hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dennish Himawan: signed, Rosguill talk 23:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  signed, Rosguill talk 23:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and indepth.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 16:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amit Patkar: State presidents/candidates of political parties must meet the WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO criteria for a standalone article.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 11:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I previously moved it to draft just because it doesn’t meet WP:NPOL , delete per nomination.  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 11:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Goa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , India ,  and Goa .  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mentions of the individual and interviews, but nothing about the person.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TIDEL Park Coimbatore: The article consists almost entirely of a list of companies that have offices in the complex.  The only source about the complex I could find was this , which isn't nearly enough to establish notability.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 03:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , neither notable nor written as an article.  I can do stuff !  ( talk ) 03:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Draftify, update and submit it for review.  Charlie ( talk ) 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per NOTDIR.  Draftify might not be a good option since the IT park per se in not notable and I couldn't find any sources with SIGCOV for the park itself.  In future, if any notability arises, a draft can be created, but no point in keeping a directory entry of the buildings present in the IT park now, most of which are just uncited non notable OR or random entries.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Porter Airlines Flight 2691: Basically, a medium-sized plane overran the runway while landing and ended up in a grassy area.  No injuries, no damage on the plane.  I think this is a clear case of WP:NOTNEWS .  Pichpich ( talk ) 04:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Aviation ,  and Canada .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 05:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can be adequately covered in the Porter Airlines article.  Mjroots ( talk ) 06:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This could simply be appended to the existing page, an independent article for such a minor event isn't necessary.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's not our job to maintain an article about every airline safety incident that happens — our job is to maintain articles about incidents that pass the ten year test for enduring significance, which this clearly doesn't.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have my doubts about this one; but SongdaTalas what are these other runway incursion articles from last year that you mentioned when you removed the Prod?  Nfitz ( talk ) 20:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DHL Aero Expreso Flight 7216 and Korean Air Flight 631 and there was a Nok Air incident similar to these, but it doesn't have an article.  Songda Talas 00:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those were both very serious, with the planes being seriously damaged and dismantled.  Looking at one of the flight data websites, this Porter plane returned to Billy Bishop a couple of days later, and returned to regular service today (Thursday) on the Thunder Bay run; gosh, looks like it pretty much went over my house just after take-off from YTZ!  A non-event.  Data also shows the landing in the Soo was on the 16th, not the 17th.  Nfitz ( talk ) 05:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also Bearcat - 10YT is from an essay ( WP:RECENTISM ) not a policy.  And in the essay that section is referred to as a "thought experiment".  Although I agree with the sentiment - I hope we have better guidelines or policies!  Nfitz ( talk ) 20:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - plane flew back to it's base at Billy Bishop a couple of days later and returned to service on April 27.  Not significant.  Nfitz ( talk ) 05:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is too serious.  It's WP:NOTNEWS and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  CastJared ( talk ) 15:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this doesn't warrant a standalone article.   A mention on the Porter Airlines article would be more than adequate.  PK T (alk) 14:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - as per WP:NOTNEWS .  Onel 5969 TT me 18:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ron Flatter: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 13:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia .  Owen× ☎ 14:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Journalism , Television , Arizona , California , Connecticut , Florida , Nevada , New York , Texas ,  and Utah .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:JOURNALIST .  Seems run of the mill, and only 1 article links to this article.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hussain Bahzad: No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my Arabic searches.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 01:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing notable here.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
California Green Lodging Program: Sadads ( talk ) 23:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment ,  and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 00:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leesi Gabriel Gborogbosi: Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manoj S Nair: Director has only directed 1 film, Monhiroe ( talk ) 09:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Monhiroe ( talk ) 09:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable director, sources are all yellow/red per sourcebot and the film he directed is red-linked.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yes, the redlink caught my eye, too.  If you're notable as the director of a redlinked film, we're already in trouble - and we're carrying a heavy weight of tags, there, too.  Worse, 'Lessons', the redlinked film, is an anthology of four films by four directors, so we're already at 1/4 notability.  Beyond that, there's nothing.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not pass WP:DIRECTOR , lacks in-depth coverages and unable to prove notability.  Also, the references given are mostly from unreliable sources.  DSN18 ( talk ) 10:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with all people above.  Does not pass WP:DIRECTOR.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 21:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loan Castano: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this interview.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tried a . fr website search, can only find match reports.  Plenty of mentions from this site [6] , but nothing beyond mentions.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Professional rugby league footballer who has played in the Super League.  3 sources.  Fleets ( talk ) 10:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 3 sources.  Zero of them showing WP:SIGCOV .  I strongly support deletion unless something better is presented.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 19:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Assasination of a Hamas member in the West Bank: Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Article was WP:PRODed (by me) and endorsed, but was dePRODed by the currently-blocked creator.  - Eureka Lott 23:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as the person who endorsed the PROD.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 16:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Does not meet WP:SUSTAINED User:Let'srun 02:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is NOTNEWS.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 19:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , just like any other article where the only sources are news coverage.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and as an extreme stub.  DO NOT REDIRECT, now or in the future, as assassination was misspelled.  gidonb ( talk ) 14:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yenifer Ramos: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG per a lack of reliable, SIGCOV sources.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Hayes (footballer): Coverage is largely limited to press releases put out by teams; there is one example of brief coverage by the BBC (regarding Hayes signing to Ipswich), but it provides almost no independent coverage of the subject beyond that detail.  Searching online, there may be an Australian-rules footballer by this name that is notable, but the English Hayes does not appear to meet notability guidelines.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  signed, Rosguill talk 19:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep for me, I feel it's fine the article with the citations a little more other stuff online.  Govvy ( talk ) 23:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, all available sources appear to be fleeting mentions and/or stats and transaction info.  Player has not made any appearances above National League level.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 19:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fifth-tier footballer lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.  All coverage is really fleeting mentions, nothing substantial.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cornelius Butcher: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
House of Mónek: The article is based on the creator's own research of church books and passenger lists.  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 30 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Hungary .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage in RS found.  ( t · c ) buidhe 22:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hwang Hak-sun: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing on the Japanese article, the guy is Japanese not Korean, but other than that error, I don't see GNG here.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did a quick Google search and couldnt find anything to construct WP:GNG.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
22 Qadam: ROTM coverage like this is not enough to meet GNG.  Not every TV drama aired on TV channels inherently get a WP page.  In Pakistan, we only have TV dramas, nothing else, so we don't need an article on each one of them based solely on  some ROTM or paid/PR coverage.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 15:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete