hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Damien Lagrange : Primefac ( talk ) 12:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union ,  and France .  Primefac ( talk ) 12:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  There may be coverage in French sources that I'm not finding, but unless someone finds anything, delete.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Article and BEFORE showed nothing but promo, database, and routine sports news, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 23:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jiabao Li : All of the sources in the article fall into one of three categories: primary (e.g. artworks on the subject's website) aren't independent from the subject (e.g. there's sources from UT Austin, Endless Health, and ONX Studio, but she has a direct connection to all three of these institutions) is a listing (e.g. her name is mentioned on the finalist lists for some awards, but these do not contain in-depth coverage of the subject) A Google search doesn't reveal any sources that meet all three of these criteria, and a scan of her Google Scholar page doesn't reveal any papers that would establish notability.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 01:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SockGPT nonsense.  The Wordsmith Talk to me 03:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your diligence in maintaining the quality and integrity of Wikipedia content.  Since the nomination for deletion, significant updates and improvements have been made to the page to address these issues.  1. Diverse and Independent Sources : The page now includes references from a wide array of credible, independent sources.  This includes coverage in respected museums, well-regarded news outlets, and recognized conferences.  These sources are not affiliated with Jiabao Li or the institutions she is connected to, providing a neutral perspective on her work and contributions.  2. Notability Beyond Academic Publications : For individuals in the fields of art and design, notability can extend beyond academic publications.  Jiabao Li's contributions have been recognized through exhibitions, public talks, and awards, which are crucial indicators of her impact and recognition in her field.  The updated page now features these aspects, supported by credible sources, underscoring her notability from a comprehensive perspective.  The inclusion of these updates is aimed at ensuring that Jiabao Li's Wikipedia page meets the notability criteria by providing verifiable, independent, and significant coverage.  Her contributions to the fields of design, technology, and environmental advocacy are well-documented and recognized by the broader community, making her a notable figure worthy of a Wikipedia entry.  Agnescooper ( talk ) 00:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC) — Agnescooper ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] (

Discussion outcome: delete
Karen Balauf Delaney : No significant coverage in reliable, independent source.  Sabih omar 04:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: initial search indicates coverage in the local suburban newspapers which are WP:RS .  I got better results searching with "Karen Delaney"+sculpture ,.  I have not had time yet to read them.  [21] [22] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Visual arts ,  and United States of America .  — Karnataka talk 07:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The first three citations for "Art Watch" are the exact same article but in 3 different newspapers (Kennett Times, Unionville Times and Chesco Times), which makes me wonder if they are all based on the same press release, or if these 3 papers are subsidiaries of a larger publishing group, or? ) Either way, they should not be considered as three separate citations to determine notability.  The 4th ref (also Unionville Times) is simply a name check mention of her name.  I'll continue to look online (and at the refs A.B. mentions above.) I noticed that she uses two names, Karen Balauf Delaney, and also simply Karen Delaney.  Netherzone ( talk ) 00:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Art Watch article is a promotional piece written by Lele Galer, and her motivation becomes clear when you check the note at the end, which says, "Please come meet Karen and see her latest work at Galer Estate Winery this Thursday on Halloween from 5-9pm! Local Art Watch highights (sic, in all 3 versions) one local artist every week. Lele Galer is an artist who has chaired numerous art shows..."  Sabih omar 03:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Created by now-blocked acct and likely fanpage and/or promo.  Insufficient sources, low page views, no real assertion of notability etc. 128.252.210.3 ( talk ) 17:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough to support notability.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Juliana Blou : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Tura Magic FC article, coverage is all about her performance with the club (mostly game match descriptions).  [33] Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no article for the women's team to redirect to; there's barely an article for the club at large.  - Socccc ( talk ) 17:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Publications that cover the Namibia Women's Super League haven't provided SIGCOV of Blou.  With today's news that NFA failed to register Tura Magic for Cosafa Champions League before deadline , there probably won't be any imminent coverage either.  - Socccc ( talk ) 17:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Socccc : Damn, that must be incredibly frustrating for the players and coaches.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lists of abbreviations used on British Empire World War I medals : Keith H99 ( talk ) 12:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I had some challenges with the nomination, so I may have inadvertently nominated it more than once.  That I can tell, it's an article that not been nominated prior to today, and has been generally ignored.  The Article is a long list that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, for each and every item.  This duplicates content from other sites, or hosts POV on interpretation, and is best consigned to the trash can, as I perceive it.  Keith H99 ( talk ) 12:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The incorrect information in the article prompted me to take a look at the Silver War Badge article.  This needed reworking, which has been done.  That article could be corrected, I fail to see that as plausible for this article, hence nomination for deletion.  Keith H99 ( talk ) 16:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is a single usable reference in this article, to the National Archives [4] , and that content sensibly is not quoted or summarized (because it can't be).  This reference could be included with a single sentence at Awards and decorations of the British Armed Forces .  All the rest of the article is unsourced, and probably would violate WP:NOTCATALOG if it were sourced by just replicating a complete list of unannotated items found in the original.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 06:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clear violation of WP:NOT .  Whether this is a directory or extract from the table of a textbook, it is not an encyclopaedic article.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 07:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wenche-Lin Hess : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Norway .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I could only find passing mention in one book, which mentions she finished 16th in a competition (the book discusses the athlete she knocked out, so very brief) Kingsif ( talk ) 00:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added an article about her return to competition in 2019.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Zero independent sources containing SIGCOV.  The newest source is just a couple passing mentions in an article about her partner's return to sport.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NOLY and more broadly WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Rollins Barker : Ambassadors are not inherently notable nor does WP:NPOL apply.  No coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Mauritius , Somalia , Tanzania , Greece ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per Nomination.  Fails WP:GNG , WP:NPOL .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 07:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG and I could not find any sources with a Gsearch Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Szervác : Namecruft that fails WP:NNAME , WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG .  No reliable sources outside of databases, and even then not many are reliable.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NNAME and the targeted links don't even have en-wikipedia articles (two Commons pages and a Hungarian wikipedia link with no actual article).  So no evidence of notability or need for this page.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 05:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet WP:NNAME .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Kolonia : Sources 1 and 2 are primary, and sources 3 and 4 are not even about the embassy.  fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Oceania ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thandeka Ndlovu : As always, television characters do not automatically get their own standalone biographies as topics independent of the show they were in just because they "existed" -- fictional characters can qualify for articles that demonstrate and properly source some genuine analysis of their real-world impact , but do not get standalone articles if you just write a fansite-style "biography" listing a few in-universe facts about their fictional lives sourced nowhere at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Africa .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there are a number of real people with the same name, some of whom are possibly notable, but this fictional character isn’t.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  Fails WP:GNG , bad case of WP:FANCRUFT .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which speedy deletion criterion applies?  Jclemens ( talk ) 02:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of the most popular given names of Kazakh women of Kazakhstan : Strongly fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Names are even in Cyrillic, so not readable for most readers of an encyclopedia that uses a Latin alphabet.  I am also nominating: List of the most popular given names of Kazakh men of Kazakhstan ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Geschichte ( talk ) 16:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Kazakhstan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of the names are redlinks and these topics do not show any signs of notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 22:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Would be a pain to continually update as well.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sign of notability.  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:DIR .  In 2024, everyone knows: we are not a directory like this list.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phoenix Engine : ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Blitzfan51 speak to the manager 19:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harsh Beniwal : The references on the page and what I find online all fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA with bylines indicating they are press pieces or have no editorial oversight.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Everyone I would like to participate in this discussion on wether to keep this article or not, Firstly I have created this article Harsh Beniwal because he is a popular youtuber in India, and his YouTube channel have more than 16 Million subscribers (including his second channel) and also his views are more than 1.8 Billion , which is a huge number I think and he also worked in a Superhit Indian film Student of the Year 2 .  I also believe that he has not proper coverage in Indian News Media, but I think that he may be notable for wikipedia.  Thank you WikiAnchor10 ( talk ) 06:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no have any reliable source, some source are gossip material Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Deleted in previous AFDs so Soft Deletion is not an option here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not much coverage in reliable sources and views/subscribers don't really contribute to notability.  His award and his film roles are minor.  Mooonswimmer 14:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (and salt).   Still fails WP:GNG .  Edwardx ( talk ) 23:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG acting roles were minor fails WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thinvent : Pepper Beast (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and India .  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I could find apart from the company's own site was a Crunchbase entry (not RS) and a couple of product reviews.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ANI News and Globalnewswire are the only sources found, both are PR pieces.  Delete for lack of sourcing, no coverage in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 18:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete