List of Fate/Grand Order characters: The bigger issue though is a notability one: while Fate itself definitely has reactions, the harder argument is that FGO's characters on their own do in an overarching way that makes it work for WP:N or WP:LISTN .  Even reception for Mash and Ritsuka would be more for them, and that could be worked into the parent game article (and as someone that tried to do a writeup on Mash, I'm not confident the sources are there) Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 02:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 02:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect The article is massive with no substance, cites all of ONE source (Anime News Network), and it might as well be written in Martian for people like me who know nothing about the games.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 03:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Changing my vote to redirect.  Why the flip do I keep forgetting this is an option?  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 03:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, article doesn't explain why this is a notable list/topic either.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 04:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - I don't think it should be deleted, per WP:PRESERVE and WP:CHEAP , since it does have somewhere to be redirected to, which is the main Fate/Grand Order article.  While I find WP:TNT to be applied far too often to articles that are not in a very good state, I think this one of those articles that actually deserves it, should it ever be spun back out.  Mash and Ritsuka might be better off with their own articles in this case.  MoonJet ( talk ) 08:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per MoonJet - despite character lists being valid spin-offs, Wikipedia isn't TVTropes and there has to be something to go on to show notability.  As it is, people are better served by checking the TVTropes character list.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Nothing more to say.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 23:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  While there is lot of plot summary fancruft, I think this passes NLIST.  Aside of numerous game guides/tier lists and such that one can easily find, here are some more analytical sources.  Granted, some are not great (listiclis is common here), but IMHO likely sufficient for keeping this as a stand-alone list.  Here's a list of best sources I found - I think it gets stronger near the end :P  1) TheGamer 2020 - not a listicle: " Fate/Grand Order: My Servants Have My Back " 2) ScreenRant 2020 listicle - but I think it counts for NLIST: " Fate/Grand Order's Weirdest Real-Life Historical Figures " 3) TheGamer 2020 - article about a specific minor character How Lobo Broke (Then Fixed) My Heart In Fate/Grand Order " 4) GameRant 2023 listicle " Fate Grand Order: Best 5-Star Servants In The Game " 5) ScreenRant 2022 listicle " Fate/Grand Order: The Top 10 Servants Coming to English, Ranked " 5) CBR 2020 listicle (overalps with TV show but IMHO still relevant) " Fate/Grand Order - Absolute Demonic Front: Babylonia: Character Guide To Every Servant " 6) academic (if likely low tier journal) article profiling another FGO minor character: Baihaqi, Iqbal, Hafiz Aziz Ahmad, and Dana Waskita. "Adaptation of historical figures into mobile game characters (case study: Hijikata Toshizo from Fate/Grand Order). " Journal of Games, Game Art, and Gamification 7, no. 2 (2022): 21-28.  7) another academic article this time covering multiple characters Tomotani, João V., and Rodrigo Brincalepe Salvador.  "Testing the Astolfo Effect on newly-released servants in Fate/Grand Order." (2022).  8) again, an academic study of one of the characters Yosugandi, Evan Marchel, and Hendra Kaprisma.  "Historical figures in “Fate/Grand Order”: adapting Anastasia Romanova."  RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism 28, no. 4 (2023): 712-723.  9) there are various more or less SIGCOV-meeting discussions of FGO characters in a number of other academic works, I'll just leave two examples: academic book chapter on Community-based history learning: Fate/Grand Order's Online Fan Networks and an academic article Informal Strategies for Learning History in Japanese Mass Media Visual Culture: A Case Study of the Mobile Game Fate/Grand Order .  PS.  Last thought: this list is linked from Fate/Grand Order - Absolute Demonic Front: Babylonia which otherwise might need its own list.  Even more relevant is Fate/Grand Order: Final Singularity-Grand Temple of Time: Solomon which features brief appearances of many characters.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ping participants so you can review my argument/sources: @ Beemer69 @ Greenish Pickle! @ Kung Fu Man @ MoonJet @ Traumnovelle @ Wcquidditch @ Zxcvbnm Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I feel like some of these may work for individual character articles, but a bigger issue is that a lot of these are either about the game or the Fate franchise itself. Like the Astolfo article isn't commentary about the characters, but how introducing a new character into Fate as a series often supercedes search results for the real world counterpart (the Astolfo effect as it were, which is due to a character that originated from *another* Fate work). As useful as a lot of these can be for specific character, even I'm wary about the idea on building a list up on primarily valnet lists Piotrus...and I'm usually in favor of using Valnet as a source.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 03:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and cleanup/expand per Piotrus.  When someone who often advances a TNT argument on fictional topics thinks this is salvageable, we should listen.  Jclemens ( talk ) 15:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This reminds me of the case with the deletion request regarding the List of Paper Mario characters article in where while the initial article seems to be that of an unnoteworthy subject, references are clearly evident with Piotrus but that this article could use a rewrite in order to comply with notability standards as it's in a rough state as of writing this.  SuperSkaterDude45 ( talk ) 23:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect The article is long.  I'll give the creator of it that.  But it lacks sources.  I agree with the nom as the main source is Anime News Network.  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 12:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It seems like a split consensus between redirect and keep.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Keep .   LISTN specifically sets out lists where each individual member might not be notable, but the collective as a whole is notable, as a valid case.   I think that personally, FGO should be banned or the like (& other gacha), but it grudgingly is a big deal with zillions of dollars flowing around.   Sourcing is certainly tricky due to the game's most devoted fanbase being in Japan, but I have no doubt that a reception-of-the-FGO characters section can be written, albeit possibly with Japanese sources in addition to the ones linked by Piotrus above.   (Of course, I agree that part of the issue is that the reception is tied up across appearances across the franchise, so maybe there needs to be "Characters of Fate" article...  but it seems the existing style is separate articles per work, since stay/night has its own separate characters article.  And this article is already very long, and would get longer if it was turned into "Characters of Fate".  Oh well.).  SnowFire ( talk ) 17:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per the sources uncovered here since my initial redirect vote, I'm in favor of keeping this.  Though, it does need a lot of clean-up.  MoonJet ( talk ) 17:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , but needs both a "Design" chapter and a "Reception" chapter to better demonstrate notability.  From the discussion above, I believe there are plenty of sources for these chapters.  Supergrey1 ( talk ) 15:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep