hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jerrel Wijks : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Unable to find significant coverage of the subject.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 04:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 22:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - created at a time when NFOOTY was the guideline, and does not meet current GNG requirement.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 20:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Al Baraka Bank Egypt : 64andtim (chat) 07:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : This article isn't notable, and the neutrality of this article is disputed.  CastJared ( talk ) 08:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Business ,  and Egypt .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article briefly mentions the milestones that al Barak Bank Egypt has achieved throughout its time.  This is a bank that has been operating for 40 years in Egypt, it's important to list it, and its credentials on versatile page as Wikipedia.  Maha G Aboud ( talk ) 08:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a bit of coverage in these books: [38] , [39] , [40] .  There may be more, but I gave up looking because the article is so promotional that it would need a complete rewrite anyway.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 09:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to hear from more editors about whether anything here is salvageable.  Definitely a promotionally written article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Egregious WP:PROMO and fails WP:GNG -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect To Al Baraka Banking Group , which itself could use more and better sourcing, as an ATD.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect - Not in the article's current state.  Half the references are to the company itself.  - Imcdc Contact 12:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : very very promotional FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 11:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gayeshpur Padmalochan High School : Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bangladesh .  UtherSRG (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   No evidence of notability.  At the time of writing there are two citations.  One of these is the school website; I checked this for JSC and SSC exam results and found that the school website gave different figures than the figures in the Wikipedia article.   The other citation is to a news website (Prothom Alo) and was about a meeting to organise a school reunion for for former students; the Wikipedia article does not use any of the information in this news story.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Toddy1's findings -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bern, California : No information about this site available except the fact that there was once a post office there, which is not an indicator of notability.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This locale is only notable at a local level (that is, as a piece of local history).  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Even back in the 1910s this was a single house.  It was probably just a fourth class post office; it fact the label disappears from the maps for over a half-century until it reappears, presumably re-added from GNIS.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeffrey Bütz : He seems most notable as an author, with a few books that sound interesting, but he does not seem to satisfy WP:Bio.  The bio information about him in the few book reviews I found just repeats text from his book.  Edison ( talk ) 02:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete article fails WP:GNG and is written in a promotional style due to being mostly focused on his books - not the worst promotional style ever, mind you, but not very encyclopedic.  Needs cleanup if kept, but I'm not sure what's there to clean up.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep seems to be some critical discussion of his work [24] and [25] .  Author in a rather small field of theology, so sourcing is limited to begin with.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm finding a handful of short reviews for the first book, but not for the second (and the review I did find for that one implies that the author is a bit fringe).  I'm not seeing any reviews of significant length, so I don't see much for WP:NAUTHOR , and certainly not WP:NPROF .  -- asilvering ( talk ) 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 11:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   There are insufficient sources to write a properly balanced article on this subject.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 05:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seema Hamid : Have you looked at the references before nominating?  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 10:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Bangladesh .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very think attempt at notability with ref stacking.  I can't find extensive coverage of the person in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The coverage in the Dhaka Tribune articles does not meet SIGCOV (what is "World University of Leadership and Management"? their website is a shell) Other coverage seems to be  primary sources, or otherwise insignificant.  Not sure if this is of note, but none of the articles are attributed to authors.  — siro χ o 10:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glossary of computer software terms : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  In case it gets deleted, the "Software" link should be removed from Template:Glossaries of computers .  "Computer science" link in the template could be renamed to "Computer science (software)".  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : If this is deleted, redirects that point here will need to be retargeted.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - First of all, there are only 4 terms on this 2016 list.  Secondly, this was created by a sockpuppet of a now-blocked sock master.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Only 4 terms, redundant article with a better replacement as seen above.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 18:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark Deming : Rift ( talk ) 04:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] are you out there to just save a couple bits?  his allmusic reviews are quoted/re-quoted regularly.  96.42.182.14 ( talk ) 05:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For fans of indy, rock, alt, etc. he is a notable reviewer and critic.  Joelrashflint ( talk ) 05:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Journalism ,  and Michigan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Susan Stark profile (multiple pages) appears to be SIGCOV.  No?  Cbl62 ( talk ) 11:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Possibly.  It's definitely a "local boy makes good" piece which, per WP:GNG , creates the assumption but not a guarantee of notability.  Given that it's a minor acting credit (he was billed 36th), and there being a lack of secondary sources about any other aspect of his career, I'd say it's thin.  Rift ( talk ) 04:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 05:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't see much coverage for him, in newspapers or otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This might be about him, he would be about the same age [38] .  Still not enough.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR and WP:NBAND .  He might be a triple threat, but as an actor, musician, or writer, he is just not notable.  But passing references are not enough .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maher Ali Rusho : There is zero independent coverage in the article.  It seems to be an elaborate hoax, to be honest.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 22:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Bangladesh ,  and United States of America .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 22:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Don't know if it's a 'hoax', but looks like it fails WP:GNG. - KH-1 ( talk ) 02:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG .  M.parvage ( talk ) 14:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- degree does appear to be a degree mill type or hoax.  I'm sure the article impressed his friends for a few days and the utility has passed. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 02:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 15:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladyslav Kyryn : Best source I can find is Kudrivka , which is not even independent of the subject and the coverage is trivial.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Same as above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 15:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:SPORTBASIC . -- Bexaendos ( talk ) 21:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wisra Okarianto : The primary references in the article primarily revolve around his regional responsibilities and engagements, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC .  Alternatively, some references focus on his familial relations, which do not contribute to the notability of the article per WP:INVALIDBIO .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability not found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 03:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Noting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Article and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Article makes no claim to notability, seems this is only an article because of their family and notability is not inherited.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 06:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programs broadcast by DZRH-TV : Let'srun ( talk ) 14:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We generally do not maintain programming lists for individual television stations, especially those that have been defunct for over fifty years.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Dubiously notable topic and completely unsourced, seems like a no-brainer. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Next Conservative Party leadership election : This article is based off of early highly-speculative articles for an election that is entirely WP:Crystal Ball at this moment.  It is also written with the presumption that the next leadership election will be to succeed Sunak.  Likely, but that would be entirely presumptuous and WP:Crystal Ball given it is not an impossibility that the party’s next leadership election sees Sunak seek to remain leader while facing a challenger, as Thatcher did in both 1989 and 1990 (and Labour’s Kinnock did in 1988).  Should be either deleted or draftified.  SecretName101 ( talk ) 00:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United Kingdom .  SecretName101 ( talk ) 00:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or draftify .  I agree this is too soon.  We don't need to wait until there is actually a leadership contest formally announced, but we do need to wait until we're doing more than regurgitating speculation in 1-2 sources.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:CRYSTAL .  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  10:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per WP:toosoon also this would need a dab specifying it's about the uk tories— blindlynx 23:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking for sources using news searches, the results from Bing gave me 6 on-point sources, two of which were unreliable tabloid newspapers, and the other 4 of which say "likely to be", "are considering", and "are prepared to".   They in fact all cite one single newspaper report as their common source.   Amd that further, 7th, source turns out to say that an anonymous person "believed" that something was "about to" happen.   So basically this entire article comes off one source, with other sources just reporting the report, and that source never reported an actual factual event happening in the first place.   This is unverifiable.   I'd say restore the prior redirect, but that was the result of a page move in 2022, and "next" no longer means "2022" now.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 17:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails to satisfy conditions in WP:CRYSTAL necessary for articles about future events.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 00:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON .  No sense in having this article based solely on speculative news articles, better to wait until there's an actual impending leadership contest.  Gazamp ( talk ) 00:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balrampur Chini Mills Limited : Charlie ( talk ) 02:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Charlie ( talk ) 02:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , Uttar Pradesh ,  and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:NCORP .  DJ InstaMalik ( talk ) 08:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Specialist Group Information Services : I do not think the subject is notable.  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 13:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom .  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 13:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable enough to meet WP:GNG and does not have significant coverage.  The only available online sources at this time are self-published.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 06:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm not seeing any independent sources to back it up, and it doesn't quite reach the level of importance for Wikipedia.  Waqar 💬 17:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete