hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ringwood City SC: Couldn't find any online either.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Semi-professional football club the has been around for over 50 years and has played in the top tier of football in Victoria .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Simione.  Giant Snowman 13:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article appears to should WP:BASIC in my opinion.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Govvy : WP:BASIC is in relation to biographies.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 14:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  Many sources like [104] , [105] , [106] , [107] , [108] .  Clearly notbale historical team in Australia.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 17:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Das, clearly notable and passes WP:GNG shown by above sources.  Kline | let me clear my throat!  | (contribs) 20:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Iyowa : Although one of my favorite producers, he fails notability sadly.  btw, heat abnormal is a banger.  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 17:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan .  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 17:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with a high charting album reaching 9 on the Oricon chart which is the Japanese national music chart as well as charting at 9 on the Billboard Japan Hot Albums chart and another album reaching 50 on that chart, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Sam Jones (Doctor Who) : Given the few sources both just focus on her death and its canonicity, I don't think this article meets GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Chris Martin (boxing trainer) : BEFORE search only provided three sources that could be argued as SIGCOV (all written after his death); this is written by the article creator, so doesn't do much to establish notability; this is the strongest, but doesn't really offer much to base an article on (he was well respected, he trained X, people liked him, etc.); this is just a reword of the i.stuff article.  All other sources I found were the same kind of passing mentions as what's currently used in the article.  – 2 .  O .  Boxing 11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing ,  and New Zealand .  2 .  O .  Boxing 11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Even though a lot of the articles are just mentions, there is significant amount of articles which i believe meets GN.  On top of that A couple things that are missed that significant coverage including [32] , [33] .  On top of that if you see here [34] , you can see how much coverage Martin got surrounding his death and working with David Tua from local newspapers across New Zealand.  Bennyaha ( talk ) 11:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw : The depth of coverage provided above isn't the best, but it's a whole lot more than what I found, which leads me to believe there's probably more.  Good effort Benny.  – 2 .  O .  Boxing 11:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Physical system : - car chasm ( talk ) 16:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   This term is linked from a lot of articles and is used as a further exploration of a term used in a lot of physics articles.    It is not a WP:DICTDEF ; it does not describe its part of speech, pluralizations, usage, etymology, translations into other languages, and so forth.   The article can use expansion, not deletion.  RecycledPixels ( talk ) 17:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per RecycledPixels!  And expand , when I saw how nicely the corresponding German wikipedia article is written, I blushed.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] German wikipedia has different rules on content, so I'm not entirely convinced, but I've added the references from that article to this one.  The one book cited there by Mario Bunge (who is certainly reliable) says "A physical system is anything existing in spacetime and such that it either behaves or is handled as a whole in at least one respect" which seems like a very generic term to me.  - car chasm ( talk ) 18:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Because it actually is a very generic term that needs further definition as to its specific properties and (e. g. in case of an open system) any sort of relationship with the environment, in which it is found.  Used in thought experiments a lot.  It's as generic as the concept of, say, food.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 04:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Common concept in science, engineering, etc.  Article clearly needs some love.  — siro χ o 20:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The question of what can be treated as a physical system has been much discussed over the years: does a human mind qualify?  What about the Universe in its entirety?  And so forth.  It's an encyclopedic topic.  I could be convinced that this would make more sense treated as a section of another article (e.g., physics ); for comparison, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy uses the term all over the place but doesn't have an article with that title [5] .  But I'm not seeing a case for outright deletion.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 01:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Tegenaria rhodiensis : No sources can be found, no suitable pages to redirect or merge were found, and it also fails WP:V even more so than WP:N .  Equal width ( C ) 10:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Greece .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep No suitable WP:BEFORE was done; multiple sources are trivially easy to find, added three.  Valid species with clear taxonomic history.  Suggest withdrawing this.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 12:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For the nominator, the relevant guidance is at WP:NSPECIES ; basically valid species are invariably keep .  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , obviously, per WP:NSPECIES .  Owen× ☎ 14:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with sources per Elmidae, contrary to the nomination statements.  KoA ( talk ) 18:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Omar Agrebi : Could not find SIGCOV about him.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Tunisia .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Studia Islamica : If it needs inclusion it needs to be improved from scratch with valid sources.  Can't be there in mainspace in such a poor condition.  Maliner ( talk ) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  Wikipedia is not a place for the promotion of such journals.  Maliner ( talk ) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep one of the oldest, most authoritative and widely-cited academic journals in its field.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Common Sense Party of California : Most of the references are primary and one of the references even implies possible fraud, which is conveniently left out of the article.  Raladic ( talk ) 03:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and California .  Raladic ( talk ) 03:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article's promo content or lack of relevant issues have no bearing on notability, those be resolved via copy-editing.  In a five minute search I found mutli-year RS SIGCOV of the Party, some examples: LA Times profile Feb 2022 , Orange County Register March 2022 , San Francisco Chronicle Sept 2020 , KPBS September 2020 , NewsNation Jan 2023 .  Passes the GNG.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 22:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Thanks for the comment, I submit that under the WP:SIGCOV , I suppose it would meet the notability standard.  But with the article in its current form being an advert under WP:PROMO , does WP:NOT as one of the four policies on deletion per WP:BEFORE and WP:DEL-REASON not still apply as grounds for the AfD, or move into draft space?  Raladic ( talk ) 22:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If an article on Coca-Cola only contained information about how good it tasted, it would be PROMO, but that would not mean it was not a valid subject for an article because the notability of Coca-Cola can be easily demonstrated via independent reliable sourcing.   As is the case here, the solution to the problem is copy-editing, not deletion.   Note the qualifying clause to DEL-REASON #4.  " without any relevant or encyclopedic content ."  Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 02:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok thanks for explaining the nuance.  I hope someone will make the copy edits to make it less promotional.  I will withdraw the AfD per your explanation as speedy keep .  Raladic ( talk ) 20:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Gaurav Bolchhi: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 13:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and West Bengal .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 13:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment this article appears to be about a podcast not an actor.  The appropriate SNG would either be WP:NPODCAST or WP:WEB not NACTOR.  The subject also looks like it might have coverage in non-English sources.  If the podcast is not notable the article could be merged or redirected to Gaurav Chakrabarty as an WP:ATD .  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 03:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw : Inappropriate nomination, therefore, retracting it.  If anyone wishes to propose it again, they are warmly encouraged to do so.  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hudson Valley Islamic Community Center: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Islam ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Pizza (film series): However, the theme and the pace remains the same.  This is not a film franchise (most have 3+ films).  This article does not add anything that is not on Pizza (2012 film) and Pizza II: Villa .  The box office performance is not significant like K.G.F (film series) .  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun and Frustration .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 03:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw my nomination due to the news of the release of the third film in four days.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 19:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Indus Group of Institutions: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
West Virginia folklore: This has significant sourcing issues, written like an essay, once you remove the OR, unsourced and off-topic there is very little left.  No objection to drafting.  // Timothy :: talk 05:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and West Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn : I just realized this was a student editor, I withdraw to give them time to work on the article.  // Timothy :: talk 06:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
HPI Groupe: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Richard Medlin : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football ,  and United States of America .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Here are a couple of sources [33] [34] Alvaldi ( talk ) 15:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Bleacher Report does not seem to be a reliable source, and one good source is not enough to establish notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] (edit conflict) They seem to have a staff and they're cited on over 7,000 articles ; I would say its reliable unless a discussion decides otherwise.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) / [ reply ] Keep .  I expected to find more and agree its a somewhat close call, but considering this is someone who played in the National Football League in very recent (2011)/modern times (and we've never deleted one of those minus one of the '87 replacements) we should keep based on the following sources: "Garner native making most of his chance" from The News & Observer (which is an in-depth feature story); "Fayetteville State's Medlin continues NFL dream with Dolphins" from WRAL-TV ; "Miami Dolphins Sign Running Back Richard Medlin to Practice Squad" from Bleacher Report (while about a transaction, it is much more in-depth than most and so counts as SIGCOV as well); and "Fayetteville State's Medlin leads nation in kickoff returns" from The Fayetteville Observer (via ProQuest , 535 words on Medlin).  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - BeanieFan11 shows just enough coverage to meet GNG, although I am not including Bleacher Report since I am not sure it counts as RS.  Rlendog ( talk ) 16:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Beaniefan11's sources.  « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have greatly improved the article, see here .  @ QuicoleJR : Would you be willing to withdraw this nomination?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I would be.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Indian Rheumatology Association : Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Medicine ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Once Fallen : I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found these from Looper.com and Newspapers.com respectively, and neither of them are suitable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 19:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 19:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I also found this link from MovieWeb , which is not enough.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 19:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this Dutch movie magazine review here , Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for finding that.   According to User:Donaldd23 , Cinemagazine is considered reliable.   However, I will not withdraw unless: A. ) there’s one other reliable or suitable review; or B. ) more “keep” votes per consensus.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 00:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Review in Italian at MyMovies.it, which makes 2 at least.  Internationally distributed. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw nomination per reviews by Cinemagazine and Mymovies.it.   Passes NFO, NFSOURCES and NEXIST.  Excellent work, everybody.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 18:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Junlper : Clear WP:BLP1E created after her suspension from Twitter.  She's not notable on her own, only the things she did (goblin mode, Snickers dick vein, both of which have articles) are.  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 13:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 13:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Independent Curators International : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  Article written by subject.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Organizations ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn