hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Evelyn Smythe: While generally notable in universe, I can't find many sources displaying outside notability in a BEFORE.  She's listed at the Companions article, so a redirect there could work as an ATD.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Blank and redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters § with the Sixth Doctor .  This looks like entirely unsourced fancruft to me.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 05:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as lacking reliable sources.  A redirect is cheap, per WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 17:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still unsure whether this article should be blanked (as in creating a regular Redirect) or fully Deleted.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters#with the Sixth Doctor - Minor character that only appeared in spinoff material.  No significant coverage in reliable sources to pass the WP:GNG .  The character is already listed on the appropriate character list, so redirecting there is sufficient.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 17:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters#with the Sixth Doctor as AtD, fails GNG no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject diretly and indepth.  Article reads as fancruft.  // Timothy :: talk 11:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Connect.com.au: It may have been one of the first ISPs in Australia but that fact itself does not confer automatic notability.  Lacks significant coverage to meet WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing ,  and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 02:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : significant coverage provided by book in 2nd reference.  Yet again LibStar nominates an article with clear significant coverage.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We need multiple sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The book that is currently the second reference contains one instance of the text string "connect.com.au": AARNet introduced its value added reseller program, with the first Internet service provider in this formal sense being connect.com.au, in May 1994.  That's not significant coverage by any stretch of the imagination.  There's one other relevant sentence on p. 52, a passing mention in a section about another company .  If we are to have this article, we need a better basis than that.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 13:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks XOR'Easter, yes that's not significant coverage, Jack's ! vote is based on defective reasoning.  LibStar ( talk ) 15:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It may make more sense to say what can be said about this in the article Internet in Australia , which has historical sections.  Trimmed of the vaguely advertorial language (e.g., assuring the future competitiveness of Australia's wholesale and business internet market ), what's left might slot in there nicely.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The accessible sources are just trivial mentions.  The subject does not seem important enough to be added to Internet in Australia#History , as the only claim of significance that can be backed by a source is that the subject was the first user of AARNet .  Redirects to AARNet or AAPT Limited don't seem to be viable either.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 19:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to, or weak merge into, Internet in Australia § History per XOR and Tutwakhamoe.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Internet in Australia , or weak redirect , per XOR; they do fit together nicely, and it makes more sense to build out that article than to have a mostly unsourced article here.  DFlhb ( talk ) 07:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Semantic primes: It would make more sense to move any substantial content there instead.  The A universal syntax of meaning and Natural semantic metalanguage sections are completely unsourced and don't appear to conform to the encyclopedic style.  NicolausPrime ( talk ) 02:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics , Logic , Philosophy ,  and Language .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We'd be well advised to leave a redirect page in place after the deletion of Semantic primes.  Kubis ( talk ) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Redirect - it's a common enough term so we should merge the useful, well-cited content and keep the page as a redirect - car chasm ( talk ) 07:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the section in Natural semantic metalanguage .  I'm struggling to find anything worth keeping here aside from the table, which is already in the target article, but I suppose we can keep the page history under the redirect just in case.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 12:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think having the term itself as a redirect is more valuable than the page history, but I've updated my vote as I'm also fine with redirecting.  - car chasm ( talk ) 17:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Terry Lee Miall: Sources are a database record on AllMusic, an article with name mentions, and a dead link.  BEFORE found name mentions but nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indeph .  No objection to a redrect to Adam and the Ants#Members where the subject is listed.  // Timothy :: talk 06:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , England ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Adam and the Ants#Members as suggested by the nominator.  All of Miall's notable accomplishments are as a member of that group.  A couple of magazine articles mention that he was later a plumber and joined a different band, but those are not notable or significant facts that merit a separate article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 21:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Adam and the Ants . Clearly doesn't warrant a standalone article, but should certainly be retained as a redirect and there's content here that should be merged. -- Michig ( talk ) 15:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Doubtful on whether there is anything worth merging.  He was later a plumber and joined a non-notable local band, neither of which is relevant to the history of Adam and the Ants.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Adam and the Ants#Members , per comments above.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 16:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Firetalk: Couldn't find any other reliable independent sources to show notability.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to be a band with this name and a blog from the Illinois Fire Service, nothing for this web portal thing.  One reference isn't enough.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to FireTeam (video game) : where it is already mentioned.  Owen× ☎ 01:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above as non-notable.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
News Central (Philippine TV series): The only source fails WP:RS , because [22] is tied to the admin or producer of the news cast (non-independent source).  Unless more sources that are reliable and unaffliated to ABS-CBN are found, this article fails WP:Notability and must be removed.  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 10:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 10:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yet another outsourced and unnotable Filipino newscast.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Studio 23 --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 06:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs aired by Studio 23 : as WP:ATD .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 10:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs aired by Studio 23 per nom.  CastJared ( talk ) 15:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alicia Zaban: The subject has earned at least one cap for the Guyana women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Canada , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Bewitched home video releases: Ajf773 ( talk ) 01:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bewitched episodes and potentially merge some of the content there.  While it seems clear to me that this topic does not have standalone notability, I don't think it matters whether it is "cruft" or not.  jp × g 18:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per JPxG above.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 22:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete most of these “list of home video x” things have been deleted or are heading that way and I see no logic to a redirect, besides the general logic that Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap which doesn’t mean you should always redirect deletable material if there’s even the tiniest plausible excuse for one.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 08:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Textbook case of NOTCATALOGUE.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 08:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  There is not any content that is really suitable for merging to the proposed List of Bewitched episodes , and a redirect would not make a whole lot of sense, as I doubt this would be a particularly common search term.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sleep Tight (Angel): This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Previous REDIRECT was reverted, so bringing it here for discussion.  Donald D23 talk to me 18:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 18:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and near-entirely plot summary, which are both no-goes on Wikipedia.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above.  // Timothy :: talk 15:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zoës and Zeldas: Tagged for notability since 2019.  PROD removed with "de-prod, adding 1 source, coming back to this later currently travelling" about a month ago.  Nothing signifigant added since then.  Donald D23 talk to me 12:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 12:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect , target BoJack Horseman (season 1) surely.   Do we need to be here for this?  Hiding T 09:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : to BoJack Horseman (season 1) , fails GNG, BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS.  // Timothy :: talk 12:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to BoJack Horseman (season 1) , where the episode is mentioned.  CycloneYoris talk!  21:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sports City Stadium (Doha): After opening Google Maps, it's shown the stadium isn't exists, that means it might be cancelled, so it's might be not relevant anymore.  Also this should be deleted too: https://football.fandom.com/wiki/Sports_City_Stadium Chuanchauau 01:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 FIFA World Cup#Stadiums , where it can be mentioned.  Giant Snowman 20:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 08:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and Merge : per Giant Snowman Jack4576 ( talk ) 09:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above as plausible search term.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 08:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
TVP Info HD: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to TVP Info .  Article attempt did not provide sources.  Jalen Folf (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TVP Info The HD channel is just that now and the main feed.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above, unreferenced substub, catalogue-entry level, no interwiki, nothing suggests this needs to be a stand-alone entry.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TVP Info which is now the HD channel.  Rupples ( talk ) 21:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Classic Rewind: However, there have been multiple reverts of bold redirections in the last several years, and at some point an AfD discussion is necessary to have a consensus that can keep this.  Pinging the users who have made the reverts this year, PrincessJoey2024 and SouthParkFan65 , as well as Tdl1060 who restored the redirect in February 2023.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels § Rock — before all those restorations, it was pointing to that section specifically and not merely to the list alone — would appear to be the logical alternative to deletion here, as with many other Sirius XM channels without separate notability.  (I again must point out that even the pre-2021 version of the NRADIO essay, amidst its overpresumption of notability on the broadcast side,

Discussion outcome: redirect
Canesadooharie River: The identity of this river has been disputed, but there were never two rivers (or anything else) called Canesadooharie.  Richard Keatinge ( talk ) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  Richard Keatinge ( talk ) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Disambiguations .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article adds nothing new that is not already covered article at Canesadooharie .  It is a duplicate article that is best deleted.  Paul H. ( talk ) 02:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canesadooharie , as a plausible title.  Pam D 08:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect if mentioned.  No need for a DAB with only 1 entry and there doesn't appear to be others.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canesadooharie , since the page has existed for a while (not always as a disambiguation) and redirects are cheap.  Hatman31 ( talk ) 04:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Trey Farley: Non-notable broadcaster.  SL93 ( talk ) 18:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and England .  SL93 ( talk ) 18:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ATD : redirect to Live & Kicking , which covers his tenure on the show as well as his personal life (more so than Katy Hill , which is another possible redirect target).  Geschichte ( talk ) 03:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
St. Theresa's Boys High School: Despite the age of the school, no significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bandra , where the school is already mentioned.  Joyous!  Noise!  16:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : per Joyous! and my failure to locate additional non-primary material.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 16:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect