hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sanjog Waghere: Fails to meet GNG and NPOL.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 19:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 19:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article itself has reliable links from before the candidacy.  MrMkG ( talk ) 00:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nom.  also failed WP:NPOL , If this were the criteria of Wikipedia.  So today there would be an article about the candidates who stood and lost in every election.  Come on and grow up please.  Thanks you Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 09:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  To contest candidacy for political office, does not guarantee notability.  The degree of significance of the subject and of his role whether as a 3 time corporator or a mayor of industrial city is not enough to warrant a page on.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   few sources are present.  I vote for deletion.  Rustypenguin ( talk ) 20:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - This is a new account that rapidly made many AfD comments and got blocked for advertising.  MrMkG ( talk ) 13:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , sources are there as nominator concedes.  But it isn't a case of WP:BLP1E , there is a lot of coverage of him from before candidature.  It's just overshadowed by the candidature.  I'll link two below.  Jolt to Ajit Pawar-led NCP as party stalwart walks over to Sena UBT .  He is being called a "party stalwart" which should tell you it's not merely any generic local leader.  पुणे: गढ़ में अजित पवार को बड़ा झटका, संजोग वाघेरे ने खटखटाया मातोश्री का दरवाजा (Pune: Big blow to Ajit Pawar in Garh, Sanjog Waghere knocked on Matoshree's door) .  MrMkG ( talk ) 13:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have only linked to articles that talk about his candidacy.  Raut said they are looking to field Waghere from the Maval Lok Sabha seat.  ”We were searching for a strong candidate to represent the party in the Maval Lok Sabha seat.  We found Waghere among the strong contenders.  We asked him to join the party and he agreed,” he said.  It doesn't matter if he is called a 'party stalwart', as this is what WP:BLP1E states about biographies - Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 16:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karol Stricker: An obituary supports some of the details of her life and family, but nothing about her career.  Nor is she meaningfully integrated into the rest of the encyclopedia, with the only mention being an unsourced name check at China painting .  Alansohn ( talk ) 17:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women , New Jersey ,  and New York .  Alansohn ( talk ) 17:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - cannot find notability via google search, jstor search, or google books search.  Just being featured in a couple of magazines does not meet the requirements of notability for artists.  LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 17:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I found the table of contents for the January 1994 and February 1994 issues of Ceramics Monthly , but don't see Stricker mentioned.  I'm unable to identify The Lighthouse Review , partly because my searches are swamped by reviews of The Lighthouse (2019 film) .  pburka ( talk ) 20:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not finding anything for this artist, and her obit is brief and does not provide facts about her art.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
V538 Carinae: Nonetheless, it fails the notability guidelines for astronomical objects : Not visible to the naked eye (at magnitude 8.15 [25] ), not listed in any important astromical catalogue, never received significant coverage in any reliable source and was not discovered before 1850.  SIMBAD cites 29 references for this star, but all are only large catalogues.  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 19:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 19:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable per nom. , and remove from {{ Carina (constellation) }} .  Praemonitus ( talk ) 15:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable per nomination.  hamster717 ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ * my contribs ) 20:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest stars as an alternative to deletion per the precedent set by several other AfDs on large stars ( HV 888 , RX Telescopii , SMC 018136 , PMMR 62 ): while it is clearly not notable, there is an appropriate list which should mention this star.  Also, it is justifiable to keep stars which are redirects in constellation templates, so it does not need to be removed.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 15:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This star is not included in that list as it is much smaller than 700 solar radii and not well known.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tinashe Muchawaya: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no suitable lists to redirect to for Zimbabwean cricketers, there's no WP:ATD here.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madera Country Club Estates, California: Reywas92 Talk 20:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I went and added some sources about this place from a few newspapers.  The area is notable for being part of a real estate boom in the 1960's and 1970's.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete yeah Reywas92 is right this isn't notable.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Besides MOS:DECADE , I maintain that routine local coverage of housing development doesn't mean the individual development is notable, especially when it's within an existing community with an article; better to have a history section in Madera Acres, California than to suggest a subdivision like the one I grew up in needs its own article.  Reywas92 Talk 23:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete See my comments on River Road Estates, above.   Lots of places had real-estate booms in the 1960s and 1970s; if that's our standard for notability then pretty much every housing development built in those years is notable.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Josue Larose: Being a candidate for office in of itself is not enough nor is the run of the mill coverage given by a political campaign enough to meet GNG.  The excessive SuperPAC creation, is a civil offense, so it does not meet WP:CRIME (or in his case criminal).  I think in terms of notability this falls under Wikipedia:ONEEVENT .  Mpen320 ( talk ) 17:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL , WP:GNG , and WP:CRIME .  Agree that this appears to be case of WP:1E .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 14:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , floridapolitics calls him an "election fraudster" but he doesn't seem to be notable enough even so.  -- StellarNerd ( talk ) 18:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the consensus since at least 2007 that political activists and candidates are not per se notable, nor are criminals (alleged or convicted).  I've long been advocating for naming, blaming and shaming criminals , but that is not our collective rule .  No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources exists .  We are not a free web host for real crime stories.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grand Slam Prize in harness racing: My own searching found a single AP article picked up by the NY Times which doesn't say anything we don't already have.   So it passes WP:V but not WP:N .  RoySmith (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions .  RoySmith (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lauren Zander: Fails WP:GNG .  Teltle ( talk ) 05:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , New York ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Some coverage here [27] and here [28] Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find book reviews, only various talking points when she interviews in magazines.  Not enough for notability here in wiki.  Sourcing used now in the article is primary or un-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Calibre Sports: Completely unsourced as well.  Elshad ( talk ) 13:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Firearms ,  and Australia .  Elshad ( talk ) 13:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : borderline G11.  No evidence (or even claim of) notability, and involvement of COI SPA makes the choice easier.  Owen× ☎ 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not cite any references and I could not find any SIGCOV on a basic Google search.   I oppose a G11 speedy.  While there is some advertising tone, this could be corrected if SIGCOV is made available and this article is kept.  Frank Anchor 14:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't believe a poor quality unreferenced article has survived for 16 years.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 14:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO with no sourcing found.  delete for lack of sourcing Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Per WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT this is unambiguous advertising.  Tar nis hed Path talk 09:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No RSs and unlikely to be any: WP:ROTM.  Cabrils ( talk ) 03:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Konrad Mathieu: References are atrocious.  Been on WP since 2011 and never been effectively references.  Currently satisfies WP:V .  scope_creep Talk 11:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Revised and hopefully improved article, re-checked facts and existence of all publications.  Kombi3 ( talk ) 20:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the additional sources added to the article do not make a case for WP:GNG , and one of them appears to be a total red herring that doesn't mention Mathieu or his bands ( [8] ).  signed, Rosguill talk 20:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Releasing some 30 albums over four decades does seem like a noteworthy accomplishment for a recording artist like Mathieu, at least among musicians.  How does one - reference-wise - properly make a case for that?  (don't bite a baby;)  Kombi3 ( talk ) 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wait - may one, before perspicacious judgment is performed, at least ask for some more time for research.  There should definitely be more printed sources out there that - partly being from the pre-internet era - are a harder to retrieve 213.160.14.18 ( talk ) 20:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I was unable to find any significant coverage in WP:LIBRARY , Google Books, archive.org, or newspapers.com.  Jfire ( talk ) 05:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mr. Crazy: Subject doens't appear to pass WP:MUSICBIO , sources are either primary, unreliable.  There isn't a WP:SIGCOV also.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Morocco .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pretty straightforward, per VDWF.  Just a quick comment, I couldn't find the aforementioned PROD.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 13:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This [41] and this [42] don't quite pass criminal notability guidelines here, career as a musician appears non-notable as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources don’t meet their guidelines for reliable sources, and the musician’s not notable.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 20:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shah Noorani accident: All the sources provided are from time of event.  No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The event is very recent, so you can't yet say that there is no lasting coverage or impact.  I would hope that this tragedy would encourage government officials and traffic police in Balochistan to encourage safer driving practices.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 19:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "I would hope that this tragedy would encourage government officials and traffic police in Balochistan to encourage safer driving practices" is WP:CRYSTAL balling.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Admittedly, the nominator's assertation makes no sense (it happened two days ago - sustained coverage is literally impossible, it's still a breaking event), but given the media landscape in Pakistan I really, really doubt this will have long term coverage.  Most accidents like this don't have long term coverage even in Western countries.  There's not really anything to be "analyzed", it wasn't on purpose - what would be said about this in the future?  I doubt it would have much impact law-wise even in the west.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 19:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : road accident Fahads1982 talk / contrib 22:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We all knows this was a road accident.  But why should we keep this page?  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 07:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We don't create articles for every road accident.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:N and WP:NEVENT with only brief news coverage.  There's no "road accidents are assumed notable until proven otherwise".  We can say any event might have significant coverage later, but that doesn't mean we should create an article for every news story we find.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 21:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 17:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTNEWS .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joey Ciochetto: No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The source in the article is a dead link, but seems to be a blog by looking at the URL.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Oceania ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV.  That one dead link appears to be an unreliable source.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devoke water 12:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David V. Politzer: Politzer has not had a large influence in his field (digital media), and there is largely unsourced material in the article.  The New York Times source in the article which is prominently featured only mentions Politzer in a passing mention of an otherwise minor art exhibition.  The Houston Center for Photography Carol Crow Fellowship Award, which is the only award mentioned in the article, is not enough to make the case for WP:ACADEMIC .  GuardianH ( talk ) 20:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Artists , Photography , Texas ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found some passing refs from reliable sources but insufficient to establish notability.  What might do it per WP:ANYBIO is his residency at Yaddo -- that's a very selective honor.  One of the qualifying options at WP:ANYBIO is: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times" For now, I'm assuming that Yaddo's not enough but I defer to any more knowledgeable editors that show up here.  I'll also leave a note at Talk:Yaddo .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Average professor. 128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 19:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is full of dead links, press releases, and primary sources. I am not finding any RS to bring this up to notable.-- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 18:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This artist and professor does not meet WP:NACADEMIC nor WP:GNG .  While I agree with A.B. that Yaddo is a prestigious residency, it's not enough to meet WP:ANYBIO , over 6,500 artists have received residencies there, which averages 65 residencies per year.  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Netherzone , thanks for the clarification.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete