hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jacques Alberts: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  I'm thinking he goes by a nickname because I found an astonishingly low amount of hits.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 06:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Most Daring episodes: OWaunTon ( talk ) 02:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Bulk of article fails NLIST, the rest is unsourced OR.  Sources in the article, IMDB, tvschedule.zap2it.com, "Shows A-Z - most daring on trutv", show this is just a database listing, nothing showing this has been discussed as a group directly and indepth by WP:IS WP:RS to meet NLIST.  Here is the AfD for the main article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Daring , hard to argue this list is notable when the main has been deleted.  // Timothy :: talk 06:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Exactly right!  OWaunTon ( talk ) 11:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ariunbold Batsaikhan: Also tried using his native name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mongolia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Have found [12] , [13] , which is little bit, and there are number of sources like this, his name mentioned in match reports.  Also is this footballer also a chef?  There are a couple of interesting results, not sure how much can contribute to GNG.  Remains to be seen.  Govvy ( talk ) 08:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Govvy : Well these two sources are simply passing mentions, and do not contribute significantly to GNG.  I did see the Utah-based chef in stories like this and this .  While it seems interesting, I doubt it's the same person, and even if it was him, I still think it would not satisfy GNG.  However, that is why we're at AfD.  Cheers.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ JTtheOG That says goalkeeper...  Ariunbold Batsaikhan, so it should be him.  Ivan Milenin ( talk ) 13:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ JTtheOG Comment I think you might be confused with these sources for that matter from the chef and the goalkeeper.  That's how it happened.  Ivan Milenin ( talk ) 13:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sonia Shehzad Khan: BoraVoro ( talk ) 16:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:BASIC .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 14:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  77 followers on Twitter and not much else, so clearly non notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria: Apart from much detail regarding his family (his father and mother's articles, by the same author (tagged as closely connected to the subject in Indonesian) also fail WP:GNG - although the father's AfD closed as 'No consensus' a couple of months back.  Sourcing is primary or unverifiable (the first source is about the subject's father, the second a contribution to a poetry anthology and it doesn't get any better), there's no evidence of notability as an academic and the books are little more than pamphlets as far as I can ascertain.  The 'award' is not a bluelink.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and Indonesia .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The award he won seems to translate to "National Book Award" in the category for "Best Islamic Book".  Was unable to find reviews of that book, likely to be in Indonesian.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think this person is a Bruneian not Indonesian.  I read this article and many words including phrase, etc. referred to Brunei.  Ariandi Lie Ariandi Lie 04:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Seems to lack reliable sources which is especially critical for BLP.  Wozal ( talk ) 00:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Survived and Punished: On Google News, when I search "survived and punished" "prison" I get 14 results .  These sources are good, but only pass mentions of the organisation rather than being articles specifically about the organisation.
 This article also isn't sourced well.  I count 7/10 sources that are about women in prison rather than the organisation.  — Panamitsu (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Crime ,  and Discrimination .  — Panamitsu (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , California , Illinois ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Association of Asian American Professionals: No significant coverage from secondary sources found in a WP:BEFORE search, just passing mentions of someone winning a NAAAP award [39] , [40] .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naxatra News Hindi: ☆★ Sanjeev Kumar ( talk ) 11:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television , Bihar ,  and Jharkhand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not have any significant coverages and non-notable news portal.  Citadeol (talk) 18:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A pure, unadulterated promotional effort , haphazardly put together after being allowed to appear ten years ago.  But Wikipedia has thankfully moved on from that time.  It's explicitly not a collection of random information.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I want to allow this, because it seems to be a real station with 85k subscribers on Youtube and thousands of clips posted, but in my searching I could only find one third-party source [23] and it's an article from 2008 that might just be a press release.  Night Gyr ( talk / Oy ) 18:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jorekhali Senior Fazil Digree Madrasah: Theroadislong ( talk ) 12:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bangladesh .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 12:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found in Google or Gnews, what's used now as sourcing is government documents (test results).  appears PROMO as well Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 02:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SongLyrics: PROD contested by an IP.  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 00:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Websites .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 00:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article is one of a series, mostly of nursery rhymes, written by the same editor, using multiple accounts (now abandoned) as well as editing logged out.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : unsourced, author does not know the year it was created.  I couldn't find any WP:RS in my search, and prose of article seems like an WP:ADVERT.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  23:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV or RS.  This isn't the type of website to get any in the first place.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 03:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
End of Everything: Previously deprodded in 2007 with reasons that amount to inherited notability * Pppery * it has begun... 14:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Scotland .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Walking Dead references pop up, nothing for this musical number.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous WP:PROD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 14:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Three (End of Everything album) should also be deleted.  BoxxyBoy ( talk ) 05:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enchanting Apple: Unable to find sources.  Fails WP:NBOOK .  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 14:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 14:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:V , no interwiki.  Not a hoax, but nothing in the article suggests WP:NBOOK is met.  Failed attempt to create an article.  Original PROD removed by the creator, sigh.  Almost all of their articles have been deleted ( [13] ), I see one is prodded, I'll prod the last one.  Someone clearly has hard time understanding WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Sexuality and gender ,  and Japan .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cookbooks and a Victorian Halloween traditions are what come up, nothing for this manga/book.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Uzbek Women's Football Championship: This is basically a "stats only" article with no sources covering the topic of the article in depth.  So, no indication of wp:notability under GNG or the SNG.  Regarding the subject of the article, the prose contains merely a statement of it's existence and what it is and the n remainder is stats-only covering who won it.  In trying to do my NPP job properly, I can find no evidence of wP:Notability under GNG or the SNG.  Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 00:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Uzbekistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  killer bee 09:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep – Supposedly it is the most important women's football competition in the country.  Women's football is certainly less notable, but I don't think it's a case of exclusion.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Being the top event of the country doesn't mean it passes WP:GNG , which is needed for this article to be kept.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rho Capital Partners: No references hace significant coverage so fails the general and corporation specific policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation , Finance , Organizations , Business , United States of America ,  and New York .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only found the usual routine company listings and statistics; other sources seem to be press releases.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Most sources are just based on investment participation for other companies.  Still, no significant coverage.  Toadette ( let's chat together ) 12:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV about the fund, beyond routine business transactions or non-independent sources.  22:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TalentEgg: Article unchanged since then but does not meet WP:NORG .  Orange sticker ( talk ) 10:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Internet ,  and Canada .  Orange sticker ( talk ) 10:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  Most of the sourcing focuses on interviewing the founder and contains no "Independent Content" beyond what has been provided by the company and/or execs.  HighKing ++ 17:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete