Karin Vogel: A reporter did some OR and identified what he thought was the last in the line of succession.  In reality the lne of succession is almost infinite, if one whole line died out the rules allow succession to be tracked back to earlier monarchs and through wider family connections.  This is just trivial nonsense.  Was PRODed and dePRODded before, hence this AfD.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Germany .  Velella Velella Talk 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notability is established by all the media coverage already cited in the article, including an article in The Wall Street Journal .  Contrary to the nominator's claim, the line of succession is distinctly finite.  It consists only of descendants of Sophia of Hanover .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Interesting human interest story, but without much more, I don't see notability.  Medical therapist interviewed a decade ago with nothing since, I don't see sustained coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : 4972nd in line, if that helps.  Could be a one line mention in an article about the monarchy, but that's all.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Succession to the British throne , a sentence on the lines of "In 2011 it was reported that some genealogists had stated that therapist Karin Vogel, from Rostoock, Germany, was then the 4,972nd and last in the line of succession." with the various sources.  (The WSJ seems to be the core report, but is pay-walled so I can't see it).  Seems an encyclopedia-worthy snippet of reporting, but not enough to give her an article of her own.  Pam D 21:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking more carefully at Succession to the British throne I note that the list on which she appears is mentioned and referenced, as is the update  10 years later where she was again in last place, this time at 5,753.  I have added her name and a couple of her refs to that article.  I now think we can just Redirect to Succession to the British throne#Current line of succession .  Pam D 22:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] By the way, the reporters were not "doing OR" as asserted by the nominator: they were reporting on a report by a notable genealogist William Addams Reitwiesner who had compiled what he asserted to be a complete list (and yes, it is a finite set of people because of the requirement that they be descendants of Sophia, although this list is over-inclusive as it doesn't check for "in communion with the Church of England"!).  Pam D 22:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect .  WP:ONEEVENT .  DrKay ( talk ) 06:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 18:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect .  Stub with limited opportunity for growth.  66.99.15.163 ( talk ) 16:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : while not the definition of WP:ONEEVENT , this person isn't notable.  They hold a spot in a line, that, because of it's position, has received news coverage.  Redirect is suitable as she is mentioned at the target: Succession to the British throne#Current line of succession , per PamD.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 18:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect