hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
District Regionalism: Search results seem to be either talking about unrelated concepts or mirrors of this Wikipedia article.  No plausible redirect target.  Un assiolo ( talk ) 12:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Geography .  Un assiolo ( talk ) 12:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article has no sources at all, and I can't find any good sources either.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sources posted with none to be found.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 07:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HeroCraft: Kadı Message 16:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Russia .  Kadı Message 16:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable (failing WP:GNG , WP:COMPANY ).  Also, the creator of the page and the most prolific contributor Special:Contributions/Haseth to it appears to be a single-purpose account created solely for promotion of this page.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 20:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Companies ,  and Cyprus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 21:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete They were around for a while, but most sources that come up are either press releases, routine news or WP:PRIMARY interviews.  There may be significant foreign language coverage so I am open to changing my opinion if that is shown.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I know Russian.  But yeah it's mostly Interviews.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 15:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG, cannot be considered as notable; no significant coverage as well.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 13:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baker's Dozen Donuts: This is not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia.  747pilot ( talk ) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 08:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . In general, I'd expect a franchise that apparently once had 100 locations to be notable, but there are almost no sources that attest to that. It might be that, if we had access to a bunch of Canadian local newspapers from the 80s and 90s, we'd find a wealth of information on this chain. Or we might find nothing. But as it is with almost no sources at all, we can't judge even that. -- Tserton ( talk ) 12:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : there appear to be quite a few results on ProQuest when searching for " "baker's dozen" donut " restricted to the years 1975-1999; there are also a number of unrelated results.  I cannot access the articles to assess their relevance, though.  Mind matrix 17:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27): Even the sources which the author has used in this article contradicts his claims for example author has used New History of Marathas Vol2 by Govind Sakharam Sardesai in his article and that book's Pg 85-90 (here is the link for book) [28] , says there were two campaigns one from 1725-26 and second from 1726-27 both led by Bajirao called "Bajirao's 1st Carnatic Expedition" and "Bajirao's 2nd Carnatic Expedition" the author simply combined those two conflicts kept a name as per his choice which violates Wikipedia guidelines.  Also result section has a problem; the same source stated above gives a Maratha victory see Pg 85, quoting 1727 April: Karnatik Chiefs submit to Bajirao , so Nizam victory is also inappropriate.  Mohammad Umar Ali ( talk ) 18:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , India , Andhra Pradesh , Karnataka ,  and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A separate article is not warranted for this much content.  Capitals00 ( talk ) 02:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per above-mentioned comments.  Rawn3012 ( talk ) 04:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Constructive45 ( talk ) 21:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC) .  Blocked sock .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 01:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see you provided no counter to my comment for which I nominated this article for deletion.  I am assuming it's because you simply can't.  Also, I see your talk page is full of edit disputes with other users where you are constantly trying to push your narrative.  Mohammad Umar Ali ( talk ) 03:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Page is WP:SYNTH .  So many sources and not a single source helps with verification of the war and the timeline.  The page is written with a circular bit of logic.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Archer Connection: Attempted to PROD, but a buzzer-beater drive-by editor removed the PROD minutes before the end of the PROD period with no notes about why they did so .  Since I can't double-PROD, here we are at AfD.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant coverage found online, and it doesn't look like it'll release any time soon.  Fails WP:GNG .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found since 2018 sourcing used, appears to have vaporized into thin air...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Louisa Simmons: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Fiji .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Does not satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zeno (programming language): IntGrah ( talk ) 00:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  IntGrah ( talk ) 00:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage at all.  One of countless programming languages that received no attention.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 20:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meyah Romeo: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2016 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Trinidad and Tobago .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Michigan and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 01:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raima Khan: Even the subject is not mentioned in the cast section of the Shows they did.  Fails WP:GNG -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pakistan .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loch Lomond (Illinois): Small reservoir without significant, independent coverage to justify an article.  SeymourHolcomb ( talk ) 16:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment , Geography ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: If editors of this article wish to keep it, they may want to cite some secondary sources, as the article's only current source is a primary source from the lake's website.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 05:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's a million of these sorts of rentention ponds and suburban subdivisions, but there's no indication this is notable.  Reywas92 Talk 01:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laughing Jackalope: Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Nevada .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- it's mentioned in a lot of regional crime novels but only passing mentions in RS, mostly having to do with the fact that it was torn down to make way for some other building. Central and Adams ( talk ) 03:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -- "it's mentioned in a lot of regional crime novels" That mean it has significant pop culture relevance?  Like the Prada Marfa ?  Jaiquiero ( talk ) 06:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage outside of local or travel websites.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 04:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kojo Soboh: No links to any RS found.  Reads like a resume.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment by creator - @ User:Oaktree b no link to a reliable source you said? , checkout the website publications as shown by Google News here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siagoddess ( talk • contribs ) 20:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of those appear to be RS, except perhaps the Forbes one.  We need more than one article about a person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b Sources used as references are from GhanaWeb , Yen.com.gh , Peacefmonline.com , Daily Guide (Ghana) , The Ghanaian Chronicle , Business and Financial Times which are the most reliable source of information in Ghana where the entity comes from.  Siagoddess ( talk ) 20:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Africa .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Seems to generate coverage in Ghanaian media, but it's not strong coverage and mostly looks like recycled press releases from him, rather than objective articles written about him, for some external reason.  The EMY coverage in particular: this is an event that he's behind, rather than an independent one which has recognised him.  Andy Dingley ( talk ) 09:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Though notability is not inherited, the sources provided state his contributions to the Ghana event industry, leading and overseeing major events.  He is also a former musician with songs that top charts in Ghana.  Siagoddess ( talk ) 12:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SP77 31-18: SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 14:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , absolutely nothing notable about this object, fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG .   No studies dedicated to this object individually or as a member of a small sample.   The article is created purely on the basis of a large radius, calculated from one large-scale database which has a particularly high luminosity and low temperature.   Other databases suggest a more typical star, possibly not even a true supergiant.  Lithopsian ( talk ) 13:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - running a search, I came across this Simbad data .  I assume that does not count.  I didn't find anything else using non-astronomical resources online so it doesn't meet WP:GNG .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : there are no studies or other sources with any WP:SIGCOV of the star; the only sources are SIMBAD and databases.  Neither of those sources establish any notability.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 08:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Himeko: This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:GNG (no WP:SIGCOV , hardly any reliable sources outside of simple databases).  All of the people listed are fictional characters, none of which seem notable enough for their own article.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Lists of people , Fictional elements , Lists ,  and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  PROD had to be successful.  Orientls ( talk ) 17:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet WP:NNAME .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
East African School of Media Studies: Not seeing sources to WP:V basic details, whether it is a degree awarding institution etc.  Possibly sources exist that I'm not seeing but currently per WP:V claims can be removed.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Kenya .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maria Rabinky: A Google search only produces links to websites selling her artwork, although I did find this press release on Google News about a distinction she seems to have won.  I'm unsure of its notability.  In any case, I haven't found anything else.  (NB: Sorry for resubmitting, was interrupted when I did it the first time and it was deleted.)  WikiFouf ( talk ) 02:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women , Architecture ,  and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , it's basically a CV/resumé, of a busy artist with a knack for self-publicity, but with no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST Sionk ( talk ) 18:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST .  She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  Seems more like WP:PROMO -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete purely promotional as written.  SportingFlyer T · C 05:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above lacks indepth coverage fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 13:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Event Supplier and Services Association: Fails WP:CORP .  SL93 ( talk ) 18:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  SL93 ( talk ) 18:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As to be expected with a small trade association, coverage is only in WP:TRADES publications and does not rise to the level of coverage needed for NCORP.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Claudia Pană: All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Romania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 13:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 17:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Was unable to find coverage.  Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 00:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete