hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mirza Aziz Akbar Baig: Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:GNG .  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 23:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Codenamewolf ( talk ) 06:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The nominator has been blocked as a sock and they started quite a few AFDs in their three weeks of activity.  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Codenamewolf.  Can't find anything of note in Pakistani media.  41.97.58.27 ( talk ) 20:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unsourced BLP and likely lacks notability.  The fact the nominator is a sock should not affect the outcome of the discussion.  Broc ( talk ) 20:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Uncited with no GNG.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adam Kroener: Coverage is solely related to the already-deleted Carbliss ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbliss ), and WP:NOTINHERITED in any case.  ~ A412 talk!  01:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America .  ~ A412 talk!  01:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as it seems promotional and not very notable Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brighton & Hove bus route 5: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable.  Athel cb ( talk ) 09:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per route 1 and 6.  Only primary sources and not a topic getting treated in significant independent sources.  Remember to remove all routes from Template:Brighton & Hove bus routes .  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce Judd: The article in it's current form is a resume so would be willing to attempt to clean it up if someone can prove notability.  Qcne (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Qcne (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not pass notability guidelines as per nom.  Furthermore, article was heavily edited and contributed to by the subject himself.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 09:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this article was poorly created and articles should have references.  Catfurball ( talk ) 21:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arkadia Joint Lyceum: All available significant coverage is from official websites.  Media coverage exists, but it is either in local news providing list-style coverage of high school graduates and test scores, or it is routine coverage in news related to school openings and closings.  One news story appears to constitute significant coverage, but one is not enough to clear the hurdle.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Finland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Finland .  Owen× ☎ 20:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ESpew: Trying to find any information about this website at all doesn't produce many, if any, results.  Most references to eSpew are Wikipedia mirrors.  S EMMENDINGER ( talk ) 19:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd, not elgible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I find absolutely nothing.   If it ever did exist as a search engine, there is no evidence now.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks references to support.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 03:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can verify that it existed, but that's about it.  Jacona ( talk ) 01:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuliya Shiryayeva: My searches of Kazakh sources led me to Sports Arena , which mentions her twice in the main body and once in an image caption.  Sports.kz is a squad list mention only and Pro Sports mentions her as a goalscorer and again in the squad list.  None of the above are examples of significant coverage for a footballer as they do not address Shiryayeva directly and in detail.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexa Pacheco: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alan Rogers Travel Group: Possible advert.  Sources provided are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Products .  –– Formal Dude (talk) 04:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT following a search of Google, GNews, and GBooks.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Haynes Aero Skyblazer: Category indicates it is an abandoned project so doesn't have any expectation of gaining any notability.  Fails WP:GNG .  Additionally, article was created by the creator of the topic.  Perhaps a merger into another article to fulfill WP:ATD .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Transportation .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete Wikipedia is not a host for individual project's pages.  It junk at best.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 08:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero coverage of any sort, only some hit on a Russian website, which looks sketchy to begin with.  Nothing in Gnews or newspapers.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The CNN Money piece used for sourcing is literally an image caption; the second deletion discussion proposes that there were sources that exited at the time in 2013 (the first one was for a Gsearch which now gives a 404, the second links to the Deseret News site, but the article in question is gone).  I'd revisit if we had something more than the Deseret News source (assuming it's even extensive coverage), but I can't find anything.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jang Jong-hyok: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Certainly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barnea Jaffa Lande: My concern from then still stands: I can't find any sources that indicate that WP:CORP is met.  SmartSE ( talk ) 01:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Business .  SmartSE ( talk ) 01:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing is entirely to a JD Supra website; nothing we can use for sourcing.  Routine announcements used to build the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think "Barnea Jaffa Lande", or "Barnea Law", passes WP:NORG .  Few law firms in smaller countries do.  Lawyers quite a few.  gidonb ( talk ) 05:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  In this list from 2023 , the law office ranks 14th in Israel.  Not small, not huge.  gidonb ( talk ) 15:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Talia Barnet-Hepples: Limited google news hits and article solely based on primary sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roger Chang: Rift ( talk ) 05:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 06:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly non-notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Mooonswimmer 15:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk ) 09:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sisante Wind Farm: This wind farm might exist, but i cannot to find any sources which would confirm that it actually does.  Jexio ( talk ) 13:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions .  Jexio ( talk ) 13:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It exists, but you have to search in Spanish.  Here's some sources 1 2 3 4 Comment : I've had a look at the sources you provided.  Keeping in mind that the nominated article was written in 2007 and talks about a 196MW wind farm.  The article is from 2021 and talks about 3 installations near Sisante with a combined capacity of 148 megawatt.  This is much lower than the claimed 196MW.  Is about a 49.5 MW wind farm in Sisante consisting of 33 wind turbines.  The article is from 2018 and talks about a future 300MW wind farm.  The location as described in the source matches with this one on OpenStreetMap: [14] , which according to there was commissioned in 2022 and is not actually located in Sisante.  This matches with a group of wind turbines here: [15] However, there is no mention of the installed capacity of the wind farm.  Only that they use " a section of real wind farm located in Spain featuring 115 turbines. " for their simulations.  None of the sources you gave seem to support the claim that there exists a 196MW wind farm located near Sisante.  Only that there are various wind turbines and wind farms in that area of Spain.  Together they might add up to 200MW, but none of the given sources actually confirm that.  Jexio ( talk ) 22:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/merge if there is suitable target Why didn't this get a prod first?  I don't see one in it's history.  I think it's moot to argue it's existence or nonexistence.  This is about the article, and the state of this nominated article is not encyclopedic #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information .  Based on what I saw, this one subject will not make an acceptable article.  What should have happened was that somebody should have written an encyclopedic article about wind power in Spain, they could then list various wind farms in that article.  But we don't need one line articles about individual wind farms on Wikipedia.  James.folsom ( talk ) 00:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Violet Cripps, Baroness Parmoor: 11 years ago I created this article and now I do not know what I was thinking.  I can hardly find any information about the subject other than basic genealogical data such as whom she married and to whom she gave birth, so this falls under WP:INVALIDBIO and WP:NOTGENEALOGY .  The title is also nonsensical, as noted at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Where to move an article?  .  In my defense, I was young, very young .  Let's get this over with and never speak of it again, please :) Surtsicna ( talk ) 11:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and United Kingdom .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 11:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as proposed.  -- Hoary ( talk ) 11:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or Delete .  There's this passing mention about her interests here , which is not SIGCOV.  Not sure what the proper redirect target could be, given her numerous marriages and being initially born into a baronetage herself.  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only mention I can find outside genealogy is that she was "A leading member of the Society of Friends she had been connected with peace movements in Britain and the Continent for nearly 50 years, and has been for some years president of the Women's International League." but nothing to flesh out anything encyclopedic.  MilborneOne ( talk ) 14:57, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect ...she was of some note as Violet Duchess of Westminster if you search on that name but the article on her second husband (the 2nd Duke of Westminster ) could be the best place to cover her.  108.29.145.226 ( talk ) 18:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A note of admiration to the nominator for not only admitting to a well-intentioned error from a long time ago, but also taking a very public step to correct it.  This is wonderful to see.  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete