Hasan Khan (actor): The subject does not meet criteria outlined in the relevant WP:NACTOR as well basic WP:GNG.  No evidence indicating significant roles in notable films, TV dramas, etc.  Merely being in a film or TV drama does not make one Inherently notable.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 19:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 19:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He is a notable actor.  And how he started his career and everything can be found in his interviews with The News Internatioanl and daily times. ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 07:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] As the creator of this BLP, you've to provide references to support claims made about her significant roles.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 09:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] His notable roles in drama Dil-e-Veran , Amrit Aur Maya , Soteli Mamta , Juda Hue Kuch Iss Tarhan , Soya Mera Naseeb and Hina Ki Khushboo .  These sources have mentioned his acting career and education.  [3] [4] [5] — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeauSuzanne ( talk • contribs ) References ^ Caligiuri, Vittorio (2024-05-02).  "A new ring in the spiral: re-reading Marini's work at the end of the hegemony of US-led imperialismBook Review of Ruy Mauro Marini, The dialectics of dependency . New York, Monthly Review Press, 2022 (1st edition in English)" .  Middle East Critique : 1–6.  doi : 10.1080/19436149.2024.2348306 .  ISSN 1943-6149 .  ^ Ford, Derek R. ; Svensson, Maria (2024-04-13).  "Still-existing utopian pedagogy: Architecture, curriculum, and the revolutionary imaginary" .  Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies : 1–17.  doi : 10.1080/10714413.2024.2336816 .  ISSN 1071-4413 .  ^ "Hasan Khan" .  The News International .  ^ "Hasan Khan — the superstar of tomorrow" .  The News International .  ^ "Stunning and brilliant – Hasan Khan" .  The News International .  These paid interviews =  primary sources.  Do you have any substantial evidence ?  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 11:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These aren't paid interviews.  These newspapers interviews many other actors and models as well and they write about everything.  The News International is owned by Jang News Group which is one of the oldest newspaper in Pakistan.  Daily Times was run by Politician Salman Taseer until his death.  The News International also Daily Times are both English major newspapers in Pakistan. ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 11:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] I'm not questioning the credibility of the sources, but rather the interviews themselves.  While it's common for actors to be interviewed, these interviews alone may not sufficiently demonstrate that the subject meets the WP:GNG or WP:N.  Additionally, these interviews (primary coverage) are not sufficient to verify claims of significant roles in TV dramas/films.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 12:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: The creator of this BLP @BeauSuzanne is suspected UPE and a SPI is underway .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 17:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As noted in another AfD also regarding a sock insinuation involving the same users, also on the May 7 log, "unless something is confirmed, best not to mention it."  Calling someone a suspected sock without confirmation is inflammatory and biasing.  Furthermore, that linked sock investigation shows that checkuser did not establish connection between BeauSuzanne and the other names.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Doczilla , Sure - this one is old comment and I have retracted allegations of socking since then.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, but you didn't retract it here.  It would have been appropriate if you had struck that out yourself.  I would suggest doing so if you have any other lingering sock accusations that you have not directly clarified.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  15:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These sources (primary source) are used in other articels as well. ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Delete : Promo BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article do not meet WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth, are mainly promo bios, interviews, and name mentions in routine mill news, BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIRS.  Above sources are promo interviews, fail WP:IS, and do not demonstrate notability .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 19:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Need further input on the sources presented to make a clear consensus either way - more voices will help.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The WP:THREE presented all are by the same publication (The News) and two by the same author (Asif Kha), published within a couple months of each other and all are interviews with one being a straight Q&A.   Per WP:GNG Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability so at best they count as a single source.   As stated by TimothyBlue, the other sources are brief mentions, press releases, promo, or routine coverage and the CLF award is a non-notable award.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete