hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nintendo Switch 2(Focus): I'm not sure what the "Focus" is, but "Nintendo Switch 2(Focus)" is missing a space.  This is not a casual type-o someone would make.  Andrzejbanas ( talk ) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Andrzejbanas ( talk ) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  It's indeed too soon, and right now, the "Successor console" section of the Nintendo Switch article is sufficient.  Cortador ( talk ) 11:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's already a draft, in better shape, at Draft:Unnamed Nintendo console .  Sergecross73 msg me 17:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:CRYSTALBALL , it's not even enough for a viable article right now and the name is not believable as a redirect.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per CRYSTAL and TOOSOON.  Probably SNOW too, since this has already been discussed before.  It's not even announced yet.  Sergecross73 msg me 17:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per WP:CRYSTALBALL .  All we have is a supposed "leak" right now.  Leaks are not reliable in the slightest.  Suggest a WP:SNOW close.  ― Blaze Wolf Talk blaze__wolf 17:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Pure speculation, no need to move to drafts since we have Draft:Unnamed Nintendo console .  WindTempos ( talk • contribs ) 10:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete yeah DELET IT QuantumFoam66 ( talk ) 19:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Can we WP:SNOW close this?  It pains to have this false info published in the mainspace, but there's so little there that it's impossible to clean up.  Sergecross73 msg me 19:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reason to keep this article, the draft mentioned above by Sergecross73 is way better; in my opinion, WP:FUTURE and WP:SNOW can close this really fast.  MK at your service.  12:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luke Watson (distance runner): No major achievements or medals won.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 20:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , United States of America ,  and Minnesota .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 20:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Kablammo ( talk ) 12:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rashid Ali Ghazipuri: Looks like a promotional page.  I didn't find anything when I did WP:BEFORE .  Gazal world ( talk ) 20:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable, was unable to find anything WP:BEFORE .  Reads like a resume/promo page.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 22:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG , not notable enough for an article.  -- Wesoree ( t · c ) 14:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have removed most of the sources from the article as being unreliable, non-independent and/or not mentioning the subject.  I have serious doubts about the reliability and independence of the one remaining source, and can find no others.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 11:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sounds it could be promotional.  No notability.  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 15:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jada Newton: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Caribbean ,  and Virginia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Excluding non-independent coverage from her college and conference, there is no significant coverage available per my BEFORE search.  Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   Not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Frank Anchor 15:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indian Film Festival Japan : Fails WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 11:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events , Japan ,  and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant notability and no sources.  Article has no net-benefical contribution.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rusdiansyah : Does not pass the current incarnation of WP:NSPORT .  I have found a couple mentions of his coaching ( [8] [9] ), but searching his name brings up only mentions and blog posts.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 20:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Places in Virginia with names involving "Dale" : Fails WP:NLIST by a wide, wide margin.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 03:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Dalete This is one of the most pointless articles I've ever seen, and the best example of WP:NOT I'll have for a long time.  Chaotic Enby ( talk ) 05:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Can anyone say WP:INDISCRIMINATE ?  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 07:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for so many reason, including WP:NLIST as nom says.  WikiVirus C (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete although kudos for "Dale as part of another word".  Not even seeing the need for this list.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete But with my compliments for being one of the funnier list concepts out there.  Can we SNOW close this one? -- Licks-rocks ( talk ) 15:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Virginia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is actually not quite as silly and random a concept for a list as it may seem at first glance.  The idea seems to be that while there is no place called "Dale, Virginia", there are places in Virginia that may occasionally be incorrectly called "Dale" (e.g. Dale City, Virginia ) as well as a person called Virginia Dale .  There is a "disambiguation page" ( scare quotes very much intentional) at Dale, Virginia .  The page histories are kind of a mess—this page was initially at the title Dale, Virginia before being moved to the current title, which turned Dale, Virginia into a redirect.  Then that redirect was turned into the current "disambiguation page" and here we are.  There also used to be an article called Places in West Virginia with names involving "Dale" before it was deleted back in 2013 (see WP:Articles for deletion/Places in West Virginia with names involving "Dale" ).  At any rate, this list was intended as a navigational/disambiguation one and doesn't do that properly (for reasons that are amply discussed at Talk:Dale, Virginia ) so it has no valid raison d'être .  TompaDompa ( talk ) 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NLIST and WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Pranesh Ravikumar ( talk ) 10:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This list masquerading as an article is a clear-cut case of WP:NLIST and WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phoenix Pick : User:Shahidm, the founder of this company, created this.  US-Verified ( talk ) 23:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Maryland .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources available are not compelling.  Graywalls ( talk ) 04:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I see two sources that are directly connected to the company and the third is a press release so none of them can be used.  The founder wrote this so we have WP:COI .  - Imcdc Contact 14:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark Komade : Database sources confirm that he played at semi-pro level in Germany but little else is known about him.  Best sources I can find are Ghanaweb , a trivial mention, Modern Ghana , a brief quote from him with no independent analysis, and Eurosport , which is just a database listing that wrongly lists him as Dutch.  No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 03:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jo Lamble : Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR .  Coverage is mainly of her commenting as a psychologist in the media.  Rather than WP:SIGCOV of her as the subject.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Grahame ( talk ) 07:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Subject also seems to run a question and answer column in Australian newspapers "Clinical psychologist Jo Lamble answers your questions".  Not finding any actual coverage right now, but there's a lot to wade through.  — siro χ o 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - being quoted in the media as a subject matter expert is not the same as coverage about the individual that would indicate notability.  Not seeing any evidence online that she meets WP:GNG or any other relevant guideline (such as WP:NACADEMIC ).  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 18:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaron Shanley : Does not seem to be notable.  Popo Dameron ⁠ talk 01:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom .  Popo Dameron ⁠ talk 01:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  We really need reliable sources for BLPs.  Bearian ( talk ) 01:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of UEFA Super Cup broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Contextes are there to claim 'channel x' brought out the right to coverages in 'country x', not to assert notability.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Europe .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Musical: Welcome to the Night of Your Life : They didn't seem to understand what my point was or that the articles they create should meet WP:NALBUMS .  While the group who made it is barely notable in English-speaking markets (most of their coverage, last I looked several years back when multiple editors including myself redirected most of their single articles, appears to be from Brazilian pop music blogs), I can find no worthwhile coverage of this album.  Its two sources at present are Apple Music and some sort of NFT/blockchain community the album was originally released on.  Plainly not notable.  Ss 112 14:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore the redirect .  I found this article which explains the NFT connection, but that's all, and that article looks like an opinion piece with an explicit conflict of interest disclosure so I wouldn't necessarily call it definitely reliable.  And if that's all the coverage this has gotten then it's easily non-notable.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt : Author can continue improving an earlier attempt to create the article which was draftified last month: Draft:The Musical: Welcome to the Night of Your Life .  Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 02:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NALBUM, no sources in the article or BEFORE meet IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Title is not a good redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 21:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Veronika Podgoršek : Seems to just run her own practice and do self-promotional things.  Mason ( talk ) 02:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and Slovenia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 02:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No notability apparent anywhere.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 05:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete Definitely not under WP:PROF -- has some assertion of notability under GNG and WP:NBASIC but the sources are extremely weak (this was the only one that was actually about her and it is not in depth [49] ).   I have next-to-no linguistic ability to help with this and happy to be persuaded otherwise, but on the face of it, seems to be a too-soon, not enough.   -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Non-English sources indicate WP:GNG . -- A09 ( talk ) 14:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you describe the sources for those who are English speakers?  That would be helpful, as my google translating is definitely not capturing anything remotely related to nuance.  Mason ( talk ) 16:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Please specify sources that establish GNG since other editors disagree with the assessment of Keep.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since the good non-English sources mentioned were never shown.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alina Maria de Roumanie : Achievements: organizing events, getting married, having two children, attending a baptism, two funerals and a wine festival.  Biruitorul Talk 05:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and Romania .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : she does WP:NOTINHERIT her husband's notability, and does not meet WP:GNG in her own right.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with redirect to Nicholas Medforth-Mills where further details can be added. -- Ipigott ( talk ) 10:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Public relations specialist isn't notable alone and being descended from famous people isn't helping notability.  There is some coverage in RS, about having a baby for example, but it's more for the celebrity gossip crowd, not really helping notability here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One small point, if I may: the subject herself isn’t descended from famous people; her husband is.  Biruitorul Talk 18:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, that's even less notable then.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTINHERIT , Tried find source on Google but nothing tangible Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 14:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Non State Actors Panel of Barbados : My own search was unable to find any significant coverage that would establish notability .  Whpq ( talk ) 02:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Barbados .  Whpq ( talk ) 02:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only primary sourced, no evidence of notability.  * Pppery * it has begun... 02:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note prior AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non State Actors (NSA) Panel of Barbados (closed as no consensus due to zero participation).  * Pppery * it has begun... 03:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete was unable to find anything that wasn't just a post on social media or a primary source.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete