Samuel Alito flag display controversy : Esolo5002 ( talk ) 20:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Politics , Christianity , United States of America , New Jersey ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Samuel Alito .  It’s notable when a Supreme Court justice who is hearing cases related to an attempted government coup is flying flags that are well established by news coverage to support that coup in front of his house.  Also, the article is well-sourced enough to establish the notability of the topic.  But it’s more confusing to wiki visitors to have a separate article for it, because when they come here looking for this, they’re going to be looking for it under his name.  This topic belongs under a “controversies” section in the main article.  Ruth Bader Yinzburg ( talk ) 22:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Samuel Alito : I agree that this event is currently notable, but I don't think it passes the 10YT .  I think it should be selectively merged to Samuel Alito#Ethical questions without prejudice to potentially creating a controversies sub-article for Alito, since he seems to be racking them up recently.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Samuel Alito I too think this could be contained within a "controversies" section in the main article.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 05:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Aside from how the controversy is affecting Alito's reputation, this event has spawned new analysis of the Pine Tree Flag 's use by Christian nationalists , whether political affiliations necessitate recusal, and the practice of blaming evidence of wrongdoing on spouses. While the most recent SCOTUS controversy of Clarence Thomas ' nondisclosure of finances is located within the "Personal life" section of his article, financial conflicts of interest are far simpler to summarize than whether particular symbols suggest bias based on their historical and contemporary meanings.  Thus, the current format of a minor summary in Alito's article with a "See also" tag to this dedicated article is preferable.  BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 18:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Samuel Alito per rationale of Ruth Bader Yinzburg and voorts.  A. Randomdude0000 ( talk ) 20:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep — Rational behind Ruth Bader Yinzburg's comment suggests a title issue.  This continues to receive coverage and the contents would not be entirely covered under a section in Alito's article.  elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could '''merge'' it.  Althought, it has been on the news a lot, maybe an article about it not all that needed.  Cwater1 ( talk ) 22:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per RBY and voorts.  It could become notable as events develop, but at the moment it's better in the main article (actually, I only came here because I was looking for info on this, and the first place I went was the main article).  Reading pro 256 talk to me contribs 13:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Samuel Alito per WP:NOTNEWS .  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 20:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge