hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Abhijit Das Bobby : Subject was never elected to any political office that can make them inherently notable, and article relies majorly on sources that do not satisfy SIGCOV and  INDEPENDENT, hence, fails GNG.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 10:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7 or G11.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nominator sums it up, not notable.  Lynch44 ( talk ) 17:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't have time right now to follow up but I tagged this article for CSD G4 because it's been deleted at least twice in previous AFD discussions.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz Oh, that's true, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijit Das (Bobby) .  Contested by the author of the page.  It's great we're here, I don't think re-requesting speedy deletion after it was contested would be a nice move.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability".  — TheWikiholic ( talk ) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The person fails WP:NPOL , like previous AfDs, this article is being created because of the general election 2024 in India.  Many similar articles have already been deleted.  Similar AfDs include: Kompella_Madhavi_Latha , Neeraj Tripathi .  Grab Up - Talk 10:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apex Moon : Let'srun ( talk ) 16:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the same reasons as discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex Sun Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it exists, the article has six references, four of them are YouTube, the other two are from World Chase Tag.  I've had a look for other sources but I can't find anything that is even close to independent significant coverage.  I don't think this article passes WP:GNG WP:NSPORT or WP:ORG .  Knitsey ( talk ) 16:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J. Luke Bennecke : Possible self-promotion by author?  Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 19:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Engineering , Transportation , California ,  and Nevada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very likely PROMO, all sourcing I find seems to be book signings or on BookTrib, which isn't RS.  No critical reviews of their novels found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable and likely written for money by BheekAam along with other articles .  The book won Feathered Quill awards but I'm not sure they're sufficient to qualify for notability as an author; here's more info about Feather Quill: [70] [71] See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Daro for another article by the same editor.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trance Fury (2nd nomination) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only one source, with no sigcov and the feathered quill award doesn't exactly seem prestigious enough to satisfy any alternative criteria.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  22:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and his only award is not notability-lending.  Appears to wear many hats, but isn't notable in any of them.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; poorly executed UPE, if they are notable WP:TNT but I don't think they are anyway.  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 18:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only one source provided, and certainly promotional.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 19:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition. -- VViking Talk Edits 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oyabun (rapper) : - UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and New York .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Simply releasing music in 2023 isn't article-worthy.  No charted singles, no sort of media coverage in RS.  "We have a person that went to school and releases music" is what the article tells us, that's just not enough for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : We are not SoundCloud, we dont list every single person who’s ever released music.  They gotta be notable at some point and this artist is not.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC with no charting songs or albums plus artist has been inactive for five years.  (Special mention to the shameless Kurt Cobain namedropping.) sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 19:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with immediate effect, Topic doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NSINGER guidelines.  Every reference is a dead link.  At least 2 or more reliable sources which are independent of each other are required for musicians (Especially Living people) WP:BLP .  Both talking about the subject "indept" is required to keep this article In the mainspace , which could than later be improved by editors but further than that.  No WP: Significant Coverage established.  Frankymulls ( talk ) 14:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Songshan Airport (disambiguation) : Lightoil ( talk ) 12:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree the actual airport is the primary topic, and page views [12] are clearly consistent with this as well.  Adumbrativus ( talk ) 05:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER ; there is a clear primary topic per the pageviews and only one other topic makes the disambiguation page unnecessary.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Helmes AS : It's been several years but there are still not several independent reliable sources satisfying WP:CORP .  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 04:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Estonia .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is all I can find [33] , about some unsavory business dealings they were involved with.  Nothing upon which we can build an article.  Article as it reads now is PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A peacockery-laden article about a company, created by a single-day account a couple of months after a previous instance was deleted at AfD.  Searches find announcement-based coverage of new contracts, acquisitions of similar firms in Lithuania and Belarus, but these fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH .  Neither these nor involvement in the case mentioned above is sufficient to demonstrate notability ; the previous AfD consensus should stand.  AllyD ( talk ) 11:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article itself is blatantly promotional, and the cited sources are promotional pieces, entry on database, and company's own websites.  While the company was mentioned in some websites and articles, none of those are in-depth coverage sufficient in proving its notability.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : blatantly promotional, non-notable, and unsourced.  DrowssapSMM ( talk ) 21:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jordan Murch : He is mentioned in a number of news articles, like this one , but they are either local/routine coverage or interviews.  I'm not seeing enough significant coverage.  He has played a fair number of games in his career but most were at semi-pro level.  March OfThe Greyhounds 15:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  March OfThe Greyhounds 15:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  I just found mentions of him in an archive search.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 15:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG —only appeared at rather low levels of semi-pro football with no distinguishing characteristics to supersede that fact.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
White Springs Television : PROD was declined in 2022 with the  rationale that the channel was verified to have existed but existence does not equate to notability.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Florida ,  and Oregon .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are no references in the article, just a few external links at the bottom.  Running through the first few pages of Google doesn't provide anything resembling a reliable source.  Small references to WSTV affiliation in relevant TV station pages are enough for the purposes of Wikipedia.  DJ Cane (he/him) ( Talk ) 23:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  – The Grid ( talk ) 17:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jorge Laguna : My own searches yielded Info7 , Medio Tiempo and Diario de Morelos but these are just squad list mentions and don't show WP:SIGCOV of Laguna.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 17:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Valley Lake Ranchos, California : This location is a subdivision, not a community.   The user who contested the PROD added a couple of references, which is appreciated, but these are just routine mentions of legal matters.   The consensus on subdivisions and other informal settlements is that they are subject to WP:GNG , and that bar is not met in this case because the sources cited are routine and not in-depth, and GNIS (which was originally the only cited source) does not establish notability.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for bringing this to AfD – definitely worth further discussion rather than simply PROD.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 15:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Undeveloped land with a history of failed development plans does not meet guidelines, I can't see anything that indicates this is more than just that.  NGEO points to GNG and this fails.  Nothing found that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 13:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This locale lacks any significant notability whatsoever.  TH1980 ( talk ) 04:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angna (TV series) : Donald D23 talk to me 00:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yes it fails to meet GNG because I couldn't find sign/in-depth coverage, such as reviews.  Some ROTM coverage like this isn't sufficient.  The article is based on several unreliable sources.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While assessing the referencing of Pakistani dramas/series, the dynamics of Pakistani media industry should be considered wherein media groups have their own news and entertainment channels.  Normally a news channel from one media group doesn't give coverage to a project of a rival channel unless it's a big hit.  So for other dramas we have to rely on other industry sources which otherwise may not be good sources but are fair enough for a Pakistani drama.  Muneebll ( talk ) 18:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But still you have to demonstrate that this TV dramas meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That assessment is not based on Wikipedia policy or guidance.  In order for an article to be kept it must be demonstrated that it meets WP:GNG at a minimum.  Saying that one media group doesn't cover another one is not a reason to keep an article.  Donald D23 talk to me 22:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And until we have coverage in multiple sources, we can't create an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : while this could be redirected to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital#Long_format/Soaps , there seems to be coverage showing it's notable: https://www.hipinpakistan.com/news/1159511 ; https://www.bolnews.com/entertainment/2022/06/angna-handles-trauma-delicately-but-leaves-loose-ends/ and so on.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mushy Yank , HIP is content farm website.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As explained above, this series doesn't have coverage outside of the originating media organization, pretty much limiting any hope of GNG or other notability.  I can't find sources about this we'd use either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of people of Korean descent : This list probably doesn't even include 1% of all Koreans who have Wikipedia pages.  (And a few people listed here don't even HAVE articles.)  Mucube ( talk • contribs ) 19:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Lists .  Mucube ( talk • contribs ) 19:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Impossibly broad topic.  Support deleting other similar topic lists.  Ethnicity is rarely a defining trait.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 19:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Way too broad, not a defining trait.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Too broad. -- Gen. Quon [Talk] 21:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Korea .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 22:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Would have to be a more focused list, "Korean singers" or what have you.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree it is too broad.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 07:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Too wide a subject.  Needs more selective criteria.  Rupples ( talk ) 00:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree it is too broad.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Ekstraklasa broadcasters : The most fancrufty list to appeal to the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are entirely primary, are basically news announcement and does not help to assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Poland .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fork Junction, West Virginia : Searching is drowned out by a "Glen Fork Junction" that is either the same as or is related to Glen Fork, West Virginia (elsewhere in the state), but I'm finding no significant coverage or coverage that indicates a WP:GEOLAND pass for a "Fork Junction" in Lincoln County.  Hog Farm Talk 04:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and West Virginia .  Hog Farm Talk 04:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete