hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Alexandre Castaing: This player certainly exists, but he lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am having a hard time finding enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Please ping me if sources are found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources (database I exclusively) means the article individual exists but it doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSBIO .  Trust this can be notable in the future.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Azarenka–Sharapova rivalry: Not seeing it.  Sourcing that I have found describes the two in broader contexts of tennis competition, but not specifically focused on their rivalry.  Eddie891 Talk Work 19:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't see it either.  Per Wikiproject Tennis: "According to WP:NRIVALRY, rivalries are not inherently notable. We can only have articles about tennis rivalries if there is significant media coverage about the rivalry. For example, great rivalries like Agassi–Sampras or Federer–Nadal warrant an article, but articles about rivalries like Agassi–Rafter and Federer–Hewitt have been deleted by the community. If in doubt, consult WP:TENNIS before creating a new rivalry article."  That's what this looks like to me.  The fact it was deleted before, when they were both playing and in the news, speaks loudly that this is not a player interaction that requires a stand-alone article.  19:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC) Fyunck(click) ( talk ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the article doesn't seem to be a "rivalry" versus a head-to-head match history.  It's not something that I can find any significant references to.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 23:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Belarus and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marketing Agencies Association: Cabayi ( talk ) 09:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Advertising ,  and United Kingdom .  Cabayi ( talk ) 09:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  and WP:PROMO .  Fails WP:ORG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frenchs Forest Public School: LibStar ( talk ) 06:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL (ie WP:NCORP and/or WP:GNG ) and would seem unlikely to be able to meet any criteria.  Otherwise a nicely constructed little page, pity.  Cabrils ( talk ) 23:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barker (advertising agency): ~ T P W 16:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 16:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails notability as there is a lack of reputable coverage that directly addresses the company and its notability.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Open Site: The mentions I can find are citations to the infomation from the website (e.g: [8] [9] ) or as an entry in lists of online encyclopaedias (e.g: [10] ) neither of which are WP:SIGCOV .  I don't see anyway this could ever meet WP:NWEB At the previous afd ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Site ) in 2007, the article was kept on the grounds that seem to me mostly WP:ATA type arguments (e.g: It is important , That it will be notable in the future , we have articles on less notable things , etc).  Cakelot1 ( talk ) 15:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Cakelot1 ( talk ) 15:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Cakelot1 ( talk ) 15:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep : Although this website is probably not notable now, at its original time before Wikipedia, it was probably notable.  Samuel R Jenkins ( talk ) 06:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 03:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY .  The article has never had any sources, and there weren't enough found in the 2007 afd.  On what are you basing you opinion that it was once notable , because I can't see how that can be based on any Wikipedia policy like WP:GNG or WP:NWEB .  Cakelot1 ( talk ) 09:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't see keeping this because it was short-lived and didn't really go anywhere.  We do, however, need to find where all it is mentioned on WP and change the wikilink to, perhaps, a link to their archived web page .  It would ideal to get a sentence or two into the DMOZ page saying that it was by "x" and ran from yyyy to yyyy.  Otherwise, there's no history as context in that article.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3278: C messier ( talk ) 07:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 00:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Society of Quality Assurance: LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 00:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't find anything either; given the huge relevance and profile of quality assurance in general, I would expect a notable society representing quality assurance to have a lot more hits than the Scottish Qualifications Authority, but it doesn't.  Might be a US thing and I'm missing it because I'm in the UK.  Article reads like a mission brochure.  I'd suggest delete , and if it ever turns into anything in the future, re-create then.  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malhama: None of the 3 entries on this page is known as "Malhama" and the page is made up of only WP:Partial title matches , and so should be deleted as a disaambiguation page.  There is no wikt entry for a soft redirect.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 16:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 16:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:PARTIAL .  The page is not really disambiguating anything, and I couldn't find anything that could fit on the page.  Persent101 ( talk ) 11:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  I removed one entry, another is very questionable.  This does not meet dab guidelines.  // Timothy :: talk 16:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leo Motley: Reads like a resume with flowery language.  Non-notable per sources, none found we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page about Leo Motley should not be removed because he is a significant figure in the technology industry as the founder of Cloudax Ltd and the creator of numerous popular programs and applications used by hundreds of thousands on platforms such as Google Play, App Store, Discord etc.  His contributions have had a substantial impact on the software industry and have garnered attention from various sources.  Keeping this page allows Wikipedia readers to access valuable information about a prominent innovator in the tech world, preserving his accomplishments for future generations to learn and appreciate.  JaydenPritchard ( talk ) 09:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So it's PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional and non-notable person.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage in reliable independent sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  SoniaSotomayorFan ( talk ) 13:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've deleted some unsourced information.  But still, all the sources are primary sources like LinkedIn, his personal website, etc.  SoniaSotomayorFan ( talk ) 13:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Honestly this should probably have been speedied.  SoniaSotomayorFan ( talk ) 19:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Pure promo, no indication that it meets WP:NBLP .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 20:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamaica–Turkey relations: Most of the actual diplomatic relations in the article isn't specifically about relations between Turkey and Jamaica.  The only thing noteworthy is a bit of trade but that is minuscule compared to the size of the Turkish economy.  Lastly the banned editor had a habit of adding extraordinary long reading list none of which refers to Turkey.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Turkey .  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 05:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions .  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 05:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No good refs.  More importantly, there just doesn't seem to be much of a relationship.  The countries recognize each other legally but neither has an embassy.  Turkish Airlines flies to 124 countries ; Jamaica is not one of them.  Jamaican imports from Turkey <2% of total imports.  Jamaican exports to Turkey were minuscule: $500,000.  On the Turkish side the percentages are infinitesimal.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 08:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aintabli ( talk ) 19:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yu Kwang-jun: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicole Brune: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 01:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Women .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 01:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Googling leads to only social media.  Adler3 ( talk ) 03:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, I'm not clear as to the reason for this or what needs to be done, but I'm happy to make any needed adjustments.   If I'm understanding this, 'darklordofpinup' said this needs to be done?   That name being attached to this issue raises red flags as to the legitimacy of the complaint.   I'm very aware of who is attached to that name and they have a tendency to show up every few years to verbally assault Nicole's carreer until they find a new distraction and show up again years later.   They were recently blocked on instagram due to harrasment.  What is a "sigcov" thanks for the help!  Elcack ( talk ) 21:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Sigcov" is an abbreviation of "significant coverage", and it's one of the requirement for a citation source to be seen as adequate.  You can read more about it in WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 23:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poorly composed article, which relies exclusively on trivial mentions and non-independent sites (like link to purchase product from the subject).  Searching online, I only found more trivial mentions, promotional pieces, and one coverage about a horse racer with the same name.  Seems like a WP:PROMO to me.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 23:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any reliable sources for this comic book artist.  No way to bring this up to notable.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This promotional entry on a non-notable artist Fails WP:GNG , WP:NARTIST , WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO .  I removed the "source" that was a bare url link to an advertorial sales site.  The article is poorly formatted and the current sourcing consists of one trivial mention, one does not mention her at all, and two are photo caption mentions.  Netherzone ( talk ) 15:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wavetick: I would say being founded by Sharooz is a CCS , otherwise I would have used A7 .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 17:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 17:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, I was mulling over a WP:BLAR to the Sharooz article, but so far can not find a single secondary source on it.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jaime Morgan Stubbe: I was unable to find any substantial sources for him.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable and lacks reliable sources.  Aintabli ( talk ) 01:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Law ,  and Puerto Rico .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Redbus Internet Exchange: No WP:SIGCOV could be found on Google, Newspapers.com, or the Times Digital Archive.  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  16:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Internet ,  and England .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  16:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akhil Marar: Being a contestant on Bigg Boss does not establish the notability of the person as WP:BIGBROTHER states that the contestants should not have an article only because of their participation in the program, and all the coverage received for the person is because of his participation in the Bigg Boss.  Ken Tony Shall we discuss?  17:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Kerala .  Ken Tony Shall we discuss?  17:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No independent coverage to meet GNG.  All citations depends on Big Boss and some controversies.  202.164.137.17 ( talk ) 04:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the director of a malayalam Movie Oru Thathvika Avalokanam.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movie-reviews/oru-thathvika-avalokanam/movie-review/88621456.cms Bijzindia ( talk ) 12:48, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nominator, not enough to show WP:GNG is met, nor for WP:FILMMAKER .  Ravensfire ( talk ) 13:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the director of the malayalam movie Oru Thathvika Avalokanam.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movie-reviews/oru-thathvika-avalokanam/movie-review/88621456.cms https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/oru-thathwika-avalokanam-review-joju-george-niranj-raju-pillai-fail-to-save-this-lackluster-movie-7700092/ Bijzindia ( talk ) 14:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE : Only known for participation in Big Boss.  Fails GNG and NACTOR.  103.165.167.187 ( talk ) 09:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the director of a malayalam Movie Oru Thathvika Avalokanam.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movie-reviews/oru-thathvika-avalokanam/movie-review/88621456.cms Bijzindia ( talk ) 12:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete