hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2022 Road Safety World Series squads : We generally only have separate articles for major international cricket events like the Cricket World Cup , not for relatively obscure tournaments like this one.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and India .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm also nominating the following article for the same reason (another season squad article for same tournament): 2020–21 Road Safety World Series squads ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , South Africa , Bangladesh , Sri Lanka , England , Australia , New Zealand ,  and Caribbean .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm dubious about whether the articles about the tournaments themselves should exist, but I imagine there was almost certainly enough coverage of them in India for them to remain - but then we could get ourselves into a situation where we allow articles on really insignificant things at this rate.  As for these articles listing a bunch of has beens topping up their retirement money in a beer and pretzels made for TV tournament?  Delete .  Clearly.  Not even close.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 14:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Squad articles aren't needed in separate pages.  The information can be concisely moved into a table on the main article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - to the main article Road Safety World Series in a smaller table.  Will improve and expand the main article.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 19:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unnecessary fluffery, for an event of dubious notability.  StickyWicket ( talk ) 20:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Agree with Vinegarymass911 .  Merge to the main article Road Safety World Series .  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 05:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
University of California, Washington Center : Seems unlikely that a university internship programme is notable - I can't find refs that would meet the GNG.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Washington, D.C. .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 14:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 06:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Most sources I found are primary sources published by UCI or other institutions. Would also be open to merge to University of California, Irvine . -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 15:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Pamela Meyer Davis : Could easily be merged into Rod Blagojevich corruption charges .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 05:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politics ,  and Illinois .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 05:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Rod Blagojevich corruption charges per WP:BLP1E .  Fails WP:GNG , standalone page not warranted.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Berman Jewish Policy Archive : Fails WP:GNG and no WP:SIGVCOV about the archive per a WP:BEFORE Longhornsg ( talk ) 07:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 07:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Stanford University Graduate School of Education .  killer bee 09:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Light merge to above target.  There's a bit of promo and outdated information in the article that should not be merged.  — siro χ o 10:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Social science , California ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Board Wages : BEFORE searches give where to watch and a few passing mentions when describing the TV series this stems from.  Karnataka ( talk ) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Karnataka ( talk ) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge .  I think this individual episode is notable.  If it isn't, I would merge the plot summary into the article on the series or the first season.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 19:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Agreed.  And the article also an independent reference.  Rillington ( talk ) 09:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you mean you agree with the statement that the invidiual is notable, or that the article should be merged?  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 20:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of Upstairs, Downstairs episodes .  There's no plot summary there so some of this article's details could go there, and episode titles are suitable search targets and should be kept as redirects.  I don't see enough to warrant a standalone article.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Actualcpscm ( talk ) 20:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Natural delimitation between the Pacific and South Atlantic oceans by the Shackleton Fracture Zone : Unlikely that anyone would search for this title, seems like it can be deleted with no loss of information on en.wiki JMWt ( talk ) 14:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Geography .  JMWt ( talk ) 14:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy merge Just do it WP:BOLD .  Reywas92 Talk 14:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree - Merge Go ahead and merge it.  Banks Irk ( talk ) 14:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Agree with nomination, this article serves no useful purpose.  Paul H. ( talk ) 00:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge BOLDly with Shackleton Fracture Zone as described above.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 18:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think on the opposite, maybe the information should be lowered on the Shackleton Fracture Zone article about the theory itself, and keep the theory and the geographic features separated mostly. -- Janitoalevic ( talk ) 20:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Rock Howard : Despite well written, sources were mostly from trivia mentions.  Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and listicles, thus showing zero WP:SIGCOV .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 12:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 12:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 12:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Fatal Fury characters .  This is precisely the kind of info you'd expect to see in a FANDOM article on the character, but does not pass Wikipedia's more stringent notability standards with significant coverage.  Standards evolved from 2009 where a sentence or two in reviews mentioning a character was thought to be enough.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Trying to search for further statements turned up nothing really tangible. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 04:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
JJ Lin: Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 12:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 12:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - apologies, nominated the wrong browser tab.  Figuring out how to "officially" retract now.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 12:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:WDAFD Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mid-Life Crustacean: Ryan barnes 1963 ( talk ) 01:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Vijay Vasant Tambay: Sources are lacking.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 04:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination .  There are sources, just not currently in this article.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 07:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Where's that damn fourth Chaos Emerald?: Non-notable quotation, no specific page on Wikiquote, no inbound wiki-links.  Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 18:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This was originally a redirect to Shadow the Hedgehog (video game) where this phrase is mentioned in one of the footnotes as being a memorable line in the game.  Should this just be reverted back to its original state?  L iz Read!  Talk!  18:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural speedy close Per WP:WRONGFORUM .  This is not an article, redirects go to WP:RFD to be discussed, not here.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy close : Per WP:WRONGFORUM and Zxcvbnm.  Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close and send to RfD as a WP:WRONGFORUM .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 22:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy close Per WP:WRONGFORUM , send to WP:RFD Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Raymone Bain: TRL ( talk ) 03:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You are celebrating women by deleting a black woman's bio who has represented some of the biggest names in sports and entertainment.
 OK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs ) 03:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) — Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] With no sourcing, yes.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - The person has demonstrated GNG based on sources, but other than representing Mike Jackson 20 years ago, she's a simple entertainment attorney with some notable connections.  Augmented Seventh ( talk ) Delete : "Michael Jackson hired her" is about the extent of coverage focusing on  her as a person, otherwise she's named in articles about the various clients she represents.  I don't see notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep : No reason has been given for deletion.  Pam D 07:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Rasa Mažeikytė: Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cycling , Olympics ,  and Lithuania .  Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets a guideline I can think of, WP:SPORTCRIT as a medalist at the World Championships , etc.  See Special:WhatLinksHere/Rasa Mažeikytė for participations.  Then, when it comes to sources, there seem to be several .  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, I didn't see that.  I'll withdraw my nom, thanks.  Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 12:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Manavs: However, it was extensively edited by POV-pushing sockpuppets: Öztürküm (the creator), Kumanof, Hatymat, Lionzm, Suyumbikä, ManavAnton.  Basically, the majority of the edits and content are from the aforementioned accounts.  There are clusters of several sources that need verification, and since they are all placed after the end of each paragraph and not interspersed throughout, there is likely a problem of synthesis.  To save time, I suggest a WP:TNT for this article, so that when it is created again, reliable sources are used with a NPOV.  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator: Given non-existent participation for more than a week, this AfD gets ironic as I could have just worked on this short article during that time.  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Godtube: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Internet ,  and Websites .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep for lack of valid deletion rationale.   Just because a user with 11 lifetime edits added a tag six years ago doesn't make it so.   Consider (among many others): Metcalfe, John.  "GodTube, Where Networking Is More Spiritual Than Social."  The New York Times 157, no. 54308 (2008): C2-L.  ITNews, Christians take on Youtube with Godtube https://www.itnews.com.au/news/christians-take-on-youtube-with-godtube-79740 The Guardian, Smile You are On GodTube https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/may/12/usa.religion @ Allan Nonymous what was the result of your WP:BEFORE searches?    If they weren't done, I invite you to withdraw the nomination.  Oblivy ( talk ) 04:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Isaiah Sellers: Only notable for a few paragraphs, written by Samuel L. Clemens , in which Sellers is claimed to have been the first to use the pseudonym Mark Twain .  Sellers is only discussed in two academic papers in American Literature and Mark Twain Journal , both in relation to Clemens' claim.  This is already addressed fully is the main Mark Twain article, and not many details are known about Sellers for any substantial expansion to his article.  〜 Festucalex • talk 19:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and United States of America .  〜 Festucalex • talk 19:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Sellers is only discussed in two academic papers" - not true.  See "Mark Twain's Nom de Plume : Some Mysteries Resolved" ProQuest 1306131770 (biographical details such as death), "A Proposed Calendar of Samuel Clemens's Steamboats, 15 April 1857 to 8 May 1861, with Commentary" ProQuest 1306139746 (biographical details such as boats worked; reproduction of Sellers' monument; discussing a report that placed Sellers and Clemens together in 1880), "Samuel Clemens' Magical Pseudonym" ProQuest 1290849714 (unearthing some Clemens-Sellers relationship; analysis), "From Sam Clemens to Mark Twain: Sanitizing the Western Experience" JSTOR 10.5325/marktwaij.12.1.0113 (more of the same), Critical Companion to Mark Twain: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work (good amount of biographical information such as place of birth).  Sellers probably died in 1864 and Clemens took the name in 1863.  There is additional biographical information about Sellers -- such as his (il)literacy, captaincy, early life, migration west -- that is undue for Clemens' article and should not be repeated there.  Significant coverage in several reliable sources, some of which is inappropriate for deletion or alternatives to deletion ...  Urve ( talk ) 00:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know how I missed this.  Withdrawing.  〜 Festucalex • talk 01:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep