hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Olivia May: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 20:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Starring or being any film crew of any Asylum mockbuster does not make anybody notable, it's a sign where your career is heading to.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Absolutely nothing of notability in this article beyond a single film role in 2009 InDimensional ( talk ) 14:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is no coverage of this subject in any major publication.  desmay ( talk ) 19:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wyprawa Robinson: Sending it here to see if anyone else can find something that would justify keeping this article, and if not, then it should be deleted.  Donald D23 talk to me 13:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Poland .  Donald D23 talk to me 13:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing how this meets WP:GNG .  I've started an AfD on pl wiki for that article too, and will update my vote here in the unlikely chance someone finds good sources there or such.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 16:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Engineering Holding: Nothing in Russian article or language results indicates CORP level depth.  Star Mississippi 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and Russia .  Star Mississippi 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rafique Sayed: TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Photography ,  and India .  TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete most references are not-reliable sources.  Almost all titles have been doctored to sound like they are news articles about the subject when they are either about someone else (ie: the one titled "Rafique Sayed captured actress Shefali Shah on Vogue India" is actually "Shefali Shah on whether playing real-life characters limits or frees an actor’s creativity" and the only hit for Sayed is a credit for a single photo) or misrepresenting a non-rs source (ie:"Rafique Sayed article on Pixel Village" is actually just his own self-published Pixel Village profile).  A draft of this article has already been rejected 3 times this month at Draft:Rafique Sayed .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Updated the article with strong sources.  The person is already notable.  The sources are not "strong"-that is why the draft was rejected 3 times already.  You are still misrepresenting references by changing the title names to make it sound like they are news articles about Sayed, when they are actually about different people with at best a quick passing mention of Sayed and sometimes just a photo credit.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The draft was not rejected three times.   It was declined three times, and has now been declined four times.   If this article is kept, the draft should be redirected to the article.   If the article is deleted, the draft should be kept.   Not commenting yet on whether to keep the article.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniil Rzhevsky: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article created by WP:SPA , sources are all PR/promo, social media, DBs, or subject's creations.  A cursory search suggests subject would not meet WP:SINGER or WP:GNG .  — siro χ o 08:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trafalgar Releasing: Expressive101 ( talk ) 11:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Companies ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Shakira tribute albums: Fails WP:LISTN : one album listed has a review in Allmusic, everything else is covered only by streaming services, catalog listings, and eBay listings.  Since the prose is mostly WP:OR , I don't see anything worth merging.  hinnk ( talk ) 20:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:LISTN as this is not a grouping discussed in reliable sources, none of these albums are particularly notable, and this comes off as WP:OR .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above: If more releases were notable then I would still recommend converting to Category:Shakira tribute albums , but there's nothing here worth keeping anyway.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 22:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The policy-based arguments by everyone above are correct.  Also note that upon inspecting some of the listings, most of these "tribute" albums are made up of cover versions recorded by unknown studio musicians and remixes by equally unknown DJs.  Just about all of them are attempts by shysters to sponge money off a famous person's success, and all failed to generate notice.  That same notice is required for an article here.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 12:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  >>> Extorc .  talk 18:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  List of non-notable albums.  OK for a fan site.  Needs sources comparing the albums to satisfy the notability criteria for lists.  Rupples ( talk ) 19:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Block Party Series: It’s all coming to me till the end of time 12:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events ,  and Nigeria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, non-notable event/party, no sourcing found since it's been shuttered, nothing turns up before either in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and Redirect the music event is notable and should be redirected to Block Party (Nigeria) or Block Party (Music event) since it's a series of mostly Nigeria and Ghana music events.  Aside from that; I have updated the article, and done some clean up on the article. -- Afí-afeti ( talk ) 06:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 00:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:NEVENT Nswix ( talk ) 00:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep .  Non-trivial coverage in 2 large national newspapers, The Guardian Nigeria News and the Daily Trust.  Clearly meets our rules.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral leaning to delete based on this comment by User:JoelleJay at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omogboye Saheed Ayodeji . It cites a journalism expert discussing rampant Nigerian journalism corruption. (That said, the Nigerian reporting style during my brief time there was florid even when reporting stuff like the weather.) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notable event with plenty of reliable citations proving notability. -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 13:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG. Avilich ( talk ) 22:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:SIGCOV -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 07:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist since a lot of work has been done to this article since its nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Bull: Had fleeting moments of fame for American Ninja Warrior, but overall non-notable.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 21:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople ,  and United States of America .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 21:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 22:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ansh Gupta: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this interview, which has maybe four sentences of independent coverage.  Everything else is trivial mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Cleary fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 01:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DJ Dominic: ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 01:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Those information are not added yet at times goes by it will be added MICHAEL PEWEE ( talk ) 01:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7, G5 and G11: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flex Liberia , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ D. Pewee , etc.  Also utterly non-notable per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 01:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Recreation of a page deleted at least 3 times by a WP:SPA that is likely a sockpuppet of the banned user:Flex Liberia due to a similar name and recreating this page.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Liberia ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Under A7, A11, G5, and G11, all of which are valid.  Why two admins declined it under faulty reasoning, I'll never know.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 05:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy deletion criteria are intentionally limited and specific, particularly A7.  One admin declined to delete and I supported them when the same exact tags were reapplied to the article.  If the page creator is identified as a confirmed sockpuppet, then CSD G5 would apply.  This AFD looks like it will result in deletion, I don't see this situation as urgent.  L iz Read!  Talk!  06:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You cannot seriously tell me with a straight face that this article isn't straight up spam by a user whose name is the same as a sock whose accounts have been blocked over fifty times.  I respect you and all you do to ensure CSD is not carried out willy-nilly... but c'mon.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 06:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy/snow delete .  I mean, come on.  Clear WP:DUCK socking, the sources are AI garbage, the article is word salad.  An embarrassment to Wikipedia.  Jfire ( talk ) 05:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SNOW - has zero chance of surviving AfD and is blatant block evasion in any case.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all the above.  Not notable in any form.  Lynch44 ( talk ) 14:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
After Dark (Dick Morrissey album): I was able to locate two (period) sources that mentioned this album, which I have added to the article, but they are passing mentions at best and the only results in Newspapers.com or (reliable results in) Google.  This does not appear to satisfy any of the criteria for NALBUMS or GNG.  The SandDoctor Talk 23:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  The SandDoctor Talk 23:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Conducted a search on TWL and verified those are the only two sources.  This probably could've been a PROD .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sudha Productions: AShiv1212 ( talk ) 16:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 16:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : content is very restricted, and almost no any inline references.  Serdaray85 ( talk ) 09:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Heydi Reyes: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The article List of Honduras women's international footballers does not yet exist, so it is not a possible redirect.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Honduras .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless significant coverage of this athlete can be found in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 02:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence of WP:NBIO and WP:GNG .  ––– Àvî Râm7 (talk) 06:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stuart Goodman: He's held some sub-cabinet state government posts and been the Arizona lobbyist for some companies.  No notable accomplishments in those positions are listed.  List of military service, education, job history.  The references are all directory type listings confirming he held those positions but nothing more, except one ~100 word prose article saying his firm was hired to represent Apple.  This wouldn't seem to meet the "significant coverage" standard of WP:GNG .  Article was created 10 years ago by an account that never did anything else, and hasn't gotten any content edits or inbound links in a decade.  Those are not criteria for deletion, of course, but they do suggest that there's just nothing to add to take this beyond prose resume form into encyclopedia article.  Which is what is suggested by the apparent lack of sources with non-routine coverage which could be cited.  Here2rewrite ( talk ) 01:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no indicia of encyclopedic notability here.  BD2412 T 01:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Most of what is claimed in the lead, was during his late 20s-early 30s.   He was 23 when he was "Associate Director of Government Affairs for the Arizona Multihousing Association" Most likely titles that were non-notable - and possible volunteer -  positions.   User:Arizonapolitical never wrote anything else for Wikipedia, but this article.  Possibly the same person as the article subject.  — Maile ( talk ) 02:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage (but a bunch of quotes and cursory mentions) in the Arizona Republic .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV, no independent, secondary, reliable sources.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 03:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Politics ,  and Arizona .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Just directories/lists as references.  Three of them don't even work anymore.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 21:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nominator; listed sources are insufficient to demonstrate notability.  Waqar 💬 09:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing much in terms of notability-lending refs.  Reads like a promotional CV.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete