faaslon-ka-safar-khan-sheen-kunwar-ebooks/ Nurain 2007 ( talk ) 04:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not meeting notability for authors; the one source used in the article isn't helpful.  I can't find any sort of discussion in a RS.  This was deleted on the 8th of May.  I'd likely SALT as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If I had to remove all the unsourced content on the page, only the title would be left on the page.  Fails WP:GNG , WP:BIO , WP:SIGCOV .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do not Delete .  I have added the reliable source ( https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/detail/faaslon-ka-safar-khan-sheen-kunwar-ebooks/ ) of the content present in the page and about the author.  Also adding the other details based on the guideline.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loveland River House incident : No lasting coverage, no real major effects.  Lettlre ( talk ) 15:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and Colorado .  Lettlre ( talk ) 15:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reads more like a play-by-play than a wikipedia article.  Sad event, but I don't see any coverage of the event even 10 yrs after, let alone nothing today.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is actually covered for a few pages in this random late 90s book on religious conversion, of all things, however it isn't a reliable source.  Mentioned for a few sentences (not sigcov) in a 2014 article by the Fort Collins Coloradoan .  Other than that, nothing, so delete PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 20:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dillanos Coffee Roasters : Sources are promotional interviews, press releases, and a non-notable award.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 20:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 3 sources are X, 2 are interviews.  Not enough coverage.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 20:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Outside the references present in the article, via my cursory searches, the subject doesn't appear to have adequate independent sig coverage.  X ( talk ) 08:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per Nom and user "X".  There are around 33.3 million "small" businesses in the United States .  Wikipedia does not need to have an article on them all (or any) because the company (owners are or other "connected" individuals) desires one.  "Interviews" (agree with "promotional" per Nom), press releases, interviews (per Yolandagonzales ) and other primary sources do not advance notability .  I could not find multiple independent , significant coverage , per policies and guidelines on sourcing to agree with a stand alone article .  -- Otr500 ( talk ) 17:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naing Lin Tun : The MNL is not independent and is only a passing mention and Tribun News is just an image caption from an under-19 fixture.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Infant Jesus School, Thiruvambady : I couldn't find any reliable sources for the article.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , India ,  and Kerala .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
C.D. Girls Inter College : Only primary sources provided, no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] First AfD is here Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/C.D.Girls_Inter_College .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are no sources cited on the page, which in and of itself would yield a delete vote.  When considering the prior AfD from 2016, that was before the 2017 RfC where WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES switched from assuming notability for post-secondary education to assuming not notability.  If sources showing notability are found, I would be happy to change my vote.  Editchecker123 ( talk ) 02:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the small amount of referenced content to Rura#Education , where there seems to be plenty of room.  Agree that there is nothing here to support a full article; disagree that this content is so unencyclopedic that it should be cast out entirely.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 00:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to suggest Merge option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is not really much to merge.  I guess maybe the pictures?  - Indefensible ( talk ) 15:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I hate to leave even a sentence of referenced encyclopedic information behind, but I would have no substantial objection to a redirect-without-merging.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 04:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajay Raju : Doesn't seem to be known for holding any academic or law journal positions, involvement in notable cases, etc.  Reliable sources are mainly smaller local outlets (in the Philadelphia area).  Bridget (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Pennsylvania .  Bridget (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lawyer that has his own law firm isn't notable.  Being a "boutique" firm is fancy wording for specialist law firm, nothing notable.  The reads as a biographical profile suited for somewhere else, not for wikipedia.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that reads more of family and a simple biography (blog).  Lacks context which doesn't show importance per subject notability guidelines.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional article which does not state why the subject is notable, per rationale above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chekidalum ( talk • contribs ) 11:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Diamonds are For Cocktails : Deleted at AfD in 2022, but recreated recently.  However, the sources are no better – they are all primary interviews with the author or PR websites (or both) and don't pass RS.  The only claim of notability is a supposed endorsement from a Fox News reporter, but I can't find any direct proof of this, only reports of it  by Zarah herself or in other non-RS sources.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Richard3120 ( talk ) 17:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No hits at Kirkus, Booklist, or PW; I can't find even one review for NBOOK.  The Fox News quote appears to be a back cover endorsement type of thing rather than a published review, and thus can't contribute to NBOOK (I also couln't find an actual source for it).  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 02:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already at AFD before, so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only links to buy the book are what I find, no sort of reviews.  This is likely PROMO.  Being featured on a billboard isn't notable, neither is much of anything else listed here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mobiliya : Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Texas .  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - After searching, found only news releases, a few passing mentions, social media, etc.  Nothing in-depth to establish notability .  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 11:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , could not find anything to establish notability either.  Persent101 ( talk ) 16:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth sources fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abshir Muse Said : Said looks notable but when this was at AfC and at User_talk:Star_Mississippi#Abshir_Muse_Said we realized some of the sources didn't even mention him and the text is conflated with that of Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed .  Likely UPE editing as well and repeated recreation, so bringing it here for consensus.  Star Mississippi 03:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Somalia .  Star Mississippi 03:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further example of lifted text here (thanks @ Wikishovel ).  Star Mississippi 03:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominator note , for the purposes of disclosure, noting I have blocked the creator from mainspace for the same content issues on other articles.  They are still able and welcome to participate here.  Star Mississippi 03:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  There may be a good case for WP:TNT here, given the faultiness of some of the sources.  But the content needs to be supported in reliable sources, as with his notability, which seems not to be the case here.  GuardianH ( talk ) 06:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Flowery terms, the potential for using sources that don't talk about this person and the blocked UPE tells me this isn't ready for the mainspace.  If someone was so inclined, they could start from scratch then send it for AfC review first, but this mess isn't worth saving.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A search did not find sources to back up notability.  Fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 17:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note from creator flagging for closing admin, the creator has commented on the Talk .  Want to be sure their input is seen.  Star Mississippi 00:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chamak Damak : Donald D23 talk to me 15:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't even find ROTM coverage in RS, much less sig/in-depth coverage as required by GNG and it clearly fails WP:NTV also.  Nominator beat me to AfD'd this one.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clearly fails WP: Notability (television) and WP:GNG .  Doesn't provide substantial material to be notable on Google search as well.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC) striking vote of confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rachel Klein (director) : Plenty of name drops, nothing more.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Theatre ,  and New York .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   There are a lot of Broadway directors who do not have Wikipedia articles.  A NY-based director/choreographer who has never worked on Broadway and never won (or, apparently, been nominated for) an Obie or Lortel Award (never mind Drama Desk, Critics' Circle, or Drama League Award) is not one of the more notable directors in New York.  I also note that the "bluelinked" references to Around the World in Eighty Days are misleading, as the musical does not have a Wikipedia article and, indeed, the particular production directed by Klein is claimed to have been at a different theatre in the page that is linked.  See WP:MILL .  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 14:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For Around the World in Eighty Days I bluelinked to the section heading on the novel's page for "Adaptions and Influences," which discusses the specific Mark Brown production.  Moving forward, should I not make section links like these?  Re: the Around the World in Eighty Days theater, good catch––checking it out, I see this theater has been called "The New Theater at 45th Street," the "Davenport Theater," and the "AMT Theater" within the past ten years.  I made that correction for accuracy.  This is detailed on the AMT Theater page.  Re: noteworthy, I was taking a cue from other Off-Broadway and Off-Off Broadway NYC theater director pages like May Adrales , Erin B. Mee , Richard Kimmel , Carl Schmehl , Jeff Whiting , and others who don't have Obie/Lortel/Drama Desk/Critics Circle/Drama League awards/noms.  TheatreHawk ( talk ) 23:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Deleted sections about less noteworthy productions, and added sources: Time Out New York, New York Times, New York Post, Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly, The Village Voice, Rolling Stone TheatreHawk ( talk ) 22:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brahmachal : No mention of this kingdom is found in any of the references in this article except the second one.  The second reference relies on romantic pseudo-historical ballads and is not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 15:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India .  -- Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 15:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Doesn't this fall under WP:RAJ?  Two of the four sources are from that period.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Precisely.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 14:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, fails GNG.   I could find nothing that supports the subject (one reference to a mountain named Brahmachal) in JSTOR, ProQuest, ProjectMUSE, Google searching for Brohmachol Rajjo, ব্রহ্মাচল রাজ্য, Brahmachal.  If a language expert finds something with SIGCOV ping me.  // Timothy :: talk 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aarati (TV series) : microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - despite the WP:REFBOMB of sources about the trailers in two different languages and the sources pretty much saying exactly the same things as each other, there is no other significant coverage.  There is nothing to say that this requires its own article yet.  At best, WP:TOOSOON and the socking (a massive indication of COI) makes me even more keen to have this deleted for now.  I also note that every source is written by an anonymous correspondent, which can also be a sign of paid promotion.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Délvidék football team : Fram ( talk ) 14:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Hungary ,  and Serbia .  Fram ( talk ) 14:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not listed at Confederation of Independent Football Associations#List of members so redirect not feasible.  Giant Snowman 18:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Non-notable football team; not enough sources or demonstrated notability.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete