hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Soane Asi : Doesn't meet WP:SPORTBASIC Shinadamina ( talk ) 14:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople ,  and Rugby union .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 14:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The only reliable information for him is on this ESPN page , that provides a mediocre amount of information.  Other than that I couldn't find any reliable sources on him.  The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 14:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found some more information KoreanDragon ( talk ) 20:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : ESPN is about the extent of coverage.  Some unrelated linkedin posts, nothing else for notability I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Linkedin profile stated that it was him, as seen in the info.  "My name is Soane Asi being working as Lab Technician for Winstone for 23 years migrates from the Kingdom of Tonga 1987 after the very first Rugby World Cup where I represent Tonga I play as an Utility Backs from 2nd Five eight to Full Back but I play my first game on wing against Canada. Back Home I work for the ministry of Works as a Technical Officers for 8 years. Graduate with a Civil Engineering Diploma on Road Constructions 2 years Study on Ministry of Works Courses."  KoreanDragon ( talk ) 10:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Tonga national rugby union players Some sourcing exists, but difficult to judge whether it would pass WP:GNG with offline coverage, redirect is a suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
X (automobile) : I am unable to find any other sourcing, and the given source is only a listing that says "X (France) (1908-1909)."  The article went unsourced for 18 years and the text has not been expanded upon since its original creation.  Even given the age of this, it does not seem to have any claim to importance or historical significance since it existed for a year at most and "little is known about the marque."  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Technology , Transportation ,  and France .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No evidence of notability.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 22:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert to disambiguation page for X-branded cars The three hatnotes at the very least justify that use and we can retain this make as part of it.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert.  MrSchimpf's proposal seems good to me.  My understanding is that the Tesla will likely be referred to more commonly as "Model X" than just "X", and as for the other two their readership counts are both below 200 per day , which to me is not sufficient to decide the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC .  S5A-0043 Talk 10:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Works for me.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 19:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems like a good alternative to me.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, there should be a disambig for X-branded cars but usually disambs are just a list of links to other pages and there will be no other page for this 1908 automobile.  But, in the spirit of incremental improvement, I'm happy to accept this proposal and do the best we can with it now and assume there will be further improvement in the future.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Paciano Rizal, Calamba : Virtually unsourced barangay (administrative ward/village) article, with a one but non-independent citation (Calamba city government).  The article primarily serves as a directory, with listings of their establishments, government offices, and industrial sites.  A breach of WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  See also Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive 47#Are barangays notable?  (can we please have a consensus now?) .  At the most closest alternative, redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays .  AfD is created to provide a strong basis for redirection.  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 02:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 02:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete being legally recognisable isn't enough.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Very hard to search for because it was named for Paciano Rizal.  There's definitely some scholarly hits talking about schools, but would need to search a local paper in order to be sure.  SportingFlyer T · C 10:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays as an WP:ATD .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 04:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays as an WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cloud9 Entertainment : Feels promotional though use of peacock wording, but without any direct advertising.  Has numerous references, though some of dubious quality.  May possibly be saved if notable and copy-edited.  Listing to gain consensus.  Os ari us 14:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Os ari us 14:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Thailand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Os ari us 09:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vachirawit Chivaaree .  There is zero coverage of the company that is independent of its owner and (as of now) sole artist; the company itself is simply not notable on its own, yet.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 11:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Charles Gaylord : Ref 2 is not WP:IS , and refs 3&4 are questionably lacking in independence as well.  So, fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sports , Martial arts , United States of America , California ,  and Hawaii .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] COMMENT It looks like he was one of the three pioneers who brought kajukenbo to the US, [6] he may also have introduced a notable technique/method called "the Gaylord Method of Kajukenbo", [7] more research for sources is needed as this is all quite old but if more found a {{ Sources exist }} template might work otherwise I would recommend a merge with the kajukenbo article.  Lewolka ( talk ) 11:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The art was created in Hawaii.   The article says he was one of the first to bring it to California.   The Gaylord method was his self-titled version of the the art.  Papaursa ( talk ) 20:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes should have added continental.  Lewolka ( talk ) 19:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of significance of the subject.  Completely fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kajukenbo .   None of the references can be considered significant, independent coverage from reliable sources.  However, he is mentioned multiple times in the article on the art and that article contains all the significant information that is in his personal article.   Therefore, I'm advocating for a redirect.  Papaursa ( talk ) 20:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] REDIRECT to Kajukenbo .  not enough for standalone article.  Lewolka ( talk ) 19:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chandler Lawson : Let'srun ( talk ) 02:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Tennessee .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss Tennessee#Winners as an alternative to deletion .  The subject has not received sustained coverage and the subject is also only notable for one event .  ~ Tails Wx 02:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
15 (Phatfish album) : They don't pass WP:NALBUMS #1.  BEFORE search: 15 : review , short news snip In Jesus : review , short news snip , passing mention Anthems for Worship : review , short news snip , passing mention SWinxy ( talk ) 19:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also nominating: In Jesus ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Anthems for Worship ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs ,  and Music .  SWinxy ( talk ) 19:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to - and unlink from - Phatfish , rather than delete.  Thanks to nom for doing a WP:BEFORE search, helpful.  Agree that it fails WP:NALBUM / WP:SIGCOV .  Mattdaviesfsic ( talk ) 20:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Phatfish per nom, although after looking through that article I'm not too confident in the group's notability either.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all (three albums) to Phatfish .  Some of the band's other works got some notice, but these three albums seem to have been generally ignored by the reliable music media, and the articles are dependent on minor fan trivia.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tufts Blue : Currently sourced only to Tufts' brand identity guide.  Oxford Blue this is not.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 22:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tufts University as nom.  (There's currently Shades of blue § Tufts blue , but given the lack of sourcing, I think that section should be removed.) {{u| Sdkb }} talk 22:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Advertising , Education ,  and Massachusetts .  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 22:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also related AfDs for UCLA Blue , BISU Visual Identity , and RISD Blue .  I tagged Carolina blue for notability, as it's a little more borderline.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 01:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above as a likely colloquial term.  The primary source provided doesn't fully support this article, and a more modern version eg [2] does not either.  Without any sourcing a merge of any kind seems inappropriate.  — siro χ o 01:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: as above.   Never mind without sourcing, what kind of actual content is there to merge?  That the university's marketing department has its own color codes for the shade of blue they prefer?   Heck, I used to live in Medford, and I've never heard this turn of phrase.  Ravenswing 04:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ann Gloria Daniel : Perhaps redirect to the pageant?  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Florida .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to Draft No solid sourcing for the article.  I believe notability might be established, but there is just not the sourcing to back this up.  PickleG13 ( talk ) 09:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss Florida as insufficient sourcing found for separate article.  The image is already on that page.  Rupples ( talk ) 16:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of forts in Artsakh : Originally prod'd the page tho per User:RadioactiveBoulevardier , I'll put this up to AfD.  As an WP:ATD, I'm also open to turning this page into a redirect though I think the article title leaves room for confusion (I think its just as likely that a user would search for a list of forts in the ancient Artsakh empires/entities as for a list of forts in the soon-to-dissolve Republic of Artsakh (both topics are also not co-extensive).  Dan the Animator 17:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Lists .  Dan the Animator 17:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions .  Archives908 ( talk ) 17:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most are non-notable.  Orientls ( talk ) 06:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect -- Now that the Armenian republic of Artsakh has been conquered and dissolved, there is no merit in the existence of this article.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 11:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of castles and fortresses in Azerbaijan .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2003 International Songwriting Competition : This particular year of the annual competition fails GNG and NCORP.  As a list of awardees, this list also fails NLIST.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ● Delete (Sooner The Better) - Per Nomination PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 18:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PaulGamerBoy360 , which of the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion do you think apply here?   (Or maybe you meant something like "this is a very obvious case"?)  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sooner The Better 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 20:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Events ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International Songwriting Competition .   There's no actual need to delete it, and it's just barely possible that someone would want to look at the old revisions if they were creating a ==Winners of the grand prize== section in the main article.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Quacula : The article has no good sources, and I couldn't find any from a Google search.  If we don't want to delete it, redirecting it to The New Adventures of Mighty Mouse and Heckle & Jeckle is also an option.  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 03:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 03:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 05:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect There are no reliable references cited in this article, and searching the internet turned up nothing.  So redirecting it to The New Adventures of Mighty Mouse and Heckle & Jeckle sounds like a better alternative.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 06:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Nothing in the article suggests this is notable .  Ping me if sources are found to suggest otherwise.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 13:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or very very weak keep I found some coverage in books ( [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] ) and [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] .  ★Trekker ( talk ) 14:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Light Merge to The New Adventures of Mighty Mouse and Heckle & Jeckle .  The sources available upon searching, including those linked to above, are very brief, with many of them being nothing but acknowledgements that it existed, which is not enough to show notability for a separate article.  Redirecting to the main The New Adventures of Mighty Mouse and Heckle & Jeckle is an obvious WP:ATD , though.  And while the character is mentioned already on that page, there is absolutely no information there explaining who/what it is, so a couple of sentences should probably be merged over to at least give some context.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per all.  This is mostly a recap of episodes that the character appeared in, without any reliable reception of its own.  The sources verify the existence of the character and perhaps a brief summary is appropriate at the main article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect