hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2023 Cork Junior A Hurling Championship: Unreferenced.  Too Soon.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ireland .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  Would ideally be restored to draft.  Or deleted.  Author/mover was premature in moving this from draft to main article space.  Given that the event hasn't yet occurred, there is zero indication of sufficient coverage to meet WP:NSEASONS , WP:NSPORTSEVENT or WP:SIGCOV .  Per nom, WP:TOOSOON also applies.  Nothing appears to have changed since was draftified in April .  Author/mover has been reminded of applicable guidelines (by multiple editors) more than a few times previously.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 16:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unreferenced, and so fails verifiability .   The move back to article space after draftification without providing the needed references was disruptive.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tregynrig: Does not appear to meet notability criteria, other sources fail to confirm notability.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 13:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 13:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found except listings for a beach cottage and misleading WP-scraped content (a perfect illustration of why articles for such nonexistent locales should be deleted).   Only source is Google Maps, which is a red flag as they source data from WP, among other places, leading to a possibility of circular referencing.   Could just as easily be a copyright trap for all we know.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It does exist but its not an OS settlement [18] (it only shows "[other features]" rather than "[Other Settlement]") so probably doesn't pass GEOLAND and could be merged with Llanbadrig .  The Welsh Wikipedia article doesn't contain anything substantial.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 19:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Cemaes which a couple of real estate sites treat it as a synonym of.   It is called a "family-run farm" [19] and a "620 acre holding" [20] both of which indicate it is not a settlement covered by GEOLAND.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DIDWW Ireland: The sources in the article, and those found in my own WP:BEFORE , do not support a claim to notability under WP:SIGCOV or WP:NORG .  Frankly, from what I can tell, there aren't even sufficiently reliable sources to support the text in the article.  And the level of FV issues and apparent REFBOMBing  is more than a little problematic.  As raised by Bastun , Spleodrach and Ww2censor in the previous AfD discussion , the majority of the references available (in the article and elsewhere) are press releases, directory-style listings, ROTM industry publications and other trivial passing mentions that do not support a claim to notability.  (In almost every case, they don't even support the text they are placed alongside.)  That multiple versions of this article continue to be created in Draft form(s) is also confusing and disquieting...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Note that the separate Draft:DIDWW Ireland Limited was created shortly after the previous article was deleted and prior AfD was closed.  It was AfC declined before yet another draft ( Draft:DIDWW Ireland Ltd. ) was created and promptly moved to the main article namespace.  Draft:DIDWW Ireland was previously deleted as an abandoned draft .  There's a lot going on here.  And it's difficult to follow.  But it seems that this content keeps being recreated.  Without any of the issues raised (by multiple contributors) being addressed.  Likely need a definitive AfD outcome/consensus once and for all.... ) Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - I agree with the need for a definitive AfD decision.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  10:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - not a notable company.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 11:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kenan Cronjé: The most I found were three sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imam Hassan Sharif: Coverage is almost solely about the death and the event itself doesn't appear to satisfy WP:LASTING .  Appears to be a simple murder and that's it.  Noah , AA Talk 17:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Islam ,  and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  JM ( talk ) 20:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:VICTIM .   No assertion of other notability.   If coverage continues over a period of months, an article about the shooting might be appropriate, but it's too soon for that yet.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 10:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only brief coverage because of his murder.  Johndavies837 ( talk ) 11:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Appears to be a WP:BIO1E (and WP:NOTNEWS ) case.  If a few months from now there is still news coverage of the murder, it may be appropriate to create a page about the murder then.  Nsk92 ( talk ) 15:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEWS and WP:VICTIM .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  DarkSide830 ( talk ) 06:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Masjid Muhammad , where he was Imam and where he was shot.  Certainly relevant to that article.  Djflem ( talk ) 16:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sameja (clan): Fails WP:GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It is a major tribe of the Sindh region of Pakistan and they are a branch of a former ruling dynasty.  You should avoid speed nominating multiple articles without hesitation and get yourself familiarized with South Asian caste related articles.  Perhaps engage in a talk page discussion first with major contributors.  The references provided are more than sufficient and reliable.  Sir Calculus ( talk ) 05:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I know nothing about this although I am confused about the content of the page.  First Samma (tribe) is said to be a clan, then Sameja (clan) is said to be a clan and then on the page there are clans (or subclans?).  It is unclear to me how many of the sources on the page are actually substantially discussing the topic.  Second, there are wp pages in other languages for Samma (tribe) but none have one for Sameja (clan) .  It strikes me that unless someone can show a source which goes into depth then we should maybe follow the lead of the other WP language versions.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  00:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomin as clearly fails WP:GNG .  2404:3100:1817:350F:1:0:B411:827F ( talk ) Delete or merge back.  It's a fork .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG and no significant and reliable coverage by secondary sources means it fails WP:SIGCOV too.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 17:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roddy Lenga: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ondrej Sobola: No credible independent sources.  Biruitorul Talk 07:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Austria , Hungary , Slovakia ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reputable independant sources with significant coverage and so not WP:GNG or WP:BIO .  While there's a case that the link to the Tree of Peace project merits a merge, the information is already there.  Shaws username ( talk ) 14:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing in terms of coverage that would support a WP:GNG pass.  Being the "inspiration" for an organization that might not even be notable itself falls well short of any notability standard.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
24 (Turkish TV channel): Chidgk1 ( talk ) 11:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mba Vitus Onyekachi: Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Fails WP:GNG Alex-h ( talk ) 16:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; the only online coverage available are routine/trivial stuff like match reports and statistical databases.  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
OpenElement: Existing article contains one reference to the subject's website, Was PRODed, but the template was removed without addressing concerns.  Greenman ( talk ) 10:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Greenman ( talk ) 10:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Contested PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references.  A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.  Dialectric ( talk ) 15:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The PROD was opposed by an IP on an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS basis, which is not sustainable here.  Searches for Element Technologie and openElement find a couple of product reviews ( BetaNews (2013) , Softpedia (2017) ) which praise the product's range of templates, but do not indicate attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaurav Nanda: The sources available in the article only appear as simple mentions, which is not enough to demonstrate notability.  And the history of contributions to the article assumes a WP:COI .  Ciudatul ( talk ) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers .  Ciudatul ( talk ) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Computer mediated environment: On consideration I doubt merging is suitable, as this article is unsourced Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or incubate - The article fails nearly all of the WP:GNG .  And there are no WP:RS !  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Basically a WP:DICTDEF .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The minimum definition already exists on page CME .  It may make sense to redirect there when deleting it.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabiha Mehzabin Oishee: Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete - Fails WP:GNG .  Can be a speedy deletion.  - AlbeitPK ( talk ) 07:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Businesspeople ,  and Women .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete References are not appropriate-profiles and self-published sources.  Did not established notability at all.  Ontor22 ( talk ) 11:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lali Chichinadze: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Georgia (country) .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] *Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] She is not mentioned at Georgia women's national football team so a redirect may confuse the reader.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per @ Spiderone .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find anything about her in Georgian Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and is not saved by WP:NFOOTY .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
C.W. Raines: The two references in the article are passing mentions of how soccer has helped him as a COO, strangely enough.  Regardless of this, there's no coverage outside of these two passing mentions, failing both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT .  IncompA 00:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Football ,  and United States of America .  IncompA 00:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find any evidence to say this article meets GNG.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Persiyali Yalimo: Local football club.  No evidence of notability under GNG or SNG.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Maybe @ Das osmnezz know something about this team.  Svartner ( talk ) 18:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete