hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Institute of Electronics Engineers of the Philippines : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Engineering , Technology ,  and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Aleppo Township Volunteer Fire Company: typically these types of topics are not notable and don't require an article made about them.  B3251 ( talk ) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  B3251 ( talk ) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looks to have no coverage in any reliable sources.  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 02:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please do not remove this article of mine JustinKurt1411 ( talk ) 02:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hey there, I know that it sucks to have an article you created deleted/nominated for deletion when you're a newer editor and it can feel discouraging to the work you put in to it, trust me I know - my very first article was deleted for practically the same reason.  That being said, it is important considering whether the article you're creating is going to be encyclopedically significant or not.  For incredibly local departments (i.e. fire departments), they generally aren't going to be notable enough to be on Wikipedia - thus, the only fire departments you see on Wikipedia are generally major ones.  I recommend taking a look at WP:ORG .  Best wishes.  B3251 ( talk ) 02:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pennsylvania .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 02:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Completely non-notable.  Elshad ( talk ) 12:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable.  Gjs238 ( talk ) 19:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing I find shows notability under WP:GNG or WP:NCORP . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Motzoid India: Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 21:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , India ,  and England .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 21:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination and also due to the article's bad track record.  IncompA 21:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can see some coverage in reliable sources, we can put this article as a stub and then add more information later on as we find.  Teachaiwala2007 ( talk ) 22:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, you need to show that coverage in relable sources exists here in this discussion.  If the company is not notable, then there is no point to waiting for more information, as the article will be deleted.  Press releases are not reliable sources.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 22:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt , obviously created for WP:PROMO reasons.  Please note this is the third deletion on record, please don't let this article be recreated a 4th time.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt - fails WP:GNG and has been repeatedly recreated by socks; see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhumik Pravin (2nd nomination) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps consider upgrading to a vote to salt BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Dr. Aravindan Selvaraj: Reason/s: no sources) Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 13:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 13:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Anthony Vaz (American investor): Not meeting notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: I was in the process of deleting this as G11 at the same time.  Completely puffery, all sources were paid and known SEO sinks.  The author lit up the blacklist log with a dozen other blackhat SEO links as well.  Sam Kuru (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom withdrawn, is already G11'ed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Acharya Satish Awasthi: Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 04:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astrology and Uttar Pradesh .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 04:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion on simplewiki .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 04:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Creator has now moved to draftspace.  Delete : Cannot find any significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.  Fails WP:BASIC Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Jo Narbett: Nothing close to WP:SIGCOV .  TLA (talk) 06:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Moynaguri High School: RPSkokie ( talk ) 13:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Goa Island (India): The author claims there is an Island within the state of Goa known as Goa Island or Island of Goa.  I couldn't find any sources mentioned in the article thats states the same.  An exact copy of the article tone was previously created on Goa Island article by a blocked user.  But I reworked the article from zero as it was actually an Island of Mozambique.  This seems like a case of WP:OR .  Rejoy 2003 ( talk ) 07:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Goa ,  and Islands .  Rejoy 2003 ( talk ) 07:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see the Talk:Goa Island (India) page of the article for the justification of the page's existence as well as the reply to User:C.Fred for the sources.  You may not find the exact name (ie. Goa Island ) in sources for two main reasons:  1. Historical references to this island ( Ilha de Goa ) is in the Portuguese language, not English; since Goa was under Portuguese rule, not British.  2. Due to the construction of several bridges in recent history, connecting the island to other parts of Goa, it gives an impression that it is not an island.  Zocdoclesson ( talk ) 08:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Here are some sources, in the form of historical maps: Notice the piece of land called Ilha de Goa is surrounded on all sides be water - which makes it an island.  (Ilha is the Portuguese word for Island)  This same body of water can be seen today.  A quick on any navigation app (eg. Google Maps ) will show you the island surrounded by water.  Geo Coordinates for reference: 15.4725025, 73.9491687 Zocdoclesson ( talk ) 08:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under criterion A10 , recently created article that duplicates an existing article: Divar .  No evidence that the name is in common usage in English.  — C.Fred ( talk ) 12:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This island is completely different from Divar .  Did you bot see the images in the previous comment?  Zocdoclesson ( talk ) 13:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not* Zocdoclesson ( talk ) 13:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
European Football Coach of the Year: There are no authoritative sources about such an award from UEPS and AEJ.  Mitte27 ( talk ) 17:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Mitte27 ( talk ) 17:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Awards , Football ,  and Europe .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as hoax (G3).  Giant Snowman 18:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:G3 Govvy ( talk ) 19:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: After deleting an article, you must also delete Template:European Coach of the Year created based on fake information.  -- Mitte27 ( talk ) 01:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: It is also necessary to pay attention to similar cases of hoaxes based on Volodymyr VB materials: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Football Coach of the Season , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPI World Soccer Player of the Year Award , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA 70th anniversary retrospective awards . -- Mitte27 ( talk ) 06:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a hoax.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete – WP:G3 .  Svartner ( talk ) 07:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Studio Center Corporation: Not to mention that it is full of copious copy-pasting and other copyvios and is written in a completely non-neutral manner.  AriTheHorse 15:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  From the creator's talk page it seems that article about Studio Center had already been speedy deleted in the past.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, it's clearly what the section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion is talking about.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was gona WP:G11 it, bu Deb beat me to it.  --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 16:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Daniel Larson (celebrity): Beyond mentions in TikTok videos and a subreddit, I could find nothing on him.  0 coverage in RS.  ULPS ( talk ) 21:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  ULPS ( talk ) 21:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  This article has been moved around at least a half dozen times to numerous different titles and namespaces by this editor, most recently deleted as an attack page at Draft:Daniel Larson (President) .  The page creator tried to hijack Dan Larson (politician) which required numerous revision deletions.  I think this article should also be speedy deleted and this editor face sanctions for continuing to create unflattering pages about this person (if they even exist).  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would you say it qualifies under G10?  I didn't think A7 applied (the billion views thing + being allegedly killed by police), but I was unsure considering it's not an unambiguous attack.  Not a hoax either, the guy seemingly does exist.  ULPS ( talk ) 22:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, considering the BLP is unsourced, I wouldn't rule out that it is a total hoax and the photo might be of someone else entirely.  I think if someone was a TikTok celebrity and was killed by the police it would not just be on local news but national news.  I'd delete it myself but I've already commented here.  But I think that my POV is also colored by the fact that I've seen this exact same article with the same content many times under different page titles over the past two weeks.  L iz Read!  Talk!  00:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that the police murder thing is a lie, but he does seem to exist.  I think we should let the AfD run (most likely will end up deleted anyway) but if someone else decides to tag or delete I wouldn't complain lol.  ULPS ( talk ) 02:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I suspect this is a hoax.  The photo is apparently a selfie, so would have been created by this person.  It was taken on July 5, and the article here says he died on the 11th.  He took the photo, uploaded it to wikipedia, died, then someone else made an article about him a week later, using the photo?  The only person with the same name [3] for which I found coverage would be about 20 yrs older and only covered in tabloid sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Proposal to make Arabic as the state language of Pakistan: Not sure why it was moved to main namespace, we should not encourage LTA.  This version is exactly same as previously deleted version by User:Bbb23 & User:Izno ( log ).  Also, previously User:Bilorv declined the article (see User_talk:103.67.156.64#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Proposal_to_make_Arabic_as_the_state_language_of_Pakistan_(December_23) ).  Anyway, this is a WP:OR article.  There was some talk but that's it, this wasn't' any sort of official proposals or any historical movement etc.  Other than some mentions, i don't see any WP:SIGCOV .  At best, article should be merge with Languages of Pakistan#Arabic .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 17:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Arafat Hassan Sohan: Theroadislong ( talk ) 20:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Journalism .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 20:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree.  This article did not explain anything that a biography article should have; unreliable citation.  ★MinecraftPlayer★ 321 Welcome!  22:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Dimitrі Torner: I’ve previously done it here , here , here and here , so I’m glad for a chance at another round.  Anyway, at the risk of repeating myself, the President of the Moldovan Biathlon Federation just isn’t notable, per any biographical criterion, and no amount of routine coverage of his daily activities will change that.  One does have to admire the desperate effort to keep creating articles about him, however.  — Biruitorul Talk 06:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging various users with various levels of previous involvement: @ Xx236 : , @ Dewritech : , @ Johnj1995 : , @ FormalDude : , @ Frank Anchor : , @ 4meter4 : , @ Sundostund : , @ Thebiguglyalien : , @ Oxi2514 : , @ Ivanvector : — Biruitorul Talk 09:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Moldova .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting that this topic has been repeatedly deleted, as Dmitri Torner , Dmitry Torner , Draft:Dmitry Torner , and probably others.  There is a spam blacklist entry, but the creator who is obviously somebody's sockpuppet (they made exactly 10 edits to their userpage before creating this page in one edit) deliberately misspelled the person's name to evade the filter.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 12:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, this title uses a Cyrillic unicode character for the last "i" in the first name.  It was also deleted recently at Dimitri Torner .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 12:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Manikanta Belde (author): Fram ( talk ) 16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and India .  Fram ( talk ) 16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Procedural note This article was created by a large WP:UPE sockfarm that I'm in the process of untangling. I've speedy deleted it per WP:CSD#G11 .-- Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Out of Dark: ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 01:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 .  CycloneYoris talk!  01:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Czech Republic .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
The '90s Are Blue's Clues (Block): 🍪 Cookie Monster 00:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : There is a sockfarm that has long tried to assert (usually in draftspace, but occasionally in mainspace) that TeenNick has a block devoted to Nick Jr.-type programming in some form.  It's all a hoax ( G3 ), and the socking probably will tip this into G5 territory too.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wcquidditch , should I tag G3?  — 🍪 Cookie Monster 00:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've gone ahead and done it myself.  (Note the overdisambiguation, too; The '90s Are Blue's Clues is salted .)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wcquidditch , ty.  — 🍪 Cookie Monster 00:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete