hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Alexandr Levintsov: Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Skating , Poland ,  and Ukraine .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 21:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , found zero sources through online searches.  Toadspike [Talk] 22:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , an AfD on this topic was closed as no consensus due to lack of participation recently, and this one was veering towards the same fate (potentially).  I find the nomination persuasive and, while I am no subject matter expert, I was also unable to find significant coverage in third party sources as required by GNG.  Daniel ( talk ) 23:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sonwabo Majola: It is likely he goes by a nickname.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Back Alley Blitz (Friday Night Funkin' OST album): The notability claim here is that it exists, which is not automatically enough all by itself, but the article is referenced entirely to primary source online music download platforms that are not support for notability, with not a shred of WP:GNG -building coverage about it shown at all.  Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to be the subject of coverage and analysis in real media independent of itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Video games .  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable sources TarkusAB talk / contrib 23:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There doesn't seem to be a grasp of reliable sourcing here - fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ic this is somehow kept it should be moved to Back Alley Blitz . -- 65.93.194.183 ( talk ) 15:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No reliable sources in the article, and I cannot turn up any myself.  Fails GNG and NALBUM.  WJ94 ( talk ) 14:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suneeta Gupta: Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 05:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Politics , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 05:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Chairperson of municipal council from a local area is not a role that confers notability.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 08:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:NPOL and the supplied sources don't help the subject to meet WP:GNG .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 12:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As a politician, fails WP:NPOL .  Gothamk ( talk ) 05:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raj Barman: Gsearch goes straight to his website, then social media.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - All of the sources are song-related updates.  no WP:SIGCOV .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 09:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Existing sources are not SIGCOV, nothing else helpful turns up on a quick search.  — siro χ o 06:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rievaldo Doorson: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found a passing mention in The Sun , which is not WP:RS , and that's about it.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WALTR: Sources are routine news coverage.  Developer also has no article, so no reasonable redirect term.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 10:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NSOFT .  Owen× ☎ 14:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I looked for sources, and all that comes up is Mac World, Cult of Mac, Mac Rumors, and similar sources.  I'd say merge with the article about Softorino, but that doesn't exist, and Softorino also doesn't seem to be notable.  Cortador ( talk ) 13:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ultimate Knight Windom XP: Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROD .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 17:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 17:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Google gave me a bunch of results for unrelated games on ModDB, and WP:LIBRARY isn't really helping.  Fails GNG .  🌙 E cl i ps e ( talk ) ( contribs ) 14:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Checked archive.org magazine scans & google, found no coverage.  Seems completely non-notable.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 23:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacob Borden: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Searches online and in the Virgin Islands Daily News turned up nothing more than passing mentions.  I also searched for coverage about his time at Indiana Wesleyan but found nothing significant.  -- MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Couldn't find any GNG passing sources in article, search, etc.  Borden is not mentioned at United States Virgin Islands national soccer team , so wouldn't be a good redirect target.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 05:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 09:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the reasons cited above.  Noneate ( talk ) 10:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mert Göksu: MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Neither source independent, written by an SPA, and probably PROMO.  small jars t c 13:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete typical PROMO.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the editor who saw this page through new page review and put the notability tag on.  I'd like to comment that the author kept adding promotional content and unnecessary external links, to the point where I almost triggered 3RR removing them.  Due to this, this seems like a strong COI to me.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not enough or reliable sources exist.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 23:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hue people: At best, this is original research by the article's original creator.  At worse, this is an intentional attempt to mislead, as an IP editor alleged early on in the page's life.  — C.Fred ( talk ) 02:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions .  — C.Fred ( talk ) 02:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - C.Fred put a lot of work into researching this and I looked into this also.  When the article was proposed for deletion, I left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vietnam#Proposed for deletion: Hue people.  asking for input.  The article says there were 1,153,795 Hue people in 2021 and that they live in Thừa Thiên-Huế province .  2 years later our article for the province said its population was 1,272,621 people.  It seems like this article is conflating the inhabitants of the province with this supposed ethnic group.  The photo's file history says it was taken from a provincial government website: https://sdl.https://sdl.thuathienhue.gov.vn/? gd=4&cn=220&tc=85594/? gd=4&cn=220&tc=85594 A machine translation of the page shows it's about the "Hue people" but reading it in context, I think it really means "the people of Hue".  I went through all 31 cited references; they contain interesting about local food architecture, etc.  None of them support the idea of a separate ethnic group called "Hue people".  None support the idea that all these people speak the Cham language or the Khmer language and not the Vietnamese language .  Our article, List of ethnic groups in Vietnam , does not mention a "Hue people".  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , a muddle created by WP:OR and confusion between province and people.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 15:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Thừa Thiên Huế province ; a lot of this material could be used to improve coverage of its demographics and culture.  I agree this article basically seems to be about the people of the province.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Indefensible .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 12:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is a hoax.  DHN ( talk ) 22:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Morse (California attorney): Possible WP:BLP1E .   I removed some scandalous content which was unsourced, but presumably mentioned in Larry J. Kolb 's book.   No other sources.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm unsure if this is the same individual mentioned here in connection with the 1992 riots in LA [13] ; regardless, it's a name drop.  What's used in the article now is simply a biography of a working lawyer.  I don't see notability and the lack of sourcing doesn't help.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Businesspeople , Law , Massachusetts ,  and Mississippi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've added two cites, one of which seems to be significant coverage, but limited to the beating in Mississippi (no kidnapping mentioned).   There's also this which I can't find online.  Associated Press (A.P.), “Beating Charged,” Clarion-Ledger (Jackson MS), October 22, 1964, p. 16.  Oblivy ( talk ) 04:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is barely verifiable (but not through sources contributing to notability) that the 1960s Stanford Frank Morse had the middle name Patrick [14] , that the civil rights activist and beating victim was named Frank Morse and was from California, that Frank Patrick Morse is an attorney based in Beverly Hills [15] and was connected to some of the named companies.  I could not verify any connection to UC Irvine (COI: my employer).  None of the legal work removed from the article nor any of its material after the 1960s looks to make any case at all for notability.  All we have left to base an article on is the civil rights story and a long "where are they now" WP:SYNfest .  And I don't think we have enough detail on the civil rights story to rise above WP:BIO1E .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for inability to meet WP:BASIC , and probably WP:BLP1E as well.   I was holding off to see if anyone found more sources, but I agree with @ David Eppstein this is really a where-are-they-now article for somebody who even at the time was pretty obscure.  Happy to reconsider if more sources are found.  Oblivy ( talk ) 14:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dinesh Sabnis: The coverage is all promotional in low-quality sources, and notability is not inherited from membership in organizations.  — Lights and freedom ( talk ~ contribs ) 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  — Lights and freedom ( talk ~ contribs ) 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Sportspeople .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Claiming to be notable, but the article reads like a resume with point form/bullet points.  Can't find anything about this individual in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As per the nomination.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 07:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Donna Ryu: .  "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 ( talk ) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  Snickers2686 ( talk ) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Found some passing mentions about this person, but nothing more than that.  Subject does not pass WP:JUDGE or WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 01:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP - — Maile ( talk ) 03:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Maile66 why?  JM ( talk ) 21:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] JM2023 are you asking because I didn't specify a reason?  I did that deliberately, because I just didn't want to get into a round-robin discussion about "not inherently notable".   Be that as it may, I think her overall body of work is impressive - at least, as far as the info given in this article.  In particular, her work on behalf of "Coalition on Homelessness v. City and County of San Francisco".  — Maile ( talk ) 23:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In that case, perhaps that case should have the article, not the living person, per WP:BLP1E .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] indeed JM ( talk ) 19:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep the coverage in the Coalition on Homelessness case rises to the level of GNG.  -- Nouspleut ( talk ) 20:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: delete
FirstVIEW: Doesn't meet WP:NWEB or WP:GNG .  I can't find any RS online nor on article.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Websites .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Other than its own web site I found nothing.  It seems to still be active, and its main product appears to be licensing photos of fashion shows.  That's all I can glean.  Lamona ( talk ) 22:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete