hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2wenty: Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, seems to exist only to promote the subject F ASTILY 20:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Photography ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any RS in a WP:BEFORE .  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 22:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Netherzone ( talk ) 01:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not pass WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG .  All I'm finding in a BEFORE search are primary sources, user-submitted content, hyper-local coverage and the like, rather than SIGCOV in reliable sources.  Netherzone ( talk ) 01:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Same as above.  I am not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources, just blogs and the like.  The best thing I found was this brief item from Wired but that is just a single, short source, far less than there has been for other articles that have been deleted.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 02:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found nothing.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 20:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Selorm Kuadey: Only news pre-death seem to be his signing which is routine/ WP:MILL coverage.  The contesting of the PROD initially placed on the article would seem to indicate that because of his manner of death he is notable, but I would counter that it would then be a borderline BLP1E case if the only significant coverage is for that single event.  Primefac ( talk ) 11:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Primefac ( talk ) 11:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While the majority of coverage found is waited to his untimely passing, there does seem to be some coverage of his career outside of his passing also, along with the extensive coverage of his death.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep More sources would help this article.  If more sporting statistics can be found, then add those as well.  More info about the subject”s death would also be recommended.  Pablothepenguin ( talk ) 16:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Very little in the way of statistics.  He played one season for England U20 in 2007, can’t find any stats on that.  17 total appearances for Sale with two tries.  https://www.itsrugby.co.uk/players/selorm-kuadey-4460.html RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 19:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in the article are stats and obits, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV.  Two Keep votes found no sources during their BEFOREs so there is nothing else to eval.  // Timothy :: talk 18:30, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : Doesn't care about the article's itself.  It did fail WP:GNG .  Agreed with Timothy.  CastJared ( talk ) 17:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only the one BBC article meets the RS criteria, and I can't find any other source mentioning Kuadey.  SWinxy ( talk ) 02:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WCPX-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Ohio .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn’t find sources that justify keeping it in.  Danubeball ( talk ) 20:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ri Hyong-jin: Simione001 ( talk ) 20:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 20:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 20:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 20:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scene description language: A PROD was removed on this article without any sourcing changes.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 13:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nomination.  Maybe worth adding an entry to the Glossary of computer graphics , not sure about the article.  Artem.G ( talk ) 15:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loft design by: I tried again online but the name of the business is a bit too basic to make that easy.   Perhaps there are offline sources.  ~ T P W 18:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 18:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete They retired the brand in 2018 [20] , [21] .  That's all the coverage I can find; not even sure a redirect to the new company name would meet notability standards.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - some references online but not enough to support notability.  No article on French Wiki.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Vogue article might just satisfy WP:NCORP 's guidelines but cannot find any other coverage that does.  If the new brand ever meets it, a redirect would be appropriate.  — siro χ o 21:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Future of Oil: Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No book reviews found, even in . ca websites.  Can only find use of the phrase.  Delete for lack of sourcing, not meeting BOOK.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Environment .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I could only find one book review from a non-reliable source.  4 out of 7 sources are from the author of the book itself.  Does not appear to meet WP:N .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 18:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Couldn't find anything to meet WP:NBOOK , though the title doesn't exactly make it an easy search.  Happy new year!  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  03:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Kensei: Could not find SIGCOV about him.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Japan ,  and United States of America .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Icingtons: Both references are not for the actual subject of the article.  Google returns basically nothing.  Google books returns nothing relevant.  Best I can tell this is not a real thing.  B roken S egue 01:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete this does appear to be a hoax.  Simply nothing other than a few social media mentions, a cake shop in New Zealand that uses it in the name, etc.   The article currently has two sources: searching in Google Books [32] version of Cinderella Dreams for the term yields no result searching for the term in the Sugarpaste reference yields no hit [33] - even if this is a failing of OCR if it was used a few times I think we'd see it Oblivy ( talk ) 03:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and add to WP:HOAXLIST : An IP editor who claims to be the page creator said it was likely a hoax: [34] Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 05:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article is 16 years old, making it quite a long-lasting hoax.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 18:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] a 16-year old hoax is still a hoax!!  albeit a believable one.  Delete.  FlyingScotsman72 ( talk ) 08:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Apologies if that came off as sarcastic, I was genuinely remarking on how long the hoax existed.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 23:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alaa Sarhan: BangJan1999 01:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Egypt .  BangJan1999 01:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the last discussion, less than a month ago: ""Les sources ne montrent pas qu'il aurait reçu des prix. Notoriété à vérifier sérieusement. Canular ?"  The sources do not indicate that he's won prizes.  Notoriety needs serious verification.  Hoax/prank?  was the reason given in the Fr wiki deletion discussion.  I'm going to say it's not notable here either.  They tag it and if it doesn't get updated, it gets auto deleted after a year (since) that it's been tagged, which is different than what we use here. " Hoax prizes, non-useful sourcing. SALT. Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also: "  No sourcing find for this person.  Not sure what sourcing we're using as notability, I can't find anything.  The Fr wiki template searches the BnF (nothing turns up), Persee (nothing turns up) and other sites.  If this person was this well-known, I'd expect something in French-African sources.  Another drapeau rouge red flag.  Zut alors!"  Lack of sources/appears to be a hoax prize.  Deleted in the Fr wiki.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per previous discussion.  Alaa Sarhan is no more notable than he was the last time.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – If you can't notice, the article is a mess, its like, He was born in Mansoura, Egypt , other than IMDb, which is generally unreliable, the first source states that he was born in a non existent city, based on the governorate Mansoura is in.  Nevertheless, there aren't any related articles for the Arabic and Egyptian Arabic Wikis, where such content would be at.  The creator also messed with sources, poorly citing material in text and otherwise there aren't much sources other than Arabic ones.  ToadetteEdit ( chat ) / ( logs ) 15:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article is not very notable.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 00:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per previous discussion.  -- Karim talk to me :). .!  10:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Priti Jain: Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 04:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Medicine , India ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable physician.  No significant coverage, awards, positions, or research that would contribute towards notability.  Mooonswimmer 14:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frana Marija Vranković: 2 sources, both of which don't have the greatest quality.  Doesn't pass GNG.  Article also has many mistakes.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  21:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and Croatia .  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  21:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S. the creator is User:Fmv~enwiki .  The initials of Frana are FMV.  Coincidence?  I think not!  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  21:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources don't support that WP:NBIO is met.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oyebanji Akins: Sources are paid, promotional and unreliable puff pieces.  BEFORE makes no difference.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "Bridging cultural divides" and 10 things I should know about him, the typical flowery language from Nigerian sources.  I don't se notability when the fluffy language is removed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per norm.  Sources are WP:PAID and regular Run of the Mill .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 19:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a critic does not inherit notability from reviewing other people's work; they get it for reliable sources about them and their writing .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WFRZ-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Alabama .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monirul Molla: This may be a WP:TOOSOON situation, but realistically, I think it just fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Poor and unreliable sources failing WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  The player also does not meet the basic criteria of notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails GNG and I can't find any good sources online.  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 16:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WNYN-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 17:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MIPIM: Other sources do not treat the subject in depth.  Does not meet WP:NCORP --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 15:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls , Events , Business , France ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IDEA1: The original paper received only few citations.  Non-notable.  Broc ( talk ) 11:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Software ,  and France .  Broc ( talk ) 11:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clearer Group: Doesn't pass WP:CORP .  Uhooep ( talk ) 12:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Northern Ireland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not even an attempt to indicate anything that the company is notable for, only that it exists and operates.  Straight up business directory listing .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fairly ROTM small water/drinks bottling company that, apart from its start as a social enterprise (prior to 2022 acquisition), is otherwise a fairly standard local/regional business.  With less than 50 employees, the only coverage I can find is the usual "press release republished in local/regional papers" type stuff we might expect for any similar business.  I've added some of this coverage to the article (Where it barely provides enough to cover the text/content - and does very little to establish/support notability).  The COI/SPA/PAID/PROMO overtones, clear in the article's initial creation, are also hard to overlook.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 14:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NCORP as references do not meet the requirement of WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete