hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
CyberEmotions: Article was created in 2011 and then BLARred in 2014.  A failed attempt at restoring the article was made a few days ago by Belbury which was then reverted by Randykitty , and there's apparently no agreement in sight.  Pinging other editors who participated in the linked RfD: Thryduulf , Lunamann , Voorts .  CycloneYoris talk!  09:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Websites .  CycloneYoris talk!  09:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No serious disagreement here, my "attempt at restoring the article" was just to undo the redirect and restore the previous version of the article, after having followed a CyberEmotions wikilink that took me to a page that didn't explain the term.  No view from me either way on whether the article should exist.  Belbury ( talk ) 09:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The previous AfD had two keep ! votes, but neither specified any policy reason for keeping the article.  There was no source discussion and the only nod to notability was that it had "big players" in the project.  But it was, nevertheless, just a research project that seems to have no lasting notability.  Research outputs would be primary sources, but, in fact, could be useful in articles that talk about notable subjects for which these are relevant.  For instance Sentiment in Twitter events would be interesting in something on the Oscars, or Twitter, or an article about group dynamics.  Those notable subjects are not the project itself.  Redirect would be fine if there were agreement on a redirect target, but failing that, this should be deleted.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Run of the mill research project.  40 participants sounds impressive, as does the list of the organisations where they work, but a standard NIH grant to a single investigator usually runs up to a million $$ for 4 years.  The EU grant contrasts rather paltry with that: 3.6 million Euros (augmented with existing funding 4.6 million) for 4 years for those 40 investigators.  Usually these consortia are ephemeral and CyberEmotions is no exception.  It was closed in January 2013 and has disappeared without much trace since.  Of course, notability is not temporary, but almost all of the references present in the article date back to when the project wa active and none are the in-depth independent sources required for GNG.  Some don't even mention this project at all (e.g. ref 4), which is all too common in this kind of drummed up promotional "articles".  Note that one of the conditions to obtain EU funding id to publicize the project and its funding sources as much as possible, and WP is then an obvious target.  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 15:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mount Diablo Silverado Council: No independent notability shown in reliable secondary sources.  Secondary sources provided are either unreliable or passing mentions.  spryde | talk 13:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge to Defunct local councils of the Boy Scouts of America in California#Mount Diablo Silverado Council .  There's a lot of content there.  The article simply needs a good editor.  -- evrik ( talk ) 13:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability is only an essay, it saves me from having to type out my argument.  Even if a target can't be decided now, a re-direct can be quickly created at any time by any editor.  Graywalls ( talk ) 19:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, basically.  Just no notability.  This is not unlike what we see in articles on university departments--they are rarely notable in their own right, and that their existence relies on being part of a notable organization doesn't make them notable. I doubt that really any councils are notable--looking at the category and clicking randomly on one, San Diego-Imperial Council , that one is not notable.  Drmies ( talk ) 21:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Scouting ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no notability.  It's weird how some sections of the project just accumulate cruft.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 16:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Topic is not notable, as councils, even with so many references (many of which are primary), are not notable to begin with.  Also, there isn't much coverage on the topic.  Haruka Amaranth 09:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  Axad12 ( talk ) 18:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Player positions (paintball): Couldn't find any official termonology for it in any google search Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I found a few articles about it online, but nothing that indicated that this is used in competitive or even casual games.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 10:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete another example of non-notable paintball fandom.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jesús Silva: All I can find are trivial mentions in TUDN and SN Digital .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Playing for a reserve team at the age of 31 and no WP:SIGCOV falls well short of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSBASIC , as nom suggests.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Article is an unsourced stub.  The term "Jesús Silva" on search engines find other men of the same name instead of this Mexican soccer player, failing WP:V too.  Moreover, I even tried searching his full name and ended up finding nothing.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 13:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – per no evidence of notability and fails GNG.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 13:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Konstantios & Evripidis Trachoniou: However, it's an unsourced one-line stub about a football club that played in third- and fourth-tier leagues in Cyprus.  According to WP:FOOTYN football clubs can be presumed notable if they play in a league eligible for the country's national cup or top-tier tournament, which for Cyprus is the first and second divisions, so this club has never been eligible.  I also could not find any sources in English or Greek to support general notability .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 13:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Cyprus .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 13:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Google was kind enough to offer the search in Greek, and still nothing turns up.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was the person who nominated it for speedy deletion, the article doesn't pass any notability guidelines or has any sources Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found some mentions of the club but nothing to indicate WP:GNG .  There is Sigma Live 1 and Sigma Live 2 but neither address the club in detail.  The club may or may not meet WP:FOOTYN but, in any case, GNG is of far greater importance so I would prefer to delete on that basis.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeff Anderson (singer): No sources found except for database entries.  The individual albums do not appear to be notable, either.  Fails WP:GNG .  Earlier AfD discussion in 2013 did not really bring forward any arguments for notability.  Broc ( talk ) 10:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Broc ( talk ) 10:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Looking for reliable sources came up flat.  I could hardly even find any promotional material, even when searching for his name and albums.  He is clearly a non-notable artist.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 10:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears to be a religious preacher with the same name, unsure if it's this person.  Regardless, no sourcing found for a singer.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Lean Delete I found one source that had just a tad more information on him, but I'm not convinced that it's of high enough quality for Wikipedia.  Otherwise, I think that this article should be deleted.  ❤History Theorist❤ 04:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Northern Radio of Michigan: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio , Companies ,  and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One-market radio broadcaster does not meet WP:CORP.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Defunct small-market broadcaster; all of its properties went to separate parties so there's nowhere to logically redirect to.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Keep I believe this article ( Northern Radio of Michigan Spins Three FMs to Separate Owners ) qualifies as a significant reliable secondary source.   If not, I may change my mind.   If you disagree, please explain why.  -- Eastview2018 ( talk ) 15:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Though citing them is fine for honors, I generally don't really find state broadcasting associations to be a proper source for station sales and format changes as they're an advocate for the stations they represent and don't have a neutral interest; just my view though, someone may disagree with me.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per most everyone else.  I can't exactly say it's impossible that a one-market radio station group can meet WP:CORP , but I don't think there's anything that indicates that's the case here.  (It would be hard to argue that the Michigan Association of Broadcasters is an independent source for any broadcast entity in the state, so their article probably counts zero toward establishing notability.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Acorn, Santa Barbara County, California: The article's only citation is to the USGS GNIS verifying that there was once a site with this name.   The only other verification I could find was old topographic maps (most recent from 1947) showing the site with that name, absolutely nothing else since then.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 04:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 04:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : At these coordinates, Google Earth and Google Street View show just a compound at 901 Floradale Avenue belonging to Launchpad Land, apparently an agribusiness.  Lots of agricultural equipment and some living facilities for migrant field workers (that's from the sign at the gate).  There are several more buildings scattered along a mile of Floradale Avenue.  Other than that, it's just 100s of acres/hectares of crops.  It's about a mile west of Lompoc, California .  My ref check came up empty.  If there's something of historical interest that would make this place notable, ping me.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found one newspaper reference to Acorn being a place, and that articles makes it sound like the site of an agricultural plant, not a community.  Likely yet another of the mistaken GNIS "populated place" entries.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 03:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This appears to be a named place but not a notable community.  ~ EDDY ( talk / contribs ) ~ 23:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perry Stone (radio personality): BD2412 T 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All media coverage was about the incident, not the person, and was fleeting.   No media mentions since 1989, apart from a one-sentence name-drop in SFGate .   Non-notable individual remembered for getting fired 34 years ago...who cares.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:BLP1E .  Fails WP:BIO per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 07:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Citizen Matters: User4edits ( talk ) 07:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
El Cielo (band): I couldn't find relevant sources in Spanish or English.  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved.  There doesn't seem to be a suitable WP:ATD .  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Argentina .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conserveira do Sul: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Portugal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   A few web searches did not turn up anything likely to lead to reliable sources, so I do not think this meets our general notability guidelines .  Malinaccier ( talk ) 14:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matthew Kirk: I don't believe the single source coverage here passes WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 14:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Bilateral relations , Finland ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Few WP:ATD 's in this case.  For this subject, a clear ATD would be a redirect to his father Peter Kirk (English politician) .  Alternatively, this article can be deleted and Matthew Kirk (artist) can be moved to this title.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 00:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable and this one clearly fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I looked for Finnish language sourcing, and while there's a bunch of quotes (think "UK Ambassador Kirk said so-and-so about such-and-such" in a longer story about some event), the only even vaguely useful bits for this AfD I found are the following, from best to worst: [39] 350 word bio/interview about Kirk quitting as an ambassador and starting at Vodafone.  Despite its length, it's complete fluff with pretty much no encyclopedic value beyond the first two sentences, which give age, length of service as ambassador, and say that he is indeed starting at Vodafone.  [40] Finnish News Agency press release about Kirk's successor.  Consists of four sentences, of which one is about Kirk.  [41] The whole story is a single sentence: Matthew Kirk has invited for a visit demonstrators opposing the Iraq War, and has organized events to familiarize people with the embassy.  That's it.  That's the article.  There's also a Kauppalehti story at [42] , which I can't access it thru the paywall, but based on the 1 minute reading time, it's nothing extensive.  Probably just regurgitates some press release, as so much of Kauppalehti coverage does.  In totality, delete absent further sourcing.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 08:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Atterbury Theatre: However, not enough to meet WP:N from what I could find.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ICE-CREAM (Podcast): Non-notable podcast without reliable sources and significant coverage.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 00:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the sourcing is from youtube and I can't find anything about this.  Plenty of hits on ice cream the food, nothing about the podcast.  Weak PROMO perhaps.  "Sodas and telepaths" is flagged a suspect by the source bot as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Internet .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I cannot find in-depth coverage of this podcast.  Pichpich ( talk ) 17:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , no significant coverage, and all the sources in the article are primary.  Artem.G ( talk ) 11:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete