hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Hylics : -- Ap m h 20:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Ap m h 20:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DuckDuckGo query yields mostly dictionary definitions, religious sites of indeterminate reliability, and info on the game of the same name.  Tempted to propose merge into or with related concept Pneumatic (Gnosticism) , but I haven't thought this through yet.  Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs ) 20:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , cannot find sources/coverage relating to the word from Google, as per nom and Wp:WORDISSUBJECT Karnataka ( talk ) 20:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Bartolin Jr. : Joeykai ( talk ) 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Travel and tourism , Colorado , Michigan , Ohio , Tennessee ,  and West Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , and likely WP:UPE .  He's the CEO of a hotel called The Broadmoor and the article was written by

Discussion outcome: delete
PBM (band) : Since the former deletion, there is no source for passing WP: GNG and WP: NMUSIC .  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Michigan .  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Per former nominations and deletions via AFD.  I commend WP: SALT Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT if necessary.  I voted to delete in the 2020 AfD for this band and my reasoning is exactly the same now.  They have indeed released several albums and played many shows, but the reliable music media simply has not noticed.  And again, "shared the stage with prominent musicians" is irrelevant if it was at large festivals or if they were the cost-saving local opening act.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 02:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with Otuọcha and Doomsdayer: this band lacks significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources ( WP:GNG is not met); and it doesn't approach any of the alternative criteria at WP:NMUSIC .  However, this is only the first recreation after deletion, which occurred over 4 years ago.  I'm not sure this namespace is problematic enough to require WP:SALT .  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 17:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets GNG, and I made some improvements.  Eastview2018 ( talk ) 19:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relistiing to assess content changes since nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : AllMusic reviews are iffy for reliability, the rest are promotional pieces.  This is the only mention of them I can find [20] , I suppose it's a RS. I don't see much of anything else.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : strong delete, I can't find any real coverage of this band from reliable outlets online.  InDimensional ( talk ) 13:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hassan Ben Badida : It's been repeatedly draftified / declined at AfC, so I thought an AfD discussion to establish a consensus on notability would probably be more useful than moving it to draft yet again.  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Morocco .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Higly unlikely to pass WP:GNG , the sources added seem to fail WP:RS .  The article is looking like WP:PROMOTION .  Drat8sub ( talk ) 15:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Living educational theory : There also seems to be *a lot* of synthesis and/or original research.  Finally, I think its notability is questionable; at the very least, I'm concerned that the article is overly focused on Barry's work instead of, say, Whitehead's.  BalinKingOfMoria ( talk ) 23:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH .  Also, created mostly by an WP:SPA , which doesn't really contribute to objectivity attempt.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 12:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:OR Karnataka ( talk ) 22:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carl Frederik Waage Beck : Fails ARTIST , SIGCOV and GNG .  Nirva20 ( talk ) 04:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Nirva20 ( talk ) 04:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Denmark .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Of the four references in the article, the first is self-published, the second is inaccessible, and the last two (the BBC and New York Times) don't even seem to mention this person.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 13:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject fails WP:GNG .  There is no reliable sourcing that the subject is part of the incident described in the article - Iraqi refugees removed from a Danish church).  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A Neumann & Associates : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete miles away from meeting WP:CORP .  SmartSE ( talk ) 00:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass WP:NCORP TipsyElephant ( talk ) 02:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable entity BoraVoro ( talk ) 15:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sign of reliable third-party coverage.  Current sources are all self-written entries in listings.  Pichpich ( talk ) 22:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is no claim of notability and none of the sources that would be necessary to support the claim are here.  Alansohn ( talk ) 04:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramjas School, Anand Parbat : However, Ramjas School, Pusa Road also has a controversy (over fees) and Ramjas College seems notable.   All three are run by Ramjas Foundation.   So it might be worth creating a Ramjas Foundation page to link to all three (and any other Ramjas operated establishments).  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 16:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Namak Haraam (TV series) : Tag and Prod challenged by IP so here now at AfD.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A simple search of this name takes me to Pakistani drama and to an Indian movie.  I am not able to find any reliable source on this Indian series.  The current sources on the page have no coverage and fails to merit this Indian series its own article.  Fails WP:N and WP:SIGCOV .  RangersRus ( talk ) 19:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 20:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not even on IMDb.  Killarnee ( talk ) 22:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines; no relevant entries.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 20:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Big Bear Grizzly: Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , United States of America ,  and California .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Big Bear Lake, California .  This paper dates back to 1941, and is clearly the newspaper of record for the city.  IAR , I do not like deleting such articles, since we are likely to cite them in coverage of topics relating to the city.  That said, I really struggled to find sources.  There is a paragraph on the newspaper's name and basic details in this book on newspaper names , but that's not quite WP:SIGCOV .  There is coverage of ownership change here , but it only mentions the newspaper once as part of a group, so that doesn't count either.  This 1978 article (continued here ) talks about someone being allegedly fired because of the newspaper's reporting, but there's nothing we'd use it for in the article per WP:NOTNEWS , so it seems like it'd be cheating a bit to try to use it for notability.  There is almost surely significant coverage in Big Bear: Bearly Remembered , a 319-page history of the city, but I haven't been able to access it ( offline sources count , if they can be proved to exist ).  The best bet for saving this would be to get access to that book, and to hope it leads to a second source somewhere.  Taking stock of all that, what we have is a topic that's notable in the generic, non-jargon sense, but where the sourcing doesn't quite add up to Wikipedia notability — yet, from what we can access online.  The paper also clearly deserves coverage in the city's article (not mentioned there currently, but it's standard practice to cover news organizations in city articles; also keep in mind that, with a population of 5,000 people, the due bar is not high).  These factors make it very ripe for merging as an ATD .  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 18:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found three sources that provide information on this newspaper and added two of them to the article.  See talk page.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 20:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those look like unreliable database entries to me.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 23:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Agree with Sdkb 's asessment above.  Totnes Times was another recent similar merge.  Willing to change to keep if SIGCOV is found.  — siro χ o 23:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Democratic Taiwan: In summary, the article lacks reliable third-party sources for an effective introduction.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 02:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's profoundly difficult to search for sources as someone who doesn't read much Chinese because '民主台灣' appears to be a generic term as well.  In absence of improved sources during this discussion, I think a merge to Organization for the Support of Democratic Movement in Taiwan would suffice for now.  — siro χ o 07:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Due to the Chinese article being tagged with a notability template and my inability to find suitable Chinese sources, I have initiated a deletion discussion on the English Wikipedia.  The Chinese article is also likely to be nominated for deletion tomorrow.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 10:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge concur with

Discussion outcome: merge
Huawei Mate 8: A possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Huawei Mate series but I was unsure about that, especially as this is wholly unsourced.  Boleyn ( talk ) 07:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Technology ,  and Computing .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete or merge' per nomination.  Artem.G ( talk ) 11:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Kyle Katarn: Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 21:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While the sourcing in this article IS indeed terrible, a cursory glance at Google News shows a large amount of discussion, albeit it can be hard to see the trees amongst the Valnet forest. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 09:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Merge A closer examination of the google sources shows that there's not actually that much said about him as a character, at least enough to really work for SIGCOV. If they utilize him in the films or current canon that may change, but for now it doesn't feel like it's there.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 04:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Star Wars: Jedi Knight .  I am unconvinced that he is standalone notable - SIGCOV could not be found.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to Star Wars: Jedi Knight .  Majority of article is in-universe content and reception is pretty threadbare.  Beating a 40-year-old game character in a fan poll is hardly worth writing home about.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of rampage killers (workplace violence in the military): Fails WP:NLIST , as there is not RS coverage of the items on the list being covered as a group, and this is just a WP:OR list of items.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Crime ,  and Military .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of rampage killers per nom, since there doesn't seem to be any source on the notability of this grouping that I can find.  List of rampage killers is itself a hopeless mess of OR and ambiguity (it lumps together mass shooters, aircraft hijackings, certain terrorist attacks, and at least one disgraced shaman who poisoned his village ), but it's easier to clean up one overbroad list than two.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom.  There is no value in this list and it is most certainly not discussed as a group in RS.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 16:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Major League Baseball 2K9 Fantasy All-Stars: https://web.archive.org/web/20090428142706/http://nds.gamezone.com:80/gamesell/pro4013.htm QuietCicada ( talk ) 21:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Baseball .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 21:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Major League Baseball 2K9#DS spin-off per WP:ATD .  The game doesn't seem notable, but is worthy of mention.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Major League Baseball 2K9#DS spin-off per WP:ATD .  This game doesn't have WP:GNG coverage to support a standalone article.  User:Let'srun 22:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of most watched television interviews: Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 10:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 10:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm unable to find enough sources to satisfy WP:NLIST .  I was able to find one source in The Standard (Kenya) but it's not a very strong source.  The only other coverage I could find is about the controversy surrounding the Andrew Tate/Tucker Carlson interview which doesn't help satisfy WP:NLIST either.  Qwaiiplayer ( talk ) 14:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of most-watched television broadcasts .  The original version of this page actually had more sources than the current version.  The sourced version of it continued up to 2021, until they were completely gutted by this revision .  The "citations" (which at that point were just numbers encased by brackets) were completely removed here .  As older versions of the article still wouldn't meet WP:NLIST , the revision right before the sources were broken should be merged with the article I mentioned.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 15:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of most-watched television broadcasts as suggested by Deauthorized ( talk · contribs ).  The lack of  references is a problem.  Knitsey ( talk ) 14:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge