hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Noizbloc : Fails to meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  I could not find any sources on Google, and nothing has changed since the last AfD .  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 09:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (or possibly speedy) again no sign of notability of any flavour, just like at the previous AfD.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I also thought about applying CSD A7, but I wondered if it had already been rejected for speedy deletion before, which might be why it was nominated for AfD.  So, I concluded that AfD would be the best course of action.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Unable to find anything else usable online.  Here is an analysis of what we have right now.  Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://www.thecompanycheck.com/company/noizbloc-private-limited/U59201TN2023PTC165258 Provided by company.  I suppose it's just factual data?  ✘ No https://www.planetexim.net/indian-company/noizbloc-private-limited/cin/U59201TN2023PTC165258.html ✘ No https://aeroleads.com/list/top-music-label-companies-in-india ~ ✘ No https://fox40.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/689077362/breaking-boundaries-kadhal-kadamaye-emerges-as-a-musical-masterpiece/ Press release.  ?  ✘ No https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001wppt ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  TLA tlak 12:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please note that profiles like in the first citation are often unreliable at least.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 20:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and India .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no sources to satisfy the GNG, none of their artists appear to be notable either, so coverage feels unlikely to be found...  Sergecross73 msg me 13:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete still fails NCORP. - KH-1 ( talk ) 06:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Has essentially no notable artists and is less than 2 years old, so it fails against the WP:MUSIC suggestion of an important indie label.  Pretty clearly spam.  Chubbles ( talk ) 07:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Case of WP:PROMO , Promotion, advertising.  Company fails WP:N and WP:NCORP .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly failed WP:NCORP basic WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 19:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Shouldn't this be G4'ed instead?  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 20:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hacqueville (disambiguation) : The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and per WP:TWODABS .  BD2412 T 02:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  "Hacqueville" is not ambiguous.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Youth Assembly of Korea : 'National Youth Assembly' is not official assembly run by government, it is only kind of civic movement group.  Members of the 'council' are not elected by election, but are arbitrarily selected from the executive branch of adults.  This organization has been criticized by Korean Intellectual Property Office and youth activity groups due to many operational problems, such as promotion through false or exaggerated information.  Korean Government officially denied its relationship between National Youth Assembly.  [1] References ^ [ https://youthpress.net/xe/kypnews_article_society/410244 A civic group stole the name of the National Assembly and operated the 'Youth National Assembly'..Need to pay attention to 'Korea Youth Council' . Korea Youth Press Corps. 03 March 2018. Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and South Korea . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability not established.  Searches didn't turn up references in news or books.  Flurrious ( talk ) 20:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Institute of Cape Wine Masters : I see nothing other than self-promoting, probably paid, editing throughout the article history.  There is very little that can be saved and I think it is better off deleted.  MarcGarver ( talk ) 16:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wine , Education ,  and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find references to this Masters thing in various obituaries, news pieces and the like, but always in regards to another person (Mr. XYZ who was a Cape Wine Master, did xyz thing).  Regardless, there is no extensive coverage and this is PROMO with flowery language.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The article has survived since 08:48, 17 July 2008‎.  Gjs238 ( talk ) 12:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It should have been deleted then...  I am astonished that something with no references, no apparent notability and so promotional has managed 15 years of life.  MarcGarver ( talk ) 12:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
903 Peachtree : Even with WP:TNT though, the title of the article would suggest the article is about the company, and not actually the physical address 903 Peachtree Street.  The history of the building development does not seem notable in itself as all ten existing citations seem like WP:ROUTINE news coverage and I cannot find any heritage or other historical information.  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 19:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 19:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - truly awful advert.  Surprised it’s not already gone through speedy.  KJP1 ( talk ) 20:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Utterly unremarkable building which replaced an utterly unnotable strip mall; the article copy is just 'On date thing happened' details about building progress.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gerard Armond Powell : Jtbobwaysf ( talk ) 17:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Costa Rica ,  and Pennsylvania .  AllyD ( talk ) 17:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ping those who participated or were pinged in the last AfD discussion SwisterTwister ( talk · contribs ), Melcous ( talk · contribs ), Conquistador2k6 ( talk · contribs ), and Dthomsen8 ( talk · contribs ).  Thanks!  Jtbobwaysf ( talk ) 03:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only significant coverage is from press releases and non-RS sites, such as a Medium blog.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 20:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There doesn’t appear to be justifiable evidence to support keeping the article.  Little to no RS news coverage or notability.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 05:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kriti Singh Debbarma : These sources are WP:ROUTINE and WP:RUNOFTHEMILL as they all say almost the same things, her father being a three-time MP and her mother being a two-time Congress MLA, and they also do not provide sufficient WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG , also, notability is not inherited.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 20 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tripura-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Another example of WP:BLP1E , the subject fails WP:NPOL as she was never elected as an MP or MLA.  She received media coverage because of the general election in India in 2024.  Grab Up - Talk 15:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] this is a good article on a living person please keep thanks Briannemartindale ( talk ) 23:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  The degree of significance of the subject and of role as princess and politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of companies in Amarillo, Texas : Some of these companies just have a presence in the city, not based in.  We could add McDonalds, Taco Bell, and Starbucks to the list as well if we kept going that route.  Currently there is a category covering the companies based there and at the moment there are only five.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Lists ,  and Texas .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per NLIST, these companies are not notable as a group for this characteristic.  This list is short enough it can easily be addressed in Amarillo, Texas#Economy (with reliable sources).  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 22:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  the entire world has changed dramatically since this was created in 2006.  Weyerhaeuser, for instance, sold its Amarillo assets a long time ago.  Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and other techno visionaries changed corporate business forever.  Whatever businesses are operating in Amarillo in 2024, it's unlikely to be this list as is.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NLIST .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 18:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Athang : A draftification was contested.  There are a few sources online, and I am personally unsure about whether or not the sources meet SIGCOV.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment These [52] [53] [54] [55] are some of the better sources online.  I am leaning towards delete, but I'd like an evaluation from some more experienced editors.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: FInal relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If this were a film it'd only need "2 reviews" to pass ( WP:NFILM ), but since it is a web show it will need 3 WP:GNG sources.  I read the 4 sources mentioned in this AFD.  The first source looks good, I think that passes GNG.  The other 3 sources aren't great.  2 and 3 contain a lot of quotes so probably aren't independent.  4 is a bit too positive, could be based on a press release, so not independent.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 08:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ARVØ : There is a citation but it links to a recording of a radio show which is in Estonian.  Searching for information about this award or any coverage of the subject brings up absolutely nothing apart from the artist's socials.  Additionally the article was written by the subject or his staff as WP:PROMO InDimensional ( talk ) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Germany .  InDimensional ( talk ) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No WP:SIGCOV .  It is also poorly sourced and its tone does not necessarily express as written from neutral point of view.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 21:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bryon Kiefer : A web search throws up two short articles ( [80] , [81] ) but no WP:SIGCOV .  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Netherlands .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unable to find sufficient SIGCOV from third-party sources to satisfy notability requirements.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of PlayStation games incompatible with PlayStation 2 : While List of backward-compatible games for Xbox One and Series X/S and List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 have History sections putting the feature in context with the console's development and such, this article has only the list, sourced either to primary sources or YouTube videos.  QuietCicada - Talk 01:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada - Talk 01:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article reads like original research , and it also fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This violates the rules against Wikipedia being a database as well as WP:OR .  It's potentially useful info but misplaced.  Maybe in Wikibooks or a different Wiki.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV .  Contains WP:OR .  User:Let'srun 15:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:OR .  They had 17 years to make this a notable article.  Here we are still.  There is no reason to sustain this listing.  Any game that is forward-compatible should be listed in its article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 05:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As far as I know, the vast majority of PS1 games are incompatible with the PS2.  Content is too specific, and perhaps it has lost its meaning since both video games are considerably out of date.  I archived it on the Wayback machine anyway Svartner ( talk ) 04:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTDATABASE , WP:INDISCRIMINATE , WP:OR , WP:GNG , and WP:SIGCOV .  Videogameplayer99 ( talk ) 09:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDATABASE Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sevad : Ping me if reliable sources are found with indepth coverage meeting SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are some external links from famouse news portals related to this article.  Different Rahul ( talk ) 06:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Rusty4321 talk contribs 19:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I found nothing that can be called in-depth coverage.  The article totally fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  To establish notability, it requires multiple in-depth coverages from reliable independent secondary sources.  Grab Up - Talk 08:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rowan Vargas : Fails WP:GNG with no significant, in-depth coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Mexico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Vargas is a former professional footballer who got many caps with professional clubs, and now is managing a professional club, if that is not notable, then I don’t know what the concept of notability means anymore.  I’ll include more references hoping it could be enough to keep the article alive.  Merlyn26 ( talk ) 21:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Merlyn26 : Please provide GNG-passing references here so we can better evaluate the keep arguments.  Remember that notability isn't based on WP:NFOOTY anymore.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 01:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just playing the game doesn’t qualify you for an article.  Not notable and I vote delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 20:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no significant coverage means no article, regardless of whether he was a professional Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete