hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of leaders of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands Shire Council : Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:NLIST .  scope_creep Talk 04:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Scope creep, don't you regard World Statesmen.org as a source?  Mbakkel2 ( Talk ) 05:27 (UTC), 19 June 2023 Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Politics ,  and Australia .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  One source is the council's website, and the other is a deprecated source.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Mbakkel2 : There is only one blue link on the article and references are very poor.  The first reference is non-rs and the second is a website, which is WP:PRIMARY .  scope_creep Talk 07:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For those wondering, WorldStatesmen was deprecated following this discussion .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 08:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It would be a shame to lose this information, but there's no source which specifically covers the entire list that I can find online.  The topic clearly meets LISTN I think, we just need to source it properly.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Shire of Cocos (Keeling) Islands discusses the local government, but for a shire of around 500 people, its leaders are not notable.  If not deleted, it should be merged there, but we don't typically compile names of non-notable individuals leading small places.  Reywas92 Talk 02:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shire of Cocos (Keeling) Islands as WP:ATD - agree with Sportingflyer that it would be a sham to lose this information, given external territories of Australia have less coverage overall on Wikipedia.  Other local government areas in Australia have a list of mayors on their page - I don't see why this can't.  Please don't delete this.  Deus et lex ( talk ) 14:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I always wonder if these lists of elected leaders should be judged through the lens of WP:NLIST or WP:SPINOFF .  Assuming the information is reliable and verifiable, NLIST looks at the notability of the list as a unique article entry, while SPINOFF suggests when the conditions exists to create a stand-alone article (with the assumption that the information would be acceptable within the parent article).  I think that these lists of elected leaders should be seen as valid spinoffs and judged accordingly.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 17:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
George Cole (musician) : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The nominator should suggest which band to redirect to, as this musician has been in several.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 12:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I count two: Beatnik Beatch and David Grisman Quintet.  However, he does not appear on the list of 20 members of the latter on their page or in the credits for any of their albums.  So, since he is listed as a founding member of Beatnik Beatch, I propose that this page redirects to that band's page.  Blockhead14 ( talk ) 01:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Beatnik Beatch .  That's the band for which he seems to have gotten the most coverage as a musician in his own right.  He is described in some publications associated with Green Day as their longtime instructor, but those are fan-based.  Otherwise I can only find him listed in the credits for various albums by other people in which he was a session hand, and his solo albums received little notice.  I suspect that this article started out as an attempted autobiography .  It looks like he has made a living as a trusty associate for many notable people, but he just hasn't gotten enough reliable coverage in which he is the focus.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Beatnik Beatch .  Not notable enough for own article as poor (primary) sourcing therein indicates.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 08:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KZPY-LP : No secondary sources at all.  No significant coverage.  Fails WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 05:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Organizations , Companies ,  and Oklahoma .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 05:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Searching through google yields results that boil down to either listening to the station or information already included in the article.  mwwv (converse) 12:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in Oklahoma#Defunct where it is already listed as preferred WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect to List of radio stations in Oklahoma#Defunct : this is another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" still in place in this topic area as late as 2020 (a year before the 2021 RfC that made it clear that GNG and its requirements for significant coverage are the inclusion barometer).  Outright deletion is not being outright opposed either; there simply isn't much to retain here, and it has only ever been sourced to the FCC database (which only establishes potential existence, which is neither notability nor the establishment of same ).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in Oklahoma#Defunct : Subject lacks the needed coverage to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
You Must Remember This (House) : Nothing found in a BEFORE.  Tagged for notability since 2020.  PROD removed with "deprod; all House episodes have articles", which is not true.  Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid keep arguement.  Donald D23 talk to me 19:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 19:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable episode of the series, all I can find is the House of Hammer mentions.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure how you missed the ones I found below, but I found the first two with the straight up Google link, and the third adding "M.D." after house in the Google news search string.   Cheers, Jclemens ( talk ) 01:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep [1] , [2] , [3] RS summaries/reviews, GNG is met for this particular episode.  Even if for some reason it's not kept, ATD would be to merge to the season or show: there is no policy-based rationale for deleting this article.  Jclemens ( talk ) 01:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It's not a valid keep argument, but it's a valid argument against prodding, which is only for uncontroversial deletion.  Something which many editors seem to fail to understand.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  22:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of House episodes .  Episodes may not be individually notable, but the series is, and deleting episode articles outright isn't particularly helpful.  - Sumanuil .  (talk to me) 01:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of House episodes , episode does not have sources showing notability.  // Timothy :: talk 14:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eugene E. Stone III Stadium (Greenville, South Carolina) : No references, one link to the stadium's page on the University's site.  Does not seem to meet WP:RS or WP:N .  glman ( talk ) 14:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions .  glman ( talk ) 14:19, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found in any independent source.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 19:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Furman Paladins as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 13:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Furman Paladins , as the subject does not meet the GNG for a standalone article User:Let'srun 02:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect However it should be redirected to Furman University and not Furman Paladins, as the stadium belongs to the university and can be multi-purpose if need be.  Govvy ( talk ) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bad Gumaan : — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Momina Duraid#Television : Producer - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 17:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 16:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
20 August 1955 Stadium (El Oued) : I have redirected it to the parent club US Souf where all the info already exists but the creator objects.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Algeria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to US Souf as it is primarily a football stadium; it is not even mentioned at El Oued .  Giant Snowman 12:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 12:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Billy Keikeya : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Battlestar Galactica characters .  Fails WP:GNG .  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Clearly I did not finish my pass of BG characters as I thought I did a while back.  Yes, of course, redirect this GNG-failing plot summary.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 00:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Piotrus.  Does not pass WP:PLOT or WP:GNG without more coverage in reliable sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , unless some decent sources can be identified.  Josh Milburn ( talk ) 07:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Adam Klein (Survivor contestant) : He also finished 12th in Survivor: Winners at War , but I doubt that makes him also notable.  Furthermore, he hosted only one local TV program and no other.  I've yet to see his notability outside Survivor .  WP:PAGEDECIDE should apply if neither WP:BLP1E nor WP:BIO1E does.  Moreover, appearing at least twice on Survivor doesn't make the person notable.  George Ho ( talk ) 09:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Television ,  and California .  George Ho ( talk ) 09:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Almost forgot: it should be redirected to Survivor: Millennials vs. Gen X or list of Survivor (American TV series) contestants .  George Ho ( talk ) 09:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with everything George Ho says... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecheeseistalking99 ( talk • contribs ) 16:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as George says.  GNG not met Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 23:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I also agree with George.  It is not very notable.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Do we have a target for redirecting the article?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 10:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom's comment - @ Shadow345110 , Belichickoverbrady ,  and Thecheeseistalking99 : How about Survivor: Millennials vs. Gen X as the page's redirect target?  That's what I'm going for primarily (or by default if no objections).  -- George Ho ( talk ) 16:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That sounds good as it seems like that's more relevant than the entire list if he was the winner.  Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 16:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sounds good to me.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
MD Anand : Sources reveal nothing about the individual.  The creation seems to be a part of a series of additions by the User: Sajantext to promote a single, low-key movie.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 15:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : one low-key film will wait untill 3 films he do and willl make it live Monhiroe ( talk ) 16:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable till now ... atleast, artist should have work in three movies Worldiswide ( talk ) 09:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge with Marijuana (2020 film) , his only notable film so far.  Rather opposed to delete as both pages have sources. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom. ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 13:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Raydon Franklin : The only source is a statistical database that says he played in one first-class cricket match.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 02:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and South America .  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 02:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Guyanese representative cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG , however there's a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect The debut and last match dates are also not known, a statistical source only says that he played one first-class match.  Doesn't contain significant coverage to meet WP:GNG .  RoboCric ( talk ) 17:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A redirect as above seems sensible here.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 10:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aberystwyth University Students' Union : Searches reveal very little else.  Plenty of social media and the occasional local paper mention when things get exiting in town but nothing that stacks up to notability.  Only a few students Unions do make the grade for notability.  The claim that it one of the oldest might make the notability threshold but that would need good sources which I couldn't find.  There is a chance that there are good sources in the Welsh Language but even searching through the Welsh medium press output did not immediately reveal anything obviously noteworthy.  Velella Velella Talk 19:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fraternities and sororities and Wales .  Velella Velella Talk 19:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I don't see the point of deletion.  Were it a stub, written about a recently formed institution without significant history, and if we were sorely constrained for space like in a print encyclopedia, I might think otherwise.   But this is well written and the group appears to have affected many student participants over a century.   Thus, here I do not think deletion serves our readers nor the aim of Wikipedia.   The article simply is a work in progress, like many articles, and should be left to gather them.  Jax MN ( talk ) 21:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aberystwyth University , charitably, this seems to be here for the wrong reason, as an extension to the student union website.  It's largely original research or cited to the university/stduent union sources.  Though some events occasionally reach the news, there isn't enough basis for a Wikipedia article.  Sionk ( talk ) 21:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aberystwyth University , per Sionk.  Not sufficiently notable for its own page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 22:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested above.  -- Bduke ( talk ) 02:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - as outlined above.  Not enough notability for a separate article.  Dunarc ( talk ) 21:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aberystwyth University .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect