hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Laxmi Steel Railings : A WP:BEFORE search shows a variety of "Laxmi Steel" companies but none fitting this description, and the only references to "Laxmi Steel & Railings" are on other commercial catalogues.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Redirect to KK Bishnoi would have been fine too, but I can't find a RS to connect the two.  Article creator seems a bit focused on the Bishnoi family.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 20:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, didn't want to redirect as even that claim doesn't seem to be supported anywhere.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Telangana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing from reliable references to support WP:GNG .  Agree with analysis regarding redirect.  Onel 5969 TT me 10:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lack of WP:SIGCOV , Does not pass WP:NCORP .  Macbeejack ☎ 08:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jay Verma : The subject appears to fail WP:GNG , and for WP:NACTOR to be met, we would need to be demonstrate through reliable sources that Verma had "significant roles" in notable films or shows.  The mere claim (in the article) that this is the case is not enough to establish notability.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 13:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and India .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 13:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The absence of reliable sources in the article can be attributed to the lack of any reputable sources that cover this individual.  The only mention of the person comes from TellyChakkar, an entertainment website, but their credibility falls short of meeting the necessary standards.  As of now, the individual does not meet the eligibility criteria.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 08:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ill add IMDB reference Link if you want ill add more link 3foxwriter ( talk ) 18:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IMDb is considered user-generated content and accordingly does not contribute to establishing notability.  If you have other relevant reliable sources , please do mention them here or add them to the article.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 18:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hinaki Eel Trap Bridge : A quick search shows little in coverage outside of local government sources.  The article is mostly promotional in tone for the company that design it.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New Zealand , Transportation , Architecture ,  and Engineering .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are no reliable sources showing that this is even somewhat notable.  LinkedIn is not a reliable source.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Delete merged some into Oakley Creek .  Nothing else worth keeping.  NealeWellington ( talk ) 09:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional article for company, editor wrote nothing before or since The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marwan Effendy : See WP:PERPETRATOR .  On both counts I propose to delete this article.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 22:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 22:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Law .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 00:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Other than the alleged bribery, I don't see what he did that was unusual for his day .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 02:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The article could be expanded using the corresponding article in Indonesian (which includes 10 references) at id:Marwan Effendy .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I checked the id:Marwan Effendy article using a computer translation.  The article says that Effendy was appointed Junior Attorney General to clean up the image of the office after Urip Tri Gunawan, a prosecutor, was arrested for taking a bribe from Artalyta Suryani .  If I understand correctly, as Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes ( Jampidsus ), Mr Effendy reported to the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes.  Certainly an important position in the Attorney General´s office but prima facie not inherently notable in terms of Wikipedia:Notability (people) .  Also his academic positions do not presume notability in terms of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) .  There are indeed several Indonesian sources.  One refers to an alleged bribe unrelated to the Suryani case; there was no proof.  Another set of sources refer to a possible case of plagiarism regarding Effendy´s dissertation.  I don´t think it is quite enough to meet Wikipedia:Notability .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 17:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and my own standards for lawyers.  The above discussion says it all.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) P.SZ.  Since nobody asked, see User:Bearian/Standards#Non-notability .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Yudin : Shellwood ( talk ) 22:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clearly not notable.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Source Insight : Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG Zim Zala Bim talk 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 04:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There are some reviews out there in trade journals, but the independence of those is highly questionable.  I cannot find any sources meeting criteria.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 07:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant coverage from secondary sources.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 14:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rose Lefebvre : I tried looking in google books, but comes up with hits of namesakes.  Fails WP:ARTIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Visual arts ,  and France .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per the one source in the article, she is mentioned on page 8 of Émile Delignières Catalogue raisonné de l’œuvre gravé de Jacques Aliamet, d’Abbeville , Paris, 1896, digital scan available here (in French) .  Evidently the same information given by the source used in the article, and hardly conveying any amount of notability: it's a single, one-sentence aside in a footnote.  Otherwise, the closest thing to a source I could find is that Google Books hints there may be a mention on page 109 of Achille Le Sueur Le clergé Picard et la révolution - Volumes 1-2, Yvert et Tellier, 1904 (but snippet view isn't showing it to me and I haven't found the work digitalized anywhere I can access it).  AddWitty NameHere 09:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Azerbaijan–Tunisia relations : There are no aspects to these relations that add to notability like embassies, state visits, significant trade or migration.  The 2 cultural aspects mentioned seem to be minor factoids.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Tunisia ,  and Azerbaijan .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There does not seem to be WP:SIGCOV that could establish notability.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 17:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samidin Xhezairi : Can find little literature that mentions him (by real name or nickname), and these mentions are very brief.  The source used for the article names him as one of 100 ex-guerrillas being questioned at the Hague, and relies itself partially on the man's brother on Facebook.  While it is clear that this man did participate in the Yugoslav Wars, I can't see the sources proving notability.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 17:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Albania .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - insufficient RS, no real claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom BLP, not sure this even makes a valid claim to notability.   Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Open to a consensus redirect suggestion, but I really don't see an appropriate one.  // Timothy :: talk 18:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Toyen (band) : The article is also long-time unsourced and has other issues.  FromCzech ( talk ) 07:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Czech Republic .  FromCzech ( talk ) 07:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The Czech Wikipedia article also is unsourced and lacks any reliable secondary source, which might help otherwise.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Yohay : Page is written like an advertisement, which is surmountable, but there doesn't appear to be sufficient sourcing to warrant keeping the page even once it's properly rewritten.  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: may or may not be notable but he's working on it.  "Acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Settlement With Substance Abuse Treatment Center And Its Owner For Enrolling Patients Through Kickbacks And Using Falsified Patient Admissions Forms (announcement)" .  Southern District of New York .  United States Department of Justice .  21 December 2020 .  Retrieved 7 August 2023 .  Bryant, Bailey (6 January 2021).  "SUD Treatment Provider, Former CEO to Pay $6M for Medicaid Fraud" .  Behavioral Health Business .  Hasday, Jill Elaine (18 July 2019).  Intimate Lies and the Law (PDF) .  Oxford University Press .  pp. 73–74.  ISBN 9780190930233 .  Retrieved 7 August 2023 .  190-word description of a privacy-lawsuit arising from his divorce.  He won.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the subject appears to be mostly known for defrauding Medicaid per what A. B. found.  There is another "Stephen Yohay" who specializes in OSHA law who might be more notable.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cannot find any SIRS .  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 05:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  This article 1 mentions him in a Medicaid fraud.  CarribeanKing ( talk ) 19:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hamad Al-Harbi : Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Qatar .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article uses a single source, which is the player profile on a blog.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Azealia Banks' controversies : There may be reliable sources on some of Banks' various feuds, but not every single one of them needs to be recorded per WP:NOTNEWS ; especially given how Banks has attacked and criticized most mainstream celebrities at this point.  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 14:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Popular culture .  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 14:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A lot of is poorly sourced, unencyclopedic, and tangentially, giving air to the Internet rants posted by a woman who is better known for her feuds than her music at this point.  Ss 112 00:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The nominator nailed all the relevant policy violations.  The fact that Ms. Banks is always in a beef with someone is already described adequately at her main article, and a list has no encyclopedic value.  The Disputes and controversies section at her article could be cleaned up too, with a general summary rather than a few isolated examples.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and those above.  There is no justification for a separate article on the "controversies" of the subject.  BD2412 T 15:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ibrahim Sani : No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Basically a resume which collected and spun up a range of factoids.    None of the references is even partial GNG type coverage of him.   The only one describing him clearly looks like a self-supplied BIO.  Some concern that the creator has 25 lifetime edits and edit #5 was creation of this article which IMO was a wiki-saavy creation.  North8000 ( talk ) 12:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 12:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Journalism , Television ,  and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Association for Defending Victims of Terrorism : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 6 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Terrorism ,  and Iran .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Previously deleted by PROD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ORG .  Would reconsider if someone found sources in Persian.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: No reliable sources, fails WP:ORG.  Toadette ( let's chat together ) 05:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Capstick-Dale : Subject fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG .  Only two sources from the Evening Standard may establish notability, but one is an interview.  All others are brief statements, mentions, a listing, and unreliable content.  Toadette Edit!  17:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , France ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sources used in the article don't go into enough depth to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 16:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete