hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bhilwara Kings: Couldn't find independent coverage about the team, to pass wider requirements of WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  The highest to SIGCOV are the sources which says about the announcement of the teams, launch of jersey by the team owners- with all of these belonging to WP:ROUTINE .  Robo Cric Let's chat 07:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Cricket ,  and India .  Robo Cric Let's chat 07:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Too many of these trivial nonsensical articles appearing of late!  AA ( talk ) 09:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Poor sources and many are just announcements and hold no significant  notability to warrant a page.  Fails WP:NORG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Legends League Cricket#Franchise tournament No way near enough coverage of GNG quality to warrant an individual team article, but can be redirected to the league page, which just about has enough coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Legends League Cricket#Franchise tournament as a sensible WP:ATD .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 19:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Redirect, or simply delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: Per above arguments, redirect article to Legends League Cricket#Franchise tournament .  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 08:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Vicious Engine: IgelRM ( talk ) 01:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Delete - fails the WP:GNG .  I'm open to reconsidering if some are found, but it looks like this was largely used for games that fell somewhere between "low budget" and " shovelware ", so it doesn't seem like the sort of thing that would garner much coverage...  Sergecross73 msg me 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Revising to redirect, as it is a plausible search term.  No need to merge, as the bulk of the info is already present at the target as is.  Sergecross73 msg me 16:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to Vicious Cycle Software#Technology - Best sources I found: Game Developer Magazine (fairly short piece of a larger article), Edge Spain (interviewing engine and game developers), FiringSquad (very promotional feeling interview), The Escapist (another interview, doesn't talk about the engine much).  I don't consider GDM piece significant coverage and the rest aren't independent of the subject.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 15:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested by Mika1h.  The only real source, the Gamasutra article, mentions the engine once and doesn't really talk about it.  I found one piece from Game Developer , but it's short and I can't vouch for the quality of the website.  At best, these sources are good enough for mentioning the engine in the Vicious Cycle Software article.  Cortador ( talk ) 16:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alibina Belalova: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 23:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 09:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - can't find anything decent at all Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Laurentia (bioregion): I can find no significant coverage of a "bioregion" called "Laurentia" outside of some organization calling itself the " Cascadia Department of Bioregion ".  The definition of "Laurentia" there (equivalent to the Great Lakes Basin ) does not even correspond to the more expansive definition given in this article, which isn't supported by any reliable source.  The map in this article that purports to depict "Laurentia" and other "bioregions" was made by the same banned user that created this article in the first place.  Cobblet ( talk ) 15:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bioregionalism I only found this source as a reliable, scientific, definition of a "Laurentia bioregion."  Google shows some Cascadia-related hits from non-reliable sources, so a redirect seems plausible.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 19:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for finding that book, but all it says in the preface is, "We have divided the continental United States into six bioregions. They are based on a simplified combination of schemes developed by the World Wildlife Fund, the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Forest Service."  In other words, their definition of "Laurentia" is entirely the result of original research – there's no sign this is an established concept.  If the "Laurentia" concept has any genuine notability in North American environmentalist philosophy, we should be able to find better evidence for it than a book about home gardening projects.  Cobblet ( talk ) 22:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough, but redirects are cheap so it makes more sense to me to convert this into a redirect given there are indeed people looking for it.  (The article currently gets about 20 views a day on average).  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 13:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 20:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider possible Redirect option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with the proposed redirect to bioregionalism as WP:ATD-R .  — siro χ o 04:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
C.G.S. colony: GSS 💬 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or, merge and redirect to Antop Hill the larger neighbourhood in which this central govt.  residential enclave is located, as an AtD in the absence of sufficient sourcing to establish notability under the GNG.  It could do with a separate heading within that article — at present CGS colony is noted therein.  Thought this may be notable and a keep based on it being an early example, if not the earliest, and largest 1950s India central govt.  housing complexes but haven't as yet found sourcing to determine this.  Rupples ( talk ) 21:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support redirect .  Ben Azura ( talk ) 01:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Antop Hill , agreeing with Rupples.  sourcing online is not good enough to be its own article.  Password (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Forbairt Naíonraí Teoranta: Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gaeloideachas .  As an ATD , I wonder if it would be best to summarise some of the relevant/cited/supported content to Gaeloideachas (the organisation into which the subject was seemingly "subsumed" in 2014 ).  And redirect the title there.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 01:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Languages-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gaeloideachas , with merge of any material not already there.  Cnilep ( talk ) 07:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Portland and Western 1501: No indication of notability in article.  One article is from a possible RS and contains SIGCOV of the subject's paint scheme.  Other sources are either SELFPUB or just lists that include the subject (or are both).  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 02:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Oregon .  Pbritti ( talk ) 02:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree , even rather deep google search did not give me any sites that would satisfy RS.  AriTheHorse 03:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of individual notability.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 05:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (a summary of)( the parts that can be verified to Portland and Western Railroad#Locomotive fleet .  There is no evidence of independent notability, but equally there is no reason this cannot be included as part of the broader article per WP:PRESERVE .  Thryduulf ( talk ) 13:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like someone

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of MÄR characters: Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Lists .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Very extensive plot summary with sparse references to manga ( WP:PRIMARY ).  Sadly, this is just WP:ITSUSEFUL but not encyclopedic content (aka WP:FANCRUFT ).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So far, the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginta Toramizu has some decisions to redirect to this page. -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 19:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MÄR as per above.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 19:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Selective Merge to MÄR ; not enough non-fancruft to warrant an article but a small listing on the characters is recommended per MOS:ANIME .  Link20XX ( talk ) 03:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with the character section at MÄR .  I was able to get a character section placed there so that the character information can go there in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 17:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect , excessive in-universe content, nothing useful to merge in my view.  Stifle ( talk ) 10:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or very selective merge.  Mostly WP:PLOT information, but some of it can be covered at the main article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Merchant Engineering College: Recommend converting this into a Redirect to Gujarat Technological University - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 16:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Engineering , India , and Gujarat .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 16:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gujarat Technological University#Affiliated colleges per nom.  I don't see any independent coverage that would merit a section, let alone a stand alone article and the article does not have any WP:IS sources for a merge.  // Timothy :: talk 16:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lucia Domazet: The subject has earned at least ten caps for the aforementioned national team.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Croatia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 15:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
High Commission of Antigua and Barbuda, London: No secondary sources; sole source is a government list of diplomatic missions in London.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , United Kingdom ,  and Antigua and Barbuda .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of diplomatic missions in London#Embassies and High Commissions in London , which contains most of the same information so is more helpful to readers than deletion.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article merely confirms it exists.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why is deleting better than redirecting?  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Abdessalem Kazouz Stadium: Equalwidth ( talk ) 09:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Tunisia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to ES Zarzis .  Just because the team is notable doesn't mean the stadium also needs a separate article, the stadium doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Yes it's a redirect but not to ES Zarzis, the stadium is owned by local government and is multi-use.  The correct redirect is the town Zarzis .  Govvy ( talk ) 15:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 20:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zeekerss: More tabloid promo than an encyclopedic article, this is a CFORK of Lethal Company .  Was redirected, but then a redirect war started [20] .  I think the redirect should be restored after the article is deleted.  BEFORE showed nothing that makes this subject notable apart from the suggested target.  Nothing in this article is worth merging.  // Timothy :: talk 11:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Well, Gbkang said let another user remove it if they agree with you.  If it's reverted by someone else, I won't undo it .  So you could just restore the redirect yourself.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep and redirect to Lethal Company - Subject is not notable, but closing the AfD, keeping the article, and turning it back to a redirect is better than just deleting the page and starting over again .  Davest3r08 > : ) ( t a l k ) 14:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lethal Company .  I don't know where this "speedy" is coming from since it's not a malformed nomination, but harmless to create a redirect.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – subject not notable, fails WP:NBIO ; hits on Google news shows up his notable game Lethal Company instead with brief mentions.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 06:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lethal Company per above.  The developer as an individual is not notable enough for a standalone biography, but the game is notable and the developer is a plausible search term that should direct the user to the article about their game.  Vanilla Wizard 💙 02:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Container Wars: Donald D23 talk to me 14:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs broadcast by TruTV Another 'follow the leader' reality show copycat concept that didn't get further than one season.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator I would be ok with a redirect.  Donald D23 talk to me 13:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sophia Churney: It seems that most coverage of the subject is in the context of Ooberman (and to a lesser extent – The Magic Theatre, which is a section of the Ooberman article), a redirect to which would make sense as an alternative to deletion.  toweli ( talk ) 19:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Bands and musicians , United Kingdom ,  and England .  toweli ( talk ) 19:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Psychology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find any sourcing for this musician, other than streaming sites.  Nothing we can use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article presents no evidence of independent notability and my searches did not turn up anything.  I found this through the academic deletion sorting list but an unsourced stint as a grammar-school teacher obviously isn't going to pass notability that way, either.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 01:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ooberman .  Searching ProQuest, I find multiple articles that mention her or have some short discussion of her, but it's all in the context of being a member of the band.  Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 01:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete notability is WP:NOTINHERITED and the subject is not notable on her own.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 21:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect