hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
155142 Tenagra: ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf ) 23:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bri and MB : pinging contributors since last redirect.  ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf ) 23:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable (or redirect to List of named minor planets: 150000–199999 ).  Shaka, when the walls fell.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 02:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sense in redirecting to a list which should probably be deleted as well.  Fram ( talk ) 08:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Owen× ☎ 12:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a list (either List of named minor planets: 150000-199999 or List of minor planets: 155001-156000#155101–155200 ) as is customary for minor planets which do not pass WP:NASTRO .  16:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC) I think

Discussion outcome: redirect
Amal Neerad Productions: No inherent notability.  Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with nom in principle.  Redirect to Amal Neerad hopefully leading readers to the information they seek over there thereby discouraging creating such an article again, no merge necessary.  — siro χ o 21:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources to meet GNG.  116.68.98.76 ( talk ) 12:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: @ The Doom Patrol , WP:ROUTINE is a section within the Notability (events) guideline .  Amal Neerad Productions are not an event.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Announcements, filming, related functions, promotional tours, screening etc are events. The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 12:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Doom Patrol , the applicable guidelines are: Notability (films) guideline Notability (organizations and companies) guideline Those are the ones the closing admin will refer to, not the Notability (events) guideline . -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I know that.  I think you are not following.  Coverage for film related events won't count as notability for a company.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 10:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Amal Neerad Graywalls ( talk ) 09:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Amal Neerad .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hongsawatoi Kingdom: Page also has multiple issues and potential copyvio.  Hongsawatoi is an alternative name for the WP:COMMON name and main article at Hanthawaddy Kingdom EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 14:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 14:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 14:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:15E1:6E30:FBF1:377F ( talk ) 14:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
David Rushmere: Cricketer BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  Looks like he is the son of Mark Rushmere ( 1 ), but I can't find any WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Just be WP:BOLD and redirect, these AfD's are tedious and improper where there will be no contention.  AA ( talk ) 22:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Boland representative cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tamasha season 2: The only coverage I found are ROTM - all from same publication - like this , this , and this one .  Not enough because Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.  and provided coverage is without bylines.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 13:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 13:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Tamasha (TV series) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kathleen Marie Sweet: A redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies seems reasonable.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  You will find several Google hits when you search for "Kathleen M Sweet" rather than the full name.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies per nom (thanks for unbundling this from the rest , makes things a lot easier).  There is a noticeable lack of sources on this person (no matter what version of the name is entered) outside of the WP:BLP1E failed judicial nomination.  Take the paragraph on that nomination out of the article, and all we're left with is a WP:RESUME .  The target article retains the basic info just fine.  Stony Brook babble 03:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Are you just going to keep nominating each judicial article individually until you get you desired result?  Because that's how it's starting to come off.  Snickers2686 ( talk ) 03:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of these people appear notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the sources in the article don't demonstrate she passes WP:GNG .  No problem with an AtD.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies per nom and StonyBrook.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 Sindh Premier League: The tournament doesn't have official status with no lasting effect.  Robo Cric Let's chat 05:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Pakistan .  Robo Cric Let's chat 05:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Robo Cric Let's chat 06:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sindh Premier League Not enough coverage for separate season article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sindh Premier League Not enough coverage on its own.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 15:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1896 Indiana State Sycamores football team: A one game season against a local high school, with the game result unknown, does not scream notability, despite it being the first football game for the school, due to the seeming lack of GNG coverage.  Open to a WP:ATD but not sure what would make sense here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football ,  and Indiana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A single game against the local high school boys is neither "college football", nor is it a "season".   A "merger" with the 1897 and 1898 seasons isn't viable at this time, because those articles are unsourced messes as well (with no results even reported in the 1897 article).  If and when someone cares enough to research and properly source a combined article, that may make sense, but as things stand, "delete" is the only viable solution.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 23:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Indiana State Normal football, 1896–1898 a la similar action for Delaware State Hornets football, 1924–1929 , Temple Owls football, 1894–1899 , and Henry Kendall Orange and Black football, 1895–1899 .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 23:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose merge as things stand.  All three years have articles that are essentially unsourced.  WP:NSEASONS does not mean that three unsourced articles can be "grouped" and suddenly be acceptable.  Also, merger isn't something the closer can do without the target existing.  Accordingly, merger isn't viable here unless someone creates that target article and includes enough sourcing to get it over the WP:GNG .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 23:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Cbl62 , I've created Indiana State Normal football, 1896–1898 .  The Sycamores fight name doesn't appear to have been introduced until the 1920s.  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 01:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:NSEASONS to Indiana State Normal football, 1896–1898 as an appropriate redirect target has now been created with adequate sourcing.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I support a redirect to the target article now as well.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that I have redirected 1897 Indiana State Sycamores football team and 1898 Indiana State Sycamores football team to Indiana State Normal football, 1896–1898 .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 18:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yuper Khine: The subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  All I found were passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Myanmar .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, no evident of WP:SIGCOV found.  Suggest a Redirect instead to Myanmar women's national football team#Players which might be more narrowly relevant than the suggested redirect.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 19:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shalka Doctor: I took a look, and while some potential sources exist, they don't seem to be enough to establish this incarnation as a separate article.  Thus, this article currently does not meet the GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Scream of the Shalka - The sources in the article, and ones I found upon searches, are really discussing the Scream of the Shalka web series in general.  There is nothing really demonstrating that the particular version of the Doctor that appeared in it is notable in his own right so that a spinout article is needed, and pretty much all of the information regarding the development and the question of canonicity of the character is already covered in the main article of the series.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 18:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Rorshacma.  The subject isn't significantly covered in sources, failing the WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alexandra Trofimov: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Moldova .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I support listification.  This is probably the way forward for several minor football nations.  Geschichte ( talk ) 12:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Swimming pool cover: The only sources that came up on Google were pool cover company websites and advert-laden listicles.  NW1223 < Howl at me • My hunts > 01:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject doesn't meet the GNG, and WP:NOTDICTIONARY also seems to apply here.  User:Let'srun 01:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swimming pool § Covers may be a valid alternative to deletion here.  Apparently this was split from

Discussion outcome: redirect
Raymond J. Bowman: WP:BIO1E , known only for being the subject of the notable photograph The Picture of the Last Man to Die , and insofar as I can tell not substantially covered in reliable secondary sources for other reasons.  Some of the content could be merged to the article about the image, but not the overly elaborate infobox, etc.  Sandstein 18:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America .  Sandstein 18:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the article about the photo.  I mean, other than being the subject of the photo, it's pretty routine soldier stuff, the photo and him are basically notable for the same thing.  I'm wondering if the photo is even notable, but that's another issue.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:BIO1E .  Mztourist ( talk ) 04:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  AryKun ( talk ) 04:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:BIO1E .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested.  Reasonable.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I started the article & am willing to make the redirect edit & migrate/merge useful content myself.  = paul2520 💬 16:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Second superpower: It's a term that some people and sources have used, but it has no sustained coverage or coherent meaning.  The lead describes it as an anti-Iraq War protest movement (with sourcing from the early 2000s), but then the main body also just uses it to refer to states such as China and Russia.  There is no reason why this merits a standalone article.  It's so confusing that it probably fails WP:DUE for inclusion in Superpower or Great power .  Thenightaway ( talk ) 20:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : The article is confusing, horribly unfocused, under-cited, and seems to conflate a few unrelated social movements as nom points out.   But the Moore essay had responses in RS, at least, and there does seem to have been enough media attention to support an article (I don't know if reference 1 counts as RS or not because it's "analysis", but the Nation piece seems legit and I suppose the Greenpeace article might make the cut).   An awful lot of work and trimming is needed, though.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll admit to being completely unfamiliar with this concept.  That said, doesn't the sourcing suggests that this a rather contained media debate in 2003–2004 which did not have any sustained attention or importance?  Do scholars of social movements, protests and NGOs still use this concept in any meaningful way?  A Google Search and Google Scholar search does not show significant coverage in the last five years.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 00:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:SYN concerns here - a grab bag of different uses can't be cobbled together into a unified article.  I would also be OK with a redirect to Polarity (international relations) , which discusses bipolarity.  Neutrality talk 17:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is WP:SYN and WP:FORK of Polarity (international relations) .  My very best wishes ( talk ) 22:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hati Yang Terpilih: Sources in article are promo about the artist and do not meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject (the compilation album & soundtrack album) directly and indepth .  BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV.  There is no sourced content that would improve a target, but no objection to a consensus REDIRECT.  // Timothy :: talk 10:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rossa (singer) .  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 02:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chorr Police: The article lacks significant coverage from multiple reliable, independent sources.  It does not offer in-depth analysis or substantial coverage in reputable publications.  The references cited do not provide the necessary independent verification of the show's notability.  M S Hassan ( talk ) 14:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green_Gold_Animations#Television : No time to check possible existing sources but this ATD seems at least warranted.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green_Gold_Animations#Television .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect