hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sorani Kurdish Wikipedia: That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.  Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing?  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Internet , Websites , Iran , Azerbaijan ,  and Turkey .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per WP:ATD-R — siro χ o 06:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  No need for a separate article.  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Un-closed discussion per User:Oblivy .  Please also see this article and this article .  -- Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 07:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Although I did mention this AfD at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tatar_Wikipedia , I didn't vote here.   I'm convinced by the arguments and happy to follow @ Siroxo 's proposal for redirect.  For avoidance of doubt, I also would be fine if this was withdrawn (per comments on nominator's talk page).  Oblivy ( talk ) 08:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on individual Wikipedia language editions .  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Omer Dadi Aur Gharwale: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nadeem_Baig_(director)#Television - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 17:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
OSAMI-E: Couldn't find reliable sources with significant coverage.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Spain .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to OSAMI or delete, depending if the OSAMI article is deleted or not I know that this article isn't notable enough for this Wikipedia, maybe the OSAMI one is okay, but this one definitely isn't.  Toketaa talk 15:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eureka_(organisation)#Significant_projects : the organization running the project.  Not enough notability for a standalone article.  Owen× ☎ 16:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jill Carnes: Boleyn ( talk ) 13:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Elephant 6 : No sourcing found [22] is simply a confirmation they exist.  Notability seems to be around the Elephant 6 group/collective/thing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Classic Hip-Hop: Let'srun ( talk ) 20:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC) z [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to classic hip hop An utterly generic description of the format, and no regular listener is even able to tell if this is a satellite format in the first place, or they will immediately judging from it being utterly unremarkable HD Radio filler.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:51, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , couldn’t find much in search — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach61 ( talk • contribs ) 22:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : I would redirect it to Westwood One , since it is one of their 24-hour formats (but that's just me).  - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Classic hip hop ; there is no separate notability for the syndicated national feed, the network name is too generic that any coverage it could (but probably doesn't and never will) get would be difficult to distinguish from the overall format, and given how it is a bit too common to capitalize every word in a format name a redirect to Westwood One rather than the format itself could be misleading.  (Note that Classic hip-hop redirects to Classic hip hop , so it would not be a redirect target itself.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to classic hip hop per Wcquidditch.  Fails GNG and the name is too generic for a redirect anywhere else. -- Tdl1060 ( talk ) 18:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to classic hip hop .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lithuanian Wikipedia: That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.  Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing?  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Internet , Websites , Europe ,  and Lithuania .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per WP:ATD-R — siro χ o 06:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  No need for a separate article.  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on individual Wikipedia language editions .  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Lack of notability but does merit inclusion in a list of Wikipedias.  #prodraxis connect 01:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cumbria Men's League: Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Can't find any sources but established how it fits into the British rugby league system - Open to keep if sources can be found.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cumberland League .  This league was fairly short lived and appears to no longer exist.  [3] J Mo 101 ( talk ) 12:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So the Cumberland League is the league refered to as "Cumbria Rugby League" on the RFL website and not this one?  Mn1548 ( talk ) 14:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, the top division of by the looks of it [4] .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 14:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
UGC 224: I suggest to turn it to a redirect Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies#Material ejected from nuclei .  C messier ( talk ) 14:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : it is discussed on a couple of web sites, but nothing that I'd consider sufficiently reliable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 17:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect : That section heading feels a bit like undue promotion of Arp's nonsense views, even though it was the original catalog section name.  I suppose a redirect is reasonable here, since it's in Arp's catalog.  - Parejkoj ( talk ) 19:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 01:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chris Motionless: Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 07:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Motionless in White , see WP:BANDMEMBER -- FMSky ( talk ) 12:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pennsylvania .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per FMSky.  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 02:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bitsaeon: The article was typically based on M.O.N.T including if not all the sources.  The article didn't pass WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO .  I AFD it to he WP:TOOSOON and per WP: MUSICBIO may need to be redirected to the article M.O.N.T .  For WP:PRESERVE , Like the singing competition may be fixed variably and optionally, though he may not meet.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 09:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Music .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 09:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok i agree with the nomination.  Aidillia ( talk ) 09:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nom.  98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 09:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per 98Tigerius. -- Eastern Anatolia ( talk ) 11:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Dratify per nom.  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 13:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 13:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
William Radenhurst Richmond Lyon: The attempted notability claim here is that he was mayor of a small town that has long since been eaten up as a city neighbourhood, which is not "inherently" notable in and of itself -- a mayor would have to pass WP:NPOL #2, which hinges on the depth of substance that can actually be written about his political impact and the volume of sourcing that can be shown to support it.  But this is strictly on the level of "he is a mayor who existed, the end", and has been tagged as unsourced since 2009 without ever having any new references added to it.  As well, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED , so he isn't automatically entitled to keep an unreferenced article just because some of his family members have articles.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as ATD.  The subjects father is in the Canadian DNB and has an article where this subject is mentioned, so redirecting to George Lyon (Canadian politician) might be ok.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Monégasque films of 2014: References section is empty.  Does not meet WP:NLIST AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists ,  and Europe .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all There's a lot of these, please just merge/redirect where appropriate since I don't think individual discussions are necessary.  Reywas92 Talk 13:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List_of_European_films#Monaco .   I search for "List of Monégasque films of" and again without the e not an é, and only this list shows up, so not enough to make an entire article for.   If any are notable enough to be mentioned put them at List_of_European_films#Monaco .  D r e a m Focus 18:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_European_films#Monaco.  The three films listed are not notable, if the reader is looking for significant Monégasque films, we can redirect them to a place to find such.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 15:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Flames Central: But I would like to know what a national hybrid entertainment restaurant is.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Entertainment , Business ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: I notified WT:HOCKEY Wracking talk!  05:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note A possible action here is to rename to Palace Theatre (Calgary) to expand the scope to the building itself, which is registered as a historic place .  [50] [51] Wracking talk!  05:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If secondary coverage can be found, I’d be inclined to support this.  The Kip 18:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not too much coverage to meet notability.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 06:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to newly-created Palace Theatre, Calgary (where Flames Central was located), which mentions Flames Central.  Jiffles1 ( talk ) 17:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Palace Theatre, Calgary , which has a paragraph about Flames Central.  Persingo ( talk ) 01:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tiger (2007 film): Pinakpani ( talk ) 18:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This should be redirected per previous nomination yesterday.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Black Reel Award for Best Breakthrough Performance: This is an older duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance .  As this award was divided into two categories from 2014 to 2023, the article is also partly a duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Male and Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Female .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Film ,  and Awards .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A redirect (and merge, if necessary) to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance seems quite uncontroversial (as the edit summary of the person who dpD the page stated, if I remember well).  I had thought about it and deproDd it before reverting myself but on second second thoughts, redirects are cheap.  I don't even think an Afd was necessary but thanks for taking the trouble. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep then merge Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Male and Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Female into Black Reel Award for Best Breakthrough Performance .  If we delete Black Reel Award for Best Breakthrough Performance we lose the 2003 through 2013 awards which were not divided by gender.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The 2003 to 2013 awards are already covered in Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance .  The article here is practically an older copy of that, hence the nomination.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 18:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance per WP:CHEAP and numerous incoming links and attribution purposes.  Sorry I misunderstood the proposal and am casting a new ! vote here.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 22:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Uganda national under-23 football team: Nothing but routine sports coverage.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 14:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : it is sad and unfortunate that WP's existing guidelines are unable to accommodate articles like this.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Uganda .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I think NSPORT still (if it is the N guideline I am thinking of?) permits articles for international teams more or less just for existing, but since this team doesn't seem to have played any competitive international games, that would be a real stretch.  Kingsif ( talk ) 15:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Federation of Uganda Football Associations , per WP:ATD .  There seems to be nothing with which to build an encyclopedic article here, and we don't need stats dumps and squad sheets, which is all this is ever likely to become.  wjemather please leave a message... 16:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It's not that the team has never played any competitive international games, it's that they haven't managed to qualify for their continental championship (and that championship is, for some reason, the only event listed in this article).  They have entered and played in the qualification rounds for the U-23 Africa Cup of Nations but not made it into the main tournament.  See 2011 African U-23 Championship qualification , for example.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Uganda national football team .  Under-23 teams can be notable, but the lack of coverage kills this for now.  Giant Snowman 12:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per GiantSnowman.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per GiantSnowman. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 20:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect