hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Paigham TV: No reliable sources found online that contribute towards WP:GNG or WP:NORG .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 11:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies , Islam ,  and Pakistan .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 11:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations per WP:ATD .  I tried really hard to find references about this seemingly notable topic, but unfortunately, there is limited coverage, which I suspect is not enough to meet WP:GNG .  I think there could be some coverage in the Arabic language or academic coverage, which I couldn't find due to lack of access.  Therefore, a redirect is the best option.  2A01:CB06:366:2B00:D0D1:2CFB:B267:3962 ( talk ) 12:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - insufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG or even to have a good redirect target Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's nothing sig/in-depth as required by WP:GNG.  Fails WP:BROADCAST.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BeerTender: This article was PROD'ed a few months before, but somebody didn't like WP:NOTDICT as a reason and removed the PROD.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails to meet the GNG .  On a search, all of the results are just sites selling the product and related accessories.  No significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the producers.  Combustible Vulpex ( talk ) 11:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is just an advertisement page for the product.  Not needed in wikipedia.  killer bee 12:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per G-11 .  Banks Irk ( talk ) 17:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, seems like it has a snowball's chance in hell to survive the discussion.  I'll tag WP:G11 on it.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A++: all three articles were created by gploc , and cover essentially the same topic.  gploc is the creator of these languages - he owns the websites https://lambda-bound.de/ and https://lambda-bound.com/ .  i do not know what the first one is, but the second promotes a book about a++.  a quick look for sources all lead back to primary sources and this book.  this nomination is bundled with: ARS++ ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) ARS-based programming ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) ltb d l ( talk ) 13:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  ltb d l ( talk ) 13:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all .  The language author has apparently written quite a lot on this topic, but as far as I can tell, one blog aside, nobody else has.  ~ GQO talk!  15:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as A412.  Notability would stem from multiple independent sources, and these just aren't independent of the language author.  Andy Dingley ( talk ) 16:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was unable to find sources apart from the author about these topics when I searched.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect A++ to A+ , delete others A+ is definitely a plausible typo , but the concept itself here is non-notable.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for several reasons.  The first reason is that there are no secondary sources The second reason is that there are not many sources
 The third reason is that there are typographical errors.  GQO ( talk ) 6:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Is there anything else than primary sources here?  (rhetoric question)  Rrjmrrr ( talk ) 09:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khalilullah Masjid: DSP2092 talk 09:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Asia , India ,  and Delhi .  DSP2092 talk 09:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Islam .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG / WP:Sigcov .  The page creator was already told to go through AFC, as they don't understand notability guidelines, I have drafti-fied many of their articles as they were not notable.  But they submitted it without improvement which got declined again by other reviewers.  Maliner ( talk ) 16:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce Kelly: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Owen× ☎ 19:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arizona , Florida , Massachusetts , Minnesota , North Dakota , Pennsylvania ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tried to add some more sources from his time in Phoenix, which may qualify him.  Some of his career stops seem less than notable, though.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The many trivial details in this overlong article obscurEs the fact that his career has been fairly prominent, and sources for notability can almost certainly be found.  Llajwa ( talk ) 00:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pak Gyong-chol (North Korean football midfielder): Simione001 ( talk ) 00:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources found.  Ping me if there are sources.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mashirima Kapombe: As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show markers of significance such as noteworthy journalism awards, coverage and analysis about the significance of their work in sources other than their own employers, and on and so forth -- but this, as written, is of the "journalist who exists" variety, and is referenced entirely to primary source staff profiles and unreliable "career, marriage, education & net worth" sources that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no WP:GNG -worthy sourcing shown at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Kenya .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG and speaking from a reliability viewpoint, the sources used are utterly unreliable.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hanetball360: The article was very promotionally written with a lot of exaggerated claims; I have cleaned it up and removed several superfluous and inappropriate sources.  I have not been able to find any independent sourcing, just press releases and churnalism in English and French.  bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Florida .  bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For reference: here is the article before I started cleaning it up, in case someone else finds anything useful in there.  -- bonadea contributions talk 13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The WSVN item twice calls the sport "obscure", not a very good endorsement of its notability.  I haven't read the Sun Sentinel item because I would have to disable my ad blocker to do so.  A Google search turns up a lot of social media and blog posts, press releases, and other questionable sources, but nothing new from reliable sources.  Unless someone turns up more reliable sources, I expect to support a delete.  - Donald Albury 16:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per submission.  Samuel R Jenkins ( talk ) 05:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 03:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO .  A recently invented "sport", and so unsurprising that there isn't enough coverage.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As nothing meeting GNG has been noted, I now support deletion.  - Donald Albury 12:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Three Phase Operation: Rumors, in other words.  I can't find anything at all at the third reference as it just points to some index page.  The other three are just the same text in different places.  "Three Phase Operation" is a name unknown to history.  More importantly, the organization "Supreme Command of the Arab Allied Forces (SCAAF)" is also unknown to history.  The piecemeal Arab irregular forces at that time did not have a central command and it certainly was not directed from Cairo.  What actually happened in Katamon the day before this news story is that Jewish forces blew up the Semiramis Hotel killing at least 24 civilians.  But that's not even mentioned in the news story.  There is a vast literature by historians on this period of history and there are already multiple properly sourced Wikipedia articles that cover it, such as Battle for Jerusalem .  We don't need articles on single obscure newspaper stories.  Zero talk 04:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Zero talk 04:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: For being almost wholly based on a random piece from Oregon local news - the sourcing would struggle to be less appropriate, and if this is the best quality available, it doesn't really attest the term or standalone notability.  Not much to say here: definitely nothing approaching an encyclopedically valid topic.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 12:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article that doesn't have enough sources or content and doubtful more could be found MarkiPoli ( talk ) 13:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Insufficient evidence exists to suggest that "Three Phase Operation" is a notable topic, at least not under its current name.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 14:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  Current sourcing is just one newspaper article reprinted in multiple publications.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a POVFORK.  When justified, such a topic should grow organically, before being eligible to a SPINOFF.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maryland Department of Commerce: Sources do not establish independent notability, being all press releases or primary sources from the organisation itself.  Could possibly be stubbified, but totally inappropriate in its current form.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 14:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions .  Folly Mox ( talk ) 14:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh, come on .  Every U.S. state has a department like this, and the claim about it being a "promotional puff piece" is extremely speculative.  This article does have problems with uncited statements and not enough independent sources, but AFD is not cleanup.  It is not take much more than a GNews search to show that actions taken by this department get coverage on Maryland sources independent of the department.  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 15:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh, my word on what to do?  Do not keep going with nomination until a valid rationale is made .  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 16:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Stubbify post haste to remove copyvio [30] and generally shit writing.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 19:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] AFD is not cleanup to improve prose quality, though the Copyvio is serious.  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 14:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It looks like this has been a copyvio since 2009 .  SportingFlyer T · C 20:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khaled Abouemara: TLA (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Engineering ,  and Qatar .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No indication of notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Veritas Christian Academy: I have carried out WP:BEFORE , and only found one additional reference, local news coverage about a day of service .  I don't think the school meets WP:GNG or WP:NORG .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , United States of America ,  and North Carolina .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - one transactional reference and a reference that should be on all US schools does not show notability.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 15:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing notable Rhadow ( talk ) 18:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Disha Vadgama: Fails WP:BIO .  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 01:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , India ,  and Gujarat .  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 01:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Fashion .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Mentions in the Free Press Journal and the Telegraph India, unsure how RS they are, seem iffy.  I can't find any further sources to support keeping this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete failed WP:NBIO WP:GNG & free press journal is not a reliable source.  Hukumat Namanzoor ( talk ) 13:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , another Indian fashion/beauty person with no evidence they have done anything worth noting.  I don't think we can even consider the "Times of India" either per WP:TOI and Paid news in India .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 11:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deepshikha Secondary School: yvanyblog (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is a mess.  I can't find proof that this school, in this location exists.  There is another school, Deepshikha Secondary Boarding School, in Ghorahi , which is not Bandipur, as this school purportedly is.  No citations, no decent categories.  Can it.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 11:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject does not seem to be notable.  Not much news coverage.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2021 Algerian-Israeli naval incident: A transient event that had no consequences.  Can easely be added in a section to Algeria-Israel relations instead of a whole new article.  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 12:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Algeria ,  and Israel .  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 12:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NEVENT -- Shrike ( talk ) 13:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment On face value this incident seems notable - this isn't a particularly unusual type of event, but they're rarely this well documented as they're usually hushed up by both sides (for instance, it's been reported that an Australian submarine got trapped in netting off China during a Cold War intelligence gathering mission, but essentially no further details have ever been released by either government).  However, I'm concerned about the sourcing, which is somewhat low quality and includes Fars News which is definitely not a reliable source.  Are better quality sources available here?  Googling doesn't turn up anything of higher quality, which makes me somewhat skeptical.  Nick-D ( talk ) 23:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A minor incident with no significant repercussions.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete