hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
ChoCo Entertainment : Fails WP:CORPDEPTH .  US-Verified ( talk ) 20:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Korea .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *about the company* .  "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  Looking at the references none meet the criteria for establishing notability as there no in-depth Independent Content about the company and I am unable to locate anything that does.  Perhaps someone will find something in another language but until then I can't see this meeting notability criteria.  HighKing ++ 20:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kotii Reddy : Aronitz ( talk ) 12:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  CptViraj ( talk ) 13:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Andhra Pradesh and Telangana .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I could not find any significant secondary coverage for this businessman.  There are some websites linked in the article that do discuss the subject, but they are mostly promotional pieces or provide most of their coverage towards his company rather than himself.  Another linked source was an interview where the subject talked about himself.  I would say that the article does not meet WP:NBASIC due to a lack of independent coverage, and would note that the creator of this article was blocked for potential involvement in WP:UPE .  The Night Watch (talk) 16:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sahyadri School : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Singapore representatives at international male beauty pageants : The only source in the article currently is to Miss World , which is primary.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Beauty pageants , Lists ,  and Singapore .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This list is more trivia than encyclopedic.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as we have deleted several similar articles.  Mccapra ( talk ) 15:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Qonto (neobank) : scope_creep Talk 11:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Organizations ,  and France .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and promotional in tone.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 20:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as coverage exists but it is in French and behind paywall.  This article in Les Echos notes that it is valued at 4.4 billion euros, i.e. unicorn (finance) - a good indicator that we can uncover good amount of coverage if any of us do a proper WP:BEFORE .  I understand this is a case of WP:TNT but there is a well-written article about this topic on French Wikipedia, fr:Qonto .  Why not just translate?  We know that French Wikipedia's notability criteria is very tough and requires " at least two independent and reliable secondary sources, in national or international publications, spaced at least two years apart and centered on the subject ".   I don't know if copying all the references from French Wikipedia here is a good idea or not.  In any case, it is an obvious keep.  2A05:87C7:9008:2C00:A839:6080:4248:D58B ( talk ) 21:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no indication of importance and nearly no encyclopedic information in the article.  Just a vague description as French online payment institution for freelancers and SMEs .  Undescribed product (A vague description of it has been removed because it was promotional.) and a list of amounts of money raised.  Janhrach ( talk ) 21:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I was going to do a source analysis but I see not a single reference in the article passes WP:SIRS .  Not one.  WP:THREE is the consensus based best-practice for proving an article is notable.  If there is references, now is the time to prove it.  scope_creep Talk 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Democratic Republic of the Congo–Ukraine relations : Doesn't look like they even have official embassies.  This info could easily go in Foreign relations of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and/or Foreign relations of Ukraine .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Democratic Republic of the Congo ,  and Ukraine .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Relations not subject to third party coverage, fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per lack of SIGCOV.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 05:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Finger Your Neck : The existing sources that can be validated provide only routine coverage (e.g., "This show will be playing Sunday at 8pm!").  One source provides two sentences about the show's creators.  A quick Google search did not provide further insights.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 18:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Significa liberdade ( talk ) 18:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added some extra details and references.  The fact it was a play about the mafia adapted to Australian radio is very novel for me - but if concensus of the community is that it isn't quite enough then by all means delete.  Britfilm ( talk ) 12:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Super League Ultimate 13: Grand Final Team : PROD was contested, suggesting a merger instead.  I have no problem with this suggestion if anyone is able to provide citations, but I was unable to find any sources for this myself.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 16:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 16:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Worthy as a footnote on Super League if sourced at most.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Couldn't find any sources via ProQuest and nothing on the SkySports website via the Wayback machine.  This might have been worthy of a merge to either the Super League XII article or the 2007 Super League Grand Final article if references could be located.  Storm machine ( talk ) 05:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Renzo García : Several references, but none of them seem to cover the biographee with any depth.  The same article was twice deleted from Spanish Wikipedia.  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 18:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Colombia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Scattered mentions of the person, seems to be PROMO as they're running for mayor.  Doesn't seem to pass notability for academics either.  Reads like an extensive resume Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.  The article reads like campaign literature and the subject lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of WP:RS to ensure notability.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 21:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bee Broadcasting : Let'srun ( talk ) 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Montana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree that subject lacks needed secondary sources.  Also appears to fall firmly under Wikipedia:ROTM .  Manyyassin ( talk ) 04:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:NCORP , no coverage in reliable sources found.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 20:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lochana Munda : Everything that came up in my searches were trivial mentions.  The same goes for the sources in the article, as well.  I also searched her name in Odia (ଲୋଚାନା ମୁଣ୍ଡା), though I can't be sure the translations were 100 percent correct.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 19:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Killi Luqman (2017) : — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Afghanistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital (Daet) : No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 01:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no good hits on GSearch, GNews and GBooks.  GNews Archives gave an article about the family of doctors who founded the hospital from a small clinic.  However, I'm not sure that that is enough to warrant notability.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete should have never been created.  Catfurball ( talk ) 15:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gardella Racing : Article has had maintenance tags since 2010.  Very little in the way of sources.  I do not believe this passes WP:GNG as they don't seem to have much in the way of significant coverage.  Qcne (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Qcne (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is about all for coverage [16] , sadly it's not enough.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Fails WP:GNG and has very little in the way of coverage.  IncompA 21:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jed MacKay : UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and Canada .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to draft space for referencing improvement, does not meet quality standard for article space.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non notable BLP, I see no value in moving this to userspace given the lack of sources, Fails GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 23:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulaziz Al-Faraj : The best sources found in an Arabic WP:BEFORE are Ar Riyadiyah 1 , Al Araby and Ar Riyadiyah 2 .  The first two are trivial mentions and the last is an image caption.  Still no evidence of meeting WP:SPORTBASIC so the reasons for deletion are still valid.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Can confirm that no SIGCOV exists in English or Arabic. Results for عبدالعزيز الفرج overwhelmingly return results for an Egyptian Qari' .  〜 Festucalex • talk 13:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 12:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shri Shiv Chhatrapati College : Sohom ( talk ) 14:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dalamarmarangal : A search for reliable sources did not reveal any that were anything more than just a placeholder page with minimal details, at least among the mostly English ones I could find.  Perhaps there are some in Malayalam that I did not uncover.  No apparent significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject as required by WP:GNG .  Also does not appear to satisfy even one of the notability criteria for films (see WP:NFO ).   — Archer1234 ( t · c ) 10:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .   — Archer1234 ( t · c ) 10:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donald D23 talk to me 12:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Bearian ( talk ) 01:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bader bin Saud bin Mohammed Al Saud : Except for [4] , no other independent source can be found.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 15:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Military ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seems to be a resumé-type article about a subject of no clear notability created by an SPA.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reads like a resume and has no sources to support its claims.  That is problamatic for a BLP.  – Pharyngeal Implosive7 (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  DrKay ( talk ) 09:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete