hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of sports television composers: Virtually all of those bluelinked are not specific to sports broadcastings; for example, a bulk of John Williams' fame was from movie composing.  Are we going to every film and TV composers who worked on the Olympics too.  Are we going to list Emerson, Lake & Palmer ( Fanfare for the Common Man ) and Fleetwood Mac ( The Chain ) too?  I cannot see this passing WP:NLIST too.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Lists of people .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's nothing but trivia.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 19:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It seems to have some people who work exclusively in sports programming but there are probably many more; and it also throws in some notable composers (as mentioned by the nominator) who happened to sell a few things to sports programs but there are probably many more of those as well.  Simply not a tenable list per the requirements at WP:NLIST .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Svartner ( talk ) 08:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of songs about Chennai: The list fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE , WP:LISTN and WP:OR .  There is little to nothing worthwhile in this list, be it content or context.  This has even been deleted previously.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Lists ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Whole article is a trivia.  Orientls ( talk ) 17:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Syron Saut: Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Philippines .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 20:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the sources provided do not amount to significant coverage.  C 679 07:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thur Deephrey: Searching for coverage brings up nothing on this artist beyond start concert and festival listings.  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , Germany ,  and Ukraine .  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  I have done a quick Google search and all that comes up are just events, press releases of which none covers the subject in depth.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 21:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only search result that isn't routine cataloguing seems to be a passing mention in a review of a different artist that they did a backing track for. -- D'n'B - t -- 10:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ayyaloori Subhan Ali: - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 06:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , India ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 06:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Low level politician, no independent sources provided, none found.   Draft was declined by three different AfC reviewers and rejected by a fourth.   After inquiring about the rejection at the AfC help desk, article creator ignored the provided advice and moved the draft into mainspace themselves and contested MPGuy’s prod without comment or improvement.   -- Finngall talk 07:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Creator has attempted a move back to draftspace, which was quickly reverted.  -- Finngall talk 13:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Not a major political figure who have received significant press coverage.  Fails WP:NPOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Just winning a local election does not make him notable per NPOL; no sources found.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 20:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  Killarnee ( talk ) 20:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable per our guidelines.  Nobody ( talk ) 08:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly failes WP:NPOL , also WP:GNG .  Agree with Nom!  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 11:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update: Article creator has been blocked as a sock, making this article eligible for G5 speedy deletion.  -- Finngall talk 19:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom. Does not meet GNG . Drowssap SMM 20:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 11:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Kimbrell: Most of the superficial referenciness is taken from directories or "About" pages of groups he is part of.  Guy ( help! - typo? ) 19:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Law ,  and Environment .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete: no reliable sources at all Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  At least one of the sources is arguably reliable , but appearing briefly as one of 50 is not significant coverage.  I've never heard of him, but his work appears to be useful, if not notable, and there are lots of lawyers (like me) who have been involved in the environmental movement .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ecodan: It is written like an advertisement, and most of the page is unsourced.  𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 14:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The three sources used for this, one is the company's own site, another is an article written by the product manager for the product, and the third mentions the brand as an aside.  So no sign given of notability.  -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 14:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Freemantle: There are a handful of reliable-looking sources out there, but even with them, it still seems like an edge-case.  I'm also weary of some of the sources out there, because this seems like such an obvious COI-created article.  Whisperjanes ( talk ) 08:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Arts , Literature ,  and United Kingdom .  Whisperjanes ( talk ) 08:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominator comment - To save others some time, the best sources I found were 1: this National Library of Wales blog post [47] , and 2: this collector's magazine article [48] .  The rest of the sources I've seen are mainly passing mentions, non-independent, or primary sources/interviews.  - Whisperjanes ( talk ) 08:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - so far I'm not sure.  I feel generally that the nom is likely correct that there is limited referencing to show notability.  However there do appear to be a number of interviews - and I'm unconvinced that these don't show anything about the individual.  I understand the argument but for me if independent publications have decided that someone is worthy of an extended interview, that is showing that they are considered notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 14:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is paywalled [49] , hits on the name.  Nothing else found; I honestly expected to find something about this fellow.  Lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : 3, 6, and 14 are sources per the source tool, so iffy.  9 is red, so no good.  Rest are not identified by the source tool/bot.  I don't think they help for notability as they don't appear RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Certified Financial Manager: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] First: If the programme was discontinued, as the article implies, then it is no longer of interest, is it?  The article attempts to describe the certification but it is vague.  And towards the end it mentions a completely different qualification (ChFM).  It's a delete for me.  Looks incoherent and somewhat lost.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 20:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Defunct, run of the mill certification; few current reliable sources exist.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CRUMBS: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Non notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 15:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and lack of sources.  I did look for a few book and news sources - and found nothing.  The current article notes a few sources, but they don't look reliable .  Please message or alert me if you find anything.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angeline Gustave: I found a couple of pieces covering her move to France ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ), but nothing in-depth.  #3 is probably the best source.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Haiti .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agra (given name): This name fails WP:NNAME as having no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, and having failed NNAME fails WP:GNG as having no WP:SIGCOV and having hardly any reliable sources outside of simple databases.  It might even fail WP:NOTDICT .  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 06:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Lists of people ,  and Latvia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the only information is that a few hundred people have that name.  The only person listed is redlinked.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  16:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as this article has been PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: No indication this meets the WP:NNAME , with a lack of coverage either in the article or elsewhere.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , namecruft.  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:NNAME .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The references in the article are enough to establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 10:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see how.  A few mentions in databases, calendars and frivolous sources of questionable reliability does not seem to indicate notability.  And the sources you added are about the person listed, so I don't see how they contribute towards notability of the name itself.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul van Rietvelde: Fails NBAD , BASIC and ANYBIO too.  Cannot find a single RS which mentions "Paul van Rietvelde" more than once except this and this , which are only promotions for a new sponsorship, and some local news/interviews like this (maybe the best source but still doesn't help the article achieve BASIC) and this (routine charity event that doesn't provide coverage for the subject except for some feelings from him).  1E might also be applicable as these two sources exist just because he was going to participate at the Commonwealth Games; ("preparing for the Commonwealth Games", "I'm definitely going for a medal", "competing at a home Games is always important", "hoping to take part in the Commonwealth Games") no similar coverage could be found after the Games.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 08:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Badminton and Scotland .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 08:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stanley Modrzyk: This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Paganism ,  and Illinois .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking through The Wild Hunt, the main Pagan news site, there seem to be a couple of mentions that Modrzyk passed away but little beyond that to really sustain notability for Wikipedia's purposes.  Midnightblueowl ( talk ) 12:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in EBSCOhost.  ProQuest has a few news articles in which he is briefly quoted, e.g. ProQuest 309969259 , ProQuest 420258868 .  Similar articles in newspapers.com.  I don't see any significant coverage.  No reviews of his books.  Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG .  Jfire ( talk ) 03:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 4223: C messier ( talk ) 12:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable galaxy.  I didn't see any significant coverage in scholarly studies or observer's guide books.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 14:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not appear developable now nor in the near future.  ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf ) 15:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it is not notable and there is no significant commentary on this object.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 04:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
House management: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre , Business ,  and Management .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Entirely WP:OR .   -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 20:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTDICT ,  this is nothing but a show business trivia definition.  — Maile ( talk ) 22:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT .  The scope of the article, or its possible use as a dab, is not well stated.  "Front of the house management" is an occupation, but I'm not sure this is the right title.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete