hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dominika Polakowska: Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Skating ,  and Poland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No other sources have been found to change my analysis from the previous discussion.  Article still fails WP:NSKATE and WP:GNG .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already at AFD AND PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not a fan of bringing a non-consensus outcome back so quickly but I agree, the subject fails WP:NSKATE and WP:GNG ; news coverage is all WP:TRIVIALMENTION .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashwajit Singh: Most statements in the Early life and Career sections are not supported by the corresponding references, so the page suffers from massive WP:OR , WP:V and WP:PROMO concerns.  There are similar issues with his company page which has also been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPE Global Limited .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 22:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 22:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Delhi ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There are no reliable sources found which talks about the subject in details, these sources are just passing mentiones.  Totally fails general notablity .  Grabup ( talk ) 07:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mathias Moldt Baskjær: The best sources that I can find in Danish are Sport Herning , which mentions him twice in the results summary, Badminton Bladet , a single passing mention, and Hojbjerg Badminton , another passing mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Denmark .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TAPCO (mail order company): Articles of this vintage deserve discussion in my view.  I agree with the PROD reason: " No evidence it meets N:ORG . Redirect to Remington Arms isn't helpful to the reader as it isn't mentioned, and a mention wouldn't be DUE " given by Star Mississippi but not that mechanism.   I obviously invite them to comment here should they wish.  I have copied and pasted the PROD here.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Firearms ,  and United States of America .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] PRODder comment/delete (since I'm not sure how best to format this input given the conversion of my PROD): thanks Timtrent for saving me the step of the nomination.  No issue with your contesting the PROD either, of course.  My research found lots of forums discussing TAPCO's parts and what had happened to the company, but nothing even approaching N:ORG as it was a small company that appeared to deal mostly in B2B sales.  It was active recently enough that coverage in trade publications should be accessible online, but a BEFORE found none.  Should the relaunch come to fruition, an article could be created.  I don't think draft space is viable as it hasn't launched and is therefore likely more than six months from notability.  Star Mississippi 17:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notification left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:22, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I cannot locate any sources that meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  Hardly any sources even mention the company.  HighKing ++ 16:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maureen Sander-Staudt: No significant coverage, fails WP:NACADEMIC Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and Philosophy .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This Google Scholar search shows some widely-cited publications.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are three well-cited papers, after that not much.  Looks like a WP:Too soon for WP:Prof .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 05:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] I'd hazard a guess that her field is a low-citation one overall, but even taking that into account, I'm not seeing any indications that she stands out, rather than being an academic doing an academic's job.  Philosophical Inquiries into Pregnancy has been reviewed [11] [12] [13] , but that was a co-edited anthology.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 15:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - I search and found a few possible sources, including this podcast , but to be honest, she does not appear to pass GNG.  I tried to fix the formatting and references, but I don't have a lot with to work.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing to indicate that GNG has been met.  The podcast listed above is an interview with Sander-Staudt, so not completely independent.  And while she has some widely-cited work, this does not seem to me enough to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC .  WJ94 ( talk ) 16:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Handgod Abraham: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE .  Possibly a WP:COI or WP:UPE .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 21:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Haiti .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 21:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines; some sources are mentions, and the final appears to be a blog.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 21:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – The various articles from Le Nouvelliste (Haiti) is paywalled for me.  The rest don't appear to establish notability, so I'm leaning delete for now.  TLA tlak 04:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leonel Pérez (footballer): The best source that I can find is Informador , which is simply a match report that mentions him scoring a goal in a cup match.  I can't find anything towards WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Open and shut.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 17:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - at least as of now this article is not within WP:GNG.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Srbija FF: Its home city, Stockholm, is not a viable merge target, but maybe Swedish Serbs .  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  No suitable location for a redirect.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , any coverage I can find when looking in the archives I have access to is routine minor events or match reports.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 17:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The club doesn't even appear to exist today.  There is no encyclopedic content for this.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage found in Mediearkivet, which collects most contemporary Swedish newspaper articles.  Can't find any other sources to base an article on.  / Julle ( talk ) 17:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniele Mattielig: Boleyn ( talk ) 08:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Italy .  Owen× ☎ 09:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails in every category.  No justification for the article or indication of even a modest notability.  Easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Duel at the Diamond: Let'srun ( talk ) 01:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball ,  and Virginia .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There are other instances of these games like the Apple Cup , Platypus Trophy , along with many, many others.  :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: With all due respect, WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST applies here.  Those subjects are clearly notable, but this one has to stand on its own merits.  Sports rivalries aren't inherently notable.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per user Let'srun.  killer bee 05:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nom.  The only keep vote is just WP:OSE , and doesn't actually demonstrate that this article passes WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oliver Brand: Provided references are mere directory entries mentioning him and his songs with no biographical information.   I found nothing better online to satisfy notability, though it’s entirely possible there may be better sources in print.  -- Finngall talk 13:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Music , Theatre ,  and England . -- Finngall talk 13:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of these songs is notable, and his output, for a lyricist, was not impressive.  Compare Adrian Ross .  I've deleted the material from the bio that attempted to assert notability by saying that he wrote for a theatre company that W. S. Gilbert had also written for.  The bio was written by User:FairlyPuzzled , the only article edited by that user, who appears to be a descendant of Brand's.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 18:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vusal Abdullazade: It is possible to see this from the list of winners of the mentioned competitions.  Even the years and countries where the competitions were held are incorrect, in some indicated years no competition was held at all, and in some cases, it was not held in the mentioned country.  Generally, there are almost no sources to proof any of the facts in the article and topic doesn't pass GNG.  The article has been deleted on Azerbaijani Wikipedia, this is the discussion .  Surə 🗯 13:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's no significant independent coverage and no evidence he won a major world championship.   I checked several of the article's external links that go to "world" championships he supposedly won and could not find his name.   The dates and locations of his championships don't match those of major organizations.   Finally, the fact that his article was deleted on the Azerbaijani WP for lack of supporting evidence seems pretty convincing.  Papaursa ( talk ) 04:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not very familiar with Azerbaijani media, but is this considered unreliable?  The news story appears to confirm that he has won the championship seven times.  TheJoyfulTentmaker ( talk ) 06:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Apparent COI vanity page.  Subject does not meet WP:NKICK or WP:NMMA criteria, as well as does not have independent significant coverage.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suleiman Ahmed Gulaid: Fails WP:GNG .  The only SIGCOV I could find of the subject is in local Somalilander outlet Horn Diplomat [29] .  He received routine coverage due to his involvement in Amoud University , but not enough to establish sufficient notability.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 06:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Somalia .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 06:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] More sources: an award he received , and a speech he made , both reported on by national press.  Still not sure about notability.  BhamBoi ( talk ) 07:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Semi Jaupaj: Other sources range from press releases (lack of a byline) / WP:ROUTINE to highly likely non- WP:RELIABLE .  Aside from that, there's a lot of WP:ORIGINAL .  TLA (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and Albania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with fire, at that.  Got soft deleted last time due to minimal RfD participation and here it is with precisely the same problems as my last nomination for deletion in 2022: "Albanian singer of little notability. Been watching this for a while to see if any sign of improvement or abiding importance emerges. It hasn't. Hasn't won any music competition, no evidence of any music charting, no evidence of any enduring influence or impact. Coverage is skimpy social pages stuff, no in-depth coverage. Borderline, yes, but ultimately not a WP:GNG pass and not WP:MUSICBIO either."  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I tried limiting Gsearch to Albanian websites with . al, they all are celebrity gossip items [18] and all in English.  Most of the article now has no citations so could be OR or simply a hoax for all we know.  I'm not seeing notability.  Could be too early, TOOSOON.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Equinox (Amiga demogroup): Surprisingly, there isn't significant coverage of the group in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár [ hu ] .  I am also bundling the disk magazine European Top 20 published by Equinox in this nomination.  toweli ( talk ) 18:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Organizations , Computing , Norway , Sweden , Switzerland ,  and United Kingdom .  toweli ( talk ) 18:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete