hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
LZJB: I suggest merging it either to Jeff Bonwick or LZRW .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into the articles suggested by Deltaspace.  I cannot find enough sourcing for this topic to merit its own article.  But that doesn't mean it should be nuked off the wiki, it could do with a mention in another article.  RetroCosmos ( talk ) 07:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , to ZFS .  This algorithm does crop up quite a lot in reliable sources, but only short snippets, discussed alongside the other compression algorithms available in ZFS.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  We have 3 different Merge target articles suggested and we need to get that down to 1.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Per above: article does not merit its own.  The system ZFS makes most sense here in my opinion.  TLA (talk) 04:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Jeff Bonwick .  The unifying characteristic between these articles is their creator, IMO.  Jacona ( talk ) 14:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Embassy of the United States, Lomé: Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Given the sizes of the articles, I think a Merge to Togo–United States relations probably suffices by WP:NOPAGE .  — siro χ o 02:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 Starbucks strike: There was also an unrelated strike by staff on a different issue in November 2023, so the title "2023 Starbucks strike" could also relate to this.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Business ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Starbucks_unions#Strikes .  While it was in the news, it wasn't sustained coverage as the strike was mostly symbolic in nature.  Star Mississippi 01:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename 2023 Starbucks strikes to include both major strikes.  They both received significant coverage but are better handled together than separately. -- User:Namiba 03:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As the page creator, I have no objection to renaming the page and expanding the scope. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sexuality and gender .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Starbucks_unions#Strikes per Star Mississippi, not extensive enough to need standalone article.  Reywas92 Talk 16:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Starbucks_unions#Strikes , Definitely a case of no enduring coverage, at least in the current timeframe; may be notable in the wider context of Starbucks labor relations, but isn't on its own.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect per above.  So, there sources on the matter, but in comparison to the larger scale of union strikes across Starbucks, I feel the smaller ones in 2023 don't amount to much SIGCOV.  However, the section in Starbucks unions works well.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 18:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Rename per the above reasons.  Both seem like reasonable options in my opinion.  - User:LoomCreek 01:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Starbucks_unions#Strikes .  A four-sentence article about a weeklong strike is not needed.  Persingo ( talk ) 01:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect as per above.  The article itself isn't too long and would be a good fit in the Starbucks_unions#Strikes section of the Union's article.  i2n 2z 08:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Shaktawat: A standalone article on this topic is not required here as it is one of the clan of Rajput caste.  Though it lacks content too, but whatever it contains should be moved into Rajput article and this page should be deleted. - Admantine123 ( talk ) 17:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 17:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Rajput per above.  -- Wyndhan Han ( talk ) 11:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Ian Long: Article sourced to owned media (Lulu), no pass of WP:GNG evident from WP:BEFORE, which purely reveals networked vendors of Blob Tree books.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Education ,  and United Kingdom .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge to Blob Tree - it seems the subject of the page does not have a public profile and hence is not notable.  I note that even editors who work on the page have had difficulty verifying basic details, so the fairest thing to do seems, IMO, to redirect until as such time as reliable sources come available to create a properly referenced page.  JMWt ( talk ) 12:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Blob Tree seems a good outcome.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 13:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Having taken a look, I'd worry about whether Blob Tree passes WP:GNG...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 13:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Apologies for these issues, I am responsible for part of this.  I must note at least with the Blob Tree page that this went through the articles for creation process and was deemed suitable.  I cannot comment on the author Ian Long as strongly however his notability is inheritable precisely from this connection.  I appreciate a redirect to the Blob Tree may be suitable at this time, but I do believe there is sufficient information and reputable sources for both pages, they just have not been added so far but instead needing improvement.  If others can take the time to gather information and improve this page, it may prove a more helpful result in the long term.  Wikijohnword ( talk ) 17:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't understand your logic here.  Notability specifically is not inherited, the fact that a book he wrote is considered notable does not therefore mean the author is notable.  You are welcome to find the RS to show that this person is notable even if the page is deleted at this time, of course.  JMWt ( talk ) 16:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Blob Tree.   Entire statement of notability for the author comes from the invention and Blob Tree isn't a Cotton Gin where people have done independent work on the inventor.  Nicely written article though, so it should merge nicely into the other article.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Electoral firsts in Guernsey: Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Politics ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to States of Guernsey#History – information is sourced and can reasonably be noted there.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 02:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No room for "firsts" because it is trivial.  Shankargb ( talk ) 01:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Ultraman Belial: Fails WP:GNG.  AfD'ing it to end the edit war.  🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 22:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 22:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see, then if you don't mind, may I downsize the page?  Even if the verdict is unchanged, at least I tried.  Zero stylinx ( talk ) 03:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can definitely improve the article while it's here at AfD.  The most important thing is to identify reliable independent sources that cover this topic.  There are a lot of sources in the article right now — I don't read Japanese, so I don't know how to evaluate them.  What do you think the best sources are?  Toughpigs ( talk ) 04:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I looked over other 3 character articles that are related with this, but oh god all of the sources that were used were also primary sources.  🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 05:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject, and this is critical, lacks independent notability.  A decision to Merge the text to Mega Monster Battle: Ultra Galaxy , after a serious trimming, would be not unwelcome and perhaps preferable to a plain Redirect.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the List of Mega Monster Battle characters instead, I can relocate some of Belial's story to that column easily.  Zero stylinx ( talk ) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, not bad at all that.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of rulers of the Janjero state of Gimirra: WP:UNSOURCED for 19 years.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 15:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 15:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I check the history and it the creation of this article is not recorded so you wouldn't know whether it has been created by an expert Adler3 ( talk ) 15:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Royalty and nobility ,  and Ethiopia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources , no dates (not even estimates) in much of the timeline, even the blue links don't point anywhere relevant.  Redirect to Kingdom of Yamma .  -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Kingdom of Yamma for potential sourcing.  Srnec ( talk ) 01:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Kingdom of Yamma , to which Janjero is a redirect.   We do not have enough content to justify a separate rulers article; and most of the rulers listed are redlinks.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 14:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kingdom of Yamma .  As there's no sources currently in the article and none have been put up in this AfD there's no verified content to merge.  The blue Wikilink for Tureta points to an area of Nigeria and Duka to a village in Hungary.  Rupples ( talk ) 02:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Amantia peruana infasciata: Author declines to merge to the species article.  - UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are many subspecies based articles.  If you want to remove them the why not remove all of them?  See Category:subspecies Uploader1234567890 ( talk ) 14:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As I said, subspecies are not inherently notable.  That doesn't mean no subspecies are notable, just that the notability of a subspecies must be demonstrated.  Your argument is WP:WHATABOUTISM and that doesn't fly here.  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Amantia peruana , as with Amantia peruana peruana .  There isn't any new information in each subspecies article that isn't in the species article, except an unsourced sentence about etymology.  It would be great to see additional information about the subspecies, but it would still be more appropriate for a merged article presenting all the information in one place rather than three separate articles with a high level of duplication.  Mgp28 ( talk ) 22:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is an acceptable (and expected) WP:ATD .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Mgp28 's rationale, but I think WP:PM would have been a better venue for this.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 19:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merger was proposed but rejected by the author.  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ UtherSRG : Just because someone wrote the first version of a page doesn't mean they WP:OWN it.  They can't unilaterally reject merging it, any more than they can unilaterally reject its deletion.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 02:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Columbiana Centre shooting: Last edited 6 months ago.  I think a merge into Columbiana Centre would be sufficient.  What does everyone think?  Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk ) 01:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I feel like a merge request would have been easier than a whole AfD, but now that we're here, merge and redirect .  Not like there's much content to lose.  A bunch of people got shot and then the center got sued, would better fit there.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 16:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge any applicable info not already in the target article to Columbiana Centre .  Sourcing is routine news coverage of the event and its aftermath, which does not indicate notability.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 20:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of ESPN College Football personalities: Just another case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS , most of these are about the game and if they do, barely offering much to establish notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and American football .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Indiscriminate and WP:LISTCRUFT , and Wikipedia is not a directory.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 18:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to College Football on ABC#Personalities as an WP:ATD .  Agree with nom about everything except WP:NOTTVGUIDE .  This is a list of personalities to which I do not see how this would be a tv guide, so that policy is out.  I don't find the list covers WP:LISTN exclusively.  It's good to return to the main article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Iron Cobra: Likely can just be a paragraph or two in her article.  Zim Zala Bim talk 22:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Becky Johnson .   No standalone RS found.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , ideal ATD for such a subject.  There's a bit there already so it might be a light merge, including probably the awards and nominations.  — siro χ o 03:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Becky Johnson per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Takamaka Rum: It seems rather awkward that instead of the plantation having its own dedicated page, the brand is represented solely.  Moreover, the page lacks reliable sources and is being developed by a banned editor exclusively focused on promoting this rum brand.  Charlie ( talk ) 14:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Charlie ( talk ) 14:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have created a Wikipedia page for La Plaine St. André .  I am open for merge and include any non-promotional content from Takamaka Rum on the La Plaine page.  Charlie ( talk ) 15:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources .  Many are interviews with the founders/"rum maker", blog-based reviews or press releases, so don't count towards notability.  These may be Ok though: [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] .  Fair coverage, but would like to hear other views before making a decision.  Rupples ( talk ) 17:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Could merge a portion to the plantation article as discussed.  This appears largely PROMO.  Mentioned in plenty of travel guides in Gbooks, but the are all only a few lines only.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to La Plaine St. André .  That makes more sense for the subject, , which doesn't seem to be notable.  Valereee ( talk ) 14:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to La Plaine St. André , now that an article exists on it.  X ( talk ) 22:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge