hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Slatecut, Indiana: Mangoe ( talk ) 02:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The second source (published in 1995) on this article states that it was simply a post office.  this source on places in Indiana, lists it as a postoffice only.  [34] .  Let's delete this post office.  James.folsom ( talk ) 21:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raja Zulqarnain: Should be redirected to the primary topic Raja Muhammad Zulqarnain Khan .  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 22:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Delete A 12 year old stub MNewnham ( talk ) 19:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Law ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  41.100.198.103 ( talk ) 20:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV.  Sources are dead links and no GNG.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Viviana Campanile Zagorianakou: The coverage that I can find is all very much concentrated around that one event, and is news rather than analysis ( WP:NOTNEWS , and she doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG .  Indeed, practically all of the first page of Google on her is mirrors and copies of this article.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 11:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants , Greece ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I added some references, although they may not be enough to prove notability.  A bit of speculation: If she is still the romantic partner of Ilias Kasidiaris , a former member of parliament who is currently in prison, she may run for office herself.  I will leave it to people who are more familiar with Greek politics than I am to say whether this is likely.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that would fall under WP:TOOSOON , wouldn't it?  That is, we shouldn't have an article because of something that might happen (unless it's been covered extensively as a possibility in sources, so GNG is met that way): if we think she might become notable in the future, the usual pathway would be to delete the article for now but recreate it if/when the situation changes.  We do the same for e.g. sporting events in the far future: we shouldn't create 2048 Olympic Games at the moment, even though it's 100% certain that that topic will pass GNG and need an article in the future.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 14:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete no, it is not even known in Greece, it only appears on gossip sites ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη ( talk ) 23:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not in depth coverage by RS.  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 10:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Electoral history of the Left Front (India): The four parties listed in the article do not have and have not had any ongoing *national* electoral alliance since the first Lok Sabha elections.  The electoral tally in the article is original research .  Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and India .  Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Front (Bharat) is relevant to this AfD.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Goldsztajn Would suggest you to merge both disscussions. Anyways once that page is deleted this too shall be deleted on own. Because if the alliance only never existed then what is the electoral history doing here. Shaan Sengupta Talk 20:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Shaan Sengupta not really sure I understand your suggestion.  As far as I understand (happy to be corrected), it's not possible to merge a deletion discussion with one started earlier. Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 15:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per the AfD outcome of Left Front (India) plus the additional absurdity of retroactively stretching the Left Front back in history before 1977. Also notably CPI(M) and CPI were electoral enemies until 1982, so combining the 2 during the 1970s is completely wrong. -- Soman ( talk ) 21:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as is original research.  Alextejthompson ( Ping me or leave a message on my talk page ) 20:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Goldsztajn and Soman.They were not a united national electoral entity.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Pharaoh of the Wizards @ Alextejthompson @ Goldsztajn @ Soman , Explicit has deleted the article of Left Front (Bharat) .  So I think that any more discussion is not needed.  This too can be deleted.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 02:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wellington Taira: I attempted to search for various formulations of his name, combined with teams that he's played for, including Romanian and Uzbekistani spelling; no meaningful results were forthcoming.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Uzbekistan ,  and Brazil .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – In Brazilian sources I found this article in Lance! covering about his time at Macaé Esporte and transfer to Moldova, a interview in Youtube, some posts in Instagram by account " easy.progress " covering the athlete's moments in Uzbekistan [41] [42] , and a post in LinkedIn showing his presentation at Newroz SC .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That was less than I expected.  Also pinging @ BrazilianDude70 for input Geschichte ( talk ) 12:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Geschichte : I'd say it barely scraps by.  There's another article about him at Linense and two articles about his move to Macaé , with the second one being from the Federação de Futebol do Estado do Rio de Janeiro .  I'd clearly disconsider the Instagram/Youtube sources since they all might be promotional, plus the LinkedIn post might not be a source indeed.  So, keeping the actual "valid" sources, there's four articles: two of them directly mentioning him, and two others with his name amongst others...  BRDude 70 ( talk ) 13:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
N. Satyen: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Karnataka ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably meets WP:CREATIVE for his multiple contributions as cinematographer to notable films (noted here , or here , for example) or  in various books (see GB).  These are passing mentions but they allow verification of his contributions.  Keep .  Worst case scenario, redirect to I Indian cinematographers - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 04:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Two sources in article are database listings, BEFORE showed nothign that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 16:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jimmy Blakeney: Boleyn ( talk ) 21:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to be a NN industry journalist now MNewnham ( talk ) 20:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bader Al-Hagbani: Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Saudi Arabia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article uses a single source, which is the player profile on a blog.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Water Mission: A couple reference different, similarly named projects, but nothing independent about this project.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 14:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riverfront Broadcasting: The current sources are either press releases or are covering routine business transactions, and a BEFORE check didn't come up with much better.  Let'srun ( talk ) 11:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies , Minnesota , Nebraska ,  and South Dakota .  Let'srun ( talk ) 11:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
B. Syed Mohammed Yasin: Has held multiple roles during his tenure at IPS, but all of them are run-of-the-mill posts held by all IPS officers and nothing at the highest levels of the bureaucracy which may have earned him notability.  Is mainly notable for a faux pas when he was unable to identify a state minister.  Fails WP:GNG , adequate references not seen and is mainly created and edited by a single-purpose editor.  Jupitus Smart 13:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , India , Andhra Pradesh ,  and Kerala .  Jupitus Smart 13:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Terrible article, but he did hold the highest possible rank in the Indian Police Service.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He holds distrit's highest rank not national's highest rank.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  15:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Director-General is the highest possible rank in the IPS, which is clearly what I said.  I said "rank", not "post".  Just as an army officer can hold the rank of general and not be head of his nation's army.  But we'd still write an article about him because of his rank, because reaching that rank is a clear indication of notability.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 08:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DGP is the highest rank in the state, but is not holder of the highest position.  Holding the highest rank does not make them automatically notable, though holding the highest post which is the chief of police staff in the state may do so.  Per this list, there are 5 DGPs and 15 ADGPs in the state [76] and Kerala is among the smaller states, and most of the 3200 IPS officers stand a good chance of retiring as an ADGP or DGP.  Besides there are not enough references to indicate WP:N is met.  Jupitus Smart 12:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not seeing notability, I can't find extensive mentions of him, only confirmation that he exists.  Kudos on the bicycle photo though.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per the discussion above, there is no presumed notability.  Per Oaktree b and my own searches, cannot find sufficient information for an article under WP:BASIC .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but clean up is needed.  Looks like an advertisement.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 16:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom does not meet notability guidelines.  Divesome ( talk ) 14:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aidé Mendiola: I am unable to find the in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Genrobotics: Product is not a company started by college students.  All the other awards are non reliable and not helping in notability.  Lordofhunter ( talk ) 05:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India .  Lordofhunter ( talk ) 05:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree, I'm unable to locate any references that aren't just regurgitated PR.  I'm unable to find any in-depth "independent content" , topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 20:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pierralit Tovonay: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources outwith of databases and none that pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 11:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Be With You (JD Allan song): Sources in article and BEFORE do not show WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Only possible redirect is to another AfD JD Allan , so a redirect is only possible if this is kept.  // Timothy :: talk 00:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I was planning to nominate as CSD A9 if that AfD is closed as delete.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 00:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : found no additional coverage or evidence of notability for this single or for JD Allan.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not seeing anything to suggest that this song has anything like the sort of notability that would justify it having an article.  Dunarc ( talk ) 23:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per comments above.  I looked for a possible redirect target, but JD Allan doesn't have an article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sayyad Dadashov: Coverage online in English and Azerbaijani is limited to brief mentions in writeups of Azerbaijani athletes' performance, but does not have significant biographical coverage of the subject.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Azerbaijan .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's a lack of significant independent coverage.   Success at the junior level has never been considered WP notable for martial artists.   As an adult he has competed at one European championship and two world championships, but he didn't even win a single match at any of them.  Papaursa ( talk ) 20:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parcel audit: ~ T P W 18:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not seem to be a common term.  All mentions I find are in Business Wire and other press-release articles.  Not sourced to any RS here either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete