hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Embassy of the United States, Kinshasa : The rest is a content fork.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Democratic Republic of the Congo ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Democratic Republic of the Congo–United States relations .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per ample precedent; no redeemable content.  — Biruitorul Talk 20:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 14:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Treehouse Trolls Birthday Day : I can't see how it meets WP:NF , interested to see if others can make a good case for inclusion JMWt ( talk ) 13:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing but database entries, YouTube, IMDb, and non-notable lists of videotapes for sale.   No discussion in secondary sources that I can find.   Clearly non-notable.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no clear evidence of coverage in secondary sources and as noted above, what there is seems limited to db-like listings.  I'd also throw the almost identical Treehouse Trolls Forest of Fun and Wonder into the mix as well for deletion consideration.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 08:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  I have not been able to find anything beyond aforementioned.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Marston : Nothing of note.  Links are purely to interviews and programme links.  Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs ) 11:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clear vanity article full of minutiae and edited mainly by a user with a WP:COI .  This is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to post their CVs.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article is packed with BBC references, but no independent sources are available to establish notability.  Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 20:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Math-U-See : It may have won awards from Home Schooling organsations but I cannot find any firm evidence of that.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 19:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Mathematics .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: no secondary coverage, just ads Hi!  ( talk ) 10:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I also cannot find any news coverage on this company.  Bradelykooper ( talk ) 08:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ville Seivo : Only film databases and user generated content.  Printed coverage in foreign language is unlikely, as the subject seems to have played minor roles in not many major works.  However, if they exist, one may list so.  X ( talk ) 03:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Finland .  X ( talk ) 03:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Finnart F.C. : – Meena • 10:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Scotland .  – Meena • 10:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Stub article and a number of improvements necessary to bring up to the same level of the other teams in the same league (where there is no consideration of deletion).  Id keep until improvements are made.  Macarism Talk 10:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to West of Scotland Football League#Third Division .  The subject appears to fail the essay WP:NCLUB , and I could not find enough SIGCOV online for this article to meet the GNG.  However, it would be preferable to redirect instead of delete because this team is part of a notable league and is a possible search term.  The Night Watch (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability.  Ping me if multiple IS RS SIGCOV sources are added to the article.  // Timothy :: talk 21:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 21:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication of notability.  Nigej ( talk ) 19:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Kuban Airlines destinations : A subsequent AN discussion concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close .  This article fails WP:NOT as it is a clear failure of WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  Specifically it is a complete listing of all the services provided by a company.  It is no different, ultimately, to a complete listing of all the outlets of Roy Roger's as of 5th July 1983.  Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not the Yellow Pages or Skyscanner.  Even if the RFC were set to one side, and the WP:NOT issues dealt with somehow (and I do not believe they can be), this article would still be a failure of WP:CORP , which explicitly requires that articles solely about the services offered by a company are cited to significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources that go beyond mere specialist/industry press and are not simply local or narrow-interest coverage .  This is resolutely not the case for this article, which is cited only to the company website Kuban.aero (now 404), a blog on Travel.ru (a website that sells travel tickets), and Agent.ru (another website that sells tickets).  Given the NOT issues a WP:BEFORE search is not mandatory, but I did one anyway and unsurprisingly there was nothing that would fix this.  The lack of a corresponding RU-language page about the destinations of Kuban Airlines is also indicative of the problem.  Looking at the sourcing for the Kuban Airlines page there is also nothing that would fix this.  FOARP ( talk ) 15:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Russia .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and per WP:IINFO , of which these kinds of ephemeral lists of airline destinations are a textbook example.   Also, the RFC above shows there is an existing consensus that these lists should be deleted.   -- Jayron 32 14:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator and per Jayron32.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 01:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophisticated Games : Boleyn ( talk ) 08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , Companies ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Small board game company.  No refs, nothing i can find on google.  Desertarun ( talk ) 08:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Generative AI tools : Password (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : The article is unreferenced as as no clarity about the subject, need to update missing information as well as writing tone.  Morekar ( talk ) 09:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Too vague, there is already Large language model#List and hundreds or thousands of "generative AI tools" Mr Vili talk 04:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, no RS backing the article, from a quick search I just did.  Cinadon 36 16:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Mr vili.  Large language model seems to cover this well enough already TappyTurtle ( talk ) 05:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This article is somewhat slopulous and seems to have been written by a GPT.  jp × g 🗯️ 17:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] which, would be quite ironic given the article’s topic, lol TappyTurtle ( talk ) 21:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have noticed a lot of "whatever and AI" articles/drafts written by LLMs.  I imagine it's similar to how the first thing everybody 3d prints is some accessories and brackets for their 3d printer, and the first thing everybody makes on a lathe is random lathe attachments, etc etc.. .  jp × g 🗯️ 05:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yara Mustafa : Also fails WP:NACTOR .  popo dameron ⁠ talk 23:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and Jordan .  popo dameron ⁠ talk 23:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mizanur Rahman Khan : Two obituaries used as sources and looking for sources I did not find any significant coverage that would contribute towards notability.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 14:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Journalism , News media ,  and Bangladesh .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 14:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete Seemingly non-notable, though some light searching indicates that he was a rather influential journalist/editor at the largest newspaper in Bangladesh.  Would err on the side of delete unless someone (perhaps with better access to Bangladeshi sources than I) could provide evidence of greater notability.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 16:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He has several references in journalism, writing and research.  And they have depth and significant coverage.  So it can be kept.  -- DelwarHossain ( talk ) 10:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you show some of them here?  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 10:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 19:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Didn’t find any WP:SIGCOV.  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 03:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  BEFORE found obits, nothing with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 04:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Habeeb Zain Arif : Pepper Beast (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Andhra Pradesh ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Has not held any role that would give him a free notability pass under WP:NPOL without WP:GNG -worthy sourcing for it, but this is sourced solely to a YouTube clip that isn't GNG-worthy sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agreed with Bearcat Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
StraitsX Singapore Dollar : Sources online are all primary or are noted for not being reliable WP:NCRYPTO Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Singapore .  Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  All primary and WP:TOOSOON .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 20:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TXT402 : Existed since 2011 with a single primary source.  Searching google requires wrapping "TXT402" in quotes as otherwise you get all kinds of incidental results of "TXT" and "402".  The news and book searches have zero results.  -- ferret ( talk ) 19:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  -- ferret ( talk ) 19:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - "Non-notable company" per nom.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 20:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Definitely doesn't seem to meet GNG.  Can't find much information even from webarchive, but I'm unclear if this is a "company" at all.  At a glance (and based on the article contents) I think it's just some web forum for selling stolen passwords.  The article reads like (poorly written) marketing too; doesn't seem like the content belongs on Wikipedia at all.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 14:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Fails notability.  Created by a single-purpose account that had no other edits.  — Maile ( talk ) 19:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Only one source within article.  Quick search demonstrates nothing of substance.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 02:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaltungo Emirate : "" Gjs238 ( talk ) 19:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Africa . Gjs238 ( talk ) 19:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete regardless of whether the report from the office of the vice president is "erroneous" or not, I can find no evidence of notability for this "Emirate".  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:SOAPBOX and WP:GNG .  I can't find any evidence online that this traditional state existed, and this page just seems to advocate for that point of view.  It is not encyclopaedic.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wai Linn Aung : Contested draft.  Star Mississippi 15:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Star Mississippi 15:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no significant coverage found in English or Burmese.  No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC being met.  The article is too promotional and contains citations to YouTube and Facebook, which are both completely inappropriate.  This should not have been moved back to mainspace but, given that it would just be edit warred back if it were draftified again, I'll have to favour deletion this time.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Due to the article being moved from draftspace without the proper submission process.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Total Experience : WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  12:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete On initial before I thought this was going to be keep, but on review I can only find one additional reliable use of the term: https://www.techradar.com/opinion/total-experience-a-trend-for-future-business WP:NOTNEO implies at least three sources are needed, and I couldn't find two others, hence my vote.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Plenty of mentions of the term in PR items, nothing beyond that.  [37] is about the best I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete