hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Parvinder Singh : He has played in domestic-level cricket. .  but does not appear to meet the notability requirement maintained by the cricket wikiproject.  Jip Orlando ( talk ) 15:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople ,  and Cricket .  Jip Orlando ( talk ) 15:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  A substantial domestic career, with 8 centuries and a high score of 203 not out; sources in Indian print media are bound to exist, his career isn't one which will go without coverage.  AA ( talk ) 22:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there doesn't appear to be any significant coverage here.  GoldRomean ( talk ) 01:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - beside his Cricinfo profile which gives a career overview, there looks to be a fair bit of coverage regarding individual innings.  Hindustan Times 26 November 2009 , Telegraph India 2 November 2013 , The Statesman 7 January 2009 , Indian Express 20 November 2012 .  He has played at the highest level of domestic cricket and this seems sufficient coverage to justify an article.  -- JP ( Talk ) 08:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Primary match reports are routine news and per NSPORT and NOTNEWS do not count towards notability, and that is all I'm finding for the subject (including among the links above). Sportspeople are required to have IRS SIGCOV cited in their article, regardless of their achievements and regardless of where or when they played. JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SIGCOV not regarding individual matches also exists if you look hard enough. -- JP ( Talk ) 07:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That does go somewhat beyond a routine transactional report, so I'll reconsider my ! vote.  I'm not overly familiar with what's routine in cricket outside of match reports, though, so I'm going to ping @ Wjemather for his input.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Think there's enough here in what JP has found for a keep.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Naser Kelmendi : Mccapra ( talk ) 08:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Bosnia and Herzegovina ,  and Kosovo .  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP As far as I'm concerned this easily passes notability: he is inserted into the history of Sarajevo for reasons mentioned in the article, was singled out by US President Barack Obama for sanctions, is constantly in the news regarding events in the former Yugoslavia (including news from last year), and was even named as one of the most notorious criminals in 2012's OCCRP Person of the Year report.  I agree the article needs to be expanded still, but nominating for deletion this early and by pointing to a guideline that the article does not seem to breach as far as notability goes seems a bit premature to me.  -- Dynamo128 ( talk ) 08:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP/INCUBATE this article was created in the last 24 hours.  It has sufficient sourcing in my mind to satisfy WP:CRIME and WP:GNG, and in my own search I see coverage I’d describe as in depth and ongoing coverage, he’s been tried and convicted and that was covered in major world media ( https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kosovo-trial-kelmendi-idUSKBN1FL5SA ), he’s under sanctions ( https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20150324_kelmendi.pdf ), etc.  Why are we rushing to delete this article?  Give the authors some time to improve the article.  My own quick search suggests he’s notable, I encourage others to conduct their own cursory search before reaching any conclusions.  Jo7hs2 ( talk ) 16:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 13:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 11:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cartoon (DJ) : I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Estonia .  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  There are some serious sources, but rather WP:ONEEVENT (song "On & On").  Secondly, the group existed only about two years: 2015-2017.  Some sources: https://elu24.postimees.ee/6869461/uskumatu-menu-eesti-bandi-cartoon-hittlugu-hingab-maailmakuulsale-muusikule-kuklasse https://menu.err.ee/287663/eesti-koosseis-cartoon-on-nomineeritud-maailmas-mainekale-d-n-b-auhinnale https://parnu.postimees.ee/4220745/cartoon-laks-laiali Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable sources WP:NBASIC .  Redirect is a good option too I think.  128.6.36.94 ( talk ) 20:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As the nominator, I'm totally okay with this comment being struck out if someone chooses to do that.  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Alternatively, instead of deleting, possibly redirecting to List of musical groups from Estonia may be the best solution-- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 06:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep Delfi has a list of sources [45] .  Takes some time to check all the 369 hits, but passes GNG and WP:NEXISTS .  Pelmeen10 ( talk ) 17:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Abu Hudhayfah Al-Ansari : The very few reliable sources that mention him do so only in passing; all else I could find in a WP:BEFORE search in English and Arabic is blogs and social media chatter, and it's difficult to verify whether he actually exists.  His predecessor's name is a redirect to Islamic State .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military , Terrorism , Islam ,  and Iraq .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He has made a audio speech and i have posted blog link to its english translation by Aymenn j al-tamimi, one of best experts on Jihadism & Islamic State in particular.  We had a article Abul-Hasan al-Muhajir since he made his first speech and his personal identity remained unknown and was revealed after his death.  Sam6897 ( talk ) 16:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , but I bet for Maintain : Same as Wikishovel, it need to be extended and with more reliable sources.  I believe there are sources which can help us to say more than his occupation and his succession.  In the case of Abul-Hasan al-Muhajir, we have a biography of him, so it makes it more notable.  Tajotep ( talk ) 11:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All things about Abul Hasan identity emerged after his death in late, 2019.  For 3 years he was mysterious unknown spokesmen but he still had a wikipedia page.  Sam6897 ( talk ) 21:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 12:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just wanted to clarify a speech is a primary source and is not any indication of notability.  Industrial Insect (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Terry Fossum : MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Texas .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sum total of contributions fails WP:BASIC and individual components are not significant on their own; WP:FILMMAKER of film is not cited and doesn't seem to be a notable film, and WP:ACT requires "significant roles in multiple films/shows" MetricMaster ( talk ) 10:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC) This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia.  Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions.  The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked.  [ reply ] Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  North America 1000 08:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I was able to find this[ [1] ][ [2] ], I believe their might be more sources to help sustain the article.  Epcc12345 ( talk ) 22:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was able to find this more sources[ [3] ] [ [4] ]
 Winner of Kicking & Screaming (TV series) [ [5] ] [ [6] ].  I still believe, there are more sources to establish notability.  Epcc12345 ( talk ) 11:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 12:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 22:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Having just ! voted in a few rather frivolous yet notable topic AFDs, I've ended up here where we've had 3 relistings with nary a comment.   I'd be happy to say he's just a minor reality show winner, but he does seem to have parlayed that into later coverage [7] , despite the current promo-y feel of this article.   Which means we are heading to no consensus without more debate, I suppose. -- Milowent • has spoken 13:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per WP:SIGCOV .  This is not in any way an endorsement of his views.  It seems as though he has done enough after winning a reality show on a major United States network to reach a barely notable level of notability .  We have, for what it's worth, sometimes treated the winners, places, ad shows of major reality TV show as as if they are automatically notable.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Charissa Tansomboon: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Thailand .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Subject is now a researcher in online learning, though I'm not seeing anything that would indicate notability under WP:NPROF .  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find enough WP:SIGCOV from RS for this to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I was trying to figure out what "platinum medalist" would be, as that sounded interesting, perhaps specific to Thailand...  But no, turns out to be vandalism .  The Skate Today piece referenced is good and dedicated to her, but it alone is not enough to meet GNG.  - 2pou ( talk ) 20:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Chang-myong: There doesn't seem to be anything here, and a single appearance for the North Korean national team in 2000 doesn't cut it.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and North Korea .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is no basis for an article here.  We don't even know his DOB, position or POB!  I note that Order of Kim Jong Il and this source have a person of this name achieving an award which might be a claim towards WP:ANYBIO , however, I am not completely satisfied that this is the same person.  Unless we can prove it's the same guy, we should delete the article on the footballer.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 15:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Erin Mikalsen: However, she does not meet WP:GNG in my opinion.  I found this article from the Jamaica Observer , which is a good start, but everything else that came up in my searches are passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Jamaica ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  killer bee 05:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iron Man (vol. 4): The relevant information are already present in Iron Man (comic book)#Volume 4 Redjedi23 ( talk ) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would support a merge, but there doesn't appear to be anything due that isn't already covered in the target article.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Biography work: The article seems to be an unsourced essay, not to mention very over-capitalized.   Is there a notable topic here that someone can point out so we can fix it, or should we just delete it?  Dicklyon ( talk ) 19:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe this is a western esotericism philosophical concept.  I see some journal sources describing "biographical work", but they appear to be talking about different concepts.  Maybe there are sources for this, but I'm leaning delete as the article is too incoherent to properly describe what it's about.  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 20:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article is mainly the work of two WP:SPAs , Neckarpro in 2011 and Biographyworker in 2016–17, who edited nowhere but this article.   I don't how it has survived until now.  Dicklyon ( talk ) 23:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : unable to discern the topic, seems to have some weird link spam thing going on at the bottom.  Queen of Hearts ( talk ) 04:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fringe concept based on(?) anthroposophy that's not independently notable enough for its own article.  The 'literature' at the bottom is also just cruft.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 10:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Wikipedia does expose quackery.  That's why in quackery topics I lean for keep.  This article is typical for Anthroposophical articles, which do applaud the practice for many claimed merits, but never explicitly tell what the practice really is.  Like what biography work is and how it's done (i.e. its method) should remain a secret.  tgeorgescu ( talk ) 05:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , if you aren't really, really , REALLY interested in esotericism, this will be patent nonsense to you.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 17:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Sanko: Their main claim to notability is being head of the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency for one year, which does not seem sufficient to meet notability requirements for politicians and officials.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Pennsylvania .  Owen× ☎ 13:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 17:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The subject has not held positions that confer notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edward B. Kurpis: The rather WP:EXTRAORDINARY claim of having played a founding role at both CNBC and NBC is cited to page 24 of this book , which is the author bio at the end of an article written by Kurpis himself.  I am unable to find any further coverage beyond the cited routine hiring announcement for BNN in Variety ( [12] ) which fails to even identify which BNN it refers to, let alone provide any further biographical detail of the subject.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There seems to be nothing here but self-promotion.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete