hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Scott Spiker: Contested WP:BLAR .  ( NPP action )  Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Wisconsin .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note There is active disruption going on where the article is being redirected to Scott Speicher , which is not a plausible redirect to the subject of that article.  With that said, delete , as subject is not a real known politician in Milwaukee politics as-is.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It was a redirect to Scott Speicher since 2006 before being repurposed to the current page a few days ago.  It's a plausible redirect because Speicher is pronounced Spiker so someone only hearing the name may guess at that spelling.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 18:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I appreciate the clarification on the page history, did not see that.  I would support restoring the redirect in this case.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am the one that created the page, I agree with the deletion or restoration of redirect and I would like to apologize that i was edit warring, I'm new to this and this was the first page I made and wanted to keep it as a trophy, again i agree in the deletion of this page, Good day.  WTBgaming ( talk ) 14:38, 28 February 2024 (CST) Restore redirect , but no prejudice against recreation if someone can write something more substantial and better-sourced.  Milwaukee is a large and important enough city that its city councillors potentially could have sufficient media coverage to meet NPOL #2 — but an article about a city councillor still has to be more substantive and better sourced than this before it can actually be kept.  At the local level, city councillors aren't all "inherently" notable just because they exist, and need to have content about their political impact — specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their time in office had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  I don't know nearly enough about Milwaukee's local politics to know whether that's possible here or not, so I'm willing to reconsider if somebody can expand the article, but this isn't sufficient as written.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect -- I wanted to save this article but sadly there are literally no sources and city councilmembers don't satisfy WP:NPOL automatically.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 19:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kabar (TV program): No evidence of wp:notability under sng or gng.    Has zero sources other than their own website, and has zero content on the subject other than a program schedule.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find coverage of this TV program, and what's used now for sourcing are TV Guide-type listings, not enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to tvOne (Indonesian TV network)#News One .  Hansen Sebastian Talk 03:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per the above, as it lacks notability as a standalone article.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 09:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TvOne_(Indonesian_TV_network)#News_One : is treated there.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WBQR-LP: Fails WP:SIGCOV ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 22:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Wisconsin .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 22:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in Wisconsin : this alternative to deletion as an {{ R to list entry }} is about the best that can be done with an unsourced, never-sourced article about a relatively-new radio station.  How this lasted nearly five years before finally being taken to AfD is beyond me (an identical creation today would, at best, probably be shipped to draftspace/AfC within weeks); even

Discussion outcome: redirect
John C. Sigler: A search turns up no novel citations.  Subject was President of the NRAoA (not notable in itself unless he was involved in some major reform/event).  Subject also unexpectedly resigned as Delaware GOP Chair (again, no prior notable work or achievements other than "Being Chair". Can't find a source for his appointment/election to that post!).  He was not an elected politician/office holder per WP:NPOL.  It is unclear how he is notable or that the article can be improved to meet GNG, unless some major achievement or scandal has been overlooked.  WP:PROD was posted and removed on basis that all NRA Presidents have an article, however the user was mistaken - they were looking at a list of NRA Presidents which only included those with a page(!) There appeared to be no other objections to deletion.  Hemmers ( talk ) 09:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Law , Military , Firearms , Delaware ,  and Michigan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect >>>> List of presidents of the National Rifle Association at viable ATD.  Djflem ( talk ) 17:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per previous vote.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 03:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant, in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability.  Being president of the NRA obviously does not confer automatic notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 19:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Daniel Tonkopi: Little-to-no non-trivial coverage of him as a person rather than the company.  Doesn't meet WP:NBIO or WP:GNG .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 19:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Ukraine , United States of America ,  and California .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 19:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the company.  It's notable, he isn't, independently of it.  Llajwa ( talk ) 17:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Llajwa.  SomeoneDreaming ( talk ) 03:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Like a Star in the Night: May be sources in Japanese I couldn't find, but the Japanese version doesn't cite any.  Rusalkii ( talk ) 21:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Rusalkii ( talk ) 21:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to album as ATD.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 21:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is some minor coverage available at a glance but most coverage of this type of material in 2002 will not be online in the case of Japan.  The song charted at number 2 nationally, so it almost certainly satisfies WP:NM , but redirection seems like a viable alternative until sufficient sourcing is found at some point.  Dekimasu よ!  03:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Stevens Derilien: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 19:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 01:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  I also couldn't find substantive coverage from reliable sources (besides general directories of football players).  Enervation ( talk ) 07:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - plausible search term, no WP:SIGCOV Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gallon smashing: Therefore, in hindsight the fad seems short-lived and confined to that time period with little impact ( WP:IMPACT ) beyond that.  An alternative way to proceed could be a broader article about criminal "challenges/pranks" directed against grocery stores/food places, as gallon smashing seems closely related to ice cream licking [40] etc.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Crime , Internet ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Already has a well-sourced entry at List of internet challenges , which goes into more than enough detail.   All sources cited (and all sources I can find outside social media) are from 2013, making this a textbook failure of WP:10YT .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per GNG (disclaimer: page creator).  I take the opposite position as above.  I think there's sufficient secondary coverage about this trend and the page is an appropriate fork from List of Internet challenges .  The list merely defines "gallon smashing" without providing any additional context about the trend's history or impact.  I'd prefer to see this entry expanded, not merged or deleted.  I've added additional in-depth coverage by Bloomberg News, ABC News, CBS News, etc, and I've shared more refs on the talk page.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "the trend's history or impact". What impact? Geschichte ( talk ) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Charges filed, arrests, injuries, etc. Many trends don't result in these things. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of internet challenges.  I looked at the titles of the sources and thought that an Internet challenge still getting media coverage eleven years after the fact might indeed merit its own article, but then I checked the sources.  The articles listed as being from 2024 are actually from the mid-teens, merely archived in 2024.   Possible mislead but also possible NBD.  Given that, the entry in "List of Internet challenges" seems sufficient to me.  Would reconsider if there is in fact analysis of this challenge from 2020 or later.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 21:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dennis R series: WP:GNG NHPluto ( talk ) 21:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No mentions of this particular bus, only this [62] .  Nothing we can use to write an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to a short sentence at Dennis Specialist Vehicles#1977–2000 .  Given that some other of their vehicles are notable this is a plausible search term, and the content would enhance the list at the target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Complex / Rational 00:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DAM (Palestinian rap group): LusikSnusik ( talk ) 15:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Palestine .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sources used in the article seem fine, al Jazeera is of course going to be biased, but we can rewrite that out of the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep: The current sourcing is already almost entirely international sources, many of them reliable.  Dam have also been around for decades - long enough to have entered scholarship , and plenty of books , so there is absolutely no notability issue here, and article quality alone, unless the state of play is truly abominable, is not a good cause for deletion.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 19:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: Actually, this went in a weird direction when I was working to improve the page only to realize that it is a recent creation that duplicates DAM (band) (where it's actually a level-5 vital topic, so again, no notability question, though the point is now moot).  I've now merged the content from this page to that page, so this page can now be redirected there and become a 'redirect with history'.  @ Zero0000 , FYI.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 09:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] great to fine a way for this page.  I opt for redirect too Mozzcircuit ( talk ) 14:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : FYI (should have pinged you too) Iskandar323 ( talk ) 14:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect doesn't bother me.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep: for the same reasons as Iskander323.  I'll also note that the OP is non-extended-confirmed and this article (by OP's own words) is related to ARBPIA.  Therefore, per WP:ARBECR , OP is not allowed to even comment here let alone initiate the AfD.  Zero talk 04:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Iskander323.  Zero talk 10:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KAMP-LP: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Alaska .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as outlined in nomination.  Fails WP:GNG .  Sources only indicate that the station existed, not that it was notable.  Only source that points to notability is about the "other" KAMP, unrelated to the subject of the article proper.  Bgv.  ( talk ) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in Alaska per established consensus WRT this topic area.   Yet another tone-deaf nomination from this editor.  RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:AOBF .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DWTE-TV: Given the age of the article, there are a few thousands Wikipedia mirrors, but no significant coverage in reliable sources.  MarioGom ( talk ) 15:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 15:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television and radio stations owned by TV5 Network It's a full-power translator of the main Manila station and its history after joining 5 is duplicative.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television and radio stations owned by TV5 Network : Fails GNG and NCORP.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 12:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lionel Tromp : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from independent sources, thus failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom, most helpful outcome for the reader.  Also the best outcome for the project: it's highly likely that Aruban sources exist that just aren't readily accessible, so we'll be doing future editors a favor by preserving the content for future restoration.  Notability is about whether we should have an article on a subject, not about whether we should have any coverage at all, so where a reasonable target exists it isn't a sufficient basis for deletion.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Algeria at the 1993 World Championships in Athletics : Article is entirely unsourced and was draftified because of this.  No improvement has been made in this regard.  Would support draftification naturally.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 23:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Algeria .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 23:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per other similar articles (see Clyde note below) Support noms suggestion to draftify .  I added one specific ref, but it still needs a bit of work before move to mainspace.  Presumably same for Algeria at the 1991 World Championships in Athletics .  — siro χ o 00:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Consider draftification : However, if it is considered that this will simply be moved back to Main space then delete 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting the much better attended discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for_deletion/Algeria_at_the_2022_World_Athletics_Championships which I closed as snow redirect.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 19:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I did nothing wrong. .  All my articles are correct and they all contain reliable international sources and you can be sure of that.  Nassimohr ( talk ) 00:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] By any chance, can you provide the names of the sources?   Other editors can help you write the citations if you can provide as much detail as possible?  Denaar ( talk ) 15:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect since the rest of the articles were at: [1] .    I don't have a strong feeling of when we should keep/delete this type of article, but consistency if beneficial too.  Denaar ( talk ) 15:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect same as the other articles, the only reason this one was treated differently is because this AFD predated that one.  Would be wildly inconsistent to do anything except this, as Algeria at the 1993 event doesn't have demonstrably different levels of coverage to all the other events.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 15:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect