hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Fang Liufang: Fails WP:NPROF .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Law ,  and China .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - anyone with more expertise comment on Co-Dean at Chinese-EU University of Law?   It appears to be close to a WP:PROF pass as the highest ranking officer at a significant institute of higher education.   I don't know enough about legal academia to be a judge; visiting fellow at Harvard Law is not enough to pass the academic notability guideline, but it is generally a hint to dig deeper.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 02:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He's held a lot of prestigious appointments at his university, including the deanship of the "Chinese law" side of the China–EU School of Law, dean of the Graduate School of Law, and vice chairman of the Academic Committee.  I'm not familiar with the administrative structure of Chinese universities – where I only worked for a single year – but I don't think the positions the subject has held quite meet criterion 6.  He's also been an expert on several temporary committees, including one for the World Bank and one for the Beijing (as a prefecture level city, not the national government).  He's written a couple books, but seems more involved in education than publication or research.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 03:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I do remember that "vice chairman" of whatever is the highest ranking subject matter expert / professional in the group, because the "chairman" is always a party official, but I don't think that affects the overall analysis.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 04:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  If you believe this BLP article should be Kept, I advise you to locate sources that can verify the information and claims in this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I do not have sources that demonstrate passing WP:NPROF .  Folly Mox ( talk ) 19:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adam Page and Kenny Omega: Tagged sporadically for a year, despite holding a championship.  Would be happy for a merge, but pretty much everything is already in the parent articles.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 12:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America .  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 12:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One source used, nothing much else found.  Forbes contributor piece [33] then various non-RS websites.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This is not an argument so don't take this as whataboutism.  I created this article with inspiration from other tag teams that existed for around a year, such as Team Hell No and Vince's Devils .  I also followed the WP:PWTAG guideline where a tag team holding a championship for more than 100 days in a major promotion is considered notable.  I think the nominator's argument is valid.  However, I don't think it has lack of sources issue, although I agree most wrestling sites are dodgy, and that is why I relied on a book.  BinaryBrainBug ( talk ) 13:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons provided by nom.  Llajwa ( talk ) 13:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bratislava New Generation-Day FM Festival: Appears to have been a one-night, one-off event.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Slovakia .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete noi evidence of noitability, abandoned article.  - Altenmann >talk 04:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahwahnee Heritage Days: TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 16:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and California .  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 16:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , History ,  and Popular culture .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very little coverage, fails WP:NEVENT .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 19:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PES PU College, Mandya: — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Karnataka .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Same as other nominations for school, this page too has poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gautam Kapur: In a WP:BEFORE search I couldn't find any significant, independent, secondary coverage of him, just interviews in obscure news blogs like "Hindustan Metro", passing mentions in film notices, and WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid placement.  His acting has all been minor roles so far.  According to this reference , the short film he produced was an official selection at the Golden Door Film Festival , but the actual awards he's won so far are all from minor festivals of unknown notability.  Zero secondary coverage of his vitamin business.  Other editors interested in searching for coverage that I missed should note that there's an unrelated basketball player with the same name, and that this person's surname is sometimes transliterated as "Kapoor".  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Fashion ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Considering this was only created recently, do not believe a soft-deletion here will 'stick', so relisting to establish a consensus either way.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 16:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  For Linked-In.  Not Wikipedia.  MisterWizzy ( talk ) 03:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this non-notable model who has appeared in a few minor acting roles.  The article was created by an account whose sole purpose was to promote barely-known actor/models, suggesting COI.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NMODEL , WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Howard Gentry Jr.: The attempted notability claim here is that he's a clerk of the county courts and vice-mayor of a city, which are not "inherently" notable offices -- they're offices where he could get an article if he were shown to clear WP:GNG on the basis of a lot of media coverage, but not ones where he would be automatically eligible for a Wikipedia article just because he exists.  But five of the eight footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all (stuff self-published by his employer, his own LinkedIn, etc.), and another is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in a biography of his father -- which leaves just two footnotes that actually represent reliable source media coverage about him , which is not nearly enough to clinch the notability of a purely local political figure all by itself.  And notability is not inherited , so he isn't automatically entitled to have an article just because his father has one either.  Also note that another article about the same person was previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Gentry Jr.  , but this article is different in form (but not really in substance) from the old version and the prior discussion was a soft delete due to minimal participation, so I wouldn't feel comfortable speedying it as a G4.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Tennessee .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bearcat and the last AfD - he fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL , and there's some puffery.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Finance ,  and Law .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above.   The sources in the article do not come close to the WP:GNG bar that consensus says local politicians of this sort must meet.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arbade Bironze: I used Ikinyarwanda Wikipedia for guidance as well but it's clear that that article is a WP:REFBOMB of sources that make no mention of Bironze.  When an article has the title "Soulcalibur V – Trophy Guide" it's obviously not going to have anything about a Ugandan footballer.  Fails WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Uganda .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete So, per google: No results found for "Arbade Bironze" -wikipedia.  Rest my case.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lacks significant coverage.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 11:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Searching in Thai turns up a few match reports from 2009, [2] [3] [4] [5] but nothing in-depth.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 13:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG; cannot be considered as a notable as per search results!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 12:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brisa Da Silva: All that I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uruguay .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Bergstrom: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete per nom, this probably could have been A7d.  Mach61 ( talk ) 03:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NBLP due to lack of significant coverage.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  can't find anything that suggests notability  -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 17:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
An Song-il: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Search in Korean revealed no results.  No sign of notable coverage in the other language articles as well.  :3 F4U ( they /it ) 17:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William H. Riffee: Vanity creation.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 23:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine , Florida , Ohio , Texas ,  and West Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see enough citations to his publications to convince me of WP:PROF#C1 , and dean isn't a high enough administrative position for #C6.  Nothing else in the article can be used to make any kind of case for notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per David Eppstein .  I don't see any WP:SIGCOV otherwise.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  nf utvol ( talk ) 18:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 14:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He easily passes WP:PROF#C5 .  I updated the page with a link.  People seem to be simply voting to delete without doing a basic search on the subject.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 12:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bomdila Monastery: Boleyn ( talk ) 14:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Organizations , Buddhism ,  and Arunachal Pradesh .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KoiKoi Nelligan: The subject fails WP:GNG and there has been no increase in coverage since the first nomination.  None of the sourcing in the article suggests significant coverage also.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet GNG.  There is this interview and some transactional announcements , as well as a bunch of trivial mentions, but nothing that would constitute WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Due to WP:SUSTAINED , as well as it failing WP:GNG .  Noorullah ( talk ) 05:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Igor Lestar: Not meeting notability for business people.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Sweden .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  A standard professional profile.  — siro χ o 04:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clearly promotional, no evidence of coverage that meets GNG, heavy reliance on primary sources.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 05:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no SIRS coverage in Swedish news.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 08:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quannnic: Instead there are Spotify primary sources and this Wordpress article which doesn't add to notability.  Binksternet ( talk ) 20:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Binksternet ( talk ) 20:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I plan to update the article with better sources tomorrow, consider it "in progress" as of now.  If I don't follow through with this plan tomorrow then there can be further discussion on deleting the article, and you can hold me to that BigChungusOnVinyl ( talk ) 02:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not notable.  Other than music streaming websites, there are no sources discussing about them even passing mentions.  AllNotAll ( talk ) 10:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lui Morais: Article is on the global title blacklist due to cross-wiki spamming * Pppery * it has begun... 16:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Philosophy , Poetry ,  and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This truely fails WP:GNG as none of the cited sources are independent of the subject.  Redivivus carmina and Laboratório de letras are just personal blogspots. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 21:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I only see hits for a soccer player Junior Morais, nothing about this person. I don't see notability. Most sources used are non RS as well. Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of reliable sources . Bearian ( talk ) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- the Journal de Poesia biography looked like it might be independent evidence of notability, but the Journal seems more a directory of every Brazillian poet with thousands listed (the "A" list is over 400 long), so not particularly selective or confiring of notability.   I didn't see much else beyond this.   -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing demonstrates WP:RELIABLE sources independent of the subject and fails WP:GNG -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 17:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete