hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kang Kuk-chol (footballer, born 1990) : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete – Article has been unsourced for years, so does corresponding Korean Wikipedia.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Considering the long-standing sourcing issue, perhaps deletion is the best option.  Waqar 💬 19:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP:GNG , and has been a WP:STUB since 2012.  Only has one source.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 08:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sajad Azizi : Sports2021 ( talk ) 18:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 18:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He does not meet any of the notability criteria WP:BIO , WP:NBIO , WP:NBLP .  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 15:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bin There Dump That : No source that is interdependent of the company and speaks about the company.  Appears to be a promo job created immediately auto-confirmed status is attained Velella Velella Talk 14:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Velella Velella Talk 14:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darko Pavlović : In my searches, I found a blog post in BB Glas , but it's about a goalkeeper who turned 17 in 2021 so clearly not the same guy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Serbia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't meet any guideline and is not eligible for Wikipedia.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of ESPN Latin America announcers : Let'srun ( talk ) 20:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television , Lists ,  and Latin America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN .  Via ESPN Desportés, there were a few good in-depth pieces about their announcers.  Thing is.. .  it's WP:PRIMARY .  I've found nothing otherwise pertaining to the secondary sourcing of this WP:NAVIGATION .  The category article, works just as well.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 21:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Conyo14.  Unsourced and WP:OR excuse of a WP:LISTCRUFT list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no references which is required on Wikipedia.  Catfurball ( talk ) 21:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Armoured fist : The two rationales were: Armoured fist is a symbol used by some armoured formations, but its notability is already reflected in those articles.  It does not constitute a cavalry or an armoured doctrine or tactic despite the suggestion in the article — User:Mrg3105 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Article has had no references since its creation 19 years ago.  It is little more than a stub and not WP:NPOV — User:LicenceToCrenellate 08:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC) – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 17:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Pure original research.  Non-encyclopedic content, unsourced.  // Timothy :: talk 19:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Sun Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Also, mostly unsourced per WP:RS .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , it has a storied history on CBS, see [53] , [54] , [55] .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 16:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ROUTINE and WP:ITSIMPORTANT applies.  This is not about the notability of the games itself.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 18:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet notability.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN due to a lack of sources from RS.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Unicode/Versions : This was copied into mainspace from a draft, complete with AfC comments and tags.  Author has repeatedly recreated/moved this page under different names, so there might be some satellite messes to clean up (judging from their contributions ).  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Technology ,  and Software .  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Beyond clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG BrigadierG ( talk ) 00:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Definitely covered by WP:NOTCHANGELOG Mason ( talk ) 01:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clear cut violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG Steven Walling • talk 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just a clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG .  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 01:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing has changed since I declined it citing Wikipedia is not a changelog , except that the originator is continuing to be tendentious .   It still violates Wikipedia is not a changelog .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 03:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fall under WP:NOT .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 07:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I could see how some kind of sourced and prose-based history of the development of Unicode could plausibly be encyclopedic.  This is not that.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 21:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Interesting information for sure, but Wikipedia is not a changelog per above, although this is snow at this point.  Utopes ( talk / cont ) 05:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : more AfC-dodging from this user; I previously draftified the exact same content.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PayTabs : Given WP:NEWSORGINDIA and the general surface level, uncritical tone of the article I'm skeptical this is quality coverage.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 21:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Technology ,  and Saudi Arabia .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 21:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thankyou for your input, I have asked the brand to place proper link.  This will be done in 1-2 days.  180.151.24.178 ( talk ) 14:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : If "the brand" want to contribute anything, they should limit themselves to suggesting edits on the article Talk page, with full disclosure .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Obvious WP:UPE but evaluating on a notability level, it fails WP:NCORP .  Yes, NEWSORGINDIA applies to some of the referencing but even outside of that the references are weak.  For instance, this reference in the Arab News seems good on its face until you see it is basically WP:CHURNALISM from this press release .  Nothing I can find would meet WP:NCORP .  I am also anticipating IPs and SPAs coming with keep votes.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the links are OK now, if there is any specific media mention that needs to be deleted or replaced, please let us know.  We will get it done Prince-rkt ( talk ) 07:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] > We Are you a paid editor?  If so, why have you not disclosed your affiliation under WP:COI ?  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No I am not a paid editor, I am an employee of PayTabs and have created the page with limited expertise.  Therefore you can let me know the limitations or problem areas.  180.151.243.205 ( talk ) 08:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As they are your employer, this is still a conflict of interest, even though it was done in good faith.  You might like to build your expertise on Wikipedia by editing articles that are not directly related to your work, but on things that interest you.  In the case of this page, you would be well advised to contribute through the talk page rather than editing the article directly.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 10:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  G4 and enforce AFC or some other process.  Probably could have just drafified tbh, the title is already salted.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 07:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Third Vote : The sourcing in the article appears to be diverse from a first glance, but upon a closer examination it's clear that the only sources tied to one person actually talk about 'Third Vote'.  The rest of the sources are inserted into the article in a WP:SYNTH fashion.  For example, the first citation in the article suggests that the journal 'Electoral Studies' covers the topic of the article, but it does not mention 'Third Vote' anywhere.  This article appears to have been created by a WP:COI account who is refspamming one person's (Andranik Tangian) work across Wikipedia.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 19:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SOAP and WP:SIGCOV .  Advocacy is the opposite of an encyclopedia.  Some articles, but they are primary for the most part.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naomi Shah : Fails WP:BIO , WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 08:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Entertainment , Finance , Science , Technology ,  and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources.  Mooonswimmer 13:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Individual has significant coverage.  Corrugateboard ( talk ) 19:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Winning a science fair and meeting the President is fine, but it's the coverage about the person we're looking for.  The best there is, is a Forbes contributor piece [49] , rest are PR pieces from VentureBeat.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As stated by others above, not close to WP:N .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 18:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Obiageli Olorunsola : Also lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Nigeria .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Olympics .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any detailed coverage Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Midnight Shift Records : ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music ,  and Singapore .  ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; Mixmag seems unreliable, the CNN source wasn't SIGCOV.  Little else pops up Mach61 ( talk ) 14:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 08:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP .  This is the only source I found but does not count towards notability.  Delete per nom.  Tails Wx 13:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Matches on night shifts, nothing for a record label found.  Sourcing used now in the article isn't helpful, discogs in particular isn't a RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2030 European Men's Handball Championship : Event is still 6 years away.  Dratify can also be applicable.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 16:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:TOOSOON GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 17:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way WP:TOOSOON .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  There was an indiscriminate creation of articles about upcoming sports events.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Боки ☎ ✎ 17:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kimberly Crowe : No sourcing other than primary sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  — siro χ o 01:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and New Hampshire .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks independent coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can only find promotional materials provided by her.  Her book is published by a vanity press, and the "Speakers Playhouse" article is provided by a publicity agent.  Lamona ( talk ) 01:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable  -- Devoke water 18:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete