hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mirko Siakkou-Flodin: The article sources consist of an online CV, and a short blog article that does not mention him but does mention a different artist (Mo Flow-den), perhaps that is a pseudonym?  An online BEFORE finds only user-submitted content or other blogs, but no substantial, independent in-depth coverage one would expect for a notable artist.  Bringing it here for the community to decide.  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Visual arts , Germany ,  and Greece .  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in WP:LIBRARY .  All web and news results are trying to sell me art or are social media/blogs.  Jfire ( talk ) 02:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mantra Lingua: NN company that fails WP:NORG .  Possible that their product has more notability than the company.  UtherSRG (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Been on the cat:nn list since 2010 and never been updated.  References are woeful.  Fails WP:NCORP .  scope_creep Talk 18:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jarolím Antal: - Altenmann >talk 03:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians ,  and Slovakia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete expression of notability not given in article and quick searches through the tools did not find sources/citations/etc.  that come close to a typical WP:PROF, Author, or GNG.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 19:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with only 1 source and nothing else found, I vote for deletion.  Rustypenguin ( talk ) 09:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WXXW-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Puttshack: No coverage past PR agencies and routine announcement.  Award is not major duffbeerforme ( talk ) 03:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that the page was deleted last week at RfD as it was not found suitable as a redirect to Oakbrook Center .  Jay 💬 06:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Lots of press surrounding location openings but nothing that really covers WP:CORPDEPTH .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Award winning company which can be redirected to Topgolf .  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 18:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How are they related? Topgolf founders are partners in starting Puttshack. Topgolf has only a See also entry for Puttshack currently. Jay 💬 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jay : , nothing in WP:NCORP allows for notability simply for winning an award. Are there any references meeting WP:ORGCRIT that you found. Let me know as I may have missed some in my search. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CNMall41 , I think you meant to ping Jax 0677 .  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did.  Thanks for the courtesy ping.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 03:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Forbes article outlines big plans for expansion, but at the moment it seems to be still TOOSOON to be notable.-- Gronk Oz ( talk ) 08:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for clearly failing WP:CORPDEPTH .  The only keep vote frankly does not make sense and should be ignored ( keep the page as it could be redirected to an unrelated company).  -- C avarrone 12:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Liberty: Pretty self-explanatory.  Never held elected office, no significant media coverage.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Finance ,  and New Hampshire .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom J2m5 ( talk ) 08:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete candidate for office who looking at the article very clearly fails WP:GNG .  SportingFlyer T · C 02:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blaine Hogan: Three episodes of Prison Break does not a notable actor make.  Novemberjazz 16:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Theatre , Illinois , Indiana ,  and Minnesota .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vo-Na Imoru: Mccapra ( talk ) 21:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sierra Leone-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mccapra , The chief of a large town as Voggu, and a dipplomat of an entire country to Yugoslavia is certainly notable enough to be on WIkipedia even if the only sources are in books that are easily verifiable on the internet.  -Masssly ( talk ) 16:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] well the standard for biographies is WP:BASIC and that isn’t met here.  Diplomats are not automatically notable and indeed most aren’t.  Mccapra ( talk ) 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 03:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can see that some ambassadorial positions are quite likely to be inherently notable (eg permanent members of the UN security council), that said, we're not discussing a posting of that nature here.  In the absence of sources, and my own searches revealed no SIGCOV, I cannot think of grounds where we might assume that satisfactory sources could exist which would demonstrate anything more than the quotidian activities of a diplomat.  Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 06:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Diplomats are not inherently notable.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vimankallu: No reliable source.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sri Lanka .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Haven't found anything other than its listing in the GNS Ceylon list as a populated place.  [25] — and two settlements with that name are listed.  Unable to locate an online gazetteer for Northern Province.  The co-ordinates I've added from the gazetteer point to the similarly named Veemankallu — the name of a lake but also a settlement and school.  Because of uncertainty over the name I'm going to recommend delete.  Rupples ( talk ) 13:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Larika Russell: Central American and Caribbean Games medals and ITF junior titles do not satisfy WP:NTENNIS .  More importantly, I could not find anything to suggest that WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG could be met.  Uno TV and D10 only mention Russell trivially.  Likewise, the best that I could find in ProQuest was EFE and El Nuevo Día , which mention her once.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Tennis ,  and Bahamas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This one should have been dead on arrival.  No idea how it got created like this.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 07:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aviv Productions: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Mach61 ( talk ) 16:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  gidonb ( talk ) 14:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Such companies usually stay behind the scenes, as they should.  This company is succesful especially with Israeli artists but that doesn't make it notable.  I included the debate in the Israeli queue so others who take interest can share their opinions.  gidonb ( talk ) 15:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources.  Definitely feels like WP:COI due to the excessive listing of its staff team.  TLA (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Towerlands Tram Road: DuckDuckGo is no better.  Google Books search turns up at most two possible secondary sources : Wham, The Lost Railway Lines of Ayrshire and Stansfield, Ayrshire & Renfrewshire's Lost Railways .   Paterson, History of the Counties of Ayr and Wigton, pts.  1-2: Kyle does not seem to include anything relevant.  Google News Archive turns up a number of primary sources: articles in the Glasgow Herald .  No Google Scholar hits.  Current content is exclusively original research .  Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk ) 06:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions .  Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk ) 06:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk ) 06:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk ) 06:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Use of published maps - is this classes as original research?  Rosser Gruffydd 13:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Whey you attribute claims to maps that are not explicitly depicted on them, that is absolutely original research.  Instances of this are omnipresent in the article.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 22:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete What we have is so utterly full of OR and speculation that it's hardly clear what is fact and what is the author's personal thoughts and theories.  Even if there were a notable topic here this would merit a healthy dose of TNT.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 22:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of MexicanaClick destinations: Fails WP:NOT , specifically WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  This is a complete and exhaustive listing of all the services offered by a (now defunct) company as of a particular date in October 2007.  Also fails WP:CORP , since the only source cited is the defunct company's website.  WP:BEFORE is optional, particularly where the main failing of the article is not only notability (though it does fail this per WP:CORP ) but I did do a brief search and found nothing that would remedy the issue - just the usual aggregator sites, ticket-sales sites, fan-sites, and industry/specialist media outlets of dubious independence (see WP:ORGIND and WP:AUD ).  FOARP ( talk ) 16:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Mexico .  FOARP ( talk ) 16:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Textbook WP:IINFO material.   Also, the RFC cited above seems valid.   -- Jayron 32 14:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator and Jayron32.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 01:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Corpus Mortale: Sources are all primary, and the band has sold under 1000 albums in 30 years.  Very Average Editor ( talk ) 06:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Denmark .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katie McBeath: Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Sports ,  and Ohio .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kitson Cécile: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources like [27] or [28] are in passing.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 20:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Henry Hereford: Tacyarg ( talk ) 13:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 13:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not an article for deletion - definitely meets the criteria for actor.  Multiple credits in major film and tv shows.  2600:1700:4640:E70:ECCA:5D5:421E:ECB4 ( talk ) 13:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure what you mean by "employer".  Henry is an established actor having been on several films and TV shows as referenced in IMDB and trade magazines.  There is no reason this page would be deleted.  Thefilmsorcerer ( talk ) 22:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG or NACTOR.  A 21st-century actor and yet yields no results in Google News tells a lot.  General searches also did not produce anything of use.  Other than 1-2, the used refs aren't about him rather the films/shows he's starred in.  X ( talk ) 05:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR .  His roles are all of the single-name supporting cast, so insignificant they don't even have a full name, or are throwaway characters .  Bearian ( talk ) 18:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1 Park Avenue: The first source is not significant coverage.  The second source is not independent.  The third is dead and even the archive is broken.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Park Avenue (about a different building), which concluded neither was notable.  * Pppery * it has begun... 15:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hey man im josh : Shouldn't this be in United Arab Emirates not Saudi Arabia?  * Pppery * it has begun... 15:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yep, definitely should be @ Pppery .  Thanks for catching this mistake, I must have misclicked in the drop down for middle eastern countries.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not finding significant coverage in reliable independent sources via Wikipedia Library (where I would expect to see coverage about developments like this one), although it is mentioned in articles about 1 Dubai and Jumeirah Garden City .  IMO, doesn't warrant a redirect, either, given that there are many other properties around the world with the same name that are possibly more "notable" in the Wikipedia sense.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 14:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , isn't notable enough to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete