hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WFHA-LP: All radio stations must meet WP:GNG , and this one does not.  All sources are primary government sources and directory/program listings.  First AfD was closed as keep due to assertions of the inherent notability of every radio station in the world.  A RfC has subsequently rejected this.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , United States of America ,  and Florida .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yet another remnant of the looser notability "standards" of 2007 in this topic area — and most of that era's over-presumption of notability for broadcast stations was still at least somewhat present during that 2020 AfD (there's virtually no way, after the 2021 RfC the nominator alluded to that found no consensus for any looser notability guideline in this topic area than the GNG, that citing NMEDIA / BCAST would be considered policy or guideline-based today).  We now require significant coverage , and directories, government records, and program affiliate lists don't fall under that category (the affiliate lists probably also wouldn't be independent , which in and of itself would take them out of contention for determining notability).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Diakonia Catholic School: The school didn't have any notability for inclusion to Wikipedia.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Christianity ,  and Indonesia .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect Not finding anything either.  Would suggest a redirection to List of schools in Indonesia .  ❤History Theorist❤ 23:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article is unreferenced and clearly fails to meet WP:NORG 1keyhole ( talk ) 16:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enabled.in: I also don't believe the coverage this has received is enough to pass WP:NCORP or WP:WEB .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 15:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Websites ,  and India .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 15:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is nowhere near enough to meet WP:NCORP .  There does not seem to be enough references to establish notability and it is written like an advertisement.  The prose is also very poor.  Article was created by the person who created the site.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 21:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Subject not notable, and the very short article is basically an advert.  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 09:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Milos Calic: All I found was this interview.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , France ,  and Serbia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minimal coverage Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I've seen articles with loss less coverage still being on Wikipedia.  Боки ☎ ✎ 07:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] While this is certainly true, it is also irrelevant to this discussion.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm not seeing any coverage which meets the WP:GNG for this subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Whatever (podcast): Previously referenced to various fringe right-wing sources, tabloid gossip sites and non-RSes.  After I asked on the talk page over a week ago for three solid RSes showing notability, a frequent editor tried to remove the single RS reference.  On a WP:BEFORE , there doesn't appear to be anything in solid mainstream RSes that discusses this topic such as to show it meets WP:GNG or any specific notability guideline.  PROD removed with no action to remedy these issues.  David Gerard ( talk ) 16:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet , Websites ,  and United States of America .  David Gerard ( talk ) 16:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Calling this a podcast is pretty much incorrect; it's more of a never-ending live stream and it seems these moments get picked out because...the show is six hours long and the guests are lethargic by the end and the regulars somehow call that a 'gotcha moment' to mock their invited guests.  Just by its length, lack of topic clarity and and its guest pool made up of mostly unknowns, it can't easily hit WP:GNG because you have to be in that specific interest field and have the endurance to last six hours to call it notable, and very few are going to make that commitment to a show that can't even be bothered to stay on its topic of dating.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - as the original page creator, there was a reason why I kept it in the WP:DRAFTSPACE ; there was simply too little sourcing in May and I made the bet that this will eventually pass WP:GNG .  It hasn't yet.  It.  I see that EytanMelech ( talk · contribs ), who was the individual who moved this article to the WP:MAINSPACE , has not been notified of this WP:AFD .  — Knightof theswords 20:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was aware of it.  I had plenty of sources that I assumed were RS, but it seems as though Gerard and others disagree on that account.  If those sources do not count, then I wholeheartedly second the article for deletion.  The podcast is past its peak and I highly doubt that the sources reporting on it will ever be the ones Wikipedia allows cited.  EytanMelech ( talk ) 20:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - if there are decent sources, I can't find them.  I can't even find that many garbage sources, tbh.  Grayfell ( talk ) 07:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm only able to find tabloid and unreliable sources like the NY Post, Breitbart, and the Daily Wire.  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 01:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
938749233: Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 02:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Does not meet WP:NNUMBER and the only source is a random census count.  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 03:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Would be pretty surprised if this doesn't SNOW.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 04:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NNUMBER as a number with no discovered interesting properties.  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "One number found in a census count" doesn't get you an article, no matter how hard you try.  This isn't notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all of the above.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 19:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A look at the actual page in question does not find this number — only the consecutive numbers 938, 749, and 233 on one row (the first one labeled "Persons under 18 years").  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 20:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SNOW delete Completely unnotable, I would PROD this article if I could but now that we are having this AfD we should SNOW delete.  Air on White ( talk ) 04:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Someone should take a look through the author's list of contributions and see whether there is anything at all that suggests that they are WP:HERE .  -- JBL ( talk ) 20:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Weird, pointless.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 01:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muki (duo): I could find one review for an album of theirs [20] but thats it.  No profiles of the group are extant as far as I can tell Mach61 ( talk ) 18:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Mach61 ( talk ) 18:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  No sources used and I also couldn't see anything better out there.  Editing84 ( talk ) 09:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wellington Phoenix FC–Western United FC rivalry: The mere fact that two teams play each other does not constitute a rivalry.  Only one of the sources provided on the page actually calls it a rivalry, and that source appears to be a blog as opposed to a reputable source.  Alza08 ( talk ) 08:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - it is a 'rivalry' - other sources refer to it as such, see e.g. this - but there is no significant coverage of the rivalry that I can see.  It's probably not a notable one, given other sources such as this talk about games between the clubs without referring to a rivalry.  Giant Snowman 16:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with GiantSnowman's summary.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 08:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as above.  Relationship between the clubs is unusual in that Western Utd appear to have signed a lot of Wellington's players (maybe using expansion team rules to get them more easily? Not sure) and that caused annoyance between fans.  But that situation can be mentioned briefly on the teams' pages, very unlikely to be something that will endure, no mutual local interest and does not have significant coverage as a result (the Stuff link above specifically states "Western started out as the Phoenix’s bitter rivals after poaching coach Mark Rudan, and signing long-serving captain Andrew Durante, Max Burgess and Filip Kurto for their inaugural season in 2019-20. But that rivalry was short-lived as Rudan was sacked at the end of last season and now coaches Western Sydney Wanderers, and none of those three players play for them any more either" ).  Crowsus ( talk ) 10:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Night Owl: Nationbuilder's Manual: Most sources are puff pieces, the rest are passing mentions with little SIGCOV.  Article created by COI user Amylamentillo , same name as the author of this book.  SparklyNights ( t ) 02:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Products , Engineering ,  and Philippines .  SparklyNights ( t ) 02:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PROMO, agree that most of the sourcing isn't helpful.  I can't find critical reviews of the book.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  HueMan1 ( talk ) 12:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:PROMO and MOS:FLOWERY .  There is a lot of promotional language on the article.  Ganmatthew ( talk • contribs ) 12:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:PROMO .  SBKSPP ( talk ) 00:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grace Junot: Not seeing notability required under ACTOR, no sourcing found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Thailand .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TC Business School: There are no independent sources and generally does not meet WP:GNG criteria.  FromCzech ( talk ) 05:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Schools ,  and Czech Republic .  FromCzech ( talk ) 05:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - this is a self promoting directory entry, not an encyclopedia article.  No sources to be found to convert this to an encyclopedia article.  Speedy deletion as PROMO -only is completely appropriate.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 13:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Ho-gun: Simione001 ( talk ) 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to pass WP:NSPORT toobigtokale ( talk ) 17:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Malallah (footballer, born 1990): Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Arab Emirates .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why, is there something wrong with the seven Arabic sources currently in the article?  You have to write more than just "notability."  SportingFlyer T · C 13:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm sorry I didn't give enough info, I thought it's obvious.  One of the sources is the player profile from a blog, and the rest are match scores that have players listed.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Song-gi: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough information here to be worth keeping.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dilip Thadeshwar: Sources in the article and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Source eval: Comments Source Facebook  1. https://m.facebook.com/dellip.thadeshwar/ Name mention in database record  2. ^ Srihari, Gudipoodi (29 November 2001).  "Unlikely flick from SVK".  The Hindu.  Archived from the original on 30 May 2022.  Retrieved 4 June 2022.  Name mention, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  3. ^ "SV Krishna Reddy to direct 'Jaabili'".  Idlebrain.com.  25 July 2001.  Archived from the original on 1 June 2022.  Retrieved 4 June 2022.  Promo about film, nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject dirtectly and indepth  4. ^ "NRI girl for NRI's film Joke Falls!".  Viggy.  BEFORE found nothing meeting WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 02:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found for this person.  Sources used in the article aren't the best, facebook and two others that are a trivial mention and a film review.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Advertising ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete .  Could not find any in depth sources.  I am one of the main contributors.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 19:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:NACTOR for his significant roles (main/lead) in multiple notable productions, that received coverage. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete