hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ziad Abdelnour (financier) : I don't find coverage about this person, only him talking about other things.  Rest of the sourcing isn't helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Finance , Politics , Lebanon , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, due to the previous AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziad K Abdelnour , Soft deletion is not an option.  We need more opinions here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt We'll whack-a-mole another page title probably, but nothing new here since the last nominations.  SportingFlyer T · C 01:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We could title blacklist , I guess.  It's absurd that the same stuff has been going on since 2006.  * Pppery * it has begun... 01:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per everyone above.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources are articles written by Ziad Abdelnour or quotes from Ziad Abdelnour, but nothing about Ziad Abdelnour, other than some YouTube videos and some blogs.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 00:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the reasons stated above.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 23:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Commonwealth Markets : Cabayi ( talk ) 16:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Internet , California ,  and Kentucky .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO.  SEC filings and various blogs or un-reliable websites don't help notability, I can't find anything extra.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which blogs are you referring to?  Which un-reliable websites are you referring to?  SEC filings are completed with multiple third party law firms and audited annually.  104.35.224.196 ( talk ) 23:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom as WP:TNT .  Jumpytoo Talk 18:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I still think this should be G11 but I do see that this was declined, so I will refrain from tagging for it.  In any case, speedy delete .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 16:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since this is blatant promotion.  The article was created almost single-handedly by Dominic.persinger , an account which was created on August 20 and blocked indefinitely on August 25 for "undisclosed paid editing for advertising or promotion".  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 09:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Clearly just promotional.  Nigej ( talk ) 07:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madiha (singer) : Steven Walling • talk 06:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Netherlands .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 07:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Poorly sourced article per WP:RS and I do not find any notable albums or songs which meet WP:SINGER . - CSMention269 ( talk ) 10:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Like others above me, I tried to find RS.  Maybe someone who once dreamed to be a star?  Nothing wrong with that, however, we work by the GNG.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage from WP:RS at present.  The MSN.COM source does not mention the singer.  Artene50 , 24 December 2023 The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
English Music Festival : Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harsha Bahadur Budha Magar : UtherSRG (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and Nepal .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Evidence of passing WP:Prof not found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete .  His 1990 dissertation was published in book form as Is Gorkhaland a reality or simply mirage?  (Kathmandu 1994 : Pushpawati Bura Magar); I only found a single citation for that on google scholar.  I can't find the source this article is based on, either.  If this is about him, it's a strong indicator of notability: [10] .  But that's all I've found.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Waleed Asiri : The best sources that I can find are Alyaum 1 and Alyaum 2 , both of which only trivially mention Asiri as an unused substitute in a reserve match.  WP:FPL is no longer relevant and Asiri needs to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC to have an article.  I'm not seeing a passing of either guideline at this moment in time.  WP:TOOSOON at best.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Searching in English and Arabic, nothing beyond passing mentions.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  A case of WP:TOOSOON .  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paolo Cecconi : UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ GiantSnowman : , he made 193 appearances in Italian fully pro Serie C from 1970s to 1980s do deifnityl has offline sources.  Clearly was significant figure in Italian lower league football.  Also I found [66] , [67] , [68] , [69] , among more Italian sources.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 15:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 1 and 2 are the same source, and all the sources are very brief routine death announcements.  Playing in the Italian 3rd division is not a claim to fame now, let alone 40/50 years ago.  Giant Snowman 17:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG with references above. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 04:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - All of the available coverage are obituaries, with the Il Tirreno and Notizie Prato ones derived from an A.C. Prato press release making them questionably independent of the subject.   The La Nazione obit is independent coverage, but similar to the Prato TV source it is extremely brief.  Keeping in mind that this footballer played one season in Serie C1 (the third tier of Italian football) and nine seasons below that level, I don't see a justification for an IAR argument when SIGCOV isn't available (I'd prefer to see something covering him prior to his death).  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per Jogurney.  Derivatives of press releases are not independent, and significant coverage in general is totally lacking.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 19:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Lyon (footballer) : signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per this decent article, [1] , other bits like [2] , the cites on the article already, more around in google is enough for me for basic WP:GNG thanks.  Govvy ( talk ) 22:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with Dougal18's evaluation of these sources below (although the Sun citation is really just a mere mention even before we consider the paper's reliability).  signed, Rosguill talk 13:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Herald contains a couple of sentences and his boss waffling on about Lyon.  The Sun is depreciated, the cites on the article are either non independent (PTFC) or mentions in match reports (BBC).  He fails GNG.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 12:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Lyon has literally today moved on loan to a new club, I have already added new sources covering this and will continue to update the page and add content and sources when necessary.  This move will only provide the page with more detail.  Partickthistle123 ( talk ) Comment Where is the SIGCOV ?  Read CRYSTAL .  Dougal18 ( talk ) 13:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I really don't understand the persecution of Scottish football league players at times.  They get similar coverage to English players.  I still don't get why people don't like general coverage.  Govvy ( talk ) 14:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Herald source is OKish, Sun is absolutely not.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , maybe TOOSOON, but he's playing pro football and already has some coverage. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 13:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Government platform : No sources added for 16 years, and anything relevant to a country's government platform would already be covered in its own article.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 22:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Vague dictionary definition with no sources.  Worth noting however, the similar term "government as a platform" could possibly meet notability (even if it is just a buzzword).  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 08:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This could be merged to political platform , but that just redirects to party platform , which is not the same thing.  British-originated two-party politics doesn't need separate government and party platforms, because the dominant party gets to dictate the government platforms, but this doesn't mean the concept doesn't exist in genuine multi-party democracies.  The term has been used at least with Finland and Austria.  -- vuo ( talk ) 10:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as a dictionary definition, per others.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) * [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTADICTIONARY .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kayode Adegbulugbe : No reliable sources.  BoraVoro ( talk ) 16:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not sure the award is notable, rest of this reads like a CV, with simply confirmation of employment.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Engineering ,  and Nigeria .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't think "no reliable sources" is a fair description of the article.  The notability claim is a bit buried in the article - he's known primarily as a philanthropist.  See eg [27] (unfortunately no byline) and [28] .  Those don't add up to a keep ! vote, but I think we ought to do a more thorough look for sources before deleting this one.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 22:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I don't agree with WP: BEFORE . Considering sources is not variably the reason to delete. There are sources to support certain claim. I will suggest rewriting. Otuọcha ( talk ) 06:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I see reprints of publications in different outlets. Aside from those reprints (which are obviously paid for), there are no articles to prove the notability of this subject. It also gives me the WP: PAID or WP:COI vibes. Reading Beans 13:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Reading Beans whose judgement I value on Nigerian sources. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Refund Home Loans : There is the possibility of merge/redirect to founder, but I think that might unbalance the article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - From what I can tell this just barely meets SIRS with the Advisor article being the most in-depth and substantive.  It seems to have been notable and controversial independently of the notable founder.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 20:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment there is some coverage.  I found this in-depth article .  Geeraarts ( talk ) 00:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 03:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree.  Fails GNG.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Coverage is run of the mill.  Not the only Australian company to breach the Trade Practices Act.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yair Lemos : Appears to have only had 90 minutes of play time in 2011/2012 in the second level of the Uruguayan football league system.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete .  Seems like an open and shut case.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 19:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What basis for a speedy deletion?  Giant Snowman 19:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah this doesn't fit any speedy deletion criteria.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chon Byong-ju : Simione001 ( talk ) 02:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because there is no reasonable target for a redirect.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 19:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete