Battle of Mullihambato : (in terms of the victor), and "unknown")  – and they are totally unverifiable.  Spanish version of article also doesn't inspire confidence, as it suggests that this battle is also called the "Battle of Ambato", the "Battle of Chimborazo", or the "Battle of Nagsichi" – and it's doubtful that any source actually links all 4 of them as one and the same.  (Newson  (1995), Life and Death in Early Colonial Ecuador , mentions a major battle in Ambato, but that doesn't exactly match the description here, either. )  Perhaps a new article could be created in the future called "Battle of Ambato" or equivalent, but if so, it would need to be backed by reliable sources.  (N.B., a separate article on Battle of Chimborazo already exists in English Wikipedia.)  Article as it has stood for 16 years is essentially original research  ( WP:OR )  and should be deleted on those grounds.  Cielquiparle  ( talk )  11:56, 28 May 2024  (UTC)  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Ecuador .  Cielquiparle  ( talk )  11:56, 28 May 2024  (UTC)  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 28 May 2024  (UTC)  [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra  ( talk )  19:02, 28 May 2024  (UTC)  [ reply ] Redirect to Battle of Chillopampa per Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco , History of the Inca Realm , 1999, p. 116: "The two armies had their first encounter on the plain of Chillopampa, with Huascar's troops defeating those of Atahualpa. Nevertheless, Atahualpa's generals, reacting quickly, regrouped their scattered troops and, with fresh reinforcements from Quito, were able to recover. According to Cabello de Valboa, this first encounter took place in Mullihambato, near the river, and in a second battle, luck favored Atahualpa's captains. Cieza maintains that only one battle took place. In this fighting...Atoc was taken prisoner and fell victim to the cruelty of Challcochima, who, according to some versions, had a gold-incrusted chica cup made of his skull."  There is no clear source that says that this battle occurred independently of either Chillopampa or Chimborazo, and through Rostworowski the suggestion is made that Mullihambato is Chillopampa, with the second battle, if it occurred, being Chimborazo.  A redirect to the Chillopampa page would allow mention of the possibility of this name to be made there.  I do not recommend a merge because the article is uncited and would require a complete rewrite to be useful in any article.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe  ( talk )  14:38, 29 May 2024  (UTC)  [ reply ] Comment .  @ Pickersgill-Cunliffe Interesting find...but then why not simply redirect to Inca Civil War and have some corresponding text there explaining the historians' disagreement?  In general I'm wary of the entire set of individual battle pages – it's almost like the Wikipedia "wars/battles" structure is driving a certain type of framing of the Inca Civil War that may not be warranted, given that there is disagreement among historians about which battles even took place to start with, and the depth of information available about a few of the battles is quite thin for many.  (Even the broader Inca Civil War article itself tells a different story from what the individual battle pages and template seem to suggest.)  As an example, there is yet another framing in Enduring controversies in military history: critical analyses and context  (ABC-CLIO, 2017)  which explores "Did the Inca Civil War play an important role in the Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire?" which suggests that the main battles occurred in Tumebamba, Ambato, and Quipaipan.  On Wikipedia now we have the following pages, some of which only cite one source, and present information as though it's uncontested: Inca Civil War Battle of Chillopampa Battle of Mullihambato  (subject of current AfD discussion)  "Capture of Tumebamba" (soft redirect within the template to main Tumebamba page) Battle of Huanucopampa Battle of Quipaipán If you go through the sequence of individual battle pages, it feels like a rather breezy creation of a bunch of articles for the sake of building a narrative that fits the template.  (Not suggesting we need solve the whole problem here, just pointing out the context.)  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 23:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Cielquiparle : Agree there seems to be some confusion about the civil war, but as you say we'll stick to this article.  I think that redirecting to Chillopampa is most appropriate because it appears that we do have historians mostly agreeing that this battle occurred, and that if Mullihambato existed (as the same battle or a different one) it was directly connected to it.  People searching for these events are more likely to go to Chillopampa, which isn't actually mentioned in the main article!  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 12:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Inca Civil War : I just don't see why this should redirect to another battle, this would confuse readers who are looking for information on Mullihambato and end up on a different battle.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 21:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] While I'm not opposed to the redirect instead being Inca Civil War , I would note that the point of my vote is that this battle is considered the same as, if not interconnected with, Chillopampa.  I'm not just voting to redirect to a random battle.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 21:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect