hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Claudia Baccarini : Interstellarity ( talk ) 12:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - dubious notability that could be summed up in her inclusion in the List of Italian supercentenarians .  9H48F ( talk ) 22:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEEVENT .  Only mentions of the subject are related to her age.  I support the inclusion in a list -- Broc ( talk ) 10:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I understand the rational, but this is not one event - it is what she has been notable for for years (for her age), and now after the death she is even more notable.  If it is deleted, it should be merged to List of Italian supercentenarians#Biographies to ensure that the information is not lost.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 01:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Potential for a Mini Biography in List of Italian supercentenarians but certainly no more, not enough sources or coverage to justify a standalone article, being the oldest living person in Italy is not enough to suffice that.  N1TH Music ( talk ) 14:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Italian supercentenarians .  WP:ONEVENT applies, and per WP:PEOPLEOUTCOMES : Articles about people known only for being the oldest person in a country, etc., at any given time are normally redirected or merged to a list of oldest people .  The article may need proof of additional coverage, using reliable sources, to justify a biographical inclusion in List of Italian supercentenarians#Biographies .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 21:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lesego Moeng : All that comes up in searches are passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  I searched both "Lesego Moeng" and "Gloria Moeng".  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Botswana .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Oriana Bedingfield : The subject made one appearance for the Malta women's national football team in 2011.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Malta .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 20:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Although perhaps, given 2011, it's a bit of a soft decision.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 18:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Werneth Cricket Club : Non-notable.  Tails Wx 02:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Cricket ,  and England .  Tails Wx 02:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Fails WP:GNG as the coverage is only the usual match reports and usual local cricket team website stuff.  There is this but would be nice to see some more.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would usually argue for a redirect in a situation like this but I'm not sure there is a great target.  The league they currently play in Greater Manchester Cricket League is a redlink and the bluelink league from the article Central Lancashire Cricket League is defunct.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 10:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 20:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Werneth, Greater Manchester#Sport a heading I've just created in the Werneth article.  Made use of the citation found by User:Rugbyfan22 above.  Rupples ( talk ) 00:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd support this redirect FWIW.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Asian Carrom Confederation : L iz Read!  Talk!  16:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , Organizations ,  and Asia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to International Carrom Federation , per Visviva .  Can't find any WP:SIGCOV online.  Should be noted that this and Asian Carrom Billiard Confederation are not duplicates.  One is a tabletop game, while the other is a type of billiard.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 23:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International Carrom Federation , where I have added a brief mention of the Asian confederation.  The ICF article is in bad shape but from a quick look there at least are secondary sources to cite, which seems to be more than can be said for the ACC.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International Carrom Federation .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Racine Kamatari: Sources used are blogs or music downloads sites which dont count towards WP:RS .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 07:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Rwanda .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 07:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : he has a good career as a rapper he has over 600 songs and being reported by The New Times is very remarkable.  I think this hinges on if The New Times (Rwanda) is a reliable source.  Pfomma ( talk ) 18:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I vote no this page should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion.  Twickenhm ( talk ) 18:40, 07 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Bruno PlayHard: Nominated for an esports Brazil award, didn't win it.  Not notable, fails WP:GNG - coverage owned media, self-fulfilling platforms or passing mentions in gamer titles.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Websites ,  and Brazil .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I didn't create the article here, but I'm the original creator on ptwiki.  It clearly meets WP:GNG with presence of significant coverage on [51] [52] [53] .  Plus, he appeared on Forbes Brasil's 30 Under 30.  Skyshifter talk 23:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: With only one keep ! vote I'd like a little more input before closing one way or the other.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 00:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Sources above are either interviews or passing mentions.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 01:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  We need more opinions here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Loud (esports) , though I would weakly support for deletion.  There is enough for me to say that he passes GNG.  That is, there seems to be enough interest in the Brazilian media from the refs in the article ( WP:THREE : 1 2 3 ).  They're not all great, but they demonstrate to me some notability.  SWinxy ( talk ) 21:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Trent Staggs (American politician): The sources cited are either the city's website, election results, or routine coverage of his administration or campaigns from local media outlets.  Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 03:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The subject has decent sources like https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trent-skaggs-utah-senate-mitt-romney_n_646d1259e4b056fd46dd071d , I think it might not be a bad thing to expand coverage to include such articles if they are well referenced and not overly promotional.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have added several points and citations from various news sources.  I hope that addresses the concerns.  Hilton80 ( talk ) 22:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete mayors and candidates do not have inherent notability per WP:10YT .  He is not independently notable of his candidacy and should be covered on the Utah senatorial election page.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Many articles for mayors and candidates are not as good as this so policy can be used to exclude them, but subject here probably has enough to meet WP:GNG .  - Indefensible ( talk ) 15:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We exclude candidates even if they meet WP:GNG .  He's a small town mayor and candidates are almost always redirected to the election they're running in unless they're independently important, he's not as a mayor of a small town, and this article was specifically created to WP:PROMOte a senate candidate - it's in the very first edit summary.  SportingFlyer T · C 15:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article's not in bad shape and it covers some things outside of his political activities.  Well sourced too.  I've seen worse articles that are still around here.  -- TDKR Chicago 101 ( talk ) 20:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is not just a discussion about whether or not the page is well-written, it's also a discussion about whether or not Trent Staggs is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page.  Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to assess changes made to the article since its nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I believe Staggs is worthy of a page, but it definitely needs work.  The fact that he doesn't even have an officeholder infobox makes me wonder if there are POV issues at work here.  Going to work on some edits.  PickleG13 ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dilse: I removed all questionable sources (no wiki link).  Remaining 8 sources confirm that the film released and nothing else.  Could redirect to Dil Se. . .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 05:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] weak Keep because production has attracted relative attention (I am not sure all sources removed from the page were not appropriate, but maybe that's just me); if not, redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023 .  The film is not a remake of Dil Se. .  , is it?  Why would we redirect the page there, if it is not? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 07:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mushy Yank : I agree with your vote but I feel the article will be stronger had it had two reliable reviews.  It is not a remake like you said.   The name is a common misspelling of Dil Se .  However, I had to remove unreliable sources because of the promotional tone.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Development Business: Only non- WP:IS sources.  Fails wP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Article probably needs to be re-written, it's so out-of-date, and needs independent sourcing.   However, the home page of United Nations Development Business is evidence that this is a vital part of the United Nations.  Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations doesn't look like it's too active these days.  The article is legit and notable.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 22:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dreams of India: The journal article is a passing mention.  The other sources do not appear independent.  Andre 🚐 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Radio , Popular culture ,  and Hinduism .  Andre 🚐 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This article is about the second of four radio plays in the Travels With Jack series.  Why is only the second play in the series being repeatedly deleted as not notable?  It seems peculiar to do this while leaving the first, third, and fourth plays in the series in place.  If Dreams of India is not notable, shouldn't the articles for the other three plays also be deleted?  Won't that be strange to have only the links for the second play in the series be dead?  Won't the article just end up getting repeatedly recreated each time someone notices the missing link?  Should there perhaps instead be an article for the series that replaces the articles for the individual plays?  Bryan H Bell ( talk ) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, maybe we should just merge them into one article about the series.  Is the series itself notable though?  Dreams of the Amazon , Dreams of Bali and Dreams of Sumatra all seem pretty skimpy on source coverage?  Andre 🚐 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe you're right about notability for the series.  Looking at the other Dreams of... articles, I am seeing almost identical content and a similar lack of sources.  I must admit I did find it difficult finding coverage of Dreams of India .  Give me a day or two to see if I can find any significant coverage for an article about the entire Travels With Jack series.  If I can't, can you help me with nominating the other articles for deletion?  I'm not too familiar with the process.  Bryan H Bell ( talk ) 10:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dominika Polakowska: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Poland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Corresponding article on Polish Wikipedia only contains one source that is a database and no significant coverage .  My Google searches also come up with nothing else.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Chiesa di San Michele Arcangelo: Should not be a redirect for "San Michele Arcangelo, Anacapri".  Article "Chiesa di San Michele Arcangelo (Venezia, San Marco)" exists in italian wiki.  Deleted redirect to avoid confusion in interlanguage links and in general.  Gor1995 ( talk ) 22:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Christianity ,  and Italy .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Wrong venue.   The nominator should have begin this discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion .   This redirect is justified by the following example: "They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article."  The same with the name of the church.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in favor of a change of venue per Eastmain.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 03:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus