hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Grossology (books) : Insufficient sourcing for 15 years, no independent sigcov provided to establish notability.  PROD removed due to talkpage message from anon who "loved the books as a kid".  Jdcooper ( talk ) 01:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Video games , Biology , Medicine ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The anon was right.  Grossology was an incredibly popular book series that spawned a TV show and a traveling museum exhibit, and I can find tons of newspaper articles about it.  Here's a few: " Teaching the oozy gooey science of grossness " (Allentown Morning Call, Aug 2013), " Museum exhibit uncovers all things gross " (Lincoln Journal Star, Sept 2005), " Totally Gross " (Louisville Courier Journal, Feb 2007).  Keep the article per WP:NEXIST .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 05:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep And move to Grossology as the primary topic per Toughpigs and the reliable sources he has found.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , these sources seem to refer to the exhibition, so I'm not sure they establish the books as the primary topic.  The article about the TV series is far longer (though with a large amount of unsourced excess trivia).  Maybe all the articles (+ info on the exhibition from the sources) should be merged into one.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 10:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll start one big page to see how a merge would work out at User:Jellyfish/Grossology and see how it looks all together.  Will edit when time allows.  Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk ) 18:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] On second thought - Grossology (TV series) is absolutely massive , at least on my phone.  Unless there's a significant bit of fat to trim off the article, I think it'd be best left as a summary with the main article template thrown on top of the section.  Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk ) 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I removed the worst of the fancruft, but yeah it's still a large article in its own right, so I agree with you.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 13:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also just realized it has one incredibly nonspecific and presumably un-archived source.  Lovely!  Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk ) 04:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - traveling museum exhibit appears notable and has received nationwide coverage (albeit, from multiple local newspapers) from about 2007 to 2021.  I also tracked down this NYT article , though  it looks to just be a passing mention of the book.  jellyfish ✉ 19:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tatjana Đekanović : Atakhanli ( talk ) 07:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Bosnia and Herzegovina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NATHLETE .  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : Has a Bosnian speaker conducted a BEFORE search for sources (I'm not seeing one on the talk page)?  If not this nomination is premature, you can't make a good faith declaration that it isn't notable unless BEFORE has been conducted.  Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 16:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : looking at the other language Wikis which cover her has suggested a couple more sources, which with the help of Google translate have allowed expansion of the article.  Pam D 17:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:GNG with expansion.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep following the work done by PamD and ForsythiaJo in expanding and sourcing this article, which has shown notability.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 18:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the coverage which has been added to the page is enough to get us over the GNG line.  Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 18:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Ditto what DaniloDaysOfOurLives stated.  -- Rosiestep ( talk ) 18:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY / WP:BEFORE . The coverage already in the article at the time of nomination did not demonstrate notability, but that has never been the correct standard to apply. Now we have not only the same notability we had before (because notability is not a function of the current state of the article) but a clear demonstration of that notability within our article. — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Obviously notable.-- Ipigott ( talk ) 07:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Notability within the article is clearly stated.  Kaybeesquared ( talk ) 14:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Notability is demonstrated by existing sources.  Rublamb ( talk ) 19:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per all forementioned reasons above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Autostrad (band) : Sources largely do not contain significant coverage of the band.  * Pppery * it has begun... 23:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Jordan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (and rename to Autostrad ).  The prior AfD in 2012 was for an article that was apparently entirely unreferenced.  Today's article is not, and since 2012, Autostrad has played internationally and received the following significant coverage: Garratt, Rob (2017-04-05).  "How Autostrad became the indie ambassadors of Jordanian culture and music" .  The National .  Retrieved 2024-04-11 .  "Autostrad indie band members express 'their humanity' through music" .  Jordan Times .  2015-03-03 .  Retrieved 2024-04-11 .  Saeed, Saeed (2018-02-01).  "Wasla music festival: Autostrad explain the Jordanian music ethos" .  The National .  Retrieved 2024-04-11 .  Nabawi, Maha El (2018-05-17).  "How Jordanian musicians are finding success with new genres made in the Middle East" .  The National .  Retrieved 2024-04-11 .  There are presumably additional sources available in Arabic -- in fact the article cites some.  Jfire ( talk ) 01:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Obvious keep due to new sources since 12 years ago.  Not sure why a speedy deletion tag was added in addition to this discussion.  Makeandtoss ( talk ) 09:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - Articles about this band were deleted or speedy deleted several times from 2009 to 2015 because less-experienced editors did not find reliable sources and did little more than announce that the band existed.  However, the article's history since 2015 shows that it has been developed by several more experienced editors.  The current version needs some cleanup (several sources are dead) and expansion of the band's history.  Note that the band's Arabic WP article [46] has some more sources, and those located by the previous voter will also help.  My vote is "weak keep" because they haven't gotten too far beyond tour announcements in the media, but there may be enough for a stub article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Mike Boon : BD2412 T 00:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and New Zealand .  BD2412 T 00:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Comment : This NZ Herald article gives him one tick for significant coverage in a reliable secondary source, I'd say, although it's odd that it didn't come up in the Google News search results.  It's the only source I've found on an initial search of NZ databases, and on its own wouldn't be enough to meet WP:GNG .  I'll have another look later and see if I can find anything else substantive.  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Updated to keep.  He (just) meets WP:GNG .  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 22:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This comes up in . nz sources [41] , I think that's good for notability.  There are a few NZ Herald articles about this individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : thanks for finding that Timaru Courier article.  Could you link any other NZ Herald articles?  Aside from the one I mentioned, the only other article I could find was "Comedy for kids proves a Boon" , but that reads as an advert to me.  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 03:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It was the same one you linked above and the "comedy" one you referenced here, that's all I had.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I've tracked down a few NZ reviews of Boon - theatreview: Ageless storytelling ; Silly fun for kids; dry humour for adults ; and in Threadnz.com: MR BOON SAVES CHRISTMAS .  Resonant Dis tor tion 07:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep With two feature articles in newspapers (which are twelve years apart), and a number of secondary reviews of his shows, there should be sufficient to presume notability.   I have added the above references to the article.  Resonant Dis tor tion 22:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Myōjinyama : Boleyn ( talk ) 08:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and perhaps move.  It's a 1290m mountain; based on the bluelinks at List of mountains and hills of Japan by height , it appears that the general consensus is that such mountains are notable.  The real name is "Teppogi-no-atama" or "Teppoginoatama" (the Japanese Wikipedia page is at that name), and the current English title could be mistaken for Mount Myōjin although the Japanese names are different (-yama vs -dake, but both could be translated as "Mount").  English sources using "Teppogi-no-atama" and discussing the place in some detail include this from Japan Today and this from Timeout .  Searching for the Japanese name 鉄砲木ノ頭 yields lots of hits on both Google Books and Google News, e.g. several pages of coverage in both this book and this book which are more detailed and less associated with paid tours.  Dekimasu よ!  01:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources listed by Dekimasu .  DCsansei ( talk ) 13:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
David Kramer (singer) : Elttaruuu ( talk ) 06:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  CastJared ( talk ) 07:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Theatre ,  and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep well-known singer and playwright, [15] meets WP:GNG .  He is notable enough for Britannica article.  [16] “One of South Africa’s most famous voices” [17] .  Also WP:NOTCLEANUP .  WP:BEFORE should be done before nomination, and it is extremely unlikely to have happened here.  Park3r ( talk ) 06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The bias is strong with this one.  The references are notable and a lot of digging finds coverage in non South African sources Gbawden ( talk ) 15:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , definitely.  A major figure in South African music, whose shows have toured internationally, and a cultural icon in South Africa.  There are sources in the article and plenty more online.  At best this should be a request to improve the article references, not to an AfD.  Zaian ( talk ) 11:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep SIGCOV found online.  Nom did not do any research on the web, i.e. failing to to a WP:BEFORE.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 13:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Chaos communications : A single reference that doesn't have an inline doesn't indicate that this concept is called by this name.  Fails WP:GNG , though a merge to synchronization of chaos would be a find WP:ATD .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Mathematics .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A WP:BEFORE -style search shows multiple secondary reliable sources for the topic: the review articles Applications of Chaos in Communications , Chaos communications-principles, schemes, and system analysis , and A brief survey and some discussions on chaos-based communication schemes , and chapter 27 "Principles of Chaos Communication" in the book Signal Processing for Mobile Communications Handbook .  And more with a bit more searching.  These sources establish notability of the topic per WP:GNG .  The article needs improvement, but with good sourcing available, there are no insurmountable problems.  Hence keep.  -- {{u| Mark viking }} { Talk } 17:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Mark viking's argument, basically.  The article isn't in great shape by any stretch of the imagination, but there's a topic here.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 17:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Mark viking.  More sources include: Privacy in Two-Laser and Three-Laser Chaos Communications , IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, July 2015 — Digital Communications with Chaos by W.M. Tam ( table of contents here).  The topic is notable.  HenryMP02 ( talk ) 19:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dosage Index : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 16:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 16:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - article needs clean up but subject appears to be notable: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2824166126/506A75FF7EB44502PQ/4 , https://www.proquest.com/docview/435747286/506A75FF7EB44502PQ/5 , https://www.proquest.com/docview/278484622/506A75FF7EB44502PQ/11 , etc.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Admittedly, the article needs work including simplifying, presentation and referencing, but there's significant coverage of the subject in multiple reliable, independent sources in newspapers and books on horseracing via a Google Books search plus the web, so clearly passes the GNG.  Rupples ( talk ) 00:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Further sources for consideration: [34] , a critique [35] , [36] Google Book search results [37] Rupples ( talk ) 04:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rugby League Conference North West Division : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 20:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have repaired this nomination so that it is not an outright duplicate of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby League Conference North West Premier .  (As best I can tell the nominator is legitimately nominating both articles for deletion with the same rationale, it is just that this nomination was not pointing to the correct article at all.)  No opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Rugby league ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Merge and Redirect to North West Men's League as successor competition.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Quigley (musician) : Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Television .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Certainly fails NSINGER, but I think the article does meet the general notability guidelines – there have been plenty of articles about her since her time on American Idol.  Most of the articles are about her status as an influencer, not as a singer.  Whatever we think of that as an occupation, RS seem to consider her notable enough to report on her now and then.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 20:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Tserton.  pburka ( talk ) 21:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Meets WP:GNG based on cited sources.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A few years ago, fans like me were trying to create articles for the runners up ("the best of the rest"), but the consensus has changed to include only the winners, or at most the 2nd or 3rd place, of major reality shows.  See the recent discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Melissa_Sgambelluri .  In this case, there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources to keep a BLP under even general notability guidelines , much less for a singer .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : unless I'm missing something, we've already got enough sources in the article to pass GNG.  I understand the AfD consensus linked by User:Bearian to mean that a person is not notable solely for being a runner-up on a major show: that's separate from whether they've received WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources to pass GNG.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of children of vice presidents of the United States : Interstellarity ( talk ) 23:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Well-crafted encyclopedic list.  Carrite ( talk ) 09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - While the article does require some work, it is inherently useful to have some additional information about the family of some of America's most notable politicians.  Alexcs114 ( talk ) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I replied to the wrong person, sorry Alexcs114 ( talk ) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There are many children of vice-presidents notable in their own right: for example, George W. Bush , Liz Cheney , and Jeb Bush .  Godtres ( talk ) 11:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I question when this would be useful.  The overwhelming majority of Vice President’s children aren’t terribly important or are known for other things.  TheRealJT1743 ( talk ) 22:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Discussion about whether WP:NLIST is met might be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 05:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per  Carrite.  I don't see any reason to delete this.  WP:NOTINHERITED doesn't apply here because this is a list rather than a specific child.  JML1148 ( talk &#124 contribs ) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , There are children of the vice presidents of the United States who have had their own successful careers.  Davidgoodheart ( talk ) 00:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While this is a list of non-entities of only regional or ancestral interest, I agree that this kind of odd list does no harm and has enough links on it that a user unfortunate enough to land on this article might use it to get to an article is actually useful to humankind.  Rick Jelliffe ( talk ) 01:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep