hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kumarikunda Shaktipeeth: Promotional and fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Hinduism ,  and Bangladesh .  UtherSRG (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   None of the citations show notability.   Citations [1] and [2] do not even mention the subject of this article.   Citation [3] is Wikisource.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KHIZ-LD: It appears to have only ever really been a repeater of other networks or stations, with neither the adequate sourcing nor any sort of local content or coverage that would get it anywhere near actual notability; the article also tends to attract unsourced edits of dubious quality, another reason why our old overpresumption of "notability" (based on an essay , which seemed to have these all-diginet stations slip through the cracks pre-2021, rather than GNG) was a bit of an error in hindsight.  (This is another station that was part of the failed bulk nomination of HC2/Innovate station articles that intermingled stations like this one with facilities that have slightly more substantial histories; the history here isn't quite as threadbare as some of the newer DTV America stations that went from application to license surrender in about a decade, but it isn't much better.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a strange one.  This facility went on the air in 1979, as a note.  The move to channel 33 in 1987 does have coverage in the Daily Press including a front-page story.  But that's because it was displaced from channel 64 by KVVT and it tried to buy a channel from the translator system.  But TBN translators have come to AfD before ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K17ET ), and there is no SIGCOV after that.  GNG coverage just will not exist for this facility.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting subject to a previous AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K04QR-D so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rick Goldring: As always, the notability test for a mayor is not passed just by verifying his existence, and requires significant reliable source coverage supporting a substantial article about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  But there's no such content here at all, and in fact the article is putting significantly more emphasis on an unsuccessful candidacy for higher office than it is on his mayoralty itself -- but that's also not a notability claim either, and the article is referenced to a primary source table of election results and a small smattering of local-interest coverage nowhere near sufficient to claim that he would pass NPOL #2 on that basis.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to have considerably more substance and better referencing for it than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Not seeing the notability, and there's no claim of it other the mayorality by default, which doesn't cut it.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL #2.  As Bearcat mentioned, there's not really a significant claim to notability here except for just being a mayor of a city.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Names of India in its official languages: An alternative to deletion might be a merge to Names for India .  Pepper Beast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and India .  Pepper Beast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge This seems to be reasonable information to have in that article.  Reywas92 Talk 02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It is not reasonable, and in fact against the spirit of WP:NOINDICSCRIPT .  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 04:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; Names for India already exists, and unlike this article it at least tries to be more than a laundry list of dictionary entries.  And no, not merge, delete.  See WP:INDICSCRIPTS as to why a merge is unwarranted.  We don't need to enumerate the name of every Indian topic in every one of its many scripts, and we have a policy in place specifically to guard against such tedium.  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 04:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree it is more of an enumeration of dictionary entries rather than an article.  Imranqazi90 ( talk ) Delete per nomination.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vaisravanath Raman Namboothiri: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Hinduism ,  and Kerala .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 15:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lapor Polisi: Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  Bringing it to AfD instead of CSD or PROD because of contested deletions in this area.  // Timothy :: talk 12:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 14:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet inclusion criteria for an encyclopedia.  (Note-- I have the creator's talk page watch listed from UTRS encounter.) --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 17:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Concar: Sources are purely mentions of his appointments.  Fails WP:NBIO .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bilateral relations , Tanzania ,  and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable, not seeing significant coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MiniMax (company): Fails to meet notability with significant coverage about the company.  Whpq ( talk ) 14:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Routine funding coverage, isn't terribly useful.  Company is still new, might not have enough coverage yet in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All I can find are the funding items from Reuters and the "China Money Network" , which doesn't feel RS-ish.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree that these are routine coverage, and a couple also sound like a press release.  Maybe consider to DRAFT the page and wait for more coverage.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 20:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This was in DRAFT but the author decided to move it to article space without using AFC.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutrality : It seems that the quotation is not enough, and more information and reports need to be collected ~ Thank you for pointing out the problem ~ Carleyeta ( talk ) 14:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – Somewhat routine coverage, this feels a bit like WP:TOOSOON .  TLA (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darren Clarke (snooker player): My WP:BEFORE search of web and newspapers.com sources found lots of passing mentions of results and of a disciplinary incident in 1999, but nothing that I considered really contributed to notability.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 12:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cue sports ,  and England .  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 12:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete no suggestion of meeting GNG.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 14:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as stated above Montgomery15 ( talk ) 19:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not seem to have had a career or the level of coverage that would meet notability requirements.  Dunarc ( talk ) 23:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bill Smyth (broadcaster): There's a picture of Bill Smyth from the Belfast Telegraph about the 40th anniversary but most other mentions are from self-published sites, i.e. forums, and don't back up these claims.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 17:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Northern Ireland .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 17:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I searched and was unable to find any meaningful secondary coverage focused on the article subject.  Left guide ( talk ) 21:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: there does not appear to be anything much available to justify this article.  ww2censor ( talk ) 14:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mondera Chakroborty: There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are Independent of the subject.  Most of sources are either passing mentions or primary (e.g. interview).  Acted in two films but not yet released.  Fails every criteria of WP:GNG , WP:NACTOR .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 22:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Dance ,  and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of passing WP:NACTOR .  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chamod Dilshan: This footballer played some international games but I cannot find any significant coverage of his life or career.  March OfThe Greyhounds 19:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Football , Asia ,  and Sri Lanka .  March OfThe Greyhounds 19:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .   A Google search only has WP:ROUTINE player profiles and unrelated info about other men with the same name.   Willing to reconsider if significant coverage is found, so please ping me.  Frank Anchor 19:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV , but I sincerely believe that senior national team caps should count toward notability.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Africa Education and Leadership Initiative: No coverage to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Africa , Sudan ,  and Tennessee .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'm a novice in this area, but I believe that source 2 may now be found at https://sudantribune.com/article39608/ .  Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk ) 01:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks.  That source doesn't even mention this organization.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable.  I found a Guardian article that give them some coverage.  Their Guidestar profile indicates this is a very small organization: $130,544 in 2014 contributions.  I added archive.org links for the article's 3 refs; they talk about the problem of female educational equality in South Sudan.  Here's the link to the organization itself .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Greenman ( talk ) 07:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Positive Innovation for the Next Generation: No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:ORG with all of the sources failing WP:SIGCOV .  Couldn't find any suitable sources online.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Botswana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loved One (album): Two other albums can be considered together with this one: All in the Silence and Kentoverse Imaginatorium ( talk ) 14:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music ,  and Japan .  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 14:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Further background from proposer: The artist's page was recently deleted - see deletion discussion .  As in the artist's page, this album has obvious promotional style, and almost all content has been added by the same editors.  For example, the most recent addition is a "prize" on "Song of the year", discussed here: forum , which strongly suggests this is merely a paid-for award, but it is actually only listed as "Category Finalists", not prizewinner.  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 14:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And pinging editors contributing to the artist's deletion discussion: @ Michitaro , Nuraa.sinora , Loriendrew , Kaori Muraji , Tal Essen ,  and Eduardo Augusto : .  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 06:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment To add other articles, you need to tag them with an AFD tag too.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTADVERT .  The article is full of blatant exaggerations.  It has not won the International Songwriting Competition (honorable mention) nor the Song of the Year award (finalist).  Only linked sources are paid sources or primary sources.  I couldn't find other sources to show the notability of the album.  -- Broc ( talk ) 17:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . It's clear, here and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kento Masuda and Japanese AFD ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/増田顕人_20220315 , that all claims of importance have not stood up to scrutiny and searches find no independent reliable sources for anything related. Adumbrativus ( talk ) 10:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – non–notable album (does not meet WP:NALBUM ) with highly dubious or blatant false claims, of an artist whose article was deleted via AFD.-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏ (ring-ring) 14:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the exact same reasons as stated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kentoverse .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not notable album produced by not notable artist.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 22:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not meet the standards of WP:NALBUM , especially now that the artist has been deemed non-notable.  Michitaro ( talk ) 04:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete