hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dr. Bosconovitch: GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Fury and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunimitsu (Tekken) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GlatorNator ( talk • contribs ) 23:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 11:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 11:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Not independently notable.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 19:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters per above.  // Timothy :: talk 01:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Unsourced except for the reception section which is literally all run-of-the-mill listicles.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 17:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters per all.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of World Rugby Sevens Series broadcasters: In addition, several of the entries are unsourced.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Rugby union .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to SVNS and World Rugby Women's Sevens Series articles All the information in the article can be merged to the parent articles, neither of which are so long that it needs a content fork.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 11:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to SVNS & Women's SVNS .  Content would need to be updated before this happens as most of it is out of date.  LouisOrr27 ( talk ) 01:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Unica NetTracker: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : does anyone have a copy of Kevin Roebuck's 2011 Web Analytics: High-impact Strategies - What You Need to Know Definitions, Adoptions, Impact, Benefits, Maturity, Vendors ( ISBN 978-1-74304-640-1 )?   Apparently, the tracker received some coverage there.  The textbook itself is included in the esteemed ACM digital library.  Owen× ☎ 01:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Unica Corporation .  Abandoned stub about a minor utility that was abandoned over a decade ago.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Unica Corporation : sounds like a good AtD.  Owen× ☎ 21:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
London to New York Air Route: We already have an article at transatlantic flight that should cover this.  Interstellarity ( talk ) 19:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism , Aviation , England ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the article as it stands seems to be largely WP:SYNTH .  The sources cited do not directly describe this route per se, and I see no sign that the route meets WP:GNG any more than the hundreds of other key routes between major city pairs.  The Translatlantic flight article has sufficient mention of the route and a standalone page is not justified, per WP:NOPAGE .  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 09:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : I feel like it is the best to merge it with the Transatlantic Flight article.  The route does have a lot of history of being a way of connecting North America to Europe, or just being a way for people to go to London but modern planes with great engineering like the Airbus A321 and Boeing 767 and 777s have the range to do JFK-LGA with no stops, as compared to the Comet 70.167.194.163 ( talk ) 18:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for the Merge option suggested by the IP editor.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Transatlantic flight page.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 18:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Transatlantic flight page.  Bduke ( talk ) 22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Embassy of the United States, Belmopan: Fails WP:ORG /.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Belize ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Belize–United States relations , both articles are currently pretty short.  — siro χ o 03:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Siroxolo.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 23:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of College Football on ABC personalities: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Also, this list is mostly unsourced per WP:RS , barring two WP:PRIMARY and a wiki page, none of those asserting notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and American football .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to College Football on ABC#Personalities as an WP:ATD .  Agree with nom about everything except WP:NOTTVGUIDE .  This is a list of personalities to which I do not see how this would be a tv guide, so that policy is out.  I don't find the list covers WP:LISTN exclusively.  It's good to return to the main article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2013 Peshawar mosque attack: LibStar ( talk ) 01:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013 , given the same rationale I gave with the last few AfDs (it's a terror attack so should probably be noted overall in terms of their security situation, likely mentioned somewhere in overall discussions of the issue).  As with most of these cases, if there is later coverage it's almost certainly not in English, so this is difficult to evaluate.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013 .  No analytic coverage that warrants this event having a stand alone article.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 18:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Asuka Kazama: Still lacking third-party sources.  Merging it into List of Tekken characters seems the way.  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge There is WP:SIGCOV in Den of Geek , which doesn't appear featured in the article at all.  However, all other sources appear to be sentence-long mentions or shorter.  With a single significant source, it does not appear to merit a standalone page.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters per nom.  The above Den of Geek is the best of the sources, but a single source is not enough to justify a standalone article per GNG.  At best this is an unnecesssary CFORK.  // Timothy :: talk 20:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Rubik's Cube in popular culture: This is half a list of said random media featuring this toy (ex. "In the South Park episode "The Coon" a Rubik's 3x3x3 cube is seen."; in fact the entire article as often happens started as " a list of cultural references involving the Rubik's Cub" - something that WP:TVTROPES handles better [54] anyway) and trivia about its popularity such as " almost 40,000 entries on YouTube featuring tutorials and video clips of quick solutions" or "there was a Google Doodle about it".  Given that the main article on Rubik's Cube has no reception, I think we may entertain merging some stuff there (said trivia about its popularity), to such a section (as it can arguably constitute a section of the article, but not an article itself), but there is no need to keep this as a stand-alone article/list (due to failing aforementioned GNG/NLIST policies for stand-alone stuff).  Final damning evidence: not a single source seems to discuss the broad concept of "Rubik's Cube in popular culture", nor is the term "popular culture" mentioned in the article outside the title and categories, which also suggests this article as framed is a big piece of WP:OR .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , Popular culture ,  and Lists .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  This is way better than most pop culture lists.  Good chunks of of it is actually about Rubik's Cube rather incidental pop culture references.  The Liberty Science Center exhibit should be merged, as well as some of the lead.  Much of § Art could be merged too.  Perhaps more.  — siro χ o 19:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Rubik's Cube , though only the 'Art' section has encyclopedic value.  The rest are pretty unremarkable WP:IPC .  SWinxy ( talk ) 21:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge To the main article.  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 12:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Midlands Junior League: Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Non notable junior competition - Delete .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: As a contested PROD, this does not qualify for soft-deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Midlands Rugby League Premier Division , as was done for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Rugby League Division One .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Walsh90210 , that is not an appropriate target article as it is a Redirect.  It should be appearing with a green font color.  L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That page was merged to Midlands Rugby League a few hours after my comment; presumably that would be the merge target now.   That is, "selective" merge; other than that the league exists (and some senior teams have junior teams in the league) there is no content to merge.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 02:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mint Velvet : Most coverage discussing the brand is actually coverage of its founder, Liz Houghton.  In a brief search I found only two detailed writeups: this piece in Vogue which reads like a press release, and this article indicating the brand was acquired by another company in 2019.  What little content is here could easily be merged to Liz Houghton .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 17:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Liz Houghton as per WP:ATD .  HighKing ++ 15:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Materials World : website claims that it's "widely accepted as the leading publication in its field, promoting the latest developments and new technologies" but I haven't been able to locate anything that would confirm this and I haven't been able to find anything that cites this zine at all.  article has had one singular source for 3 years (added 11 years after its creation in 2009 by what seems to be a single-purpose account as it made the one singular edit creating this page and then disappeared ) and the body has remained almost completely the same since its creation.  — darling ( talk ) 22:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science , Engineering ,  and Environment .  — darling ( talk ) 22:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Seems like it's had no real edits since it was created and there's nothing I can find online in terms of coverage.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to IOM3 .  This is a real scholarly periodical: take a look at the sample issue on the Taylor & Francis website here .  Skimming the table of contents is enough to see that this is a serious publication featuring prominent scholars at reputable institutions.  Looking further for coverage of it I found that the description mimics (maybe too closely -- I'm too tired to pursue that thought) the material on the IOM3 website here , explaining that Materials World is their publication.  So my thinking is that the magazine itself is not independently notable so far as I can tell, but at least the core description of it should be moved from this page to the page for IOM3.  - Astrophobe ( talk ) 02:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to IOM3#Activities where the magazine's mentioned under the publications subheading and it's a membership journal.  Wouldn't advise merging the article text because as the contributor above says it's almost a replication of the Institute's blurb.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 United States migrant surge : We don't know if this surge will continue to be notable long term.  Also, it appears there wasn't really a surge, just potential for one see [4] and [5] .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 18:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Drafitfy until WP:RECENTISM subsides and WP:LASTING impact becomes clear.  Brandmeister talk 19:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] draftify : Seems like WP:NOTNEWS territory.  It also seems like a very small amount of people to call a surge, when immegration happens of a magnitude many times higher in other countries.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 19:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename — Clearly, there wasn't a surge, but cities have declared states of emergency.  One only needs to look at New York to see this is notable.  elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsion .  I don't think this is notable in its own right ( WP:EVENTCRIT ), but it is an aspect of Title 42's history, and some of the major details in this article could be condensed down to a subsection in that one.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 20:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsion , of which the article in question is arguably a WP:POVFORK .  We are not here for tabloid-led sensationalism about human migration.  GenevieveDEon ( talk ) 20:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as news reports are reporting that the anticipated surge never happened.  -- M asem ( t ) 14:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge This article creator has a habit of jumping to creating articles for events that are unnecessary and should be covered in a main article and only split when warranted. Reywas92 Talk 22:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsion per all above, and nom. Cheers, atque supra ! Fake scientist 8000 03:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsion per all above. Von bismarck ( talk ) 12:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsions; there's not really enough here to support its own article, but covering the information can be done sufficiently there.  -- Jayron 32 18:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Title 42 expulsion , as per everyone else, a fork.  Slatersteven ( talk ) 14:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
KIV-7 : Fails coverage in secondary WP:RS to establish WP:GNG .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Politics ,  and Technology .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge