2028 Tasmanian state election: CycloneYoris talk!  02:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia .  CycloneYoris talk!  02:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep All "next election" articles are implicitly notable, the article should be moved to its redirect (Next Tasmanian state election), but not deleted.  AveryTheComrade ( talk ) 09:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If it's implicitly notable where are the reliable secondary sources?  None of the sources in this article go towards the notability of the article.  Tar nis hed Path talk 08:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is your argument that a Tasmanian election would not be notable?  Because a state election in Tasmanian is implicitly notable.  And as background is apart of election articles, this type of coverage has already started eg with the speaker being chosen /agreements being signed for the minority government as sourced in the article.  MyacEight ( talk ) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] An agreement for minority government for this term of government is your evidence for the 2028 state election?  I'm sorry can you point out in that ABC source where it talks about the 2028 election and not merely the outcome of the 2024 election?  Where is your sourcing from multiple secondary reliable sources which demonstrates demonstrates WP:SIGCOV ?  Demonstrate it is notable with sources.  Tar nis hed Path talk 05:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose Every other state/territory had their "next election" page created shortly after the last, however agree with @ AveryTheComrade it should be moved to Next Tasmanian state election Totallynotarandomalt69 ( talk ) 02:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERTHINGS is not a good argument in deletion discussions and perhaps that practice should cease.  Tar nis hed Path talk 08:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Although WP:OTHERTHINGS may not be a full or 'good' argument it can still be an argument and when in the context of elections is a relevant one.  Particularly for main election articles of National and State elections.  All of the other 5 states and main 2 territories of Australia have next election articles.  MyacEight ( talk ) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If those articles are about events that are almost 4 years away and the sourcing is as lacking as this articles then you only make an argument for nominating those articles for deletion.  Tar nis hed Path talk 05:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tasmaina only had an election 2 months ago.  Significant coverage of the next election is years away.  Similar AfDs of premature election coverage has appeared at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candidates of the next Australian federal election (2nd nomination) and the 1st nomination.  Teraplane ( talk ) 02:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is ridiculously WP:TOOSOON .  The last election has only just happened and this is almost four years off.  Tar nis hed Path talk 08:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The next election is not set in stone at 4 years away as the Tas Parliament states Term: the length of time House of Assembly elections - since 1976 this has been a maximum of four years.  and that's why I do agree with previous comments that it should be moved to Next Tasmanian state election instead.  It should be noted that both previous elections went early at about 3 years each 2018 Tasmanian state election and 2021 Tasmanian state election .  And with a hung parliament as described in the article that potential is high again.  MyacEight ( talk ) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and rename to Next Tasmanian state election .  The next election in a democratic state is not a violation of WP:CRYSTAL .  I also agree with the rational of the other comments supporting a keep position.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 15:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and rename per Enos733.  Next elections are almost always notable and this doesn't violate WP:CRYSTAL : only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place .  SportingFlyer T · C 00:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I'm still failing to see a single reliable secondary source in the article which talks about the 2028 election.  How can anyone possibly argue that this passes WP:GNG without appropriate sourcing?  Tar nis hed Path talk 12:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You seem really dead-set on insisting that an article about the 2028 election isn't notable, while failing to address that everyone arguing for keeping the article is in support of renaming it to be more generally the next state election.  AveryTheComrade ( talk ) 18:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's absolutely zero coverage in secondary sources.  How much more WP:TOOSOON can you get than that?  Even if it were to be renamed to Next Tasmanian state election the same statement holds.  At best this should be draftify but I don't really see that as much of an alternative to deletion given how far out the election is.  Tar nis hed Path talk 11:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  22:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as not too soon, but consider moving to the less definite title.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing to say about the election than "it will happen sometime".  If kept, support moving to next Tasmanian state election instead.  Stifle ( talk ) 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus