hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
EOdisha Summit : No independent sources to speak of.  Also bundling: EOdisha Summit 2013 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) EOdisha Summit 2014 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) SaUp2014 ( talk · contribs ) may need closer attention to determine whether any more of their articles merit deletion.  – Tera tix ₵ 15:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Technology ,  and Odisha .  – Tera tix ₵ 15:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Not a notable conference, and the per-year articles are filled with unsourced minutiae.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 15:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  Articles make no attempt to establish a credible claim of significance , let alone notability.  No independent sources of any kind and few sources in general.     ~ Politicdude ( About me , talk , contribs ) 18:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not sure about A7 but definitely fails WP:NORG /GNG.  Google search only returns their websites and these articles.  C F A 💬 21:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate its notability and importance. -- RodrigoIPacce ( talk ) 10:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benabaye : GNews hit says that a suspect from a drug den bust just happens to be from said baranggay .  Alternatively , redirect to its town proper at Merida,_Leyte#Barangays -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  Lenticel ( talk ) 02:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Melindy : A BLPPROD was removed after sources were added.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Ice hockey ,  and Canada .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Biography fails to meet WP:GNG .  The only sources are to statistical databases with do not contribute to notability.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 15:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found this but that is not enough to meet GNG.  Rlendog ( talk ) 17:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Sourced only to databases, plays in the low minors, fails the GNG.   Beyond that, at the very least that edit summary in the article creation is pure attack, ought to be revdel'd, and the article creator ought to get a trout slap over it.  Ravenswing 18:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amir Válá Meshkin : Only 1 article links to this.  Could not significant coverage of this individual in news and google books searches.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Architecture ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - He may be better known as an architect than a musician, but several of his architect related citations are from books or publications that cannot be accessed online to verify.  None of his music citations are acceptable, so even if the page is kept it needs to be edited to remove much of his music info.  If someone can find verifiable citations, let me know and I can change my vote.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 21:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Instablog9ja.com : All I see online is the blogs own posts on other social media platforms like twitter and X. I also see to bloggish/churnalist-type stories where the writer is guessing or implying who the author of the blog may be.  Fails GNG, NCORP and WP:WEBCRIT.  Netherzone ( talk ) 16:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Websites ,  and Nigeria .  Netherzone ( talk ) 16:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please check the references I made Realcontribution ( talk ) 22:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh i see where you're heading to how about if you check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Take_Out You will notice that they didn't add much references still it wasn't nominated for speedy deletion Realcontribution ( talk ) 23:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I ran a Google search and wasn't able to find reliable sources that discuss the blog.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  14:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lacks in depth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golden (knowledge base) : The included sources are a couple of TechCrunch articles and an archived primary blog post.  Source search has not been productive, but that may be due to the name being ambiguous (searching for "golden.com" in quotes mostly yields results from the site itself, and a few unrelated hits) That aside, this article reads more like a pitch for the site than an encyclopedic article.  It was successfully PRODed before claiming lack of notability.  ASUKITE 02:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Products , Internet ,  and Websites .  ASUKITE 02:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only non-self sources are Techcrunch, which WP:RSP mentions is questionable for establishing notability.  It's also worth noting here that one of the Techcrunch sources mentions that a former editor at Techcrunch was heading Golden's research team, which would compromise the independence of Techcrunch sources.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 21:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fundraising rounds are not notability-sustaining content.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 22:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Memento Exclusives : Paid editor created an article for this company and its founder, who is also up at AfD .  In the case of Memento Exclusives/Memento Group, the sourcing does not support notability under WP:NCORP .  Despite being a WP:REFBOMB , sources are almost exclusively WP:PRIMARYSOURCE S like press releases, WP:INTERVIEW S or WP:TRIVIALMENTION S. Other coverage is limited to WP:TRADES publications, which do not contribute to notability for companies.  Wikipedia is WP:NOTPROMO , and without sufficient WP:SIRS , this article doesn't clear the bar.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Motorsport ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with the nom.  All the independent coverage is not WP:SIGCOV and all the WP:SIGCOV coverage is not independent.  Article moved to mainspace in clear contravention of WP:AFC rules for WP:PAID editors.  No real claim to notability.  Surprising to see an established editor with 4000+ edits and with apparent affiliation with Wikimedia act with such brazen disregard with settled policy.  Mel ma nn 19:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strongest delete - "independent" coverage is limited to brief passing mentions ("X teamed up with subject to do Y", focusing on X and Y and not subject, with the sources often being closely related to X in the first place).  Possibly worth reporting to WP:ANI due to being a paid article made in obvious violation of relevant policy.  I do have to wonder what this "research" is that the user is undertaking that would cause such atrocious paid content to appear in mainspace.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 23:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As above.  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 02:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Oh I wanted to AFD this but thanks I saw this after voting from the founders page.  A promotional WP:PE and doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aldene Forbes : I can find no significant coverage of this player in web searches or Cayman Islands news sources.  There is a marriage announcement in the Cayman Compass but it is not nearly enough.  The subject of the article fails to meet GNG.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 20:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 20:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails GNG, best source found was this image caption Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Per Capita : Makes loads of unsubstantiated claims which aren’t backed up by third-party sources.  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with originally stated reasons.  Seems to have been created by an individual who could be assumed to have some ties to the group (admittedly, back in 2006 ), and the organization does not seem to have significant coverage in any sense past that point.  While some citations are present, they seem to be so passing as to not confer notability (ie. other orgnizations presenting information that 'aligns with Per Capita research' or is 'likely influenced by Per Capita findings').  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 15:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Potential WP:PROMO .  Most of the sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lacey Pauletta : JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anshul Tewari : See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Ki Awaaz (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Ki Awaaz User4edits ( talk ) 07:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Journalism , India , Delhi ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  User4edits ( talk ) 07:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Tehonk ( talk ) 20:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zynx Health : No indication of being notable.  Refs are routine business news.  scope_creep Talk 12:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Could possibly redirect to Hearst Communications .  The references on the page fall well short of WP:ORGCRIT .  I found one book source that gives a little bit of background on the company but definitely not enough to establish WP:NCORP .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darren Middleton (footballer) : He never played above the fifth tier, seems to have been created because a user thought he played in the Premier League .  However, this was an error on the Soccerbase website , he did not appear in the alleged 1995 match per the Premier League website and this news article .  S.A. Julio ( talk ) 06:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  S.A. Julio ( talk ) 06:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  S.A. Julio ( talk ) 06:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-league player after not making it at Villa or Wolves.  Went into banking, now running a training academy.  That isn't enough for notability.  Haven't found any additional sources and what is in the article doesn't meet GNG.  Pawnkingthree ( talk ) 01:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marie Wiseborn : Not notable enough for inclusion to Wikipedia.  Searches showed that she existed, but being a fiancee of someone famous is not enough to pass the WP:GNG .  Aside from being the fiancee of Moses Bliss, there are no other notability of the subject of the article.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Law ,  and Christianity .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Per nom, nothing in RS about her being a singer, preacher or a known law practitioner.  Even this article says that she's known for being someone's fiancé, the subject fails GNG .  It also doesn't look like the article can be expanded beyond {{ stub }}.  dxneo ( talk ) 05:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : No sigcov of the subject.  Her affiliation does not necessarily make her notable.  Fails GNG.  -- Donaldherald ( talk ) 08:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Speedy Delete - in agreement with the voters above.  She was in some gossip rag photos for one day, which is not even remotely close to our notability requirements.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable enough as per notability requirements.  Her current popularity is due to her engagement with a popular person which in my opinion is not enough at the moment --- MEVOELO ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 04:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:TOOSOON , also, she's doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or any applicable SNG.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 11:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
For the Emperor (novel) : Di (they-them) ( talk ) 05:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with Nominator and article doesn't have any Reference.  Historical Heritages of Bihar ( talk ) 18:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mega Long Mall : Just another mall.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Malaysia .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:SIGCOV -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 08:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No notability shown, it is just a mall that got sued once.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flying Tiger Development : The entire article's sources list consists of links to the company's website and IMDb, and I've been unable to find adequate sourcing to write a better article, so don't think it can be done (feel free to prove me wrong though, I may have missed something!).  Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs ) please always ping !  14:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Toys ,  and Companies .  Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs ) please always ping !  14:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The company actually has a history of developing games back in the day, including Time Crisis Alpha for the PlayStation and an old King of the Hill game – but none of this adds up to any kind of notable press coverage.  A passing mention at IGN ( [37] ) and small one in Kotaku ( [38] ) were the only truly reliable ones that popped up, and I don't think it passes WP:CORP .  Nomader ( talk ) 16:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not even fit WP:ORGSIG , with little to no coverage in independent sources as well as the lack of independent sources available.  MimirIsSmart ( talk ) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete