Ucodelite: BEFORE search turns up no possible reliable sources to indicate notability (or any sources at all, too).  Creator copy-pasted draft out of draftspace after a declined AfC.  WhoAteMyButter ( 🌷 talk │ 🌻 contribs ) 04:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for notifying me about the discussion regarding the article on Ucodelite .  I kindly request that the article not be deleted as it holds significance within the coding community and provides valuable information about an innovative software development tool.  I am open to contributing to the discussion and making any necessary improvements to address concerns raised.  However, I believe that Ucodelite merits inclusion on Wikipedia based on its relevance and impact in the field of software development.  Thank you for considering my input.  Mehzabin P S Alvi ( talk ) 04:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If it holds significance within the coding community, you will need to verifiably show that by including reliable sources that indicate the subject's notability.  Sources from the subject's own website are not reliable and thus do not count towards notability.  For example, see Codeacademy .  It has numerous reliable sources (almost 40).  You don't necessarily need to have 40 (avoid OVERCITE ), but you should have enough that indicate notability.  I should also note that your original draft at Draft:Ucodelite was declined .  Why did you recreate it in mainspace?  WhoAteMyButter ( 🌷 talk │ 🌻 contribs ) 05:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I apologize for any misunderstanding.  I understand the importance of providing reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of Ucodelite within the coding community.  I will ensure to include verifiable sources from reputable sources that indicate its significance.  Regarding the draft decline, I acknowledge that it was declined initially, but I believed that subsequent improvements warranted its inclusion in mainspace.  I will take this feedback into consideration moving forward.  Thank you for your guidance.  Mehzabin P S Alvi ( talk ) 05:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "I understand the importance of providing reliable sources to demonstrate the significance of UCoDeLite within the coding community. I will ensure that credible references are included to support its notability. Regarding the original draft at Draft:Ucodelite, I apologize for any oversight in recreating it in mainspace after its decline. I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines and will work to address any concerns raised. However, I kindly request the removal of the nomination for deletion to allow for further improvements and contributions to the article."  Mehzabin P S Alvi ( talk ) 05:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And I'm committed to providing verifiable information to support Ucodelite significance within the coding community.  We are actively editing the article to include additional sources and improve its quality to attract more views.  Regarding the original draft being declined, I appreciate your feedback and have since made revisions based on the guidelines.  I believe Ucodelite merits inclusion on Wikipedia due to its impact and relevance in the software development field.  Your consideration in removing the deletion nomination is greatly appreciated. " Mehzabin P S Alvi ( talk ) 05:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please consider removing the nomination for deletion, as contributors are actively editing the article and it is gained more views. In terms of demonstrating the significance of Ucodelite within the coding community, I understand the importance of providing reliable sources to establish its notability. I will work on including such sources that meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Regarding the original draft being declined, I appreciate the feedback and will take it into account as I continue to improve the article. Thank you for your consideration. Mehzabin P S Alvi ( talk ) 05:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Um, I have also contributed because it seems that it's relevant, And I am keeping my research along Ucodelite and still improving, So I requesting to remove from "Nomination this article for deletion' Thank You Harvardjustine80 ( talk ) 07:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : While this discussion was going on, the article was deleted, judged by an administrator to be blatant advertising.  Anyone wishing to restore the article as a draft so that it can be corrected and resubmitted should go to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion .  -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 13:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete