Gwinnett County Department of Parks and Recreation: TheLongTone ( talk ) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This article was nominated for deletion 8 minutes after creation.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And?  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (Struck per below) - The article's subject meets WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT .  Disclosure, I live in Gwinnett County and have written a few articles about Gwinnett-related topics.  I assume the reason for pointing out that there were eight minutes between creation and AfD nomination is that it's difficult to perform an adequate WP:BEFORE in such a short time period, and as the largest park system in the State of Georgia it's possible that sources exist.  While WP:AUD points out that local media is not necessarily a indiciation of notability, it does say that Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least regional audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability and the two largest newspapers in the State of Georgia are The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Gwinnett Daily Post , both of which are reliable sources with significant coverage of the article's topic ( Atlanta Journal-Constitution : [9] [10] , Gwinnett Daily Post : [11] [12] ) This article's subject has also received significant coverage in non-local sources including the Associated Press (not directly about this article's subject but there is significant coverage) and Aquatics International .  - Aoidh ( talk ) 16:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I find the links provide no convincing reason to change my opinion.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 13:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These sources show notability through significant coverage in third-party reliable sources, meeting the relevant notability guidelines.  An AfD started eight minutes after article creation with no evidence of WP:BEFORE having been completed is not a compelling reason to delete an article for lack of notability in the face of evidence to the contrary.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 16:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Gwinnett County, Georgia , under the local government section, with the lengthy list in columns, lest we invite the creation of tens of thousands of bare-bones articles on county-level departments across the United States.  BD2412 T 20:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with this point since even if notability is arguably met, the coverage doesn't lend itself to much more than the ~500 characters of prose currently in this article.  I've struck my bolded keep above I think a merge to Gwinnett County, Georgia is reasonable.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 22:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Gwinnett County, Georgia : Per above discussion.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge