hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
S.G. Public School: Only a primary source provided.  No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks references to support.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 03:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not meet NSCHOOL — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KSEX-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Strongest hit that I got from my search is them selling their broadcast spectrum to the FCC.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 10:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophie Ottaway: See for instance North and South , by the same author.  Not indicative of long term notability.  Eddie891 Talk Work 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Eddie891 Talk Work 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom and my search for sources; the limited coverage appears to be interview-based, and otherwise churned as tabloid/ sensationalism in low-quality sources and blogs.  WP:NOTNEWS seem to further support deletion at this time; enduring notability does not seem supported by independent, reliable, secondary sources.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 21:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The front page of the Telegraph Magazine is a reputable source which includes fact checking as part of the process.  86.22.29.36 ( talk ) 12:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most coverage seems to be culture war stuff from GB News and the Telegraph, all around the time of the original story.  Fails WP:BLP1E : "Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual....Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view."  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This case can be compared to that of David Reimer in the USA, which is still discussed 20 years after his death.  86.22.29.36 ( talk ) 12:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a BLP disaster of a marginally notable person , with scant coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saeed Hizam: The only mention of him that I can find from independent news sources is Arabian Gulf League , which is merely a passing mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet GNG.  A transactional announcement here and not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of battles in Afghanistan: Follow-up to List of battles in Albania List of battles in Algeria List of battles in Belgium List of battles in Croatia .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 19:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Afghanistan .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 19:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Poorly written index and duplicates List of wars involving Afghanistan .  Accesscrawl ( talk ) 20:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - yet another WP:FORK , this one of List of wars involving Afghanistan , per comment by Accesscrawl .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Banjax: There is some coverage, but I am not sure it is significant enough.  It was found non-notable and deleted at AfD in 2006, when our standards for inclusion were considerably lower.  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can get a consensus.  Last AfD closed due to lack of participation.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the band does not meet any of the notability guideline and Google Search was unsuccessful at finding any sources establishing notability (also sources I did find which were not reliable referenced a different band that is currently active) LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 16:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete while I got results for them on newspapers.com (also available though the Wikipedia library) all of it was WP:ROTM from local papers of band playing in the area soon and a few charity events, there's nothing to establish notability.  Shaws username .  talk .  01:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antonis Vasiliou: Sports Up has an article about a much older footballer, who happens to be a goalkeeper not a midfielder, and 24 Sports has a transfer announcement about another Antonis Vasiliou, this one being a defender born in 1993.  To make matters worse, Barnet FC also have a footballer with the same name.  The only hits that may or may not be about this Antonis Vasiliou were Phile News and Kerkida (translated) , neither of which were even close to WP:SIGCOV .  I can't see anything to suggest that an article is required.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
La Quiete: I see a few reviews in sources that do not seem to be RS (and/or may not be independent of the subject).  It seems quite difficult to search for the name in Italian media, so there may well be non-English sources that show notability.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Italy .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - They have some minor media coverage, but it tends to be brief release announcements or, in one case, a "lost album" retrospective by a genre expert ( [54] ).  Unfortunately, that does not add up to the significant coverage that is needed here, and otherwise the band is only visible in the usual streaming and directory services.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Mente: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bradfield Abbey: I can find no other historical source that references any abbey existing in Bradfield.  Tim Landy ( talk ) 15:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Christianity ,  and England .  Tim Landy ( talk ) 15:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge with Bradfield, Berkshire .  I can't find anything on Heritage Gateway on this.  There is a mention here but otherwise I can't fine anything significant.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested to Bradfield, Berkshire , or delete outright per WP:V .  Bearian ( talk ) 18:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is no such abbey in the uk, and on that basis a redirect is inappropriate.  Desertarun ( talk ) 20:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Way to Life: Searching newspapers.com and the Newspaper Archive gives a couple results on Hoff's *next* book, the Tao of Pooh, but nothing on this one.  Rusalkii ( talk ) 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Rusalkii ( talk ) 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage outside book stores and user-generated reviews.  Jamedeus ( talk ) 08:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Beyond a brief listing in Pulishers Weekly (not a review), I cannot find two or more non-trivial published works of which the book is the subject.  By definition, it fails WP:NBOOK .  Οἶδα ( talk ) 22:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I think I've actually read this many years ago, but based on the evidence , it fails WP:GNG .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
OpenSym: That does not change the fact that this is still almost entirely primary sourced navel gazing, and tagged as such since 2015 without improvement [with] no real evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 23:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Computing ,  and Internet .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator fails GNG.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 18:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No secondary sources by either current or previous name.  ~ A412 talk!  15:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lara Uebersax: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  NYC Guru ( talk ) 08:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Europe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agreed.  Couldn't find any either.  Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 06:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agreed.  Other than existence, there is no verification from a third party source thus no evidence of notability.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 01:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulla Hassan Kamal: The best that I could find in Arabic sources was Stad Doha and QSL , both trivial mentions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark Burdett Motorsport: Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 17:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete echoing the nomination.  Can’t find any indication of WP:SIGCOV and no record of notable results.  DRYT.Motorsport ( talk ) 10:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - complete NCORP fail.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jaime Nack: There appears to be very little RS coverage of the subject, if any.  The article appears to be intended to promote a non-notable consultant, which is not what WP is for.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 11:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Environment ,  and Maryland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems like a resume/promo.  Not seeing a pass of WP:GNG due to a lack of significant independant sources.  I've not looked much into if Three Squares Inc itself is notable.  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBIO .  I could not find significant coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 13:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taylor Swift (disambiguation): There's no point in keeping this page per WP:TWODABS when only the topics with the "Taylor Swift" name are the singer and her self-titled album.  Nothing else could be more than a partial title match, and WP:PTM says those wouldn't belong on DAB pages.  SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits ) 02:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G14.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 03:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bluesatellite ( talk ) 03:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: Due to WP:G14 .  User:Let'srun 03:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: The page creator tagged this as a G14 some time back which I declined as not applicable.  Jay 💬 05:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page creator tagged it as G14??? Wouldn't that mean it qualifies under G7 then?  Or are you referring to the AfD creator?  Conyo14 ( talk ) 06:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am referring to RapMonstaXY the page creator.  Yeah, it may be treated as a G7 if the user confirms.  Jay 💬 07:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Swiftly delete .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (Taylor's Version) .  per G14.  mediafanatic17 talk 00:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Has no one read G14 ?  This page disambiguates two articles, so it is not eligible, and Jay was correct to decline speedy.  That said, yes, this is unnecessary and handled by the existing hatnote at Taylor Swift , so delete unswiftly .  -- Tamzin [ cetacean needed ] (she|they|xe) 06:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete